Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Hi all
by Simon12ark Today at 1:57 pm

» Next Door Neighbor Left A Mess
by eargoggles Today at 1:15 pm

» found again...
by 123 Today at 12:12 pm

» Failure to prepare
by daveiron Today at 12:04 pm

» Setting up a trust
by handle Today at 11:29 am

» ...ARE THEY TRYING TO DECIEVE US?
by ceylon Today at 10:17 am

» Need Advice now GOODF has gone
by westcountryhelp Today at 10:17 am

» George Carlin - Saving the Planet
by actinglikeabanker Today at 10:03 am

» CCJ Delivered. I was unaware as i dont live at the address
by pieintheskywhenIdie Today at 7:31 am

» Acting agent or debt purchaser??
by daveiron Today at 7:04 am

» Chrissy Morris: Illegal Glossop eviction explained , part 1. N293a.
by daveiron Today at 6:58 am

» Food Dehydrating
by assassin Today at 1:50 am

» The windrush generation
by Tom Bombadil Today at 1:05 am

» ...The KaK & M@© Show. Have you done your research?
by ceylon Yesterday at 10:00 pm

» UK Govt Calls 2 Twitter Accounts -Russian Bots-; Turns Out They Are Humans.
by midnight Yesterday at 9:46 pm

» ANOTHER BBC GUEST REFUSES TO GO ALONG WITH THE PROPAGANDA! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KU5taO5vRDo
by midnight Yesterday at 9:30 pm

» ...The KaK & M@© Show. Is this a High Emission Vehicle?
by ceylon Yesterday at 7:29 pm

» Collection Of Useful Documents Free Download
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 6:34 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Yesterday at 4:16 pm

» ...Can Justice be BOUGHT?
by ceylon Yesterday at 3:41 pm

» Disgusting Conflict of Interest: Theresa May’s Husband’s Investment Firm Made a “Financial Killing” from the Bombing of Syria
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 12:49 pm

» ADVANCED EQUITY AND TRUSTS
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 12:35 pm

» ...The Kak & M@© Show. Is treasonous May committing Russian roulette?
by ceylon Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:47 pm

» Latest from CrimeBodge
by Kestrel Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:28 pm

» General questions about 3 letters outcomes.
by daveiron Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:48 am

» ...Is this the hottest summer ever? Or is it just another LIE?
by ceylon Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:43 am

» starting a private claim against someone
by daveiron Thu Apr 19, 2018 10:24 am

» Understanding Claims
by Ausk Thu Apr 19, 2018 9:14 am

» Afternoon all!!!
by assassin Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:23 am

» Good evening, newbie
by assassin Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:23 am

» ...The KaK & M@©Show. Travel through paradise Or are you Barricaded in?
by ceylon Wed Apr 18, 2018 8:34 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Apr 18, 2018 7:43 pm

» Statute of limitations
by handle Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:15 pm

» ...Should we be looking over there? Is it nearly GAME OVER for the CRIMINALS?
by ceylon Wed Apr 18, 2018 2:11 pm

» Vet bill
by Ausk Wed Apr 18, 2018 9:22 am

» Starting a family ?
by daveiron Wed Apr 18, 2018 8:45 am

» Council Tax & the census /White Rabbit
by assassin Wed Apr 18, 2018 3:23 am

Moon phases


Correspondence from the pole ice?

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by daveiron on Wed May 31, 2017 5:43 pm

As i understand it ,there was never a case as he was released without charges.He had them beat & they knew it.

daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 875
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by Guest on Wed May 31, 2017 7:33 pm

Hi all

Hi SIASL - i'm sure joinder represents both. After all, what do the police themselves call it when they have to hear you claim a legal name, a d.o.b. and an address before they can deal with 'you' as officers rather than constables?

Meads v Meads has been de-bunked as an agrnda-driven judge passing off his opinion as fact. It'b.s.

Have yet to become link-savvy but if you type 'no tax, no insurance - released without charge' you should find it easy.

Cheers!


Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by man on Wed May 31, 2017 8:06 pm

This video appears to be it.

man
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 38
Join date : 2017-05-20

Back to top Go down

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by daveiron on Wed May 31, 2017 9:32 pm

Hi S.I.A.S.L.
Watch the end of the vid posted by man

daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 875
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by Guest on Wed May 31, 2017 10:09 pm

Hi all

Hi man - thanks for vid

Hi S.I.A.S.L. - Sorry friend, but i've no idea where i saw that, don't even remember if it was an article or vid. Don't remember what case was about or the outcome. i just remember how shocked i was that a judge could lie like that unchallenged and i remember the sense of validation i felt when i found someone who spelt out in detail exactly where the judge was wrong and how it's just propaganda.

So no, can't provide evidence. On the other hand i'm not trying to convince anyone, i'm just sharing opinion. Besides which your posts are there for balance, so people can look into it or not if they want to. As ever - d.y.o.r.

Cheers!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

thanks

Post by toolapcblack on Fri Jun 02, 2017 4:30 pm

many thanks for all the great advice.

But what about this just ignoring all the letters sent to the Person(just putting them all back in the post box), what is the worse thing that can happen? if they send the old bill as long as i keep it Buttoned and don't consent to their actions, surely they cannot get me ....the Man.


toolapcblack
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 147
Join date : 2017-05-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by man on Fri Jun 02, 2017 4:58 pm

If you return their letters 'Unclaimed', 'Return to sender', then that is supposed to be an appropriate, honourable response of no consent, no binding agreement and no joinder with them.

However, with certain entities, they do the dishonourable thing of pretending you didn't respond to them and therefore wrongly claiming that you tacitly agreed with them and that you are in dishonour.

This means that they may pursue you as though there is an agreement with you and would give them a huge starting winning position in a 'court' room.

man
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 38
Join date : 2017-05-20

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by LionsShare on Fri Jun 02, 2017 5:17 pm

@man wrote:If you return their letters 'Unclaimed', 'Return to sender', then that is supposed to be an appropriate, honourable response of no consent, no binding agreement and no joinder with them.

However, with certain entities, they do the dishonourable thing of pretending you didn't respond to them and therefore wrongly claiming that you tacitly agreed with them and that you are in dishonour.

This means that they may pursue you as though there is an agreement with you and would give them a huge starting winning position in a 'court' room.
If you ignore alltogether you I think receive 6 points & £1000 fine or at least it was the last I looked. There was something on the old site about this by putting at 45 degs, red ink, "legal notice refused for cause" was supposed to be enough to negate any perceived joinder & render further action null & void. Becareful though, as they WILL act dishonerably you may find 6 points & £1000 fine on the way.

Take alook at the vid link in my 1st post here, the results in that are based on experience, you could write a letter already described to try to challenge based on those very points, other wise fill out the paper work & send it in. Not sure if not signing is any good although they normally need a name & signiture (permission) before proceeding. What ever you do though BECAREFUL - dont lie that will get in to all sorts.

Good luck!
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 410
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by Guest on Fri Jun 02, 2017 5:39 pm

Hi all

Just a suggestion...

If you think they might pretend to have not received your 'return to sender etc' responses then put the r.t.s. labelled letter un-opened in another envelope. Put their address on it and send it special delivery (registered post - NOT recorded delivery). Print off and keep the receipt.

Remember - I KNOW nothing.

Cheers!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum