Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» New three letters response
by Lawful rebel Yesterday at 9:11 pm

» Hoist Portfolio Holding Limited
by Indebttoo Yesterday at 8:38 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 7:33 pm

» Planning ahead for 25k debt
by jims45 Yesterday at 7:16 pm

» Vets Stealing Cats By Fraud
by assassin Yesterday at 7:12 pm

» ...MP's should we sack them all?
by assassin Yesterday at 6:58 pm

» Poor Old Ceylon
by assassin Yesterday at 6:55 pm

» My credit card come back alive
by Tiggy Yesterday at 6:21 pm

» Predictive programming and the music industry.
by Awoken2 Yesterday at 5:53 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Yesterday at 3:21 pm

» Bank of Scotland
by assassin Yesterday at 1:06 pm

» Debt ban from travelling abroad?
by LionsShare Yesterday at 12:25 pm

» Is the propaganda failing?
by ceylon Yesterday at 11:40 am

» Let's Have Some Tunes thread.
by Awoken2 Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:32 pm

» KEVIN MARK ON TRUSTS AND COUNCIL TAX
by andre.rd Tue Jan 16, 2018 7:53 pm

» Vegas False Flag
by Awoken2 Tue Jan 16, 2018 3:05 pm

» Anyone know of a natural cure for High Blood Pressure?
by LionsShare Tue Jan 16, 2018 11:59 am

» Probally the most important link I have seen
by urchinatheart Tue Jan 16, 2018 10:55 am

» Should we ignore the divide conquer tactics & pull together
by Ausk Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:58 am

» ...Is it your turn to pay again?
by ceylon Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:32 am

» How can you beat fear ?
by Ausk Tue Jan 16, 2018 8:30 am

» Old member returns.
by assassin Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:15 am

» Police are told to stop rise of paedophile hunters
by assassin Tue Jan 16, 2018 1:14 am

» Lowell & OC Letter in same envelope (strange?)
by Tiggy Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:47 pm

» Lowell CCBC claim form
by Tiggy Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:42 pm

» sol excalibre with cookiemonster
by Society of the Spectacle Mon Jan 15, 2018 8:37 pm

» Hi Annie from YT Annie logical channel
by Society of the Spectacle Mon Jan 15, 2018 1:32 pm

» Water Distiller Recommendations?
by Lawful rebel Mon Jan 15, 2018 1:16 pm

» Want to save money? WATCH THIS
by mitch Mon Jan 15, 2018 10:53 am

» Manuka honey kills more bacteria than all available antibiotics
by Ausk Mon Jan 15, 2018 9:02 am

» Nottingham Workshop Saturday 20 January 2018
by Boudica Sun Jan 14, 2018 9:10 pm

» lawful rebellion
by daveiron Sun Jan 14, 2018 1:50 pm

» Geo Engineering, are we seeing another avoidable tragedy?
by Awoken2 Sun Jan 14, 2018 1:30 pm

» Bailiffs & Sworn Affidavit
by Ausk Sun Jan 14, 2018 8:13 am

» Court defence
by seamous87 Sat Jan 13, 2018 5:44 pm

» PACE Sections 11-15
by assassin Sat Jan 13, 2018 3:45 pm

» PACE Sections 6 - 10
by assassin Sat Jan 13, 2018 3:38 pm


Is it time to attack the internet?

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Is it time to attack the internet?

Post by ceylon on Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:52 pm

Is it time to attack the internet?



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DlTiOfckRc
avatar
ceylon
Admin
Admin

Posts : 707
Join date : 2017-02-07

Back to top Go down

Re: Is it time to attack the internet?

Post by assassin on Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:50 am

Should we attack the internet? no, but we should be very careful how we use it and look at the agendas of those using it to promote themselves, companies, or products; followed by the indoctrination.
avatar
assassin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1127
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head

Back to top Go down

Re: Is it time to attack the internet?

Post by Kestrel on Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:01 am

Yes the internet is under attack as it's the last bastion of freedom of speech, hence the 77th Brigade, the amount of shills & gatekeepers, the ADL upping their attacks & so on.

So the likes of protecting us from terrorism (carried out by the state) & paedophiles (the state is infested with these sexual degenerates) will be used as an excuse to stifle freedom, i noticed the MSN stopped allowing comments some time back, i did note an increasing number of people exposing the truth here which was refreshing amongst the masses comments who do no more than recite & debate what they are told.

Kestrel
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 106
Join date : 2017-08-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Is it time to attack the internet?

Post by mitch on Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:00 am

Google hiring 10,000 reviewers to censor YouTube content

Google is escalating its campaign of internet censorship, announcing that it will expand its workforce of human censors to over 10,000, the internet giant announced on December 4. The censors’ primary focus will be videos and other content on YouTube, its video-sharing platform, but will work across Google to censor content and train its automated systems, which remove videos at a rate four times faster than its human employees.

Human censors have already reviewed over 2 million videos since June. YouTube has already removed over 150,000 videos, 50 percent of which were removed within two hours of upload. The company is working to accelerate the rate of takedown through machine-learning from manual censorship, according to YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki in an official blog post.

The hiring drive by Google is yet another advance in the campaign against any expression of political opposition. Other social media giants have implemented measures against “fake news”; Facebook has altered its algorithms to reduce the visibility of certain news stories, and Twitter has banned the Russian-funded media outlets RT and Sputnik from advertising on the platform. While railing against “extremist content,” “child exploitation” and “hoaxes” in the interest of “public safety,” the ultimate goal of this campaign is the suppression of left-wing, anti-war sentiment.

Any censorship on YouTube will undoubtedly have an immense impact on online political discourse. According to a white paper by technology conglomerate Cisco, video will account for 69 percent of all consumer-based internet traffic in 2017; this is expected to rise to 80 percent by 2019. YouTube essentially operates a monopoly on prerecorded video sharing and general video monetization, with some 1.5 billion viewers who watch 1 billion hours of video each day on the platform; in 2015, Google policy manager Verity Harding informed the European Parliament, which was then pressuring YouTube to censor “terror-related” content, that 300 hours of video were being uploaded to the platform every minute.

YouTube began removing photographic and video documentation of war crimes in Syria in August, terminating some 180 accounts and removing countless videos from other channels, including footage uploaded by Airwars of coalition air raids that have killed civilians, according to Hadi al-Khatib, the founder of Syrian Archive. YouTube later stated that it would work to “quickly reinstate” any videos and channels that it “removed mistakenly.”

In November, YouTube removed over 51,000 videos concerning Anwar al-Awlaki, the Yemeni-American imam who was assassinated via missile raid by the Obama administration on September 30, 2011. Awlaki was never charged with, let alone convicted of any crime. The mass removal was praised by the New York Times, one of the largest mouthpieces of the American ruling elite, as a “watershed moment.”

YouTube’s automated video removal system, implemented in August, places some videos under a “limited state” which makes it impossible for users to access the videos without already having the URL. Limited videos will not appear in search results, playlists, or viewers’ own histories. In addition, the videos can no longer be liked or disliked, commented on (all previous comments are hidden as well), monetized, embedded on other websites, or easily shared on social media through YouTube’s share buttons. YouTube has not revealed what criteria it uses to categorize a video as “extremist” and delist it.

The company has also begun using automated demonetization to financially censor video producers who upload content it deems “inappropriate” for monetization, including “controversial or sensitive subjects, war, political conflicts, natural disasters and tragedies, even if graphic imagery is not shown.” In August, the videos of “Ron Paul’s Liberty Report” were demonetized after a “manual review” by YouTube found it “unsuitable for advertisers.” Julian Assange referred to the action as “economic censorship,” noting that the “unsuitable” videos featured the former congressman’s criticism of president Donald Trump’s decision to send more American troops to Afghanistan, as well as criticizing the US Senate Intelligence Committee for branding Wikileaks a hostile foreign intelligence service.

YouTube has openly admitted on Twitter that it is censoring videos based on content, stating, “if the video is also not suitable for a wider audience … then it might see poorer performance.”

The system may also pre-emptively flag videos as unsuitable for advertising even before it is uploaded. In the cases where the censorship system cannot evaluate the content of the video—because it doesn’t exist—it bases its decision on the video’s description, tags, and thumbnail.

The requirements to file an appeal against demonetization are extremely demanding, leaving most small producers with zero recourse. To file an appeal, the channel must either have more than 10,000 subscribers, or the video in question must have at least 1,000 views within the past seven days. Producers are also not informed of when or what in their video the system finds inappropriate. Both small and large producers have complained on Twitter of double-digit percentage drops in new views after their videos have been demonetized, making it even more difficult to meet appeal requirements.

Google is not alone in its expansion of automated censorship. Last week, Facebook announced its newly implemented system to scan users’ posts and contact police and other first-responders, ostensibly to prevent suicide.

Last month, Google admitted to “demoting” content from RT and Sputnik news in its search engine and news service, confirming allegations by the World Socialist Web Site that the company engages in mass political censorship in the name of fighting “fake news.”

https://off-guardian.org/2017/12/11/google-hiring-10000-reviewers-to-censor-youtube-content/
avatar
mitch
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 62
Join date : 2017-05-27
Location : Northumbria

Back to top Go down

Re: Is it time to attack the internet?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum