Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» "We are applying for a warrant to change your meter"
by Tiggy Today at 12:28 pm

» Court hearing
by petesomething Today at 12:24 pm

» F**king System does my head in
by Lansdowne Today at 12:08 pm

» Acoustic Proof of Second Shooter in Vegas
by toolapcblack Today at 11:36 am

» 18600 rule
by Ausk Today at 9:40 am

» Eating Out
by Ausk Today at 9:27 am

» What have they done to GOODF
by discodave4093 Today at 6:46 am

» Residence and Domicile
by iamani Today at 2:39 am

» Spending Time Together
by assassin Today at 2:12 am

» asked for accounting and got back...
by Waffle Yesterday at 9:05 pm

» Has Anyone Ever Reminded Cabot Of Their Past?
by Waffle Yesterday at 8:24 pm

» Sajid "pants on fire"Javid
by mitch Yesterday at 7:41 pm

» New Old Member
by assassin Yesterday at 6:57 pm

» Messed up the 3 letters process
by petesomething Yesterday at 4:24 pm

» Net tightens round paedophile run councils (corporations)
by daveiron Yesterday at 3:54 pm

» Another One Surfaces
by daveiron Yesterday at 3:23 pm

» Sunday sunday
by ceylon Yesterday at 2:55 pm

» ESTOPPEL
by petesomething Yesterday at 8:43 am

» Australia version of the ebook
by Bruce0439 Yesterday at 7:35 am

» Link Financial
by discodave4093 Yesterday at 2:01 am

» Notice of Discontinuance - Court Hearing for Alleged Debt.
by assassin Yesterday at 1:20 am

» Hello New Member
by Steve Sat Oct 21, 2017 8:10 pm

» Are the DEMONS coming?
by Phillpots Sat Oct 21, 2017 7:35 pm

» Acting agent or debt purchaser?
by Indebttoo Sat Oct 21, 2017 6:57 pm

» Counter Claims
by kingkotton Sat Oct 21, 2017 1:49 pm

» A short clip from ‘Everything Is A Rich Man’s Trick’ that will either blow your mind. https://vimeo.com/184473343
by Society of the Spectacle Sat Oct 21, 2017 1:32 pm

» Statement of Assets and Liabilites
by Ausk Sat Oct 21, 2017 9:35 am

» More Northampton Nonsense
by kingkotton Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:38 pm

» 3 HOURS Winter & Fireplace Sound - Blizzard Sounds - Heavy Wind For Relaxation
by epsom Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:33 pm

» Beautiful Snow with Fireplace Sound
by epsom Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:32 pm

» Nottinham Meeting for Free Thinkers 21st October 2017
by Prometheus Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:26 pm

» Offal Wagons
by Tom Bombadil Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:22 pm

» Let's Have Some Tunes thread.
by Awoken2 Fri Oct 20, 2017 10:20 pm

» Social Media Soldiers - British Army 77th Bridage
by Society of the Spectacle Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:56 pm

» Thunderstorm At Sea Sounds For Sleeping, Relaxing ~ Thunder Rain Ocean Sea Lightning Ambience
by Tom Bombadil Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:39 pm

» The Rules for Rulers
by ceylon Fri Oct 20, 2017 8:35 pm

» County Court Claim
by petesomething Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:20 pm


Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by sam66 on Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:34 pm

I recently received a DCA repsonse to Letter 1. They included a fact sheet about original credit agreement requests. Note, I did not send a CCA request, nor is this request included in Letter 1, it was just attached to their template response no 1.

My question is around their claim that they can supply a reconstitued copy - does this apply to pre 2007 agreements?


sam66
Newb
Newb

Posts : 25
Join date : 2017-09-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by 1saberwow on Sat Sep 23, 2017 11:00 pm

Hi sam66. You say that your CC is before 2007 that the dca must send a true copy and not a reconstructed one. Others should be along to give you their advice about the attachment and how to respond. If this dca calls you that you do not mention your name and tell them that they best write to this person they are wanting and hang up. The longer you remain talking that they may be recording and you do not have to identify yourself to them.

1saberwow
Newb
Newb

Posts : 41
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by daveiron on Sun Sep 24, 2017 8:15 am

Read that letter again,

What it says is 'We may not have the Original Agreement' Well why not ,where is it now,who does have it or does it no longer exist ?
That one piece of paper (Original Agreement) is the one and only document that proves anything. Why would they not have it ? .Because they have sold it.

http://goodf.forumotion.com/t1131-new-3-letters-for-debt-purchasers

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 600
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by petesomething on Sun Sep 24, 2017 5:11 pm

Hi sam66

when was the date of the default notice or last payment , they just brought your data, would you buy a car without the paper work, (NO) , You want to see if they own the alleged debt or they just brought data for pennies in the pound.
send the new 3 letters.
avatar
petesomething
Admin
Admin

Posts : 306
Join date : 2017-02-24
Location : NORTHAMPTON

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by sam66 on Sun Sep 24, 2017 8:58 pm

petesomething wrote:Hi sam66

when was the date of the default notice or last payment , they just brought your data, would you buy a car without the paper work, (NO) , You want to see if they own the alleged debt or they just brought data for pennies in the pound.
send the new 3 letters.
Their correspondence states they have purchsed the account. This was part of their response to Letter 1. I shall fire off L2.

My question related to reconsituted agreements for pre 2007 agreements as I thought reconstituted was only permitted post 2007 and was seeking clarifictaion.

sam66
Newb
Newb

Posts : 25
Join date : 2017-09-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by Tiggy on Sun Sep 24, 2017 10:29 pm

sam66 wrote:
petesomething wrote:Hi sam66

when was the date of the default notice or last payment , they just brought your data, would you buy a car without the paper work, (NO) , You want to see if they own the alleged debt or they just brought data for pennies in the pound.
send the new 3 letters.
Their correspondence states they have purchsed the account. This was part of their response to Letter 1. I shall fire off L2.

My question related to reconsituted agreements for pre 2007 agreements as I thought reconstituted was only permitted post 2007 and was seeking clarifictaion.
In answer, yes they can reconstitute a pre 2007 agreement.

Tiggy
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 256
Join date : 2017-08-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by sam66 on Mon Sep 25, 2017 9:26 am

So what is the difference between pre & post April 2007 agreements

sam66
Newb
Newb

Posts : 25
Join date : 2017-09-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet

Post by Tiggy on Mon Sep 25, 2017 4:54 pm

sam66 wrote:So what is the difference between pre & post April 2007 agreements
Nothing, the difference is in the changes they implemented to the Consumer Credit Act 2006 (enacted in April 2007), they removed Section 127.3.

You need to refer to the case law that applies here, which is Carey vs HSBC which states:

Then, sl27(3) provides, in relation to agreements made before 6 April 2007, as follows:

"The Court shall not make an enforcement order under s 65(1) if section 61(1) (a) (signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under s60(l)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor ..(whether or not in the prescribed manner)."

Accordingly, non-compliance with the relevant regulations is capable of being cured upon application by the court unless the document signed by the debtor did not contain the Prescribed Terms. In such a case the non-compliance cannot be cured and, in the words of Lord Hoffman in Dimond v Lovell [2002] 1 AC 384 at p397F, the agreement is "irredeemably unenforceable".

So it's neither section 61 or 65, it's whether under S127(3) ( which was removed by the 2007 amendments) the prescribed terms were included, which applies to the question of enforcement of pre or post 2007 agreement.

See below, Neither Sections 61 nor 65 were changed by the 2007 amendments, but section 127 was.

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2009/3417.html

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/61

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/65

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/127


Tiggy
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 256
Join date : 2017-08-11

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum