Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» New/old Member
by Society of the Spectacle Today at 9:12 pm

» Non-limited Business Question
by iamani Today at 9:04 pm

» Hierachy
by iamani Today at 8:02 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Lopsum Today at 7:55 pm

» Lowell & Cohen Cramer - Directions Questionnaire Received
by chavboy Today at 7:54 pm

» remedy for P.C.N/COUNCIL TAX
by 7tt7 Today at 7:40 pm

» 911 Alchemy
by pitano1 Today at 4:00 pm

» Statement from Barclaycard
by Tiggy Today at 1:17 pm

» In plain sight.... Battleship.
by Awoken2 Today at 1:00 pm

» Parsons Green - most pathetic false flag ever?
by toolapcblack Today at 10:37 am

» HEAL YOURSELF natural remedies to all illness
by Ausk Today at 10:26 am

» V.Important
by assassin Today at 3:15 am

» Funds Delivered! What You Mean We Do What We Say!
by Tom Bombadil Yesterday at 10:34 pm

» RFID - corporations rule OK
by Lopsum Yesterday at 6:17 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Yesterday at 5:42 pm

» Are they RELATED, Memes and Other Lookalikes and Coincidences.
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 4:07 pm

» New Alternative Letters for Original lenders (Bank / Credit Cards
by daveiron Yesterday at 4:03 pm

» Cassini
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 3:10 pm

» tv licence
by pitano1 Yesterday at 1:19 pm

» Invisibility cloak with image projection capability
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 12:16 pm

» hmrc self assessment question???
by iamani Yesterday at 11:54 am

» NEWS-FOR-TODAY-20 09 2017-READING-BETWEEN-THE-LINES
by ceylon Yesterday at 11:12 am

» eidolon TLP - Real or Fake?
by macena Yesterday at 8:20 am

» Ban trolls from voting to deter abuse of politicians, urges electoral watchdog
by assassin Yesterday at 3:05 am

» CCA Clarification
by Rescue2017 Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:16 pm

» MARK-CEYLON-ON-RACONTEURS-NEWS-TONIGHT-8PM-TILL-10PM
by actinglikeabanker Tue Sep 19, 2017 10:53 pm

» Mozilla planning “kill shot” for entire independent media by blocking all non-approved news in the FireFox browser
by macena Tue Sep 19, 2017 8:10 pm

» Tid-bits, Nuggets and Pearls
by iamani Tue Sep 19, 2017 7:01 pm

» Defiant Catalan mayors back independence referendum
by macena Tue Sep 19, 2017 4:10 pm

» 9/11:HATJ RKB: DARPA: Judy Wood: WWWW: A New Focal Point For Love
by macena Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:59 pm

» Grant Thornton Arrest - Court Order Scam Bankruptcy
by sirus0 Tue Sep 19, 2017 1:45 pm

» Interview with Andrew Johnson & Jerry Leaphart, Dr. Judy Wood's attorney
by Awoken2 Tue Sep 19, 2017 11:46 am

» THE CENSUS, ARE YOU IN THEIR WAREHOUSE? BC, SECURITISATION
by iamani Tue Sep 19, 2017 1:21 am

» Let's Have Some Tunes thread.
by Awoken2 Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:44 pm

» Cabot
by jockenglish Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:30 pm

» DCA's implementing agreements, Template and Guide
by Waffle Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:51 pm

» SOUL INSPIRING VIDEOS of REAL LIFE NATURE,
by Society of the Spectacle Mon Sep 18, 2017 4:52 pm


Correspondence from the pole ice?

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by daveiron on Wed May 31, 2017 6:43 pm

As i understand it ,there was never a case as he was released without charges.He had them beat & they knew it.

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 538
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by iamani on Wed May 31, 2017 8:33 pm

Hi all

Hi SIASL - i'm sure joinder represents both. After all, what do the police themselves call it when they have to hear you claim a legal name, a d.o.b. and an address before they can deal with 'you' as officers rather than constables?

Meads v Meads has been de-bunked as an agrnda-driven judge passing off his opinion as fact. It'b.s.

Have yet to become link-savvy but if you type 'no tax, no insurance - released without charge' you should find it easy.

Cheers!


iamani
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 673
Join date : 2017-05-01

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by man on Wed May 31, 2017 9:06 pm

This video appears to be it.

man
Newb
Newb

Posts : 24
Join date : 2017-05-20

Back to top Go down

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

The author of this message was banned from the forum - See the message

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by daveiron on Wed May 31, 2017 10:32 pm

Hi S.I.A.S.L.
Watch the end of the vid posted by man

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 538
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by iamani on Wed May 31, 2017 11:09 pm

Hi all

Hi man - thanks for vid

Hi S.I.A.S.L. - Sorry friend, but i've no idea where i saw that, don't even remember if it was an article or vid. Don't remember what case was about or the outcome. i just remember how shocked i was that a judge could lie like that unchallenged and i remember the sense of validation i felt when i found someone who spelt out in detail exactly where the judge was wrong and how it's just propaganda.

So no, can't provide evidence. On the other hand i'm not trying to convince anyone, i'm just sharing opinion. Besides which your posts are there for balance, so people can look into it or not if they want to. As ever - d.y.o.r.

Cheers!

iamani
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 673
Join date : 2017-05-01

Back to top Go down

thanks

Post by toolapcblack on Fri Jun 02, 2017 5:30 pm

many thanks for all the great advice.

But what about this just ignoring all the letters sent to the Person(just putting them all back in the post box), what is the worse thing that can happen? if they send the old bill as long as i keep it Buttoned and don't consent to their actions, surely they cannot get me ....the Man.


toolapcblack
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 98
Join date : 2017-05-29

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by man on Fri Jun 02, 2017 5:58 pm

If you return their letters 'Unclaimed', 'Return to sender', then that is supposed to be an appropriate, honourable response of no consent, no binding agreement and no joinder with them.

However, with certain entities, they do the dishonourable thing of pretending you didn't respond to them and therefore wrongly claiming that you tacitly agreed with them and that you are in dishonour.

This means that they may pursue you as though there is an agreement with you and would give them a huge starting winning position in a 'court' room.

man
Newb
Newb

Posts : 24
Join date : 2017-05-20

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by LionsShare on Fri Jun 02, 2017 6:17 pm

man wrote:If you return their letters 'Unclaimed', 'Return to sender', then that is supposed to be an appropriate, honourable response of no consent, no binding agreement and no joinder with them.

However, with certain entities, they do the dishonourable thing of pretending you didn't respond to them and therefore wrongly claiming that you tacitly agreed with them and that you are in dishonour.

This means that they may pursue you as though there is an agreement with you and would give them a huge starting winning position in a 'court' room.
If you ignore alltogether you I think receive 6 points & £1000 fine or at least it was the last I looked. There was something on the old site about this by putting at 45 degs, red ink, "legal notice refused for cause" was supposed to be enough to negate any perceived joinder & render further action null & void. Becareful though, as they WILL act dishonerably you may find 6 points & £1000 fine on the way.

Take alook at the vid link in my 1st post here, the results in that are based on experience, you could write a letter already described to try to challenge based on those very points, other wise fill out the paper work & send it in. Not sure if not signing is any good although they normally need a name & signiture (permission) before proceeding. What ever you do though BECAREFUL - dont lie that will get in to all sorts.

Good luck!
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 200
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: Correspondence from the pole ice?

Post by iamani on Fri Jun 02, 2017 6:39 pm

Hi all

Just a suggestion...

If you think they might pretend to have not received your 'return to sender etc' responses then put the r.t.s. labelled letter un-opened in another envelope. Put their address on it and send it special delivery (registered post - NOT recorded delivery). Print off and keep the receipt.

Remember - I KNOW nothing.

Cheers!

iamani
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 673
Join date : 2017-05-01

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum