Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Cabot- is there a realistic chance to fight them?
by annap Today at 4:49 pm

» Clarity and History - Common Law vs Statutes | Banking Fraud | Words | Magna Carta
by itheman Today at 4:10 pm

» 5G AND it's implications | WOW it is scary and can't be allowed
by itheman Today at 3:48 pm

» Legal advice, from a court?
by itheman Today at 2:54 pm

» E on Lowells advice
by ohthejoys Today at 12:44 pm

» Drydensfairfax Soliciitors - Statute Barred?
by waylander62 Today at 11:19 am

» Richplanet Premier
by daveiron Today at 8:44 am

» Trainee benifit clerk jailed.
by assassin Today at 1:45 am

» CABOT filed CCJ application despite 3-letter process
by waylander62 Yesterday at 1:31 pm

» Emma's Westminster Hall bailiffs speech 09 01 2019
by Kestrel Yesterday at 10:37 am

» New to forum
by Sc001 Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:00 pm

» Conditional Acceptance and Remain in Honour, Counterclaim...but when?
by itheman Thu Feb 14, 2019 9:10 pm

» Liability Order in Respect of Council Tax....
by itheman Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:56 pm

» Mexican Scientists Find a CURE for HPV
by Kestrel Thu Feb 14, 2019 7:09 pm

» Intrum Finance letter advice please.
by Ithesoul Thu Feb 14, 2019 2:20 pm

» old married name on debt purchase letter
by Ausk Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:32 am

» Debt Collectors
by waylander62 Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:22 am

» More Disinformation
by assassin Thu Feb 14, 2019 1:25 am

» notice of assignment
by FURBY Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:37 pm

» 3 letter process
by projectzoo Wed Feb 13, 2019 9:24 pm

» More Smart Meter - The New Scam
by daveiron Wed Feb 13, 2019 7:44 pm

» Reality chat , every wednesday at 8pm (ish)
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Feb 13, 2019 7:29 pm

» Latest from CrimeBodge
by Kestrel Wed Feb 13, 2019 3:32 pm

» Ccj help
by daveiron Wed Feb 13, 2019 12:14 pm

» Types of Baliffs
by assassin Wed Feb 13, 2019 1:15 am

» NIP - speeding with photo evidence
by midnight Tue Feb 12, 2019 11:32 pm

» Merligen investments Ltd: Moriarty law
by waylander62 Tue Feb 12, 2019 5:14 pm

» Repeat after me "Britain is not a police state" - honest....
by daveiron Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:14 am

» Moriarty Law
by petesomething Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:44 pm

» GOODF ebook
by unlimuni Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:23 pm

» sol excalibre with cookiemonster
by Society of the Spectacle Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:24 pm

» AA loan
by Mrblue2017 Mon Feb 11, 2019 10:33 am

» Ceylon on debts, courts & corruption
by Mrblue2017 Sun Feb 10, 2019 9:27 pm

» fiduciary responsibility
by assassin Sun Feb 10, 2019 6:35 pm

» how long can you hold your breath?
by LionsShare Sun Feb 10, 2019 1:19 pm

» Nursing Fraud
by assassin Sun Feb 10, 2019 3:01 am

» EU Tactics Project Fear
by assassin Sun Feb 10, 2019 2:56 am

» Another Newbie
by assassin Sun Feb 10, 2019 2:51 am

» If Gov. breaks oath of office, do they still hold authority over us?
by assassin Sun Feb 10, 2019 2:46 am

» Wrong Account Numbers in Court Claim
by Kestrel Sat Feb 09, 2019 4:34 pm

» PPI - Could claiming jeopardise the 3 letter system? FREE PPI claim
by itheman Fri Feb 08, 2019 11:39 pm

» Lantern Debt Recovery
by sam Fri Feb 08, 2019 5:40 pm

» how to SAFELY get your own back on Big Brother)
by pitano1 Fri Feb 08, 2019 1:37 pm

» SAR template
by Ausk Fri Feb 08, 2019 8:58 am

» Has ESTOPPEL letter changed?
by Lopsum Thu Feb 07, 2019 9:11 pm

» 2 New letters received from DCA acting as agents on behalf of client- Please Advise
by daveiron Thu Feb 07, 2019 1:01 pm

» Extreane harrasment - police doing nothing at all
by assassin Thu Feb 07, 2019 1:47 am

Moon phases


Lesson on “Proof of Claim”

Go down

Lesson on “Proof of Claim”

Post by Ausk on Mon Nov 12, 2018 7:25 am

Lesson on “Proof of Claim”

This makes sense to me.

Published August 16, 2012 | By understand contract-law and you win.

Creditors in Commerce teachings are clear about this:   When it comes to getting your remedy in any situation where a claim is being made against you, your power lies in turning the claim upon the claimant. In arguing, defending, and/or ignoring no remedy is to be found.
Brandon Adams from Creditors in Commerce taught me this valuable lesson through his recordings and workshops.  The way we bring resolution and remedy to the matter is by being in harmony with the claimant, by accepting their position but with our own conditions attached. And we do this by asking a question, by conditionally accepting. This is also known as a counteroffer. And this is very important, because a counteroffer has the legal effect of rejecting the offer.
A contract is in motion, offer and counteroffer is taking place until an agreement is made. An agreement made, that is either expressed or implied such as through silence/ non-response, also called tacit acquiescence. In order that we do not acquiesce and depose our selves of our sovereign status, we conditionally accept the claim, upon proof of claim.
If we are offered something like jail for instance, and if we can stop ourselves from going into freak out mode or argue mode, we might recognize that this is just an offer. We are being offered jail, someone is offering us an opportunity to be “corrected” by the correctional facility, and if we do not say otherwise then we’ve tacitly agreed to the same. Some of us do not say otherwise even when we have been invited to. For example, `allocution is where the judge asks you if you have anything to say before he passes sentence on you. In that moment you are being extended the opportunity to tell the court why it should not proceed against you. If you say nothing then its presumed you are in agreement with the allegations or claims. In staying silent we lose, we are in dishonor.
In arguing or defending we lose. Think about it, if you argue about someone’s unsubstantiated claims against you; are you not bringing those claims to life and handling them as if they are real? What are you defending against exactly?  In reality we are defending against someone else’s version or story about us. This takes up a lot of our energy, puts us into dishonor, and doesn’t usually produce the results we are looking for.
In the counter offer or conditional acceptance; our energies can be directed differently to accept their position, accept their claim, upon proof of claim in the form of a sworn statement made under penalty of perjury. In essence you are saying, ‘I honor your position all I’m asking for is proof, bring some verified evidence, prove your claim.’ This puts the burden of proof upon the one making the claims. If this party does not bring any substance to what they are saying, any proof to back up their claim then all we are dealing with is allegations…meaningless statements, unsubstantiated declarations that do not qualify as verified statements.
So we need not argue another’s claim. We can make it easier for our selves by flipping it around and letting them bring their substance behind their claim. When we ask for a verified statement we are asking the claimant to substantiate their claim by oath or affidavit, we are asking them to swear to the truth of their statements. We are asking for the proof of claim. In the public, there has never been a claim against anyone that had anything of substance behind it.
For example, the PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK or any other state is a corporation.
This corporation cannot make sworn statements for it is a fictional entity, it is not a living thinking being, it is a fiction and has no substance to it. So where then is the real party in interest, the one making claim against you? No where to be found, there is no one. Without a sworn statement the unverified declarations of a claimant do not stand as evidence anywhere. Instead of automatically answering questions and accepting allegations without proof, we can stand in our power and bring harmony to the situation. As a creditor; your not concerned with being right and proving another wrong, on the contrary, you are acting as an ambassador of peace, an agent of resolution who looks to bring settlement and who works to resolve the issue.
https://shazereverquar.wordpress.com/2015/07/01/creditors-in-commerce-receive-stiff-prison-sentences/

Creditors In Commerce Sentenced To Prison
Posted on July 1, 2015 by SHAZER EVERQUAR
Fallen Upon Hard Times
Brandon Alexander Adams
“The two guiding lights of Creditors in Commerce are now fallen stars and have been convicted and sentenced to hard time in a federal penitentiary.
On June 15th, 2015, Brandon Alexander Adams received a 40-month prison sentence.  The following day, Gordon Leroy Hall was hammered with a stiff term of eight years.?

Ausk Comment: - This tells me that what these Creditors in Commerce people are saying highly likely to be true because the system does not like being taken down. Those in power tend to go after the leaders of movements that threathen the status quo because they know that when the followers see the leaders of movements being proven right, then the followers will start treading that same path.
This is exactly what the powers that should not be, fear the most and as always they take out the leadership to stem the flow of damage, actual or potential, to themselves.

http://understandcontractlawandyouwin.com/creditors-in-commerce/

Ausk
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 467
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum