Vaccines win in court

by Waffle Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:34 pm

A mother decided not to vaccinate her children, to the least to say distaste of the farther, he actually took her to court to enforce vaccinations on their children. She fought it but lost in the high court, their ruling was she was putting her children at risk by not vaccinating. I can't help but feel a lot of sympathy for this mother, as I am sure she is wide awake to the vaccine industry and must be in despair about the this enforcement on her precious children.

This is a very concerning decision made by the high court. There are huge issues in the states in regards to vaccines and their enforcement. Is this decision going to be something that pushes the UK in the same direction.....

http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/mother-opposed-to-conventional-medicine-ordered-to-vaccinate-children-by-uk-high-court/

by petesomething Tue Apr 11, 2017 5:58 pm

some vaccinations can be risky

by Waffle Tue Apr 11, 2017 6:09 pm

A recent article in a paper about the bird flu or swine flu vaccine... Children were developing narcolepsy, the government has been paying out £100,000 for this out of the vaccine damage fund, the only way to get compensation for vaccine damage, little compensation tho for something that will have a large affect on their entire life.

If you've done a lot of research you will find the risks involved with vaccines are far beyond what one might perceive, subliminal long term effects to very serious ones

by **assassin** Wed Apr 12, 2017 7:01 pm

Total rubbish story.

The children are the property of the state and not hers, his, or theirs as they are registered.

The state had words with the judge, nod nod, wink wink; and reminded them who owns the children.

by bimmer Wed Apr 12, 2017 7:29 pm

ooh, that's harsh, but true

also, if people asked for the ingredients of the vaccines and then did some research, maybe that would help

by Waffle Wed Apr 12, 2017 7:58 pm

How the story is articulated is total rubbish, its full of pro vaccine BS "they save the lives of millions" they just don't tell about the millions who's lives they effect....

by petesomething Wed Apr 12, 2017 9:11 pm

HI waffle

no they will not tell us , why , maybe some one making money Rolling Eyes

by Waffle Wed Apr 12, 2017 9:36 pm

[quote="petesomething"]HI waffle

no they will not tell us , why , maybe some one making money Rolling Eyes

[/quote]

There is no doubt they will be covering up to protect their interests, there is a lot at steak for the parma industry.

by **assassin** Thu Apr 13, 2017 12:47 am

Not personal Waffle, just another B/S story with an element of truth and presented as if a judge ruled against a parent.

In reality the mother acts for the child, fairly normal; father brings a case which is exactly what the system wants as they can then instruct a judge to act for the owners of the child which is the crown corp.

Everyone not in the know is deceived, the judge is actually doing the right thing commercially and is acting for crown corp, the real owners.

by bimmer Thu Apr 13, 2017 8:35 am

assassin wrote:Not personal Waffle, just another B/S story with an element of truth and presented as if a judge ruled against a parent.

In reality the mother acts for the child, fairly normal; father brings a case which is exactly what the system wants as they can then instruct a judge to act for the owners of the child which is the crown corp.

Everyone not in the know is deceived, the judge is actually doing the right thing commercially and is acting for crown corp, the real owners.

Spot on

by **andybreck** Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:20 pm

petesomething wrote:HI waffle

no they will not tell us , why , maybe some one making money

its all about making money

by Waffle Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:33 pm

Nothing personal taken assassin, I do agree it is a BS story, concerning from the way I am viewing it. If your aware of how parents are being treated in the states for not vaccinating their, the states, children (especially in the south) well its alarming. This decision is concerning as it has potential to set a precedence here in the UK. Is it going to be the spark that lights the fire where we do not have a choice if the states children are vaccinated or not? time will tell... Doctors have voted against mandatory vaccines in the UK, the wheels are in motion, they are pushing for it, I was vaccine damaged as a child and ill for years, there are so many side effects and most arnt even reported or acknowledged even by parents as symptoms can be mild or just considered the norm and can continue right through adult hood. Doctors are putting their career on the line if they do raise concerns. If they won't/can't support us in the ways we need to be, we're f**c*ed out of our freedom of choice.

Mass human experimentation for control and money................

Some of the most sadistic stories I have read are to do with vaccines, read about Gates in India, Africa, Bauyer and their haemoglobin vaccine.

Pretty negative thread, but maybe its something thats close to my heart, its something I feel needs to be said.

by **assassin** Fri Apr 14, 2017 1:34 am

Simple solution Waffle, never register your child and it remains your property, and not the property of the state.

Certainly right about the testing and side effects and the fact it needs saying, loudly.

by Sponsored content

Vaccines win in court

Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court

Re: Vaccines win in court