Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Australia version of the ebook
by kevinfloyd Today at 5:27 pm

» getoutofdebtfree site clone
by Margo2104 Today at 2:58 pm

» Theresa May’s Plan
by Mrblue2017 Today at 1:05 pm

» Cabot- is there a realistic chance to fight them?
by waylander62 Today at 11:08 am

» Reality chat , every wednesday at 8pm (ish)
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 7:31 pm

» 3 letter process
by projectzoo Yesterday at 5:27 pm

» Lowell - Cohen Solicitors
by waylander62 Yesterday at 12:04 pm

» raconteurs news
by LionsShare Yesterday at 10:25 am

» utility bill accounts
by LionsShare Yesterday at 10:20 am

» What response to Application for county court using N244
by waylander62 Yesterday at 1:29 am

» Arrow transferred to drydensolicitors
by Mrblue2017 Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:44 pm

» Drydensfairfax Soliciitors - Statute Barred?
by janloot Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:26 pm

» cabot/restons/county court
by Johnnyred Tue Mar 19, 2019 4:40 pm

» EU's Mandatory Biometric ID Card - on its way!
by Kestrel Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:06 am

» sol excalibre with cookiemonster
by Society of the Spectacle Mon Mar 18, 2019 7:31 pm

» Latest from CrimeBodge
by assassin Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:57 am

» Help needed please with Robinson Way
by codtree Sun Mar 17, 2019 11:08 pm

» CABOT filed CCJ application despite 3-letter process
by davidg4039 Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:47 am

» Lowell Letter of Claim
by waylander62 Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:30 pm

» Lowell Court order
by waylander62 Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:52 pm

» A previous member from old
by daveiron Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:40 pm

» Hi from South West of England
by assassin Tue Mar 12, 2019 7:01 pm

» Final Notice - Bailiff
by Solosmurf Tue Mar 12, 2019 3:28 pm

» Lowell threatening me Again !!
by barnwebb Tue Mar 12, 2019 1:33 pm

» Investigation as video of West Midlands Police 'restraint' goes viral
by Lopsum Tue Mar 12, 2019 9:28 am

» Intrum Finance letter advice please.
by Ithesoul Mon Mar 11, 2019 10:11 pm

» Overdraft LOAN has been sold to DCA
by Prometheus Mon Mar 11, 2019 7:56 pm

» sip parking notice
by lisa40 Mon Mar 11, 2019 3:30 pm

» Natural Health
by Solosmurf Mon Mar 11, 2019 1:46 pm

» Private messaging
by Solosmurf Mon Mar 11, 2019 12:03 pm

» More Lowell Success
by Mrblue2017 Sun Mar 10, 2019 3:32 pm

» 5G AND it's implications | WOW it is scary and can't be allowed
by Mrblue2017 Sun Mar 10, 2019 11:28 am

» Return to sender
by Ausk Sun Mar 10, 2019 8:39 am

» Should these missed payments have been a default?
by assassin Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:11 am

» NHS /PENALTY CHARGES
by assassin Sat Mar 09, 2019 2:01 am

» Collectica - Marston Holdings
by waylander62 Fri Mar 08, 2019 1:32 pm

» Collectica - Marston Holdings
by chopstick Fri Mar 08, 2019 8:58 am

» LOWELL FREE PHONE
by rotterdamuk Thu Mar 07, 2019 6:49 pm

» Latest Rich Planet vids Richard Hall
by daveiron Thu Mar 07, 2019 11:18 am

» 24 Storey Tower on Fire in Kensington - dies
by Awoken2 Thu Mar 07, 2019 10:35 am

» Rozer's get a PCN
by midnight Wed Mar 06, 2019 8:38 pm

» 5G Freedom of Information requests
by daveiron Wed Mar 06, 2019 2:17 pm

» Hoist Portfolio/Howard Cohen – Letter of Claim ?
by barnwebb Wed Mar 06, 2019 12:57 pm

» Rossendales in respect of Council Tax debt...
by waylander62 Wed Mar 06, 2019 12:50 am

» Private Banking?
by LionsShare Tue Mar 05, 2019 11:47 am

» This Could Be Just Down Your Street
by Lopsum Tue Mar 05, 2019 10:37 am

» intrum advice please
by waylander62 Mon Mar 04, 2019 8:27 pm

Moon phases


Conditional Acceptance and Remain in Honour, Counterclaim...but when?

Go down

Conditional Acceptance and Remain in Honour, Counterclaim...but when?

Post by itheman on Thu Feb 14, 2019 8:53 pm

Hi goodf/all

Wondering if a counterclaim can be made, in the event that one has requested (think this should be "requirement" when writing SAR) documents from DCA via SAR, has not received them and the judge continues the case?

Also if validation of a liability order has been requested (should formally be required?) from a court and not materialised...can a counterclaim be submitted? How would this work (to the issuing party (who create their own!) i assume? but it's come from the court so they have approved it...?!?

cheers all

together we are formidable / divided, we shall fall

itheman
Very helpful
Very helpful

Posts : 208
Join date : 2018-03-12

Back to top Go down

Re: Conditional Acceptance and Remain in Honour, Counterclaim...but when?

Post by itheman on Thu Feb 14, 2019 9:10 pm

if this below is true, they should not be getting any victories!

Contractual Obligation
For ANY contract to be lawful, INCLUDING A CONTRACT BETWEEN YOURSELF AS PLAINTIFF OR DEFENDANT IN A COURT DE FACTO, it must comprise the following:

FULL DISCLOSURE by both parties. Neither party can later claim 'you should have known' if it was not specifically declared at the time of making the contract.
A CONSIDERATION offered by both parties, this being the subject of the exchange. It must be a sum of money, or an item of value. Both parties agree that their CONSIDERATION is worth (to them) the other party's CONSIDERATION.
LAWFUL TERMS & CONDITIONS for the contract, to which both parties agree.
'Wet' SIGNATURES of both parties. This means hand-written SIGNATURES, as made by two human beings.
Even though businesses and officials act as though there is a lawful contract in place, 99 times out of 100 these rules have not been followed (Maybe it is 999 times out of 1,000 - or even more!).

Standing on these 4 rules, requesting proofs, is the simplest way of stalemating just about every action that may be taken against you.

Copied verbatim from FMOTL.comOpens in a new window with thanks to Veronica: of the family Chapman. FMOTL.com is a great resource for those embarking on the road to freedom; freedom from mental slavery and freedom from what Veronica calls 'The Grand Deception.'

itheman
Very helpful
Very helpful

Posts : 208
Join date : 2018-03-12

Back to top Go down

Re: Conditional Acceptance and Remain in Honour, Counterclaim...but when?

Post by Ausk on Fri Feb 22, 2019 8:41 am

@itheman wrote:Hi goodf/all

Wondering if a counterclaim can be made, in the event that one has requested (think this should be "requirement" when writing SAR) documents from DCA via SAR, has not received them and the judge continues the case?

Also if validation of a liability order has been requested (should formally be required?) from a court and not materialised...can a counterclaim be submitted? How would this work (to the issuing party (who create their own!) i assume? but it's come from the court so they have approved it...?!?

cheers all

together we are formidable / divided, we shall fall


"I accept your offer on the condition that ..................."

At the start of the process you have four options to consider:
1. Remain silent. The number one Fatal mistake!
2. Reject the offer
3. Accept accept the offer
4. Conditionally Accept - by far the most common response.

A counteroffer has the legal effect of rejecting the offer.

A contract is in motion, offer and counteroffer is taking place until an agreement is made. An agreement made, that is either expressed or implied such as through silence/ non-response, also called tacit acquiescence.

In order that we do not acquiesce and depose our selves, we conditionally accept the claim, upon proof of claim.

In essence you are saying, ‘I honor your position all I’m asking for is proof, bring some verified evidence, prove your claim.’ This puts the burden of proof upon the one making the claims. If this party does not bring any substance to what they are saying, any proof to back up their claim then all we are dealing with is allegations…meaningless statements, unsubstantiated declarations that do not qualify as verified statements.

When we ask for a verified statement we are asking the claimant to substantiate their claim by oath or affidavit.

A corporation cannot make sworn statements for it is a fictional entity, it is not a living thinking being, it is a fiction and has no substance to it. (so require the sworn statement of claim to be made in the personal capacity under full personal liability.)

Without a sworn statement the unverified declarations of a claimant do not stand as evidence anywhere.

Ausk
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 472
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Conditional Acceptance and Remain in Honour, Counterclaim...but when?

Post by assassin on Sat Feb 23, 2019 2:31 am

@itheman wrote:if this below is true, they should not be getting any victories!

Contractual Obligation
For ANY contract to be lawful, INCLUDING A CONTRACT BETWEEN YOURSELF AS PLAINTIFF OR DEFENDANT IN A COURT DE FACTO, it must comprise the following:

FULL DISCLOSURE by both parties. Neither party can later claim 'you should have known' if it was not specifically declared at the time of making the contract.
A CONSIDERATION offered by both parties, this being the subject of the exchange. It must be a sum of money, or an item of value. Both parties agree that their CONSIDERATION is worth (to them) the other party's CONSIDERATION.
LAWFUL TERMS & CONDITIONS for the contract, to which both parties agree.
'Wet' SIGNATURES of both parties. This means hand-written SIGNATURES, as made by two human beings.
Even though businesses and officials act as though there is a lawful contract in place, 99 times out of 100 these rules have not been followed (Maybe it is 999 times out of 1,000 - or even more!).

Standing on these 4 rules, requesting proofs, is the simplest way of stalemating just about every action that may be taken against you.

Copied verbatim from FMOTL.comOpens in a new window with thanks to Veronica: of the family Chapman. FMOTL.com is a great resource for those embarking on the road to freedom; freedom from mental slavery and freedom from what Veronica calls 'The Grand Deception.'

This is now out of date and contract law actually stipulates that all the MAIN contractual obligations are to be disclosed and anything which is not specifically disclosed must be "reasonably accessible" to the party requiring them, and is backed by precedent.

What does this actually mean? in reality it means that if a company has a website containing their terms and conditions, or other such site which lists their undisclosed (in the main contract) terms and conditions, and you can reasonable access them then YOU should have done your due diligence before entering the contract and refused to sign it. Where this falls down is with organisations such as the DWP who spread a huge amount of information across several sites and you would have to access several sites to find all the information, so would this be termed as "reasonably accessible" when even DWP staff cannot give you the full contract to read.
Put this in court and things change, DWP legal teams will spend weeks trawling the information and print the appropriate sections out and claim "well, we found it easily enough" so it is on our website, challenge them and ask which sections of the website they are on and under which section and the waters become muddied and it comes down to the judge to determine what is reasonably accessible.

DWP cannot operate under lawful, they can only operate under legal.

Wet signatures are a thing of the past and any court would recognise acceptance as by "any means" as under law any unrebutted claim stands in law, law stands as truth, and truth stands as judgement; the only thing a court would accept is a documented rebuttal such as a written rebuttal, and many organisations are now privvy to this and write their contracts accordingly.

By dealing with us you agree to the following:

There will be a list of things documented and one of them will be dealing electronically and this involves and includes a digital signature or no signature at all.
assassin
assassin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1799
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head

Back to top Go down

Re: Conditional Acceptance and Remain in Honour, Counterclaim...but when?

Post by itheman on Sat Feb 23, 2019 4:14 pm

For example, as a part of their T&Cs - contract entering jargon

@assassin wrote:
By dealing with us you agree to the following:

There will be a list of things documented and one of them will be dealing electronically and this involves and includes a digital signature or no signature at all.

Do they not have to prove this as been accepted and, mutually agreed for "the contract" to be in place?

itheman
Very helpful
Very helpful

Posts : 208
Join date : 2018-03-12

Back to top Go down

Re: Conditional Acceptance and Remain in Honour, Counterclaim...but when?

Post by assassin on Sun Feb 24, 2019 1:28 am

Yes and by accepting their contract you are entering into, and accepting their terms and conditions.
assassin
assassin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1799
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head

Back to top Go down

Re: Conditional Acceptance and Remain in Honour, Counterclaim...but when?

Post by itheman on Sun Feb 24, 2019 1:37 pm

hi assassin

at what points in communication with them (courts, DCA etc...) is it deemed we are accepting their T&Cs?

knowing the specifics could avoid us entering in to contract and us entering into contract is what they therefore must prove.

itheman
Very helpful
Very helpful

Posts : 208
Join date : 2018-03-12

Back to top Go down

Re: Conditional Acceptance and Remain in Honour, Counterclaim...but when?

Post by assassin on Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:08 am

Never enter a contract at all is the simple answer.
assassin
assassin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1799
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head

Back to top Go down

Re: Conditional Acceptance and Remain in Honour, Counterclaim...but when?

Post by itheman on Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:13 pm

Hi assassin, that's the key my friend (i also think), so...how do we avoid entering their contract...
How to avoid their court and remain in honour as wo/man with conditional acceptance?
If they no longer need to supply a wet signature (as an example) and we accept/adjust to this and that, aren't we playing their game?...should we not ignore the this and that, as it is another part of their legislation. And continue to insist on them acting "right" by us requiring etc../using law?

itheman
Very helpful
Very helpful

Posts : 208
Join date : 2018-03-12

Back to top Go down

Re: Conditional Acceptance and Remain in Honour, Counterclaim...but when?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum