Treason May or Peter of England

by **daveiron** Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:22 am

It now seems PoE wants to run the country.
I think he really believes that having let people down with WeRe Bank ,they are now going to vote for his cause.
Although i would hazard a guess that most who signed up for WeRe Bank will not be on the electoral roll.

tre

by **LionsShare** Wed Sep 12, 2018 5:06 pm

I will agree with some of & the overall centiament with what he says but...

As I think no single or independent has ever got the PM job, what does POE think he is acheiving?

by **Society of the Spectacle** Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:40 pm

Comments turned off ?
Shame , it wouldve been a laugh to see what type of comments he got.

By the Way , if someone is looking for Him he is in
Stoke on Trent,
https://www.google.com/maps/@53.0124767,-2.2240414,3a,15y,282.13h,86.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXzW8bJlOS5KXKNUZYHNu5A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

by Tvarred Thu Sep 13, 2018 4:18 pm

Society of the Spectacle wrote:Comments turned off ?

By the Way , if someone is looking for Him he is in
Stoke on Trent,
https://www.google.com/maps/@53.0124767,-2.2240414,3a,15y,282.13h,86.08t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sXzW8bJlOS5KXKNUZYHNu5A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

Close enough SOTS, its actually Newcastle, Staffs. Seems to be where he's been for an age.

by handle Sun Sep 16, 2018 5:00 pm

Don’t knock this guy. Support him.

He is on the right track and no different to our own complaints about the existing fake system.

Were Bank was not a stupid idea. Clive Sinclair was ahead of his time with the c5, but what a great idea it was.

The issue with a group like us is when we try to attack like minded members who are trying to do something. Even if he did charge a small sum for cheques that could take off, its peanuts recovery to change a system. He’s got to live on something. At least he is transparent

by **daveiron** Sun Sep 16, 2018 6:53 pm

Sorry handle I cannot agree. Many of us traveled up to Nottingham for his meetings & we all made decisions with our eyes open. The monthly subscription was never an issue. We saw what he was trying to achieve and gave our support.
The problem was the promised support from him never came.
We were promised access to Freeman Legal Services ,that never happened .
I only made one payment with a WeRe cheque ,as a test run if you like.
I payed my CT with it ,when the councils bank refused it ,the council attempted to contact PoE for advice on how to accept it,
the response they got was no response ,they were unable to contact him. I have no doubt that is true as I was unable to contact WeRe bank myself. He set up a forum on the bank site ,many were asking for advice & at no time did he post a single word there.
It was never going to be plain sailing to start with, but we were prepared to back him. He must have been aware there would be issues but instead of addressing them he chose to ignore them. I presume WeRe Bank is still in existance ,maybe he should devote his time getting that to work.
I do however wish him well in his endeavors.

by handle Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:14 am

Thanks daveiron and I appreciate your honesty as always.
I have seen Peter struggling and he did phone a council for me and spoke to the police at allegations about him were made to me. He also addressed the financial Ombudsman and they retracted comments they made.
I can see not everyone saw a response from him but he was struggling with the sheet load and magnitude of his proposals and changes.
I am quite a good judge of character and work in it systems - he is a very intelligent chap and works at a very advanced level.

by **Society of the Spectacle** Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:15 pm

handle wrote:Thanks daveiron and I appreciate your honesty as always.
I have seen Peter struggling and he did phone a council for me and spoke to the police at allegations about him were made to me. He also addressed the financial Ombudsman and they retracted comments they made.
I can see not everyone saw a response from him but he was struggling with the sheet load and magnitude of his proposals and changes.
I am quite a good judge of character and work in it systems - he is a very intelligent chap and works at a very advanced level.

he is a very intelligent chap and works at a very advanced level.

would that be the 33rd degree.

by handle Tue Sep 18, 2018 3:30 pm

okeeey SOTS what don't I know?

by **Society of the Spectacle** Tue Sep 18, 2018 3:58 pm

That when the time comes,
Peter has a lawful right to take peoples homes.
That some with an equal power to Judge character ,
think peter is a cheap Fraudster.
That his modus operandi has always been to introduce his scams with a predictable diatribe against the states corruption ,
not failing to bring up the spectre of Jimmy Saville.
( Ive seen the same trick pulled by many others )
He is using an Idiot board to read his script.
( very apt )
He wants a REGISTER of freeman types ,
Very handy for the authorities.

Peace.

by handle Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:36 pm

got it, but having a lawful right to take homes is difficult when the law doesn't even recognise him.

by **assassin** Wed Sep 19, 2018 1:31 am

But it will recognise paperwork and if it is submitted before a court they will accept it as courts work only on paperwork, recognising him is something of a misnomer as no court recognises anyone irrespective of whether they are an individual, corporation, or anything else and this is why they have their own language such as plaintiff, defendant, and many more, and that they only use terms such as plaintiff or defendant in court and never an individuals or corporations actual name.

by Sponsored content

Treason May or Peter of England

Treason May or Peter of England

Re: Treason May or Peter of England

Re: Treason May or Peter of England

Re: Treason May or Peter of England

Re: Treason May or Peter of England

Re: Treason May or Peter of England

Re: Treason May or Peter of England

Re: Treason May or Peter of England

Re: Treason May or Peter of England

Re: Treason May or Peter of England

Re: Treason May or Peter of England

Re: Treason May or Peter of England

Re: Treason May or Peter of England