Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» 24 Storey Tower on Fire in Kensington - dies
by Awoken2 Yesterday at 11:01 pm

» How to Grow Garlic
by Lopsum Yesterday at 10:56 pm

» British Gas to pay customers £1.1m compensation
by jss64 Yesterday at 7:55 pm

» Hi. Need help/advice
by assassin Yesterday at 7:03 pm

» hi all
by assassin Yesterday at 7:01 pm

» Company selling accounts to Debt collector--although not in debt!
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 6:39 pm

» Tid-bits, Nuggets and Pearls
by iamani Yesterday at 6:01 pm

» NOTTINGHAM CRIMINAL CARTEL WASTE BILLIONS SO THEY CAN INCREASE THE ILLEGAL AND UNLAWFUL COUNCIL TAX
by ceylon Yesterday at 5:40 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 5:37 pm

» My Council Tax Experience
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 4:59 pm

» PRA Group
by MEMEGIRL Yesterday at 3:42 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Yesterday at 3:11 pm

» The Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims is made by the Master of the Rolls as Head of Civil Justice. The Protocol comes into force on 1 October 2017
by LionsShare Yesterday at 3:06 pm

» Sheriffs Office and Denial of access Notice
by Ausk Yesterday at 11:07 am

» HMRC SELL DEBTS ?
by MEMEGIRL Yesterday at 9:36 am

» Does anyone know how to get in touch with Tiggy?
by daveiron Yesterday at 9:07 am

» Cancer Act 1939
by assassin Yesterday at 1:58 am

» Liability Order in Respect of Council Tax....
by midnight Yesterday at 1:55 am

» Buddha Dharma - Buddhism
by actinglikeabanker Wed Jul 19, 2017 8:55 pm

» Creating Energy-Wind
by assassin Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:39 pm

» Posting in forum
by assassin Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:30 pm

» The Finance Curse - Professor confirms the Promissory Note in Loans
by ceylon Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:17 am

» Intense electrical storm
by Waffle Wed Jul 19, 2017 7:25 am

» Learn Sanskrit
by actinglikeabanker Wed Jul 19, 2017 2:11 am

» THE CENSUS, ARE YOU IN THEIR WAREHOUSE? BC, SECURITISATION
by Waffle Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:38 pm

» The difference between 'affirmation' and 'oath'
by Society of the Spectacle Tue Jul 18, 2017 8:40 pm

» Hello and Capquest
by daveiron Tue Jul 18, 2017 12:13 pm

» Latest Rich Planet vids
by fozbod Tue Jul 18, 2017 12:07 pm

» GOODF ebook
by cidereye Tue Jul 18, 2017 11:14 am

» Diaspora
by Solosmurf Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:45 am

» Court
by bigend Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:47 pm

» NOTTINGHAM CRIMINAL CARTEL PARKING CHARGES TO RISE TO £100 00 PER MONTH THEY DONT WANT YOU ON THE RO
by ceylon Mon Jul 17, 2017 10:59 pm

» sol excalibre with cookiemonster
by Lopsum Mon Jul 17, 2017 8:42 pm

» UK people apparently linking Birth cert trust account to paypal
by Svetlana Mon Jul 17, 2017 4:31 pm

» The Current Pharmaceuticals Scam
by badvoc Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:54 am

» Are you sure you are a police officer today?
by assassin Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:05 am

» DIVINE SOVEREIGNTY: UTILIZING YOUR TREASURY DIRECT ACCOUNTS
by Mia Media Mogul Mon Jul 17, 2017 12:03 am


Court

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Court

Post by petesomething on Tue May 09, 2017 5:49 pm

Hi lopsum

Most people lose by just not turning up for court. What makes me mad is they apply to court without any proof of any alleged debt.

I had to do the unless order and the N244 form, which cost me £50 at the time for the court to order them to supply me with the information. But why does the court allow this? If they have not got the proof, why are they taking us to court.

To clear another point up, on my default notice they put my new address which i did not live there at that time, unless I had Doctor Who's Tardis. They falsified the default notice, so i did another N244 form to have the case struck out, but they made it the final hearing. The court did not strike it out because they put the wrong address, which was an address from the future and fraud. But on the second default notice they supplied, they put the correct address for that time, but this time they put the wrong credit card number. So they didn't strike it out for the first default notice, and i won my case on the default notice not being true copies and of course the credit agreement.

Basically they can make up these papers and the court lets them do this. But what the courts should be doing is fining these people, or we should be allowed to sue them. But like i said, these debt collection firms are making the courts thousands of pounds each year.

petesomething
Admin
Admin

Posts : 195
Join date : 2017-02-24
Location : NORTHAMPTON

Back to top Go down

Re: Court

Post by Lopsum on Tue May 09, 2017 7:17 pm

so by making it the final hearing this stops you from counter claiming?
so its the judge who you should claim against as facilitating the fraud and protecting criminals!!
avatar
Lopsum
Admin
Admin

Posts : 569
Join date : 2017-01-15

http://goodf.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Court

Post by petesomething on Tue May 09, 2017 7:27 pm

Yes, it was on a thursday afternoon. Luckily i get paid on thursdays and i had a wage slip in my wallet. I asked the judge about the money i have spent and the afternoon i have lost off of work, she told me i could not claim nothing, unless i can show proof of my earnings. So i said, i have got a wage slip in my wallet and she let me claim the afternoon's pay.

If i did not have my wage slip in my wallet, i could not even claim the half day.

I want people to know when i first went to court, i think it was on a monday morning. There was 6 solicitors in the hallway and i was the only defendant there. These other solicitors were in and out of the court within 5 minutes, when i went in we were in there for almost 1 hour. The final hearing, the court case was 1:30pm, must have went in about 2pm, and we did not come out of the room until gone past 4pm.

Think, if all the people went to court, the courts would be clogged up. And i want people to understand if you do not turn up for court, you will lose by default, even if they have not got the paperwork.


Last edited by petesomething on Tue May 09, 2017 7:29 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : mistype)

petesomething
Admin
Admin

Posts : 195
Join date : 2017-02-24
Location : NORTHAMPTON

Back to top Go down

Re: Court

Post by Lopsum on Tue May 09, 2017 8:06 pm

cheers pete, im just going over the argument some have on the other site , saying the 3 letters is ineffective simply is not tested for the conclusion to be drawn! And its akin to not saying no to a bully "because its ineffective" .This is the nuts  of the argument and they are wrong.
avatar
Lopsum
Admin
Admin

Posts : 569
Join date : 2017-01-15

http://goodf.forumotion.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Court

Post by petesomething on Tue May 09, 2017 8:53 pm

i was told off on other site about billing , the court will not let you win on the billing side , it would be end for the DCA,s but they worry , it will only take one clever person to claim , then we all will ,

this is why the DCA,s worry

petesomething
Admin
Admin

Posts : 195
Join date : 2017-02-24
Location : NORTHAMPTON

Back to top Go down

Re: Court

Post by landlubber on Wed Jun 14, 2017 3:38 pm

If anyone is confronted by a court appearance and is subjected to paying a sum of money and fill in forms, the N244 for instance, then the courts are in breach of your human rights under the declaration of human rights 1948 article 7: All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation this declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

In being forced to pay out any money, they are setting up a barrier that may/could prevent the wo/man from getting full justice based upon their ability to pay. That's fraud.

landlubber
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 128
Join date : 2017-01-31

Back to top Go down

Re: Court

Post by paymydues2 on Fri Jun 30, 2017 12:50 pm

After reading all this one thing strikes me.
Are we not advised NOT to go to court as we are not dead fictions but live individuals? Is this system not geared up to rip us off by all the wordplay and absolute fraud that goes on daily?

If we ever get a invitation to go to court what about the 'I cannot attend as I am a live man' I can only send my birth certificate. Or ask them what or whom they are requesting to attend said court.
I know it right to act honourably and asking them this would surely be the right thing to do.
To me it would seem going into court willingly is like entering a den full of lions and hoping to come out unscathed.

One things for sure I will NEVER EVER entertain the illusion of borrowing debt from banks  or so called credit cards ever again.
Thankfully I never fell for the 'death grip' (mortgage) either.

paymydues2
Newb
Newb

Posts : 6
Join date : 2017-05-26

Back to top Go down

Re: Court

Post by petesomething on Fri Jun 30, 2017 2:13 pm

Hi paymydues2

if you need to go to court Shocked ( GO ), do your home work  end of the day you may win Very Happy
if you dont go you will lose by default and may have court bailiffs at your door , would you or your family want this do you want your front door drilled goods taken out of your home Mad
my self i will say , do the three letters ,estoppel if you need to bill them bill and send the new bill cover letter with the bill  before it gets to court action,

All we can do is tell people what we did and won , i may say this , next person may say something different,( billing can work ) ( KEEP TO THE PROCEDURE) ( ONLY YOU CAN DECIDE  what to do  )Rolling Eyes ,

petesomething
Admin
Admin

Posts : 195
Join date : 2017-02-24
Location : NORTHAMPTON

Back to top Go down

Re: Court

Post by bigend on Sat Jul 15, 2017 1:04 am

@landlubber wrote:Pete, it's always worth considering that DCA's are third party interlopers and unless you admit to having a debt with them, they haven't a leg to stand on no matter what they say or do. And should they come up with some document that purports to have your signature (sorry, autograph) on it, then the response is straight forward...I don't recall signing that. Wink

Hi ,could I ask you just to clarify further re interloper DCA`s? If you have acknowledged a DCA`s demand - say for example ,an alleged pre -2007 cc debt (and started making agreed repayments) they would be able enforce their claim in court, should you stop paying and contest the debt using the 3 letters, because you have previously admitted to the debt with them?

bigend
Newb
Newb

Posts : 9
Join date : 2017-07-12

Back to top Go down

Re: Court

Post by daveiron on Sun Jul 16, 2017 9:18 am

Hi bigend,

You could try something along the lines of;

Re alleged debt account no.xxxxxxxxx I have made payments to you as letters received from you whilst not exactly containing threats ,most certainly caused me a great deal of stress .However I am now been advised to request from you valid proof of claim that this alleged debt exists.

Therefor please supply the following ; ( what is asked for in the 3 letters ) & additionally ask for a signed statement from a named individual from the OC that this account has never been sold or traded in any way,and that no insurance claim has ever been made in respect of this alleged account , prior to it being sold to (dca).


Take notice that i am now placing this alleged account in Dispute.


Last edited by daveiron on Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:18 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : addition)

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 336
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Court

Post by bigend on Sun Jul 16, 2017 3:40 pm

Thanks daveiron.
So the course of action would be to challenge the debt`s existence?
If it has been (a) previously sold or (b) had ins.cashed then up my oc has balanced his books and this debt is no longer owed to the oc by me ?
And unless the dca responds showing he has possession of the original signed cca and a NOA(? () then i dont owe them either and no court case likely ?

bigend
Newb
Newb

Posts : 9
Join date : 2017-07-12

Back to top Go down

Re: Court

Post by daveiron on Sun Jul 16, 2017 6:08 pm

Hi bigend,

Yes as you have been making payments ,i think you will need to state that you made payments because you found their letters intimidating ,& you now have additional information ,If its pre 2007 there is very little chance that they can provide what you require via the 3 letters.

If like me you do not own your home & you can probably get rid of them with one letter.
if thats the case let me know

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 336
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Court

Post by bigend on Mon Jul 17, 2017 11:47 pm

 Thanks.
A few alleged  cc debts returned to oc`s.  

Deal just with dca`s who`ve bought, (paid off) debts not oc`s who`ve recalled ?

bigend
Newb
Newb

Posts : 9
Join date : 2017-07-12

Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 2 Previous  1, 2

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum