Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Duped into guarantor, severe mental health issues
by waylander62 Yesterday at 10:27 pm

» Remember the Walmart stores ?
by daveiron Yesterday at 12:26 pm

» …Gis 20 billion and you can stay minister to Mrs may… sounds like bribery and corruption don’t it?
by ceylon Yesterday at 10:03 am

» Prisoner, Documentary + Bonus
by Lopsum Sat Jun 23, 2018 9:03 pm

» ...The KaK & M@© Show Do PAEDOPHILES want to make cannabis legal or not?
by ceylon Sat Jun 23, 2018 3:51 pm

» Do banks destroy credit agreements ?
by daveiron Sat Jun 23, 2018 2:51 pm

» ...Are the paedophiles getting treated too good?
by ceylon Sat Jun 23, 2018 12:33 pm

» Potential legal action letter from mortimer clark solicitor
by Jai786 Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:29 pm

» ...The KaK & M@© Show. Has the WAR on CANNABIS been lost?
by ceylon Fri Jun 22, 2018 7:22 pm

» Court claim
by Jai786 Fri Jun 22, 2018 4:59 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:33 pm

» Single Justice Procedure Notice
by pieintheskywhenIdie Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:15 pm

» ...Is Zionist tube censoring AGAIN? Are the commons censoring as well? wJFP7IH25Po
by ceylon Fri Jun 22, 2018 1:12 pm

» ARE WE BEING BETRAYED?
by ceylon Fri Jun 22, 2018 10:39 am

» 24 Storey Tower on Fire in Kensington - dies
by Awoken2 Fri Jun 22, 2018 8:49 am

» New 3 Letters. Any Success?
by discodave4093 Fri Jun 22, 2018 4:42 am

» ...Is it time to end the monarchy?
by El E Mentary Fri Jun 22, 2018 4:00 am

» Lowell
by assassin Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:01 am

» DW Fitness, Parking eye and Debt recovery plus
by assassin Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:48 am

» Clean up.
by midnight Thu Jun 21, 2018 9:56 pm

» Strange new symbol at speakers corner
by daveiron Thu Jun 21, 2018 8:09 pm

» Advice for partner - LOWELL
by DRAGONBORN11 Thu Jun 21, 2018 7:16 pm

» Parking Eye now DRP on my back
by daveiron Thu Jun 21, 2018 7:00 pm

» ...The KaK & M@© Show. £10 a car How much are they scamming out of the public?
by ceylon Thu Jun 21, 2018 6:32 pm

» INFO - NEW Civil Procedure Rules Pre-Action Protocols introduced OCTOBER 2017
by barnwebb Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:42 pm

» Lowell threatening me Again !!
by waylander62 Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:41 pm

» Directions questionaire from lowells solicitors
by jack Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:33 pm

» AMIGOS LOANS ON MY BACK
by waylander62 Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:31 pm

» HELP Demand? I think I have a CCJ!
by Andee Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:13 pm

» Single Justice Procedure Notice
by Winston Thu Jun 21, 2018 2:32 pm

» MORTGAGE FRAUD
by handle Thu Jun 21, 2018 1:46 pm

» ...Did the government protect serial killer doctor?
by ceylon Thu Jun 21, 2018 10:58 am

» ...The KaK & M@© Show. What is value added theft?
by ceylon Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:10 pm

» Are you the only one awake in your family ?
by Tom Bombadil Wed Jun 20, 2018 9:56 pm

» Helping a friend
by waylander62 Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:05 pm

» What are the three foundation documents?
by jack Wed Jun 20, 2018 5:14 pm

» Essex & Suffolk Water
by Sharpysparky Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:58 pm

Moon phases


Correspondence from the pole ice?

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by daveiron on Wed May 31, 2017 5:43 pm

As i understand it ,there was never a case as he was released without charges.He had them beat & they knew it.

daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 957
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by Guest on Wed May 31, 2017 7:33 pm

Hi all

Hi SIASL - i'm sure joinder represents both. After all, what do the police themselves call it when they have to hear you claim a legal name, a d.o.b. and an address before they can deal with 'you' as officers rather than constables?

Meads v Meads has been de-bunked as an agrnda-driven judge passing off his opinion as fact. It'b.s.

Have yet to become link-savvy but if you type 'no tax, no insurance - released without charge' you should find it easy.

Cheers!


Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by man on Wed May 31, 2017 8:06 pm

This video appears to be it.

man
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 38
Join date : 2017-05-20

Back to top Go down

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by daveiron on Wed May 31, 2017 9:32 pm

Hi S.I.A.S.L.
Watch the end of the vid posted by man

daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 957
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by Guest on Wed May 31, 2017 10:09 pm

Hi all

Hi man - thanks for vid

Hi S.I.A.S.L. - Sorry friend, but i've no idea where i saw that, don't even remember if it was an article or vid. Don't remember what case was about or the outcome. i just remember how shocked i was that a judge could lie like that unchallenged and i remember the sense of validation i felt when i found someone who spelt out in detail exactly where the judge was wrong and how it's just propaganda.

So no, can't provide evidence. On the other hand i'm not trying to convince anyone, i'm just sharing opinion. Besides which your posts are there for balance, so people can look into it or not if they want to. As ever - d.y.o.r.

Cheers!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

thanks

Post by toolapcblack on Fri Jun 02, 2017 4:30 pm

many thanks for all the great advice.

But what about this just ignoring all the letters sent to the Person(just putting them all back in the post box), what is the worse thing that can happen? if they send the old bill as long as i keep it Buttoned and don't consent to their actions, surely they cannot get me ....the Man.


toolapcblack
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 147
Join date : 2017-05-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by man on Fri Jun 02, 2017 4:58 pm

If you return their letters 'Unclaimed', 'Return to sender', then that is supposed to be an appropriate, honourable response of no consent, no binding agreement and no joinder with them.

However, with certain entities, they do the dishonourable thing of pretending you didn't respond to them and therefore wrongly claiming that you tacitly agreed with them and that you are in dishonour.

This means that they may pursue you as though there is an agreement with you and would give them a huge starting winning position in a 'court' room.

man
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 38
Join date : 2017-05-20

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by LionsShare on Fri Jun 02, 2017 5:17 pm

@man wrote:If you return their letters 'Unclaimed', 'Return to sender', then that is supposed to be an appropriate, honourable response of no consent, no binding agreement and no joinder with them.

However, with certain entities, they do the dishonourable thing of pretending you didn't respond to them and therefore wrongly claiming that you tacitly agreed with them and that you are in dishonour.

This means that they may pursue you as though there is an agreement with you and would give them a huge starting winning position in a 'court' room.
If you ignore alltogether you I think receive 6 points & £1000 fine or at least it was the last I looked. There was something on the old site about this by putting at 45 degs, red ink, "legal notice refused for cause" was supposed to be enough to negate any perceived joinder & render further action null & void. Becareful though, as they WILL act dishonerably you may find 6 points & £1000 fine on the way.

Take alook at the vid link in my 1st post here, the results in that are based on experience, you could write a letter already described to try to challenge based on those very points, other wise fill out the paper work & send it in. Not sure if not signing is any good although they normally need a name & signiture (permission) before proceeding. What ever you do though BECAREFUL - dont lie that will get in to all sorts.

Good luck!
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 414
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by Guest on Fri Jun 02, 2017 5:39 pm

Hi all

Just a suggestion...

If you think they might pretend to have not received your 'return to sender etc' responses then put the r.t.s. labelled letter un-opened in another envelope. Put their address on it and send it special delivery (registered post - NOT recorded delivery). Print off and keep the receipt.

Remember - I KNOW nothing.

Cheers!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum