Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Lowell threatening me Again !!
by waylander62 Yesterday at 8:57 pm

» justinian deception
by Ausk Yesterday at 10:19 am

» Intrum Finance letter advice please.
by Mrblue2017 Yesterday at 7:33 am

» I dont think so
by Phillpots Yesterday at 12:57 am

» Tudors and Druids
by Phillpots Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:39 pm

» Peter of England in France
by Phillpots Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:25 pm

» sol excalibre with cookiemonster
by Society of the Spectacle Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:26 pm

» income expenditure
by projectzoo Mon Dec 17, 2018 6:45 pm

» Company bosses to be held responsible for nuisance calls with £500,000 fines
by Mrblue2017 Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:05 am

» Collection order
by Ausk Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:02 am

» council tax
by Phillpots Sun Dec 16, 2018 7:16 pm

» New to this place
by assassin Sat Dec 15, 2018 1:19 am

» Latest from CrimeBodge
by Phillpots Fri Dec 14, 2018 8:35 pm

» Equita not very good at bluffing
by ethicsboy Fri Dec 14, 2018 3:13 pm

» Port! A word worth considering
by Phillpots Thu Dec 13, 2018 11:17 pm

» 5G & Smart Meters
by flyingfish Thu Dec 13, 2018 8:09 pm

» Police officer who raped 13-year-old girl jailed for 25 years
by midnight Thu Dec 13, 2018 6:47 pm

» List of the lord lieutenants of the United Kingdom
by Phillpots Thu Dec 13, 2018 4:21 pm

» Dr Michael Mosley
by assassin Thu Dec 13, 2018 2:07 pm

» Are you a mug or a Mancunian?
by Lopsum Thu Dec 13, 2018 1:55 pm

» Some very damning whistleblowing
by Awoken2 Thu Dec 13, 2018 11:04 am

» Reality chat , every wednesday at 8pm (ish)
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Dec 12, 2018 8:02 pm

» What the hell is 'ableism'
by Phillpots Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:42 pm

» stupid thing
by projectzoo Wed Dec 12, 2018 2:41 pm

» Dire Consequences Of Debt
by assassin Wed Dec 12, 2018 2:25 am

» Litter fines set to QUADRUPLE: Rubbish louts now face £150 on the spot penalty https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=olkdZeBWOhc
by Society of the Spectacle Tue Dec 11, 2018 7:17 pm

» Real Begging
by LionsShare Tue Dec 11, 2018 5:05 pm

» Cookies Show and Related Topics.
by Society of the Spectacle Tue Dec 11, 2018 2:44 pm

» More Recycling
by assassin Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:39 am

» Stop The Debt Threat Letters
by Mrblue2017 Mon Dec 10, 2018 11:44 pm

» Brown all CAPS window letter with "Defendant" visible!
by waylander62 Mon Dec 10, 2018 10:21 pm

» Robinson Way
by Killuminati Mon Dec 10, 2018 1:10 pm

» Dam funny
by assassin Mon Dec 10, 2018 2:17 am

» Funny Old World
by Phillpots Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:03 pm

» List of shrievalties
by Phillpots Sat Dec 08, 2018 5:01 pm

» Transcash - the death of
by LionsShare Sat Dec 08, 2018 3:45 pm

» 3 letter process
by Mrblue2017 Thu Dec 06, 2018 4:43 pm

» Warning To Site Members On Benefits
by assassin Thu Dec 06, 2018 2:13 am

» R.N.
by eargoggles Wed Dec 05, 2018 11:48 pm

» ceo of banks
by Mrblue2017 Wed Dec 05, 2018 8:25 pm

» Hiv talk ( lots of immune supporting info in this ) slides and 200 references, with quoted research and links
by Theatchet Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:25 pm

» Bladder cancer talk, slides with references, with quoted research and links
by Theatchet Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:23 pm

» Lung cancer talk, slides and references, with quoted research and links
by Theatchet Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:21 pm

» Prostate/ Prostate cancer talk, slides and references ( must watch ) with quoted research and links
by Theatchet Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:16 pm

» Breast cancer talk, slides and references for the talk, with quoted research and links
by Theatchet Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:13 pm

» Alzheimers and Dementia Talk, with all the slides and references, with quoted research and links
by Theatchet Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:10 pm

» Durham Police Get Back What They Dish Out
by assassin Wed Dec 05, 2018 7:10 pm

Moon phases


Lesson on “Proof of Claim”

Go down

Lesson on “Proof of Claim”

Post by Ausk on Mon Nov 12, 2018 7:25 am

Lesson on “Proof of Claim”

This makes sense to me.

Published August 16, 2012 | By understand contract-law and you win.

Creditors in Commerce teachings are clear about this:   When it comes to getting your remedy in any situation where a claim is being made against you, your power lies in turning the claim upon the claimant. In arguing, defending, and/or ignoring no remedy is to be found.
Brandon Adams from Creditors in Commerce taught me this valuable lesson through his recordings and workshops.  The way we bring resolution and remedy to the matter is by being in harmony with the claimant, by accepting their position but with our own conditions attached. And we do this by asking a question, by conditionally accepting. This is also known as a counteroffer. And this is very important, because a counteroffer has the legal effect of rejecting the offer.
A contract is in motion, offer and counteroffer is taking place until an agreement is made. An agreement made, that is either expressed or implied such as through silence/ non-response, also called tacit acquiescence. In order that we do not acquiesce and depose our selves of our sovereign status, we conditionally accept the claim, upon proof of claim.
If we are offered something like jail for instance, and if we can stop ourselves from going into freak out mode or argue mode, we might recognize that this is just an offer. We are being offered jail, someone is offering us an opportunity to be “corrected” by the correctional facility, and if we do not say otherwise then we’ve tacitly agreed to the same. Some of us do not say otherwise even when we have been invited to. For example, `allocution is where the judge asks you if you have anything to say before he passes sentence on you. In that moment you are being extended the opportunity to tell the court why it should not proceed against you. If you say nothing then its presumed you are in agreement with the allegations or claims. In staying silent we lose, we are in dishonor.
In arguing or defending we lose. Think about it, if you argue about someone’s unsubstantiated claims against you; are you not bringing those claims to life and handling them as if they are real? What are you defending against exactly?  In reality we are defending against someone else’s version or story about us. This takes up a lot of our energy, puts us into dishonor, and doesn’t usually produce the results we are looking for.
In the counter offer or conditional acceptance; our energies can be directed differently to accept their position, accept their claim, upon proof of claim in the form of a sworn statement made under penalty of perjury. In essence you are saying, ‘I honor your position all I’m asking for is proof, bring some verified evidence, prove your claim.’ This puts the burden of proof upon the one making the claims. If this party does not bring any substance to what they are saying, any proof to back up their claim then all we are dealing with is allegations…meaningless statements, unsubstantiated declarations that do not qualify as verified statements.
So we need not argue another’s claim. We can make it easier for our selves by flipping it around and letting them bring their substance behind their claim. When we ask for a verified statement we are asking the claimant to substantiate their claim by oath or affidavit, we are asking them to swear to the truth of their statements. We are asking for the proof of claim. In the public, there has never been a claim against anyone that had anything of substance behind it.
For example, the PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK or any other state is a corporation.
This corporation cannot make sworn statements for it is a fictional entity, it is not a living thinking being, it is a fiction and has no substance to it. So where then is the real party in interest, the one making claim against you? No where to be found, there is no one. Without a sworn statement the unverified declarations of a claimant do not stand as evidence anywhere. Instead of automatically answering questions and accepting allegations without proof, we can stand in our power and bring harmony to the situation. As a creditor; your not concerned with being right and proving another wrong, on the contrary, you are acting as an ambassador of peace, an agent of resolution who looks to bring settlement and who works to resolve the issue.
https://shazereverquar.wordpress.com/2015/07/01/creditors-in-commerce-receive-stiff-prison-sentences/

Creditors In Commerce Sentenced To Prison
Posted on July 1, 2015 by SHAZER EVERQUAR
Fallen Upon Hard Times
Brandon Alexander Adams
“The two guiding lights of Creditors in Commerce are now fallen stars and have been convicted and sentenced to hard time in a federal penitentiary.
On June 15th, 2015, Brandon Alexander Adams received a 40-month prison sentence.  The following day, Gordon Leroy Hall was hammered with a stiff term of eight years.?

Ausk Comment: - This tells me that what these Creditors in Commerce people are saying highly likely to be true because the system does not like being taken down. Those in power tend to go after the leaders of movements that threathen the status quo because they know that when the followers see the leaders of movements being proven right, then the followers will start treading that same path.
This is exactly what the powers that should not be, fear the most and as always they take out the leadership to stem the flow of damage, actual or potential, to themselves.

http://understandcontractlawandyouwin.com/creditors-in-commerce/

Ausk
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 447
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum