Display results as :

Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» The Honest Po-lice
by assassin Today at 2:28 am

» Not sure which letter to send !
by Daxer Yesterday at 11:28 pm

» living on holiday park and council tax
by jooboi Yesterday at 10:28 pm

» Predictive programming and the music industry.
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 8:55 pm

» A Reminder for everyone.
by Kestrel Yesterday at 8:38 pm

» Fighting the Banks in Other Countries,
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 8:34 pm

» Littering 'accusation'
by Tiggy Yesterday at 7:47 pm

» Vets Stealing Cats By Fraud
by Tom Bombadil Yesterday at 7:11 pm

» Want to save money? WATCH THIS
by Tom Bombadil Yesterday at 7:00 pm

» Are you a slave? Yes but a free range slave.
by ceylon Yesterday at 4:44 pm

» i hope this is correct
by Lopsum Yesterday at 4:29 pm

» Been sent a fake default notice
by Tiggy Yesterday at 3:21 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Yesterday at 2:49 pm

» ...Is this the BIG ONE or is there more to come?
by ceylon Yesterday at 1:09 pm

» Hoist Portfolio Holding Limited
by Jackbnimble Yesterday at 1:04 pm

» Silence Is Golden
by Ausk Yesterday at 8:16 am

» Planning ahead for 25k debt
by warwick65 Yesterday at 7:08 am

» Claim from court finally arrived. Quick Q
by Stevro Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:17 pm

» Qanon taking down the elites
by Tradesman Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:05 pm

» Giro Slip For Council Tax???
by LionsShare Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:56 pm

» Main stream covers council apology
by ceylon Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:49 pm

» Do Nottingham criminal cartel have any comment on todays apology by the county council?
by ceylon Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:39 pm

» Acting agent or debt purchaser?
by Indebttoo Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:54 pm

» Crime Farming
by daveiron Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:29 pm

» Nottingham County Council apologies ┬áNottingham criminal cartel remain in denial but there time is almost up :)
by Society of the Spectacle Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:16 pm

» Should we bother?
by ceylon Thu Jan 18, 2018 11:41 am

» Geo Engineering, are we seeing another avoidable tragedy?
by Awoken2 Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:43 am

» ...MP's should we sack them all?
by daveiron Thu Jan 18, 2018 9:39 am

» New three letters response
by Lawful rebel Wed Jan 17, 2018 9:11 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Jan 17, 2018 7:33 pm

» Poor Old Ceylon
by assassin Wed Jan 17, 2018 6:55 pm

» My credit card come back alive
by Tiggy Wed Jan 17, 2018 6:21 pm

» Bank of Scotland
by assassin Wed Jan 17, 2018 1:06 pm

» Debt ban from travelling abroad?
by LionsShare Wed Jan 17, 2018 12:25 pm

» Is the propaganda failing?
by ceylon Wed Jan 17, 2018 11:40 am

» Let's Have Some Tunes thread.
by Awoken2 Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:32 pm

by andre.rd Tue Jan 16, 2018 7:53 pm

Net tightens round paedophile run councils (corporations)

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Net tightens round paedophile run councils (corporations)

Post by ceylon on Sun Oct 22, 2017 12:39 pm

Net tightens round paedophile run councils (corporations)

Posts : 716
Join date : 2017-02-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Net tightens round paedophile run councils (corporations)

Post by Guest on Sun Oct 22, 2017 1:30 pm

Hi ceylon

Dunno if it's just me, but no sound on vid.

Did a barrister actually just admit that the councils and govt. are corporations?




Back to top Go down

Re: Net tightens round paedophile run councils (corporations)

Post by assassin on Sun Oct 22, 2017 2:23 pm

Actually, this has gone much further than people realise as councils corporations began passing the buck during this case to absolve themselves and blame others.

Social services is now a seperate corporation of the council and have been so for some time, they have their own corporate body and accounting as well as company registration, they make their own profits and losses and are accountable (in law) for the actions of themselves and their employees which are social workers and foster carers. They are now liable for their actions and the actions of their staff and employees and not the council, so the councils have passed the buck and accountability and liability to another corporation.

It gets worse, as social services are their own corporate body they have adopted this ethos of the council and moved liability away from themselves to another party called "the agency" and they appoint one of a growing number of specialised agencies to foster a child, and foster parents now come under the agency and not the council or social services. These agencies are appointed by social services and become solely responsible for the child to prevent these cases in the future, all foster carers are appointed by the agency and the responsibility for the carers rests with the agency as does the liability, so now the agency has both liability and the responsibility as well as the blame for any future and any future financial liability.

Now a picture is forming, the council passes the buck to social services and blames them.

Social services say hey, its nothing to do with us as we have appointed agencies and blames the agency.

The agency accepts the responsibility accepts the huge financial benefits now and if they are blamed in the future they have still received this huge income minus a share for the council and social services who must have their slice, and they accept liability and pack up their tents and shut up shop and say "were going for bankruptcy" and go bust.

Posts : 1129
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head

Back to top Go down

Re: Net tightens round paedophile run councils (corporations)

Post by kingkotton on Sun Oct 22, 2017 3:44 pm

A Basic tenet of a corporation is to externalize risk. Risk is considered anything that adversely affects the balance sheet and to hell with the human collateral damage.

That's why giant manufacturing corporations will pollute rivers, poison oceans, and desolate populations and require the state/tax payer to foot the bill, never mind humans carrying the reality of the cost of breathing clean air and drinking potable water and the destruction of the other inhabitants of the natural world.

In this case there is a risk of enabling child abusers when carrying out child protection services by the council corporation, that risk being the large legal costs paid in damages. So they externalize it by shedding that department, which in turn sheds it to other private, un-elected, unaccountable corporations acting as agents.

It isn't emotive, intentional or egregious, these are aspects of conscious humanity. It is cold, diabolical and remorseless because it is an inhuman force. The inhuman force, because it is completely devoid of compassion, then provides pathways for the sub-human paedophile to prey on the vulnerable. Hollywood is the current high profile example of this.

Do we not need the individuals to be targeted, not the umbrella entities that protect them?

Last edited by kingkotton on Tue Oct 24, 2017 11:09 pm; edited 2 times in total
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 13
Join date : 2017-10-19

Back to top Go down

Re: Net tightens round paedophile run councils (corporations)

Post by daveiron on Sun Oct 22, 2017 3:54 pm

Agreed KK

A corporation is just a dead entity .All actions and decisions are made and implemented by men and women acting
for that corporation.


Posts : 754
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Net tightens round paedophile run councils (corporations)

Post by Sponsored content

Sponsored content

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum