Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» New GOODF..
by Lopsum Today at 8:05 pm

» Failure to prepare
by Tvarred Today at 5:30 pm

» Credit File Notification to Bank
by Tvarred Today at 5:04 pm

» ...The KaK & M@© Show. Is Aleister Crowley's Daughter Dead?
by ceylon Today at 5:02 pm

» Greenfields Capital Trading
by Guest Today at 3:35 pm

» Hi all
by Guest Today at 3:29 pm

» found again...
by actinglikeabanker Today at 2:57 pm

» Next Door Neighbor Left A Mess
by eargoggles Today at 1:15 pm

» Setting up a trust
by handle Today at 11:29 am

» ...ARE THEY TRYING TO DECIEVE US?
by ceylon Today at 10:17 am

» Need Advice now GOODF has gone
by westcountryhelp Today at 10:17 am

» George Carlin - Saving the Planet
by actinglikeabanker Today at 10:03 am

» CCJ Delivered. I was unaware as i dont live at the address
by pieintheskywhenIdie Today at 7:31 am

» Acting agent or debt purchaser??
by daveiron Today at 7:04 am

» Chrissy Morris: Illegal Glossop eviction explained , part 1. N293a.
by daveiron Today at 6:58 am

» Food Dehydrating
by assassin Today at 1:50 am

» The windrush generation
by Tom Bombadil Today at 1:05 am

» ...The KaK & M@© Show. Have you done your research?
by ceylon Yesterday at 10:00 pm

» UK Govt Calls 2 Twitter Accounts -Russian Bots-; Turns Out They Are Humans.
by midnight Yesterday at 9:46 pm

» ANOTHER BBC GUEST REFUSES TO GO ALONG WITH THE PROPAGANDA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KU5taO5vRDo
by midnight Yesterday at 9:30 pm

» ...The KaK & M@© Show. Is this a High Emission Vehicle?
by ceylon Yesterday at 7:29 pm

» Collection Of Useful Documents Free Download
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 6:34 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Yesterday at 4:16 pm

» ...Can Justice be BOUGHT?
by ceylon Yesterday at 3:41 pm

» Disgusting Conflict of Interest: Theresa May’s Husband’s Investment Firm Made a “Financial Killing” from the Bombing of Syria
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 12:49 pm

» ADVANCED EQUITY AND TRUSTS
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 12:35 pm

» ...The Kak & M@© Show. Is treasonous May committing Russian roulette?
by ceylon Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:47 pm

» Latest from CrimeBodge
by Kestrel Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:28 pm

» General questions about 3 letters outcomes.
by daveiron Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:48 am

» ...Is this the hottest summer ever? Or is it just another LIE?
by ceylon Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:43 am

» starting a private claim against someone
by daveiron Thu Apr 19, 2018 10:24 am

» Understanding Claims
by Ausk Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:14 am

» Afternoon all!!!
by assassin Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:23 am

» Good evening, newbie
by assassin Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:23 am

» ...The KaK & M@©Show. Travel through paradise Or are you Barricaded in?
by ceylon Wed Apr 18, 2018 8:34 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Apr 18, 2018 7:43 pm

» Statute of limitations
by handle Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:15 pm

Moon phases


Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Go down

Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by sam66 on Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:34 pm

I recently received a DCA repsonse to Letter 1. They included a fact sheet about original credit agreement requests. Note, I did not send a CCA request, nor is this request included in Letter 1, it was just attached to their template response no 1.

My question is around their claim that they can supply a reconstitued copy - does this apply to pre 2007 agreements?


sam66
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 26
Join date : 2017-09-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by 1saberwow on Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:00 pm

Hi sam66. You say that your CC is before 2007 that the dca must send a true copy and not a reconstructed one. Others should be along to give you their advice about the attachment and how to respond. If this dca calls you that you do not mention your name and tell them that they best write to this person they are wanting and hang up. The longer you remain talking that they may be recording and you do not have to identify yourself to them.

1saberwow
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 84
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by daveiron on Sun Sep 24, 2017 8:15 am

Read that letter again,

What it says is 'We may not have the Original Agreement' Well why not ,where is it now,who does have it or does it no longer exist ?
That one piece of paper (Original Agreement) is the one and only document that proves anything. Why would they not have it ? .Because they have sold it.

http://goodf.forumotion.com/t1131-new-3-letters-for-debt-purchasers

daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 875
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by petesomething on Sun Sep 24, 2017 5:11 pm

Hi sam66

when was the date of the default notice or last payment , they just brought your data, would you buy a car without the paper work, (NO) , You want to see if they own the alleged debt or they just brought data for pennies in the pound.
send the new 3 letters.
avatar
petesomething
Admin
Admin

Posts : 394
Join date : 2017-02-24
Location : NORTHAMPTON

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by sam66 on Sun Sep 24, 2017 8:58 pm

@petesomething wrote:Hi sam66

when was the date of the default notice or last payment , they just brought your data, would you buy a car without the paper work, (NO) , You want to see if they own the alleged debt or they just brought data for pennies in the pound.
send the new 3 letters.
Their correspondence states they have purchsed the account. This was part of their response to Letter 1. I shall fire off L2.

My question related to reconsituted agreements for pre 2007 agreements as I thought reconstituted was only permitted post 2007 and was seeking clarifictaion.

sam66
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 26
Join date : 2017-09-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by Tiggy on Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:29 pm

@sam66 wrote:
@petesomething wrote:Hi sam66

when was the date of the default notice or last payment , they just brought your data, would you buy a car without the paper work, (NO) , You want to see if they own the alleged debt or they just brought data for pennies in the pound.
send the new 3 letters.
Their correspondence states they have purchsed the account. This was part of their response to Letter 1. I shall fire off L2.

My question related to reconsituted agreements for pre 2007 agreements as I thought reconstituted was only permitted post 2007 and was seeking clarifictaion.
In answer, yes they can reconstitute a pre 2007 agreement.

Tiggy
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 640
Join date : 2017-08-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by sam66 on Mon Sep 25, 2017 9:26 am

So what is the difference between pre & post April 2007 agreements

sam66
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 26
Join date : 2017-09-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by Tiggy on Mon Sep 25, 2017 4:54 pm

@sam66 wrote:So what is the difference between pre & post April 2007 agreements
Nothing, the difference is in the changes they implemented to the Consumer Credit Act 2006 (enacted in April 2007), they removed Section 127.3.

You need to refer to the case law that applies here, which is Carey vs HSBC which states:

Then, sl27(3) provides, in relation to agreements made before 6 April 2007, as follows:

"The Court shall not make an enforcement order under s 65(1) if section 61(1) (a) (signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under s60(l)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor ..(whether or not in the prescribed manner)."

Accordingly, non-compliance with the relevant regulations is capable of being cured upon application by the court unless the document signed by the debtor did not contain the Prescribed Terms. In such a case the non-compliance cannot be cured and, in the words of Lord Hoffman in Dimond v Lovell [2002] 1 AC 384 at p397F, the agreement is "irredeemably unenforceable".

So it's neither section 61 or 65, it's whether under S127(3) ( which was removed by the 2007 amendments) the prescribed terms were included, which applies to the question of enforcement of pre or post 2007 agreement.

See below, Neither Sections 61 nor 65 were changed by the 2007 amendments, but section 127 was.

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2009/3417.html

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/61

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/65

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/127


Tiggy
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 640
Join date : 2017-08-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum