Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» NIP
by J@neD0e Today at 12:30 am

» Predictive programming and the music industry.
by Awoken2 Yesterday at 11:57 pm

» Do the banks own the courts?
by ceylon Yesterday at 9:43 pm

» the dvla
by assassin Yesterday at 8:58 pm

» Thanks for welcome
by oldernotwiser Yesterday at 7:31 pm

» What does the post have to say?
by ceylon Yesterday at 7:20 pm

» Dibley dead? Green scum?
by ceylon Yesterday at 4:50 pm

» Look up in the sky 2...the sequel.
by Awoken2 Yesterday at 3:09 pm

» Blueprint for World Order
by Awoken2 Yesterday at 2:20 pm

» Restoring our Ancient Freedoms & Traditions to put People before Politicians and Banker.
by popey Yesterday at 1:58 pm

» The Smith-Muntd Modernization Act 2012
by Awoken2 Yesterday at 1:07 pm

» Letter Process / Debt transfer to new company
by Winston Yesterday at 11:45 am

» Any advice - STA international - Student Loan - OUSBA
by Ausk Yesterday at 9:49 am

» Lowell threatening me Again !!
by barnwebb Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:48 pm

» Hoist Portfolio/Howard Cohen – Letter of Claim ?
by barnwebb Sat Feb 24, 2018 10:40 pm

» Should we opt out? Is it chemtrails day?
by Society of the Spectacle Sat Feb 24, 2018 9:13 pm

» Restoring our Ancient Freedoms & Traditions to put People before Politicians and Banker.
by teddy2 Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:14 pm

» Garden Planning
by assassin Sat Feb 24, 2018 2:40 am

» 24 Storey Tower on Fire in Kensington - dies
by Awoken2 Sat Feb 24, 2018 1:21 am

» ...Is this the final straw?
by mitch Fri Feb 23, 2018 7:20 pm

» Hello :)
by assassin Fri Feb 23, 2018 6:54 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Fri Feb 23, 2018 3:01 pm

» Buteyko Breathing
by toolapcblack Fri Feb 23, 2018 1:46 pm

» Can stage 4 cancer be cured naturally?
by ceylon Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:53 pm

» No wet signature
by eargoggles Fri Feb 23, 2018 11:36 am

» A tale of three Magis
by El E Mentary Fri Feb 23, 2018 9:35 am

» Help required with CCJ defence
by Ausk Fri Feb 23, 2018 7:47 am

» fine at old address.
by Tom Bombadil Thu Feb 22, 2018 10:01 pm

» Is no news good news?
by ceylon Thu Feb 22, 2018 6:10 pm

» Cbd Oil
by Lawful rebel Thu Feb 22, 2018 3:47 pm

» Court Scam
by El E Mentary Thu Feb 22, 2018 8:31 am

» Let's Have Some Tunes thread.
by Awoken2 Wed Feb 21, 2018 11:17 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:40 pm

» Hello and a little help please for loan debt
by homerishome Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:29 pm

» Did Robin Hood Loose £7 6 MILLION in it's second year That's OK YOU can PAY
by ceylon Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:08 pm

» Florida School Shooting - TWO Shooters..?
by Awoken2 Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:17 pm

» ...Is that the perfect royal shit?
by Lopsum Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:46 pm

Moon phases


The Fake Police Stop

Go down

The Fake Police Stop

Post by assassin on Tue Feb 28, 2017 1:20 pm

The fake police stop is nothing new but it has attracted attention from the now Prime Minister Teresa May while she was Secretary for State and this relates to both the stop and search and for traffic stops, it would appear that section 165 of the road traffic act is the default setting police use when making a fake stop, or put simply they lie to try to justify an unlawful stop, so what do those in charge say.

There are two bodies responsible, one is HMIC who are Her Majestys Inspectorate of Constabularies and have responsibility for the inspection and monitoring of constabularies; and there is the College of Policing who set the policies for constabularies and interpret their definitions and the manner in which any new legislation is used by the constabularies.

HMIC have found that constabularies are abusing legislation and using it for purposes it was never intended to be used for and passed the information to the College of Policing and they have agreed to make constabularies reduce such things as the Section 60 stop and search, but Section 165 of the Road Traffic Act is the one they are really targetting as the College of Policing has identified this as an abuse of legislation so what do they say on the matter:

No vehicle may be stopped (except in certain circumstances) unless there is "reasonable cause" which they have defined as "about to commit a crime" or "in the act of committing a crime" or the constable has reasonable suspicion that " a crime is about to be committed" and that any constable must have "reasonable justification" to believe any of the aforementioned.

They further claim that Section 165 of the Road Traffic Act is not a power to stop a vehicle on its own as it is only a power available to a constable to obtain a driver or the occupants of a vehicles details AFTER A LAWFUL STOP HAS OCCURED, this means if you are stopped and suspect it is an unlawful stop you have the right to know the reason for the stop and they are obliged to give you this reason, and this must be a specific reason and not the vague and ambiguous language they use to try to get you to believe something.

Unalwful stops:

Its a routine stop sir! no such thing, illegal, no reasonable suspicion of a crime having been committed or about to be committed.

Its about your manner of driving sir! again not a reason to stop, vague and unspecific, ambiguity.

You went through a red light sir! this is a trick and many people fall for it and reply "it was amber" and you have admitted committing an offence as you can only go through a green light.

Police constables have a number of resources available to them and the main one is the PNC check, this is the Police National Computer and gives the following information:

Name and address of the registered keeper:
Insurance details:
Tax details:
MOT details:
If the registered keeper is a firearms licence holder:

Currently there is a trend among many forces to make vehicle stops with "no reasonable suspicion" to gather the occupants details for the purposes of "intelligence" and this is an unlawful stop so you have no obligation to even speak to them or give them anything as this is a Section 163 stop and the law is very clear on this. They use tactics such as "we need to check your details sir" when there is no need to check your details as they already know your vehicle is taxed, MOT'd and insured, and if you are a firearms holder, and for anything else they have to have reasonable suspicion.

They gather information for one purpose, for their own manipulation; let me explain. When they make a stop and you give your details it goes to a police employed psychologist and they form a profile of you based upon a stop and this profile will determine many things and in most cases these profiles are loaded in favour of the police to give them reasonable suspicion of something.

Example: you work shifts or odd times as you do overtime, you travel through an area known for a specific type of crime on your route to work and home, the police have seen you; they them form a profile of you and suddenly you are seen in a crime hotspot and they ASSUME you are a criminal engaging in that specific crime and suddenly in their eyes you change from being an honest individual to a criminal and they treat you as such, but why? because of your route to work and their biased profiling.
avatar
assassin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1224
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head

Back to top Go down

Re: The Fake Police Stop

Post by daveiron on Tue Feb 28, 2017 2:01 pm

Thanks for that assassin, After your previous post I was looking at section 165 this morning .The extra info here is very useful.

daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 794
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: The Fake Police Stop

Post by assassin on Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:02 pm

HMIC and College of Policing are excellent sites of reference as not only do they state the legislation, but how the legislation is to be applied Dave.
avatar
assassin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1224
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head

Back to top Go down

Re: The Fake Police Stop

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum