Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Ceylon on debts, courts & corruption
by ceylon Yesterday at 8:58 pm

» Lowell threatening me Again !!
by warwick65 Yesterday at 8:49 pm

» Proof DCA Buy and Sell Your Debt
by warwick65 Yesterday at 6:40 pm

» Hoist Portfolio Holding Limited
by warwick65 Yesterday at 6:38 pm

» Behind A4V and settling utility bills
by LionsShare Yesterday at 6:35 pm

» Littering 'accusation'
by Theatchet Yesterday at 2:27 pm

» Vets Stealing Cats By Fraud
by andybreck Yesterday at 12:34 pm

» living on holiday park and council tax
by Kestrel Yesterday at 11:24 am

» Is there anything to see here if not should we move along?
by ceylon Yesterday at 10:59 am

» Not sure which letter to send !
by Tiggy Yesterday at 10:05 am

» Debt ban from travelling abroad?
by 1saberwow Yesterday at 12:34 am

» Do I rant a lot?
by freeland Sat Jan 20, 2018 9:02 pm

» DOOMWATCH Wednesdays with Alex G every 3rd Wednesday of the month
by freeland Sat Jan 20, 2018 8:52 pm

» Setting Up New Financial Identity
by pipsaholic Sat Jan 20, 2018 6:25 pm

» Vegas False Flag
by Awoken2 Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:12 pm

» Let's Have Some Tunes thread.
by Awoken2 Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:09 pm

» Predictive programming and the music industry.
by Awoken2 Sat Jan 20, 2018 11:42 am

» Is there anything going on?
by ceylon Sat Jan 20, 2018 10:35 am

» A Reminder for everyone.
by daveiron Sat Jan 20, 2018 8:30 am

» The Honest Po-lice
by assassin Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:28 am

» Fighting the Banks in Other Countries,
by Society of the Spectacle Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:34 pm

» Want to save money? WATCH THIS
by Tom Bombadil Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:00 pm

» Are you a slave? Yes but a free range slave.
by ceylon Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:44 pm

» i hope this is correct
by Lopsum Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:29 pm

» Been sent a fake default notice
by Tiggy Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:21 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Fri Jan 19, 2018 2:49 pm

» ...Is this the BIG ONE or is there more to come?
by ceylon Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:09 pm

» Silence Is Golden
by Ausk Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:16 am

» Planning ahead for 25k debt
by warwick65 Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:08 am

» Claim from court finally arrived. Quick Q
by Stevro Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:17 pm

» Qanon taking down the elites
by Tradesman Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:05 pm

» Giro Slip For Council Tax???
by LionsShare Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:56 pm

» Main stream covers council apology
by ceylon Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:49 pm

» Do Nottingham criminal cartel have any comment on todays apology by the county council?
by ceylon Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:39 pm

» Acting agent or debt purchaser?
by Indebttoo Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:54 pm

» Crime Farming
by daveiron Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:29 pm

» Nottingham County Council apologies ┬áNottingham criminal cartel remain in denial but there time is almost up :)
by Society of the Spectacle Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:16 pm


Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by sam66 on Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:34 pm

I recently received a DCA repsonse to Letter 1. They included a fact sheet about original credit agreement requests. Note, I did not send a CCA request, nor is this request included in Letter 1, it was just attached to their template response no 1.

My question is around their claim that they can supply a reconstitued copy - does this apply to pre 2007 agreements?


sam66
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 26
Join date : 2017-09-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by 1saberwow on Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:00 pm

Hi sam66. You say that your CC is before 2007 that the dca must send a true copy and not a reconstructed one. Others should be along to give you their advice about the attachment and how to respond. If this dca calls you that you do not mention your name and tell them that they best write to this person they are wanting and hang up. The longer you remain talking that they may be recording and you do not have to identify yourself to them.

1saberwow
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 72
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by daveiron on Sun Sep 24, 2017 8:15 am

Read that letter again,

What it says is 'We may not have the Original Agreement' Well why not ,where is it now,who does have it or does it no longer exist ?
That one piece of paper (Original Agreement) is the one and only document that proves anything. Why would they not have it ? .Because they have sold it.

http://goodf.forumotion.com/t1131-new-3-letters-for-debt-purchasers

daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 757
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by petesomething on Sun Sep 24, 2017 5:11 pm

Hi sam66

when was the date of the default notice or last payment , they just brought your data, would you buy a car without the paper work, (NO) , You want to see if they own the alleged debt or they just brought data for pennies in the pound.
send the new 3 letters.
avatar
petesomething
Admin
Admin

Posts : 394
Join date : 2017-02-24
Location : NORTHAMPTON

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by sam66 on Sun Sep 24, 2017 8:58 pm

@petesomething wrote:Hi sam66

when was the date of the default notice or last payment , they just brought your data, would you buy a car without the paper work, (NO) , You want to see if they own the alleged debt or they just brought data for pennies in the pound.
send the new 3 letters.
Their correspondence states they have purchsed the account. This was part of their response to Letter 1. I shall fire off L2.

My question related to reconsituted agreements for pre 2007 agreements as I thought reconstituted was only permitted post 2007 and was seeking clarifictaion.

sam66
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 26
Join date : 2017-09-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by Tiggy on Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:29 pm

@sam66 wrote:
@petesomething wrote:Hi sam66

when was the date of the default notice or last payment , they just brought your data, would you buy a car without the paper work, (NO) , You want to see if they own the alleged debt or they just brought data for pennies in the pound.
send the new 3 letters.
Their correspondence states they have purchsed the account. This was part of their response to Letter 1. I shall fire off L2.

My question related to reconsituted agreements for pre 2007 agreements as I thought reconstituted was only permitted post 2007 and was seeking clarifictaion.
In answer, yes they can reconstitute a pre 2007 agreement.

Tiggy
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 459
Join date : 2017-08-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by sam66 on Mon Sep 25, 2017 9:26 am

So what is the difference between pre & post April 2007 agreements

sam66
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 26
Join date : 2017-09-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by Tiggy on Mon Sep 25, 2017 4:54 pm

@sam66 wrote:So what is the difference between pre & post April 2007 agreements
Nothing, the difference is in the changes they implemented to the Consumer Credit Act 2006 (enacted in April 2007), they removed Section 127.3.

You need to refer to the case law that applies here, which is Carey vs HSBC which states:

Then, sl27(3) provides, in relation to agreements made before 6 April 2007, as follows:

"The Court shall not make an enforcement order under s 65(1) if section 61(1) (a) (signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under s60(l)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor ..(whether or not in the prescribed manner)."

Accordingly, non-compliance with the relevant regulations is capable of being cured upon application by the court unless the document signed by the debtor did not contain the Prescribed Terms. In such a case the non-compliance cannot be cured and, in the words of Lord Hoffman in Dimond v Lovell [2002] 1 AC 384 at p397F, the agreement is "irredeemably unenforceable".

So it's neither section 61 or 65, it's whether under S127(3) ( which was removed by the 2007 amendments) the prescribed terms were included, which applies to the question of enforcement of pre or post 2007 agreement.

See below, Neither Sections 61 nor 65 were changed by the 2007 amendments, but section 127 was.

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2009/3417.html

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/61

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/65

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/127


Tiggy
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 459
Join date : 2017-08-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum