The GOODF Approach
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» know who you are volume ??
by daveiron Tue Mar 26, 2024 9:38 pm

» DVLA [Hick] Does It Work [Hick] ?
by LionsShare Tue Mar 26, 2024 11:34 am

» Are Lowell getting desperate ?
by Lopsum Tue Mar 26, 2024 8:50 am

» Ovo bank giro?
by Wynston.adebiyi@gmail.com Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:10 pm

» Hopefully A Success
by daveiron Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:28 pm

» Most Complete Bank Giro Credit
by LionsShare Sun Mar 24, 2024 12:06 pm

» Knowing our Lawful rights
by daveiron Sat Mar 23, 2024 6:05 am

» More Illegal Immigrants
by assassin Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:43 pm

» SAR dispute
by assassin Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:32 pm

» There goes Ireland, his off.
by midnight Thu Mar 21, 2024 1:07 pm

» The infamous DP continus
by urchinatheart Mon Mar 18, 2024 3:01 pm

» Call to the DVLA
by urchinatheart Mon Mar 18, 2024 2:36 pm

» BEWARE OF TSB BANK
by daveiron Sun Mar 17, 2024 6:53 am

» Help / Advice needed on ongoing neighbour harassment
by memegirl777 Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:51 pm

» United Kingdom? Really?
by assassin Sat Mar 16, 2024 4:17 pm

» DWP and HMRC alleged debts
by assassin Wed Mar 13, 2024 7:20 pm

» Serial Posty been awarded £10'000 for a fake bite
by memegirl777 Wed Mar 13, 2024 3:05 pm

» HSBC advice please.
by Trishiapp28 Wed Mar 13, 2024 7:36 am

» He is going to save us again
by flyingfish Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:00 pm

» Government fraud
by midnight Sun Mar 10, 2024 7:01 am

» THIS IS THE ONE ?
by daveiron Sun Mar 10, 2024 3:45 am

» how to remove a shareholder?
by scrwm Fri Mar 08, 2024 12:06 pm

» I DO NOT CONSENT [62%] - ReformUK got 5% of the electorate. Labour 17%
by badvoc Thu Mar 07, 2024 12:25 pm

» What can ai do about Santander
by Godfastro Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:47 am

» Useful videos Council Tax
by daveiron Tue Mar 05, 2024 10:05 pm

» broadcaster vs me
by scrwm Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:37 pm

» The new GOODF process works
by urchinatheart Tue Mar 05, 2024 10:45 am

» Worth a watch
by LionsShare Tue Mar 05, 2024 9:11 am

» Farmers IsThis What's Needed?
by LionsShare Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:46 pm

» Debt Bomb 11
by Biggiebest Sun Mar 03, 2024 10:05 pm

» accepted dca alleged debt
by Mrblue2015 Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:09 pm

» DVLA
by daveiron Fri Mar 01, 2024 9:20 pm

» Solicitors contacted me via e-mail asking for money.
by Kaddabriol Thu Feb 29, 2024 2:12 pm

» Claiming again
by LionsShare Thu Feb 29, 2024 11:07 am

» Useful Utility Vids
by LionsShare Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:59 pm

» what the bank of england runs the country?
by LionsShare Mon Feb 26, 2024 3:54 pm

» New Member
by daveiron Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:55 am

» Learning New Skills _Pt 2 Buying Tools
by assassin Mon Feb 26, 2024 4:35 am

» Learning New Skills _Pt 2 Buying Tools
by assassin Mon Feb 26, 2024 4:33 am

» Learning new Skills Part 1
by assassin Mon Feb 26, 2024 4:27 am

» General Equity?
by LionsShare Tue Feb 20, 2024 7:03 pm

» Visit by appointment notice
by Moonbabymum Tue Feb 20, 2024 4:37 pm

» Discussion on Info'd Vids
by LionsShare Tue Feb 13, 2024 11:52 am

» debts loans mortgages etc (tear off slips?)
by LionsShare Mon Feb 12, 2024 3:54 pm

» Quick one
by Lopsum Sun Feb 11, 2024 6:03 pm

» debt settlement payoff
by daveiron Sat Feb 10, 2024 10:58 pm

» Council tax and summons for arrest
by LionsShare Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:17 pm

» Council Tax (getting answers)
by LionsShare Fri Feb 09, 2024 12:57 pm

» council tax 1st of april
by daveiron Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:46 pm

» DSAR
by daveiron Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:28 pm

» Warning about a previous post
by Mrblue2015 Sat Feb 03, 2024 5:10 pm

» Please leave a comment on this site
by daveiron Fri Feb 02, 2024 10:01 pm

» Lithiun Battery Dangers
by badvoc Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:52 pm

» its a trap
by LionsShare Thu Feb 01, 2024 9:49 am

» Car In Trust
by LionsShare Tue Jan 30, 2024 3:05 pm

Moon phases


questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications.

3 posters

Go down

questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications. Empty questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications.

Post by Ausk Wed Apr 24, 2019 9:59 am

I thought these questions might prove useful for attacking the integrity of reconstituted documents and the whole process of on line credit applications.

I'm sure others on here can offer ideas on how to build on this approach to the task of defeating debt buyers.

Mr debt collector; Are these documents you have sent me genuine documents? He will say 'no, as they are not required to be under xyz Act or Regulation, Code of Practice or whatever rule or law it is.

Mr debt collector; Can you prove to this court, with substantiating evidence, the details on this/these reconstituted documents have NOT been digitally altered during the compilation process?

If he says 'yes' then MR debt collector I now require you to prove your claim.

If he says 'no' then you say 'so then you concede the contents of this document could be fraudulent? If he answers 'no' to this question you ask him why is he saying no. This will likely cause him to attempt to describe the process for ensuring document integrity and so you attack that process.

How does he assure an unbroken chain of data custody?. Has the reconstitution process deleted some calculations? How does the reconstitution of the documents guarantee that no part of the reconstituted document containing all the important data has not been digitally altered? Can he prove it with substantiating documentation? Remember he said that reconstituting the data did not impair the integrity of the document - make him prove it.

Alternatively he can say little other than 'yes' unless he explains how the documents are 'reconstituted' but still maintain document integrity in which case, again, you attack the integrity of that process.

IF the application was done on line the questioning would go along the line " Mr debt collector; Can you prove to this court with documentary evidence it was me who completed the application for credit forms on line?

If he says yes then you say: I require you to prove it then!! In all likelihood the DC will admit he cannot prove it so at the end of this you say to the mag. Your honor; I move for this proceeding be struck out for want of proof of claim. Have this motion typed out and a copy of it with you to hand up to the magistrate.

Unless the DC has the original documents from the OC then he cant prove it and he is highly unlikely to have them because when banks sell debts they are sold as a tranch, meaning they consist of a spreadsheet which does not contain much details and is unlikely to be supported by documentation.

If the application was done on line and you have NOT previously admitted to the debt then your line might be - "Your Honour. I know nothing of this alleged debt. I have no memory of ever making any application for credit and I submit someone hacked my computer and completed the application on line, in my name, without my knowledge or consent and so I deny any and all responsibility for this alleged debt. Again; I move for this charge to discharged for want of evidence.




Ausk
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 491
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications. Empty Re: questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications.

Post by daveiron Wed Apr 24, 2019 11:50 am

Hi Ausk,

Your thinking is very similar to mine, and I believe most of it comes down to 'presumption at law' which stands unless
evidence is provided to the contrary. The presumption is "this is what your agreement was" its doubtful we can disprove it unless we have a true copy of the original.
WE then make presumptions that the alleged debt has been sold or traded, insurance claimed against it etc.as in the 3 letters.There is plenty of evidence which can be produced that these are standard practices ,the ball is then in their court (excuse the pun) to provide evidence to the contrary,which of course they cannot.

This is a defense I would try if need be. unfortunately although its in the letters it seems no one bothers to push
for answers on these points.
daveiron
daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 4897
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications. Empty Re: questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications.

Post by waylander62 Wed Apr 24, 2019 2:35 pm

may be send a further letter to them requesting that they provide a signed deposition that what they are claiming/providing is true and accurate ?

I did this with capital one once directly, the debt buyer lowell who had already issued a claim bailed out before the final hearing no idea why they did this ? but that letter to capital one produced no reply and ended the claim ? after i sent the letter i heard no more from either OC or DCA claim ended, its at least 3 years ago now so i dont recall exactly.

waylander62
dedicated
dedicated

Posts : 1258
Join date : 2017-10-03

Back to top Go down

questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications. Empty Re: questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications.

Post by Ausk Thu Apr 25, 2019 8:25 am

Thats good to hear waylander but I thought I'd chuck it out there for whom ever it might be useful. One of the good things about the Australian civial law is that it requires the parties to undergo a compulsory pre-trial conference to try and get the parties to agree to a solution so the case does not go to trial.

This conference might be a good place to fly these sorts of kites to see how they go and therefore may go in the trial.

Ausk
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 491
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications. Empty Re: questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications.

Post by Ausk Thu Apr 25, 2019 8:28 am

daveiron wrote:Hi Ausk,

Your thinking is very similar to mine, and I believe most of it comes down to 'presumption at law' which stands unless
evidence is provided to the contrary. The presumption is "this is what your agreement was" its doubtful we can disprove it unless we have a true copy of the original.
WE then make presumptions that the alleged debt has been sold or traded, insurance claimed against it etc.as in the 3 letters.There is plenty of evidence which can be produced that these are standard practices ,the ball is then in their court (excuse the pun) to provide evidence to the contrary,which of course they cannot.

This is a defense I would try if need be. unfortunately although its in the letters it seems no one bothers to push
for answers on these points.  

Good daverion. i've been away because i lost the fire in my tummy. i've been retired for a while now and I had a bad set back with parking fine court appearance so it has knocked me a bit. Hopefully the fire will return soon.

Ausk
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 491
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications. Empty Re: questioning reconstituted documents and on-line credit applications.

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum