Search
Latest topics
» The infamous DP continusby urchinatheart Yesterday at 3:01 pm
» Call to the DVLA
by urchinatheart Yesterday at 2:36 pm
» BEWARE OF TSB BANK
by daveiron Sun Mar 17, 2024 6:53 am
» SAR dispute
by RaspberryBlu Sat Mar 16, 2024 7:18 pm
» Help / Advice needed on ongoing neighbour harassment
by memegirl777 Sat Mar 16, 2024 5:51 pm
» United Kingdom? Really?
by assassin Sat Mar 16, 2024 4:17 pm
» DWP and HMRC alleged debts
by assassin Wed Mar 13, 2024 7:20 pm
» Serial Posty been awarded £10'000 for a fake bite
by memegirl777 Wed Mar 13, 2024 3:05 pm
» HSBC advice please.
by Trishiapp28 Wed Mar 13, 2024 7:36 am
» He is going to save us again
by flyingfish Sun Mar 10, 2024 12:00 pm
» Government fraud
by midnight Sun Mar 10, 2024 7:01 am
» THIS IS THE ONE ?
by daveiron Sun Mar 10, 2024 3:45 am
» how to remove a shareholder?
by scrwm Fri Mar 08, 2024 12:06 pm
» I DO NOT CONSENT [62%] - ReformUK got 5% of the electorate. Labour 17%
by badvoc Thu Mar 07, 2024 12:25 pm
» What can ai do about Santander
by Godfastro Thu Mar 07, 2024 11:47 am
» Useful videos Council Tax
by daveiron Tue Mar 05, 2024 10:05 pm
» broadcaster vs me
by scrwm Tue Mar 05, 2024 4:37 pm
» The new GOODF process works
by urchinatheart Tue Mar 05, 2024 10:45 am
» Worth a watch
by LionsShare Tue Mar 05, 2024 9:11 am
» Farmers IsThis What's Needed?
by LionsShare Mon Mar 04, 2024 8:46 pm
» Debt Bomb 11
by Biggiebest Sun Mar 03, 2024 10:05 pm
» accepted dca alleged debt
by Mrblue2015 Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:09 pm
» DVLA
by daveiron Fri Mar 01, 2024 9:20 pm
» Solicitors contacted me via e-mail asking for money.
by Kaddabriol Thu Feb 29, 2024 2:12 pm
» Claiming again
by LionsShare Thu Feb 29, 2024 11:07 am
» Useful Utility Vids
by LionsShare Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:59 pm
» what the bank of england runs the country?
by LionsShare Mon Feb 26, 2024 3:54 pm
» know who you are volume ??
by LionsShare Mon Feb 26, 2024 12:19 pm
» New Member
by daveiron Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:55 am
» Learning New Skills _Pt 2 Buying Tools
by assassin Mon Feb 26, 2024 4:35 am
» Learning New Skills _Pt 2 Buying Tools
by assassin Mon Feb 26, 2024 4:33 am
» Learning new Skills Part 1
by assassin Mon Feb 26, 2024 4:27 am
» General Equity?
by LionsShare Tue Feb 20, 2024 7:03 pm
» Visit by appointment notice
by Moonbabymum Tue Feb 20, 2024 4:37 pm
» Discussion on Info'd Vids
by LionsShare Tue Feb 13, 2024 11:52 am
» debts loans mortgages etc (tear off slips?)
by LionsShare Mon Feb 12, 2024 3:54 pm
» Quick one
by Lopsum Sun Feb 11, 2024 6:03 pm
» debt settlement payoff
by daveiron Sat Feb 10, 2024 10:58 pm
» Council tax and summons for arrest
by LionsShare Fri Feb 09, 2024 2:17 pm
» Council Tax (getting answers)
by LionsShare Fri Feb 09, 2024 12:57 pm
» council tax 1st of april
by daveiron Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:46 pm
» DSAR
by daveiron Sun Feb 04, 2024 9:28 pm
» Warning about a previous post
by Mrblue2015 Sat Feb 03, 2024 5:10 pm
» Please leave a comment on this site
by daveiron Fri Feb 02, 2024 10:01 pm
» Lithiun Battery Dangers
by badvoc Fri Feb 02, 2024 1:52 pm
» its a trap
by LionsShare Thu Feb 01, 2024 9:49 am
» Car In Trust
by LionsShare Tue Jan 30, 2024 3:05 pm
» Honest Nottingham Po-lice
by assassin Sat Jan 27, 2024 4:11 am
» Why you rebut a complaint
by assassin Sat Jan 27, 2024 4:05 am
» Village Winter
by assassin Sat Jan 27, 2024 4:03 am
» Sand Batteries
by assassin Tue Jan 23, 2024 5:45 pm
» Hoist Portfolio Holding Limited
by Indebttoo Mon Jan 22, 2024 11:03 pm
» Occupier
by assassin Sun Jan 21, 2024 5:27 pm
» Electric Vehicles
by assassin Sun Jan 21, 2024 4:54 pm
» *** URGENT *** PLEASE HELP
by daveiron Fri Jan 19, 2024 10:02 pm
Moon phases
Dealing With The DWP
+3
Photon
daveiron
MikeThomas
7 posters
Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Dealing With The DWP
Dealing With The DWP
I am often asked about dealing with the DWP and why I am successful in dealing with them and in this section I will deal with the basics of dealing with the DWP, the tricks they use, and how to thwart them by holding them to account by using Lawful Notices and other means, To begin we need to understand how the DWP are made up as this is crucial to understand; the DWP are the Department for Work and Pensions and are a private company and a Ministerial Department and they have a trading name of Jobcentre Plus which is another private company.
This is their first line of defence, are you dealing with the correct company? Make a complaint against the DWP when you go into a Jobcentre and you are making a complaint against the wrong company, and to the wrong company! You instantly lose.
However, when you deal with the DWP you always address them as The Department for Work and Pensions trading as Jobcentre Plus in any verbal or written exchanges as this is more powerful than most people realise and you catch both companies and a Ministerial Department. Why is this important? Because a Ministerial Department is governed by a piece of legislation called The Civil Service Code which is a set of regulations which governs the conduct of all employees working for a Ministerial Department. In many cases you will see a member of staff referring to the DWP in one sentence and in the next sentence they will refer to Jobcentre Plus and now you know why, they switch between companies to suit themselves and to confuse you so always refer to them as DWP trading as Jobcentre Plus and you catch both companies.
Everything they do centres around a contract and they give it many different names, they refer to it as a “jobseekers Agreement”, Universal Credit, and many other things but it is a contract whose conditions you and them as “parties” are bound by. Now we need to understand basic contract law, in England and Wales this is English Contract Law and as members of the EU it is also governed by European Contract Protocols and we refer to these as ECL or ECP as they are both based upon something called lex mercatoria which dates back to Roman times and roughly translates to the law of the traders.
Under ECL and ECP anyone is free to enter any contract, anyone is free to negotiate individual contract terms, and once a contract is formed only the terms and conditions at the time of signing the contract come into force, so why do you refer to it as a contract. Agreements and contracts are a legally binding set of promises and under an agreement you can enforce those promises if someone is in breach of them and once an agreement is legally enforced it becomes a contract and bound by contract law; every year the DWP trading as Jobcentre Plus legally enforce thousands of these agreements so they are a contract and this is unambiguous and irrefutable.
Benefits are classed as an “inalienable right” and this means that any inalienable right conferred upon you cannot be removed as by definition they are inalienable.
Next we need to know our contractual conditions as these determine our contractual obligations and an obligation is something “the parties” have to do to comply with in the contract in force and if it isn’t in the contract then we don’t have to do it, the only way a contract can be changed, altered or amended is with the free and express consent of both/all of the parties involved. Once a benefit claimant knows and understands the contractual conditions in force they automatically give themselves the power to take on the DWP trading as JCP.
We now need to understand free and consent and to understand this we need to that free means free of coercion and coercion can take many forms, but if any pressure is exerted upon a claimant any resulting contract becomes both void and voidable as you have not entered it through your own free will as you have been coerced into signing it against your free will.
In many cases DWP staff do a contract review, now here comes the crunch, only the parties can agree to a review and as the DWP are one party and you are the other party they need your express consent to do this and this is why they use the word WE as by complying it is assumed that the WE is referring to “the parties” and not solely the DWP trading as JCP and this is pure sleight of hand.
What if you tell them to bog off? Actually nothing as WE cannot review the contract as you are denying consent under free will which means “they” are reviewing the contract without your consent and this means no contract review can be taking place with all of the parties involved in the contract. Note that the wording is subtle and very specific so you have to be alert for this.
Void and voidable are two different terms with different meanings but in practise they mean pretty much the same thing; a void contract is a contract entered into unlawfully and cannot be enforced as by its very nature it is “void” and cannot come into force. Voidable only really differs in that it may be entered into by a benefit claimant and they may comply with conditions verbally laid down by DWP staff and therefore comply, once a claimant finds out this is unlawful and becomes aware it is unlawful they can apply “rescission” and rescind a contract and its contract terms by using a Lawful Notice of Rescission, but you do have to use this notice. What have the DWP at national level stated in the public domain:
Any contract can remain in force indefinitely
Nobody can be forced into signing a contract against their will
Nobody can be forced into signing a contract against their will
Clear proof that the DWP are fully aware of contract law applicable in the UK and their employees should also be aware of this and adhere to it, but they often do not comply and hope to cheat you.
Now we can look at several of the standard tricks they employ and the reasons they employ them, remember you need to be aware of your contract conditions as a basic premise of taking on the DWP, but you can also be very creative and introduce as much legislation as you like, and introduce some they haven’t already thought of yet.
You walk into a Jobcentre and the first question you are asked is to provide identification or photo identification, why do they ask this? They always claim data protection and this is for good reason, its reverse psychology as by using Data Protection first they assume you won’t use it, so let’s look at the Data Protection Act and see what it says.
Data processed can only be processed to perform a specific task and must not be excessive and fair and proportionate.
When you go to sign on at a Jobcentre you are only signing a “declaration” so why do the DWP require you to supply more personal information? Data harvesting. When someone claims benefits they are issued with a booklet ES40JP which only states the name and National Insurance number, and if this was sufficient to sign the declaration then asking for photo ID, bank cards, and even driving licenses is totally disproportionate and unnecessary and unlawful data processing.
Protection from Harassment goes further, it states that:
It cannot be used to prevent someone doing something they have the right to do
It cannot be used to force someone to do something they are not legally obliged to do
It cannot be used to force someone to do something they are not legally obliged to do
Oops, this is why they use this reverse psychology tactic and hope that by using it first you don’t throw it back at them as by doing so you have caught them out breaking the Data Protection Act 2018 and if you have covertly recorded them doing so you have the evidence of this breach and can use it against them. Always use it against them and ask why the ES40JP is deemed as adequate for identification when it only contains the name and NI number and inform them that they are in breach of the DPA 2018 and that it is a criminal offence for which they can be held accountable for in a court of law. I have had hours of fun with DWP staff using this legislation against them.
What does the contract say? Does it require you to bring a specific type or types of identification? If it isn’t a contractual condition it isn’t a contractual obligation, and you simply don’t have to do it, if DWP staff claim you do have to do it then they are lying and “in breach of Contract” as you have no obligation to conform to any condition which isn’t in the contract. Breach of Contract is a civil breach and you can take them to court over this.
Harassment is a different criminal issue which we will deal with later.
One of the all-time classics is with Data Protection again, we all know that the DWP trading as JCP have a legal and lawful duty to protect our personal data and one method they employ is to get all customers to enter and sit in the middle of the room and this is designed to protect personal data, the computer terminals and their staff sit at the sides of the room with their computer monitors facing the walls. Nobody can see your personal data apart from the DWP staff who are bound by the Civil Service Codes. Suddenly a security man (G4S in our area) will appear and begin walking around the room and they will often walk behind DWP staff or even lean on the wall and talk to staff and are in full view of any computer monitor and the personal data it contains; often when you enter a Jobcentre you will be met by a security man and asked for personal details about why you are there, remember they are not DWP staff of a Ministerial department and not bound by the Civil Service Code and have no business in dealing with you in any way. Here we have the DWP trading as JCP in clear breach of the data Protection Act as they have a duty to protect our personal data and have knowingly allowed a non DWP employee access to it; every Jobcentre has a Data Protection Officer whose duty it is to provide clear instructions through policies to protect our data and they have failed so find out the Data Protection Officers name and contact address and write to him/her and make a formal complaint. Ministerial Departments take this very seriously.
Due diligence is always overlooked in any Jobcentre and this is nothing more than a member of staff doing their job correctly and in most cases this would be to look at their computer and see which contract is in force and then check to see if any Amendment Instructions or Variations to Contract have been undertaken, and this will tell them what contractual obligations are in force. It will tell them if you are required to bring along identification other than that in an older contract, how many job searches you have to do in a prescribed time and any other such conditions. If they persist in trying to force you to do something you don’t have to do, or enforce a DWP policy upon you which you are not bound by then they have breached their due diligence.
Unilaterally and retrospectively are very important to understand as they are an often used trick and it works solely upon compliance, they know that the conditions in force at the time of signing a contract are the only ones which apply, and that the only way then can legally change them is to do a Variation to Contract which YOU have to agree to. Only when you have consented by signing this variation can the new conditions come into force, so they employ another trick, instead of getting you to consent to a new contractual condition legally they do it illegally and hope you will comply, in many cases people will comply.
They tell you something and say something along the lines of “we are changing our policy and from !!!!!!!” or we are making changes and if you don’t comply we can stop your benefits, or we require you to do XY and Z and hope to intimidate you into compliance; in many cases it will work as people rely upon their benefits being paid as they may have direct debits set up with other companies. If their benefits are stopped it can have such a knock on effect and put people into debt.
Therefore, unilaterally is something they try to get EVERYONE to comply with it, and retrospectively means something they try to introduce after the fact when they cannot legally or lawfully do this, it is done in this way because it leaves no evidential traces and they can simply deny it if they are questioned about it and nobody can be held liable.
Either way it is illegal and unethical and a way of trapping people, usually of low intelligence or ignorant of contract law into complying with conditions which they don’t have to comply with as they are void from the outset and cannot come into force, but if people comply they can only rescind them as a voidable contract and not as a void contract.
Verbal instructions are issued by most members of DWP staff to introduce “policies” which they claim are DWP policies; great, they are DWP policies and not yours and you are not bound by them and if you refuse to comply with them then they are stuffed and know it, this is why they try to force you to do something against your will, or coerce you.
You can enter a contract in another way and this is called “action” and is basically defined as doing something you are not actually bound to do, if you are told that your conditions have changed from doing three actions per fortnight to three actions per week and you comply with this instruction, you have entered a contract “by action” and this is why it is important to rescind this using a Notice of Rescission, its unambiguous.
In many cases they use sleight of hand again and if your contract requires you to sign on fortnightly and they tell you they are changing it to weekly, or that your contract requires you to take three actions to find work fortnightly, they will claim you now have to take three actions weekly, it is subtle and you do have to listen to what they say, and if possible, clarify their claim.
One very effective tactic I have recently introduced is “Slander and Libel” and slander is something verbally said about you which taints your character and/or is untrue, or an incorrect assumption made about you which is claimed as fact; libel is only libellous if it is written down such as them recording fraudulent claims about you on their computer systems, or even online.
Slander and libel are actually easy to prove and particularly the slanderous element as any defamatory remark can be slanderous and you can easily and readily pursue them as this is a criminal and civil offence which you can hold the individual or individuals liable for.
If you get a member of DWP staff slandering you then you can use this to your advantage, you have the option of issuing another notice which is “Opportunity to Cure” which can be very useful in getting a member of DWP staff to admit something, and by taking up your offer to “cure” in full and final settlement; they admit liability for the action they took, it can also be worked in other ways which we will look at later.
Defamation of Character is an old favourite and is classed as serious harm to your reputation and is fairly easy to achieve with the DWP and a prime example happened in my presence only weeks before writing this, while accompanying someone to the Jobcentre to deal with another issue. Someone was called to see an advisor and was not allowed to sign on because they refused to provide additional identification as they had provided the advisor with the ES40JP booklet, the advisor told them they would get their manager and she appeared and sat with them. She now claimed that he could have picked the booklet up off the street, theft, and that he could have walked into the Jobcentre and tried to claim using this booklet; so we have both theft and fraud as defined by the theft Act 1968 and fraud as defined by the Fraud Act 2006; she went further and claimed that the booklet (ES40JP) was issued by that office. This was an absurd notion as it assumed that he had stolen this booklet and was trying to make a claim which someone else would get the benefit of, why? She was asked to substantiate this claim and couldn’t and by doing this she was operating on nothing more than a hypothetical assumption, it was fantasy land.
By definition she claimed he was a thief, she claimed he was a fraudster, and she went further as she called a security guard over and by inference she suggested he was violent, he was clearly defamed by these words and actions and this was in front of other staff and customers, so plenty of witnesses.
Harassment is the daddy of them all and is defined as “a course of action which causes alarm and distress” and the emphasis is always on “the course of action” which makes it the most difficult to prove as there has to be at least two actions taken at different times and these have to be within specified timeframes which are deemed as reasonable timeframes. Precedent has shown that this can vary from 3 to 6 months between actions and this does depend upon individual circumstances and who is sitting as a Judge in the case.
Harassment can also be used for multiple claimants if the same action is taken against them and this can show a pattern of behaviour by a party or its agents or representatives and a specific course of action such as telling someone or multiple claimants that they have to unilaterally and retrospectively comply with conditions which are not laid down within their contract.
In reality it is much better to get more than two actions and if you can get several more it can be used to show an inherent problem within the DWP trading as JCP and if you can get them over a longer period it confirms a pattern of behaviour which can often sway a Police report and a CPS decision to prosecute.
Harassment is a criminal matter and can be reported to the Po-lice and in most cases they will side with the DWP and make their escape by claiming things such as “insufficient evidence” which basically means they won’t bother investigating it, or they don’t think its worth investigating as the CPS won’t pursue it, more lies. They may get creative with their lies and claim many things, but the duty of the po-lice is to investigate impartially and submit the evidence to the CPS upon which the CPS will make the decision based upon the evidence; it is not the job of the po-lice to speak on behalf of, or for the CPS or make decisions for them, if the po-lice claim such things then report them for failing in their duties. If you get the Po-lice to prosecute the DWP will roll over and try to buy their way out of it as it will be cheaper to compensate you than face a court case with its associated costs, or; you can bring your own case against the DWP.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3547
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
LionsShare, MikeThomas, Biggiebest and Moonbabymum like this post
Re: Dealing With The DWP
WOW!!! Thanks Assassin A brilliant read.
MikeThomas- Not so newb
- Posts : 57
Join date : 2017-05-01
Re: Dealing With The DWP
Wait for the next part.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3547
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
Re: Dealing With The DWP
Because Assassin has won a court case against the DWP and the DWP are ignoring the judgement and subsequent correspondence about this matter and it is being put back to the High Court for enforcement and is being dealt with as we speak and cannot be commented upon just yet.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3547
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
Sharpysparky likes this post
Re: Dealing With The DWP
Very simply because the often breach of contract is ignored where the DWP try to retrospectively apply contractual conditions to your contract and in law they cannot come into force but they act as if they can and that is an instant win against them. Secondly their is procedural impropriety and this is very common as the Lower Tier Tribunal are part of HMCTS which are one company and the DWP are another company and always find for the DWP and their staff boast about the lower tier trubunal finding for them and procedural impropriety is an instant win for you as the DWP haven't followed their own procedures which are often bound in law. Next we have GDPR 2018 and this requires the DWP as data processors and controllers to protect your private and personal data while having site security men walking around live computers and viewing your personal data, they are NON DWP personnel and are there only to protect the building and check doors and windows and nothing more. Often they challenge people going in and ask why they are there and they have absolutely no authority to speak to anyone let alone demand to know why they are there and it gets better when they try to throw you out, they cannot do this as it is a public space in a public building and you can go and take your lunch and eat it if you like, I have. One such mug ried throwing me out and threatened to hurt me, one problem there as I am former mad rugby playing 18 stone hooligan and as soon as he touched me he went flying straight through a window and was evicted by me while I defended myself from his unlawful assault and he hasn't worked since.
None of these cases are my cases, they are cases I am dealing with for others and if I put all the corrupt practices iI have witnessed in a book it would be a best seller, talk is cheap and actions are lucrative against the DWP as I can claim my expenses and costs so I do, when I go into a local Jobcentre the staff normally try and hide.
None of these cases are my cases, they are cases I am dealing with for others and if I put all the corrupt practices iI have witnessed in a book it would be a best seller, talk is cheap and actions are lucrative against the DWP as I can claim my expenses and costs so I do, when I go into a local Jobcentre the staff normally try and hide.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3547
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
Sharpysparky likes this post
Re: Dealing With The DWP
You need to understand the basics first and this begins and ends with the contract, then you have to understand English Contract Law and finally you need to stick up for your rights and not fall for their fraudulent claims and hold them to account both individually and as public servants.
First and foremost you need to understand that security are contract companies and the favourites are G4skins and similar and they are NOT DWP staff and have absolutely no rights legally or lawfully to make contact with you as they are only there to secure the building such as checking doors and windows and NOTHING ELSE but they regularly wander around the JC and get behind staff and can see yours or others personal details and you need to report any such actions immediately and put in a FOI request for their camera footage as this is an instant breach of GDPR 2018. As both data handlers and processors the DWP staff are responsible in law for the security of your private data and this responsibility cannot be mitigated, secondly if they try to issue orders they cannot unless you consent either verbally or by action and they commit the common law (and indictible offence) of trespass in your private business with the DWP and you can arrest them for an indictible offence and if they verbally abuse you its Battery.
Do they confront me? not often but you always get a few who are narcicists and believe because they have been in the forces they are invincible, right up to the point where they lay hands on be and I lawfully defend myself and they lose. Security guards are NOT there to create or handle conflict as this is the responsibility of the JC staff and not contract security guards who actually have less power than a flat battery but who like to present an image of having some power because they wear a clowns uniform, they have none.
I would suggest doing some reading and your first document is the Jobseekers Charter followed by the Civil Service Code and then the Nolan Principles and then read up on English Contract Law.
Everytime you see something wrong then report it, not to the JC itself as they cover it up, but to the higher levels and demand a response, this then becomes your evidence and over time you get a feel for their unlawful tactics and ignoring something is a regular tactic and if they ignore it long enough they hope you will go away. The DWP Minister tried ignoring me and she was reported to the Parliamentary Standards Committee and is currently being investigated and she suddenly started offering me money in full and final settlement, it isn't about money as this is about criminal acts by her staff. She will sack them and report their crimes to the police and if she doesn't I will bring large claims against the individuals involved, what they dont know is that this was covertly filmed with audio and I have the footage as evidence.
First and foremost you need to understand that security are contract companies and the favourites are G4skins and similar and they are NOT DWP staff and have absolutely no rights legally or lawfully to make contact with you as they are only there to secure the building such as checking doors and windows and NOTHING ELSE but they regularly wander around the JC and get behind staff and can see yours or others personal details and you need to report any such actions immediately and put in a FOI request for their camera footage as this is an instant breach of GDPR 2018. As both data handlers and processors the DWP staff are responsible in law for the security of your private data and this responsibility cannot be mitigated, secondly if they try to issue orders they cannot unless you consent either verbally or by action and they commit the common law (and indictible offence) of trespass in your private business with the DWP and you can arrest them for an indictible offence and if they verbally abuse you its Battery.
Do they confront me? not often but you always get a few who are narcicists and believe because they have been in the forces they are invincible, right up to the point where they lay hands on be and I lawfully defend myself and they lose. Security guards are NOT there to create or handle conflict as this is the responsibility of the JC staff and not contract security guards who actually have less power than a flat battery but who like to present an image of having some power because they wear a clowns uniform, they have none.
I would suggest doing some reading and your first document is the Jobseekers Charter followed by the Civil Service Code and then the Nolan Principles and then read up on English Contract Law.
Everytime you see something wrong then report it, not to the JC itself as they cover it up, but to the higher levels and demand a response, this then becomes your evidence and over time you get a feel for their unlawful tactics and ignoring something is a regular tactic and if they ignore it long enough they hope you will go away. The DWP Minister tried ignoring me and she was reported to the Parliamentary Standards Committee and is currently being investigated and she suddenly started offering me money in full and final settlement, it isn't about money as this is about criminal acts by her staff. She will sack them and report their crimes to the police and if she doesn't I will bring large claims against the individuals involved, what they dont know is that this was covertly filmed with audio and I have the footage as evidence.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3547
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
Sharpysparky likes this post
Re: Dealing With The DWP
assassin wrote:Very simply because the often breach of contract is ignored where the DWP try to retrospectively apply contractual conditions to your contract and in law they cannot come into force but they act as if they can and that is an instant win against them. Secondly their is procedural impropriety and this is very common as the Lower Tier Tribunal are part of HMCTS which are one company and the DWP are another company and always find for the DWP and their staff boast about the lower tier trubunal finding for them and procedural impropriety is an instant win for you as the DWP haven't followed their own procedures which are often bound in law. Next we have GDPR 2018 and this requires the DWP as data processors and controllers to protect your private and personal data while having site security men walking around live computers and viewing your personal data, they are NON DWP personnel and are there only to protect the building and check doors and windows and nothing more. Often they challenge people going in and ask why they are there and they have absolutely no authority to speak to anyone let alone demand to know why they are there and it gets better when they try to throw you out, they cannot do this as it is a public space in a public building and you can go and take your lunch and eat it if you like, I have. One such mug ried throwing me out and threatened to hurt me, one problem there as I am former mad rugby playing 18 stone hooligan and as soon as he touched me he went flying straight through a window and was evicted by me while I defended myself from his unlawful assault and he hasn't worked since.
None of these cases are my cases, they are cases I am dealing with for others and if I put all the corrupt practices iI have witnessed in a book it would be a best seller, talk is cheap and actions are lucrative against the DWP as I can claim my expenses and costs so I do, when I go into a local Jobcentre the staff normally try and hide.
So the user name is quite apt lol, would love to have been a fly on the wall for that one
Sharpysparky- Very helpful
- Posts : 303
Join date : 2018-05-30
Re: Dealing With The DWP
Just a suggestion or two, Have you considered sending a DSAR ?
Asking for all documentation or records howsoever held relating to you and
your claim. You also require documentation containing the name of the
wo/man who made any decision relating to you and your claim along with
the reasons for those decisions.
Additionally ask if the DWP is operating within a trust ,if so are they acting
as trustees, and as you are a tax payer and a contributor via NI payments
are you the settlor and benificiary of the trust.
Just a couple of thoughts ,others may have some as well.
Asking for all documentation or records howsoever held relating to you and
your claim. You also require documentation containing the name of the
wo/man who made any decision relating to you and your claim along with
the reasons for those decisions.
Additionally ask if the DWP is operating within a trust ,if so are they acting
as trustees, and as you are a tax payer and a contributor via NI payments
are you the settlor and benificiary of the trust.
Just a couple of thoughts ,others may have some as well.
daveiron- Admin
- Posts : 4892
Join date : 2017-01-17
Re: Dealing With The DWP
Just a couple of points to consider, firstly benefits are an inalienable right so protected by Common Law and cannot be removed, secondly they cannot switch you over to another benefit without YOUR consent and if they do this without your consent this is retrospectively applying contractual conditions and these cannot come into force, so they are acting illegally.
I am fully aware of the medicals and have attended several with other people and I know their tricks where they place the toilets at the other end of the building and they have CCTV and if someone struggles to walk there they use the CCTV as evidence to suspend their claim and their frauds in filling in paperwork. In many cases they had a tickbox and chose an option so they dont have to record a claimants answers and boy did I have fun with this, they gave the claimant options and the claimant ignored them and gave her own answers and she said there wasn't an option for this so I told her to cross the options out and write her answer in and make a note the tickbox didn't cover her condition.
I photographed the form without there knowledge and a couple of weeks later I was there with another claimant and the same woman tried the same thing and again I told her to record her answers and ignore the inappropriate options and she got stroppy and claimed she was disabled herself and struggled to walk and said she was struggling at that time. She thought she caught us out and ran out after us, outside the building and chased me up the road and I got this on camera, I also requested the CCTV footage of the streets and inside this building and it was revealing.
Allegedly she couldn't walk more than 15M yet ran for 220M according to the CCTV footage and suddenly she was my focus and was sacked from work for defrauding the benefits system and falsifying her medical evidence and boy did she squeal, she received £80 in bonuses over and above her salary and she suspended an average 80% of all disabled claimants. I did the foundation work for the following claims against the DWP bought in the High Court and every disabled assessment was reviewed by the High Court and 70% of the cases decisions were overturned in favour of the claimant.
I am fully aware of the medicals and have attended several with other people and I know their tricks where they place the toilets at the other end of the building and they have CCTV and if someone struggles to walk there they use the CCTV as evidence to suspend their claim and their frauds in filling in paperwork. In many cases they had a tickbox and chose an option so they dont have to record a claimants answers and boy did I have fun with this, they gave the claimant options and the claimant ignored them and gave her own answers and she said there wasn't an option for this so I told her to cross the options out and write her answer in and make a note the tickbox didn't cover her condition.
I photographed the form without there knowledge and a couple of weeks later I was there with another claimant and the same woman tried the same thing and again I told her to record her answers and ignore the inappropriate options and she got stroppy and claimed she was disabled herself and struggled to walk and said she was struggling at that time. She thought she caught us out and ran out after us, outside the building and chased me up the road and I got this on camera, I also requested the CCTV footage of the streets and inside this building and it was revealing.
Allegedly she couldn't walk more than 15M yet ran for 220M according to the CCTV footage and suddenly she was my focus and was sacked from work for defrauding the benefits system and falsifying her medical evidence and boy did she squeal, she received £80 in bonuses over and above her salary and she suspended an average 80% of all disabled claimants. I did the foundation work for the following claims against the DWP bought in the High Court and every disabled assessment was reviewed by the High Court and 70% of the cases decisions were overturned in favour of the claimant.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3547
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
daveiron, MikeThomas and Sharpysparky like this post
Re: Dealing With The DWP
I would again refer you to a DSAR, .Without the info it should contain
you will not be able to proceed.
you will not be able to proceed.
daveiron- Admin
- Posts : 4892
Join date : 2017-01-17
Re: Dealing With The DWP
Just to clarify ,Without all the relevant documents you will be unable to
move foreward should you wish to attempt any claim or challenge.
For the documents ,you will need to submit a DSAR .
All you need to supply is name & address.To narrow things down a bit
just request documents from and to the dates you require.
Its a very simple process ,just write and request the ALL information
they have.
move foreward should you wish to attempt any claim or challenge.
For the documents ,you will need to submit a DSAR .
All you need to supply is name & address.To narrow things down a bit
just request documents from and to the dates you require.
Its a very simple process ,just write and request the ALL information
they have.
daveiron- Admin
- Posts : 4892
Join date : 2017-01-17
assassin likes this post
Re: Dealing With The DWP
They will also try to withold documents which incriminate themselves or will alter or amend some so always be aware of this and highlight areas which do not contain facts and are based solely upon an employees opinions as they are devoid of facts.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3547
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
Re: Dealing With The DWP
Ok, we appear to be getting nowhere. Unless and until you begin to
comprehend how things really work as opposed to your current beliefs.
This link is an old one but its as correct today as it was then ;
Watch it as many times as you need until you comprehend,then many
subjects on this and other sites will become clear.
comprehend how things really work as opposed to your current beliefs.
This link is an old one but its as correct today as it was then ;
Watch it as many times as you need until you comprehend,then many
subjects on this and other sites will become clear.
daveiron- Admin
- Posts : 4892
Join date : 2017-01-17
assassin, LionsShare, freeland and Sharpysparky like this post
Re: Dealing With The DWP
Quite clearly you are looking to create issues and not read and absorb what has been written and you clearly have not read what I have suggested but still you try to argue moot points instead of trying to understand them and you are still looking to play them in their system and you will lose. Until you take them out of their fraudulent system you will lose and once you take them on under the true law you will lose.
Instead pf posting War and peace type posts and flip flopping from one thing to another I would suggest focusing on the basics and getting it right, and instead of insinuating people are making fraudulent claims, or that it is somewhat different because they may or may not have been in that situation is somehow different because it isn't and trying to constantly undermine posts is something a troll would do.
Instead pf posting War and peace type posts and flip flopping from one thing to another I would suggest focusing on the basics and getting it right, and instead of insinuating people are making fraudulent claims, or that it is somewhat different because they may or may not have been in that situation is somehow different because it isn't and trying to constantly undermine posts is something a troll would do.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3547
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
Sharpysparky likes this post
Re: Dealing With The DWP
Assassin, theses were my thoughts exactly, the jumping from pillar to post and coming up with mile long post, is as if it were someone on the ‘other side’ trying to gain information, and just ‘noting’ comments and not doing something constructive with them made me very very dubious, well said Assassin
Sharpysparky- Very helpful
- Posts : 303
Join date : 2018-05-30
daveiron, assassin and Mrblue2015 like this post
Re: Dealing With The DWP
Thank you SS.
assassin- Admin
- Posts : 3547
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» Dealing with SSE
» My way of dealing with DCA
» when dealing with UTILITIES or any other........
» Dealing With TV Licensing
» DWP Dealing with Jobcentres
» My way of dealing with DCA
» when dealing with UTILITIES or any other........
» Dealing With TV Licensing
» DWP Dealing with Jobcentres
Page 1 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum
|
|