Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» SUBJECT ACESS REQUEST
by assassin Today at 1:52 am

» Climate change just changed!
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 11:17 pm

» Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet
by Tiggy Yesterday at 10:29 pm

» Lloyds CreditCard - Northampton Court Claim Form received.
by sam66 Yesterday at 8:36 pm

» It's a "crime" to pay tax.......
by epsom Yesterday at 7:36 pm

» UBER
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 3:45 pm

» Mark Ceylon & Jason Holmes on raconteurs news 19/09/2017
by ceylon Yesterday at 12:32 pm

» Licence Revoked
by Jinxer Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:55 pm

» Cabot offer
by petesomething Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:39 pm

» Boats & Ships
by Society of the Spectacle Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:18 pm

» Wim Hof
by Society of the Spectacle Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:07 pm

» Non-limited Business Question
by Phillpots Sat Sep 23, 2017 7:36 pm

» WeRe bank
by QUEENISABELLA Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:29 pm

» HAS-THE-WOOL-BEEN-PULLED-OVER-YOUR-EYES?
by 7tt7 Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:25 pm

» Parsons Green - most pathetic false flag ever?
by mitch Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:51 pm

» ok so i frist to post here, a way to move froward
by Tiggy Sat Sep 23, 2017 2:34 pm

» Land Registry
by Jinxer Sat Sep 23, 2017 2:43 am

» can you wait till 2021?
by actinglikeabanker Fri Sep 22, 2017 11:46 pm

» remedy for P.C.N/COUNCIL TAX
by iamani Fri Sep 22, 2017 8:34 pm

» You Tube Convertor
by Society of the Spectacle Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:20 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Fri Sep 22, 2017 6:53 pm

» Cabot Financial Ltd
by Tiggy Fri Sep 22, 2017 3:18 pm

» New Alternative letters for DCA's ( acting as agents)
by daveiron Fri Sep 22, 2017 2:36 pm

» Lowell & Cohen Cramer - Directions Questionnaire Received
by andyb93 Fri Sep 22, 2017 12:22 pm

» The Ledger Bait, Dead Men Have No Rights Justinian Deception Channel and ROHAN
by Society of the Spectacle Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:37 pm

» New/old Member
by Society of the Spectacle Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:12 pm

» Hierachy
by iamani Thu Sep 21, 2017 7:02 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Lopsum Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:55 pm

» 911 Alchemy
by pitano1 Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:00 pm

» Statement from Barclaycard
by Tiggy Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:17 pm

» In plain sight.... Battleship.
by Awoken2 Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:00 pm

» HEAL YOURSELF natural remedies to all illness
by Ausk Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:26 am

» V.Important
by assassin Thu Sep 21, 2017 2:15 am

» Funds Delivered! What You Mean We Do What We Say!
by Tom Bombadil Wed Sep 20, 2017 9:34 pm

» RFID - corporations rule OK
by Lopsum Wed Sep 20, 2017 5:17 pm

» Are they RELATED, Memes and Other Lookalikes and Coincidences.
by actinglikeabanker Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:07 pm

» New Alternative Letters for Original lenders (Bank / Credit Cards
by daveiron Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:03 pm


Moorcroft chasing 1200

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by Keithatlm on Sat Jul 15, 2017 3:08 pm

Ongoing with moorcroft they have just sent me a pile off statements and a letter after 3 letters and estoppel basically saying our
client believes the enclosed info confirms the liability they advise exist and they have also instructed moorcroft to continue
to assist with the recovery of this outstanding account balance owed. Please call us ..
Any advice greatly appreciated

Thanks K

Keithatlm
Newb
Newb

Posts : 6
Join date : 2017-05-31

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by daveiron on Sat Jul 15, 2017 3:55 pm

Dear (whoever you have been dealing with) & cc to C.E.O.

I am in receipt of your letter dated xxxxxx

You and your client have now been requested to supply proof of claim a total of six(6) times .
I have always stated that i will pay any money I may awfully owe to your client upon Proof of Claim.

It is clear that you and your client cannot provide such Proof of Claim ,because if you had you would have been paid.

In addition to the documents previously requested be provided ,I now require a signed statement from a named individual from the original alleged creditor that this alleged account has not been sold or traded in anyway.
Unless proof of claim is provided within three (3) working days ,I will deem this matter closed and no further correspondence will be entered into.

All correspondence must be signed by a named individual who takes liability for its contents.
Any correspondence that doe's not comply will be ignored.


yours sincerely

By:

John of the family Doe

Authorised Agent and Representative for (all caps name)

No assured value.No Liability.Errors & Omissions Excepted. All rights reserved
Implied admission by absence of rebuttal
Without recourse - Non assumpsit
All contacts recorded .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You could try this /adapt to suit

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 545
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by daveiron on Sat Jul 15, 2017 3:58 pm

re above, everything after the word ignored should by on the right hand side

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 545
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

That letter worked

Post by Keithatlm on Thu Jul 27, 2017 11:22 am

Sent on the 17/7/17 and just received letter to say they are passing back to lloyds.

Thanks a lot for all you help.

Keithatlm
Newb
Newb

Posts : 6
Join date : 2017-05-31

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by daveiron on Thu Jul 27, 2017 1:41 pm

Thank for the feed back ,please keep us informed.

regards dave

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 545
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by sirus0 on Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:26 pm

I had few of those debt collection agencies sending me letters but after 3 of our letters they backed off.
Please use Companies Act 2006 section 44 - Execution of documents - they never sign any of the credit agreements correctly, so on this basis they are void.
Regards!

sirus0
Newb
Newb

Posts : 39
Join date : 2017-07-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by LionsShare on Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:35 pm

sirus0 wrote:I had few of those debt collection agencies sending me letters but after 3 of our letters they backed off.
Please use Companies Act 2006 section 44 - Execution of documents - they never sign any of the credit agreements correctly, so on this basis they are void.
Regards!
That is very interesting, currently having probs with above all others LCS, just sent notice never had any contract with them to pay? So have given opportunity to prove thier claim. Don't suppose they can as I know they can't.
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 204
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by LionsShare on Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:39 pm

With these claims being made left, right, center has anyone tried a defense of using definition of FIAT currency:

"Intrinsically valueless money used as money because of government decree"

From wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_money

In other words why are ? trying to claim NOTHING from whom ever?
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 204
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by sirus0 on Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:57 pm

Yes, maybe the fiat currency is not worth anything but for us to buy food and pay the bills we have to earn it = spend time and energy to get it and this keeps us enslaved, in the constant race for survival. We don't have time to think, to socialize with family and friends, we don't have time to search info on all the bad things that they are doing to us... The deception is huge.
One of the ways is to stop eating the meat - be vegetarian - do no harm to others, even animals. Take care of your karma. With meat you consume a lot of bad energy that will lower your vibrations. Take care of yourselves - meat is poisonous for our body! Meditate as well. Smile Very Happy We are eternal souls in this temporary biological vehicle - we are GOD-like.

sirus0
Newb
Newb

Posts : 39
Join date : 2017-07-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by Keithatlm on Thu Jul 27, 2017 10:26 pm

what has meat and being a vegetarian got anything to do do with moorcroft enjoy life.

Keithatlm
Newb
Newb

Posts : 6
Join date : 2017-05-31

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by LionsShare on Fri Aug 04, 2017 9:26 am

LionsShare wrote:
sirus0 wrote:I had few of those debt collection agencies sending me letters but after 3 of our letters they backed off.
Please use Companies Act 2006 section 44 - Execution of documents - they never sign any of the credit agreements correctly, so on this basis they are void.
Regards!
That is very interesting, currently having probs with above all others LCS, just sent notice never had any contract with them to pay? So have given opportunity to prove thier claim. Don't suppose they can as I know they can't.
Received letter yesterday stating LCS dont have deed of assignment or novation - so that's it they have NO claim?
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 204
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by sirus0 on Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:24 pm

They have no standing as they were not authorized by their client to act on their behalf.
Authorization can come only from authorized employees of the company - normally it is director or secretary but then they have to put two signatures with two names and the same date.

Even if they would have valid deed of assignment they still have to prove that you own the money on the first place.

It's important to send them Fee Schedule - eg: £1000 for you to read the letter and £10 000 for each letter that you have to write back to them. You have to employ legal advisers to write the answer so the fee should be high.
You don't want them to have letter ping-pong with you for free - it cost's you time and energy to deal with fraudulent claims.
Moorcroft just run away from 2 of my cases! Very Happy

https://i11.servimg.com/u/f11/19/75/63/04/moorhf11.jpg

Very Happy

sirus0
Newb
Newb

Posts : 39
Join date : 2017-07-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by Stevro on Thu Aug 17, 2017 5:37 pm

Awesome!!!

sirus0 wrote:

Moorcroft just run away from 2 of my cases! Very Happy

https://i11.servimg.com/u/f11/19/75/63/04/moorhf11.jpg

Very Happy

Stevro
Newb
Newb

Posts : 26
Join date : 2017-08-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by Tiggy on Thu Aug 17, 2017 6:08 pm

LionsShare wrote:
Received letter yesterday stating LCS dont have deed of assignment or novation - so that's it they have NO claim?

Is the debt collector working on behalf of the original creditor? If so, then there will be no assignment documents as the debt hasn't been assigned.

Tiggy
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 173
Join date : 2017-08-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by LionsShare on Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:47 am

Tiggy wrote:
LionsShare wrote:
Received letter yesterday stating LCS dont have deed of assignment or novation - so that's it they have NO claim?

Is the debt collector working on behalf of the original creditor? If so, then there will be no assignment documents as the debt hasn't been assigned.
The collector claim to be "instructed" by thier client & the debt has not been "sold" or "assigned", so looks like you are correct Tiggy! However I have instructed them that will ONLY will deal with OC so will have to wait & see.
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 204
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by joedalton on Fri Sep 01, 2017 3:35 pm

If a debt has been assigned, can it be passed back to the OC? Eg BC have assigned a debt to Hoist

joedalton
Newb
Newb

Posts : 37
Join date : 2017-08-17

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by Tiggy on Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:51 pm

joedalton wrote:If a debt has been assigned, can it be passed back to the OC?  Eg BC have assigned a debt to Hoist
Yes, a debt can be assigned and reassigned however many times they like.

I had one assigned by HSBC to 1st Credit, I tied them up with 8 pages of pre action conduct and they gave up and assigned it back to HSBC, never heard anything afterwards and has long since been statute barred.

Tiggy
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 173
Join date : 2017-08-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by Whymeok on Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:00 pm

how did you word your 8 pages,, so this before any court action i take it?

Whymeok
Newb
Newb

Posts : 48
Join date : 2017-05-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by Tiggy on Sat Sep 02, 2017 2:58 pm

Whymeok wrote:how did you word your 8 pages,, so this before any court action i take it?
Yes, it was pre action conduct. They'd lumped a loan and overdraft facility together and tried to claim all of it was exempt from Part V of the Consumer Credit Act.

So all the questions I asked were specific go their correspondence.

Tiggy
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 173
Join date : 2017-08-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by Whymeok on Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:08 pm

if a company put up cost on agreement then what was frist agreed what part of the consumer credit act one able to look to this?

Whymeok
Newb
Newb

Posts : 48
Join date : 2017-05-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by Tiggy on Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:20 pm

Whymeok wrote:if a company put up cost on agreement then what was frist agreed what part of the consumer credit act one able to look to this?
It depends, what type of credit was it, credit card, loan, HP ? If it was a mobile phone debt then they aren't covered by the Consumer Credit Act.

Tiggy
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 173
Join date : 2017-08-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by Whymeok on Mon Sep 04, 2017 5:31 pm

ok say a mobile phone, what this come under, ?

Whymeok
Newb
Newb

Posts : 48
Join date : 2017-05-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by Tiggy on Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:27 pm

Whymeok wrote:ok say a mobile phone, what this come under, ?
They are classed as a service contract, so under the general Law of Contract.

Tiggy
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 173
Join date : 2017-08-11

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by Whymeok on Mon Sep 04, 2017 11:00 pm

ok i thought as much , so i not contract with dca company whom buys a claim debt, i found all letter process i sent to the dca comapny whom refussed deed my reqirements of proof of clai mand contract, so i need to word with proof of i, trying to settle , on proof of claim, as what i know in contract law

Whymeok
Newb
Newb

Posts : 48
Join date : 2017-05-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Moorcroft chasing 1200

Post by sirus0 on Tue Sep 05, 2017 10:35 am

If any DCA is making a claim under any of the government ACTS then they are committing the fraud as non of the governments during issuing their legislation had consent of the governed to do so.
Please every time ask them for a valid material evidence that they have consent of the governed. Where is their authority coming from? Who signed their assignment? If they did, then they are claiming that they have authority - ask them to prove it - ask for valid material evidence of the consent of the governed to prove that they can act under Consumer Credit Act.

Second important fact is: let them proof that the money exists and who was the lender on the first place.
Please read the report published by Bank of England:
Money creation in the modern economy.

They are giving us the clues. For every bad thing that they do, they have to give us something back. It is up to us to comprehend it and use it! Very Happy

Have a good day!

sirus0
Newb
Newb

Posts : 39
Join date : 2017-07-27

Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum