Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Member of the old GET OUT OF DEBT FREE. So glad i found this site again
by Logan1989 Today at 10:35 pm

» Mercers Default Notices Are Invalid
by Kestrel Today at 9:29 pm

» 24 Storey Tower on Fire in Kensington - dies
by Awoken2 Today at 8:57 pm

» Did you have the money / use the credit?
by handle Today at 8:20 pm

» sol excalibre with cookiemonster
by Society of the Spectacle Today at 8:01 pm

» Beware of ancestry DNA websites
by jss64 Today at 6:26 pm

» Ways of protecting assets from creditors
by Jan Today at 1:31 pm

» Dr. Graham Downing 5G and A.I talk
by ditchit Today at 12:34 pm

» Threatened bankruptcy proceedings
by waylander62 Today at 12:33 pm

» Notice Of Conditional Acceptance / Promissory Notes
by pitano1 Today at 9:10 am

» PoE
by ditchit Today at 8:02 am

» Set Aside Application, Can Claimant Provide Proof Of Claim?
by Kestrel Today at 7:00 am

» Is this what Greg Hallet was talking about?
by handle Yesterday at 10:38 pm

» Hello all from new member, hoping to overcome the fear this time
by Holle Yesterday at 8:59 pm

» old man tells joke
by handle Yesterday at 12:07 pm

» Anti nano tech
by chong Yesterday at 11:31 am

» Mediation Time. How to fire off your defence?
by onak Yesterday at 6:26 am

» FOS complaints and civil proceedings
by handle Yesterday at 5:27 am

» Administration of Justice Act 1970 forbids creditors to falsely pretending to be officially authorised to collect payment
by Stevro Yesterday at 2:11 am

» CCJ circa 2013 vs Santander, now Cabot/Mortimer Clarke chasing
by hughythomas Yesterday at 1:51 am

» Cabot help
by Benjisaurus Sat Oct 13, 2018 10:31 am

» Hello to all of you
by assassin Sat Oct 13, 2018 1:21 am

» Essex & Suffolk Water
by LionsShare Fri Oct 12, 2018 4:38 pm

» Lowell threatening me Again !!
by daveiron Fri Oct 12, 2018 8:08 am

» Geopathic Stress, 5 G, Microwave Radiation Toxicity, Smart meters.
by daveiron Fri Oct 12, 2018 8:03 am

» Cabot- is there a realistic chance to fight them?
by handle Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:34 pm

» Distopian Future Documentarys,
by Society of the Spectacle Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:19 pm

» NIP - speeding with photo evidence
by daveiron Thu Oct 11, 2018 4:57 pm

» Latest Rich Planet vids Richard Hall
by daveiron Thu Oct 11, 2018 4:46 pm

» Hoist Portfolio/Howard Cohen – Letter of Claim ?
by barnwebb Wed Oct 10, 2018 8:23 pm

» Brown all CAPS window letter with "Defendant" visible!
by itheman Wed Oct 10, 2018 8:22 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Oct 10, 2018 7:34 pm

» This Is Interesting
by pitano1 Wed Oct 10, 2018 10:17 am

» Hello all members of The Community
by assassin Wed Oct 10, 2018 1:40 am

» Raconteurs with extra special guest !!
by Lopsum Tue Oct 09, 2018 9:31 pm

» Hello, new here and preparing to fight the system.
by Jacko Tue Oct 09, 2018 4:07 pm

» Reclaiming cash value for loans ive paid off in the past
by onak Tue Oct 09, 2018 1:56 am

» BT/british telecom
by mitch Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:37 pm

» Civilized Materialistic DNA vs Tribal Spiritual DNA
by Kestrel Sun Oct 07, 2018 9:23 pm

» Another noob faced with a DC
by onak Sun Oct 07, 2018 2:18 am

» Cbd Oil
by Society of the Spectacle Sat Oct 06, 2018 12:59 pm

» Police Guidelines On Bailiffs
by Kestrel Sat Oct 06, 2018 11:17 am

» PRA Group County Court Business Centre??
by waylander62 Fri Oct 05, 2018 10:08 pm

» Anti-Defamation LeagueAppoint Themselves As Official Internet Censor
by Kestrel Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:24 pm

» remedy for P.C.N/COUNCIL TAX
by unlimuni Wed Oct 03, 2018 5:52 pm

» Is it to late for the 3 letters process
by Mikeyjohn Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:57 am

» Parking Notice Download
by unlimuni Wed Oct 03, 2018 6:18 am

Moon phases


Lowells - No terms and conditions

Go down

Lowells - No terms and conditions

Post by Theatchet on Sat May 12, 2018 12:24 pm

After dealing with Lowell solicitors since the rule change in October, they have failed to provide any terms and conditions. The default notice does not contain what section of the terms have been broken either. They just seem to ignore the rules, along with your requests and questions. I have stumbled across this information what may be helpful. Anyone with more knowledge or advice would be helpful.

Regulations made under section 60(1) of the Act

Section 61 of the Consumer Credit Act stipulates that a credit agreement is not properly executed unless it contains all the prescribed terms and conforms to regulations made under section 60(1) of the Act, and is signed in the prescribed manner. Therefore, the consequence of a failure or omission to state fully and correctly any of the prescribed terms is to render the agreement improperly executed and therefore unenforceable save by order of the court. However, were an application to be made to the court, 127(3) requires the court to dismiss the application for an enforcement order. Therefore, such an agreement may be considered to be irredeemably unenforceable.

The prescribed terms for the purposes of section 61 which are set out in Schedule 6 of the Consumer Credit Act (Agreements) Regulations 1983 state that:

A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless
A document in the prescribed form, itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner; and
The document embodies all the terms of the agreement, other than implied terms; and
The document is, when presented or sent to the debtor or hirer for signature, in such a state that all its terms are readily legible.

In addition, the following must be contained:

A term stating the credit limit or the manner in which it will be determined or that there is no credit limit;
A term stating the rate of any interest on the credit to be provided under the agreement; and
A term stating how the debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the repayments, which may be expressed by reference to a combination of any of the following:
Number of repayments;
Amount of repayments;
Frequency and timing of repayments;
Dates of repayments.
The manner in which any of the above may be determined; or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable.


Theatchet
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 46
Join date : 2017-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Lowells - No terms and conditions

Post by daveiron on Sat May 12, 2018 12:46 pm

Hi Theatchet

I think that is the 1974 act . its ok for debts before 2007 .Its been superseded by the 2006 act.

Its refreshing to see some members looking at acts.

daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1190
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Lowells - No terms and conditions

Post by Theatchet on Sat May 12, 2018 2:11 pm

@daveiron wrote:Hi Theatchet

I think that is the 1974 act . its ok for debts before 2007 .Its been superseded by the 2006 act.

Its refreshing to see some members looking at acts.  

Brilliant, I thought I had found something good.
This was the bit they took out then.

15. Enforceability of regulated agreements
In section 127 of the 1974 Act (enforcement orders in cases of infringement) subsections (3) to (5) shall cease to have effect.


I've just been trying to digest some of that. It's like looking through the yellow pages.
What does that first part (1) mean. I'm well lost.


14Default notices
(1)In subsections (2) and (3) of section 88 of the 1974 Act (contents and effect of default notice) for “seven” wherever occurring substitute “ 14 ”.
(2)In subsection (4) of that section after “it” insert “ and any other prescribed matters relating to the agreement ”.
(3)After that subsection insert—
“(4A)The default notice must also include a copy of the current default information sheet under section 86A.”

My question is then, how can they enforce an agreement without,

1. The actual agreement, or copy of.

(2) The firm can reconstitute a copy. It can do this by re-populating a template of the relevant agreement form with the details of the specific agreement taken from its records. If the firm does provide a reconstituted copy, it should explain that that is what it has done, to avoid misleading the customer that this is a contemporaneous copy.

Is a digital application all that is needed for this?

2. Without the terms and conditions.


(3) The terms and conditions should be those applicable at the time the agreement was executed. The name and address at the time of execution must be included.

They are claiming that terms and conditions were agreed to online ( digital signature ) and that's why they can't send me a hard copy of them.

(4) The reconstituted agreement should contain a heading prescribed by the CCA and any relevant cancellation notice.

Not sure they have done this either.

3. Without telling you what terms have been broken in a default notice.

Theatchet
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 46
Join date : 2017-06-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Lowells - No terms and conditions

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum