Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Joint Bank Giro Credit Slip Missing Utility Company Has Not sent with their fake bill/s Need advice please .
by LionsShare Today at 6:31 am

» Slaughterbots
by Lopsum Today at 3:20 am

» Predictive programming and the music industry.
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 10:00 pm

» Let's Have Some Tunes thread.
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 9:30 pm

» Old site / your info
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 8:16 pm

» Private parking firms CANNOT fine you Daniel Bostock on the BBC
by LionsShare Yesterday at 7:28 pm

» Assignment
by LionsShare Yesterday at 6:55 pm

» Minds Wiped ,Refilled And Let Loose On The Rest Of Us
by eargoggles Yesterday at 5:08 pm

» The Ledger Bait, Dead Men Have No Rights Justinian Deception Channel and ROHAN
by landlubber Yesterday at 3:53 pm

» MUST SEE- Re Diabetes. Just out-but only 1st episode available.--Episode 1 - The Black Death of the 21st Century
by epsom Yesterday at 2:46 pm

» Have you had enough yet?
by ceylon Yesterday at 1:51 pm

» David Icke demolishes, CAA, Labour MP and Man Utd at book launch they tried to stop.
by epsom Yesterday at 12:37 pm

» Is it proof..
by petesomething Yesterday at 11:58 am

» Legal firm calling
by pitano1 Yesterday at 9:20 am

» Lent Van
by assassin Yesterday at 3:55 am

» 24 Storey Tower on Fire in Kensington - dies
by Awoken2 Sat Nov 18, 2017 7:52 pm

» Bankruptcy
by assassin Sat Nov 18, 2017 7:00 pm

» School Detention
by Tom Bombadil Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:50 pm

» Landlord problem
by Tom Bombadil Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:40 pm

» Shoosmiths
by Tom Bombadil Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:19 pm

» Yellow Junction box penality ticket
by LionsShare Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:17 pm

» Is it time the poor paid again?
by ceylon Sat Nov 18, 2017 11:57 am

» History Of The Saudi Royal Family
by Kestrel Sat Nov 18, 2017 11:33 am

» Arrow Global ... reared their ugly head again!
by petesomething Sat Nov 18, 2017 10:22 am

» Geo Engineering, are we seeing another avoidable tragedy?
by Awoken2 Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:46 am

» jacobs/council tax
by pitano1 Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:10 am

» What really SCARES Big Pharma? People who know how to CURE their own DISEASE!
by assassin Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:12 am

» Took me a while
by andybreck Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:41 pm

» Hedgerow Food Plants that Grow WILD
by Society of the Spectacle Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:50 pm

» Lowell vanquis - Tiggy?
by petesomething Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:25 pm

» Hello Again,
by Philchef34 Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:37 pm

» UK Column
by LionsShare Fri Nov 17, 2017 5:18 pm

» George Soros Confirms Take Over Of Europe
by Society of the Spectacle Fri Nov 17, 2017 2:37 pm

» County Court Claim
by Jay Fri Nov 17, 2017 12:30 pm

» Cabot and Restons Conspiracy to Defraud
by barnwebb Fri Nov 17, 2017 12:12 pm

» Are they just making it up?
by Lopsum Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:35 am

» The Secret Masonic Victory of World War Two Part 8
by Kestrel Fri Nov 17, 2017 10:58 am


Correspondence from the pole ice?

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by daveiron on Wed May 31, 2017 5:43 pm

As i understand it ,there was never a case as he was released without charges.He had them beat & they knew it.

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 650
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by iamani on Wed May 31, 2017 7:33 pm

Hi all

Hi SIASL - i'm sure joinder represents both. After all, what do the police themselves call it when they have to hear you claim a legal name, a d.o.b. and an address before they can deal with 'you' as officers rather than constables?

Meads v Meads has been de-bunked as an agrnda-driven judge passing off his opinion as fact. It'b.s.

Have yet to become link-savvy but if you type 'no tax, no insurance - released without charge' you should find it easy.

Cheers!


iamani
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 912
Join date : 2017-05-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by man on Wed May 31, 2017 8:06 pm

This video appears to be it.

man
Newb
Newb

Posts : 38
Join date : 2017-05-20

Back to top Go down

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by daveiron on Wed May 31, 2017 9:32 pm

Hi S.I.A.S.L.
Watch the end of the vid posted by man

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 650
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by iamani on Wed May 31, 2017 10:09 pm

Hi all

Hi man - thanks for vid

Hi S.I.A.S.L. - Sorry friend, but i've no idea where i saw that, don't even remember if it was an article or vid. Don't remember what case was about or the outcome. i just remember how shocked i was that a judge could lie like that unchallenged and i remember the sense of validation i felt when i found someone who spelt out in detail exactly where the judge was wrong and how it's just propaganda.

So no, can't provide evidence. On the other hand i'm not trying to convince anyone, i'm just sharing opinion. Besides which your posts are there for balance, so people can look into it or not if they want to. As ever - d.y.o.r.

Cheers!

iamani
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 912
Join date : 2017-05-01

Back to top Go down

thanks

Post by toolapcblack on Fri Jun 02, 2017 4:30 pm

many thanks for all the great advice.

But what about this just ignoring all the letters sent to the Person(just putting them all back in the post box), what is the worse thing that can happen? if they send the old bill as long as i keep it Buttoned and don't consent to their actions, surely they cannot get me ....the Man.


toolapcblack
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 143
Join date : 2017-05-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by man on Fri Jun 02, 2017 4:58 pm

If you return their letters 'Unclaimed', 'Return to sender', then that is supposed to be an appropriate, honourable response of no consent, no binding agreement and no joinder with them.

However, with certain entities, they do the dishonourable thing of pretending you didn't respond to them and therefore wrongly claiming that you tacitly agreed with them and that you are in dishonour.

This means that they may pursue you as though there is an agreement with you and would give them a huge starting winning position in a 'court' room.

man
Newb
Newb

Posts : 38
Join date : 2017-05-20

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by LionsShare on Fri Jun 02, 2017 5:17 pm

@man wrote:If you return their letters 'Unclaimed', 'Return to sender', then that is supposed to be an appropriate, honourable response of no consent, no binding agreement and no joinder with them.

However, with certain entities, they do the dishonourable thing of pretending you didn't respond to them and therefore wrongly claiming that you tacitly agreed with them and that you are in dishonour.

This means that they may pursue you as though there is an agreement with you and would give them a huge starting winning position in a 'court' room.
If you ignore alltogether you I think receive 6 points & £1000 fine or at least it was the last I looked. There was something on the old site about this by putting at 45 degs, red ink, "legal notice refused for cause" was supposed to be enough to negate any perceived joinder & render further action null & void. Becareful though, as they WILL act dishonerably you may find 6 points & £1000 fine on the way.

Take alook at the vid link in my 1st post here, the results in that are based on experience, you could write a letter already described to try to challenge based on those very points, other wise fill out the paper work & send it in. Not sure if not signing is any good although they normally need a name & signiture (permission) before proceeding. What ever you do though BECAREFUL - dont lie that will get in to all sorts.

Good luck!
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 302
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by iamani on Fri Jun 02, 2017 5:39 pm

Hi all

Just a suggestion...

If you think they might pretend to have not received your 'return to sender etc' responses then put the r.t.s. labelled letter un-opened in another envelope. Put their address on it and send it special delivery (registered post - NOT recorded delivery). Print off and keep the receipt.

Remember - I KNOW nothing.

Cheers!

iamani
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 912
Join date : 2017-05-01

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum