Cancer Act 1939

Prohibition of certain advertisements.

(1)No person shall take any part in the publication of any advertisement—
(a)containing an offer to treat any person for cancer, or to prescribe any remedy therefor, or to give any advice in connection with the treatment thereof; or
(b). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F1

This is one of the legislations restricting any health practitioners ability to recommend alternate treatments for the diesease, absolutely disgusting piece of legislation

If this legislation is still in place today then  the public should be told.

When I got diagnosed I found this website, it's contents opened my eyes.

https://www.cancertutor.com/cancer-myths/

The part I have identified is still in full force. Doctors will be struck off or even imprisoned for a breach. It's the very reason they keep their mouths shut about alternate therapies.

There are only a couple of treatments they want people to use and they are containing the rest very well.

The act http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/2-3/13/section/4

note- person,,,,, again and again

I was in the local chippie a few weeks ago 'debating' with a young doctor and he had never heard of the 1939 Cancer Act despite training to be a 'specialist'! He didn't believe me and had to look it up on his phone.
Mind you, he'd never heard of bi-carb as a potential cure either.

did you dare mention cannabinoids to the doc.

All it means is you can't advertise that you have a cure for cancer, could you imagine if this act wasn't in force anyone could claim to have a cure and sell all sorts off stuff without having any proof that it would work. I can remember someone telling my mum many years ago that apple cider vinegar prevented cancer and she drank a glassful every day for years, guess what it didn't work.

you mean like big pharma does,,,o

The act covers big pharma as well as anyone else. I have never saw an advert from a big pharma company claiming they can cure cancer.

CANNABINOIDS CURE CANCER !
there you go,i said that
craig (man)

off course it covers big pharma, they have the same rights as "persons"

And of course they make huge profits from cancer cures which dont work.

There have been some interesting views in this thread. Here is mine

As pointed out there are remedies other than those provide by the general healthcare industry. Those remedies are not 100% effective, however, a lot of them are more effective and safer than mainstream therapies. Cancer rates have increased tremendously, its now suggested 1 in 2 will get cancer.. This can be largely correlated to identifying the different forms and at various stages with an array of methods due to technology developments. Cancer is in the eyes of the statistics a death sentence, however, it is not and it doesn't have to be. The stats say 1 in 2 will be diagnosed and there is a 50% chance of survival for more than 10 years depending on type etc. that means according to their statistics 25% of the population will die from it. Can anyone else see the inconsistency there, 50% diagnosed why in the bloody hell is 50% of the population suffering from this disease, it literally is depicted as a pandemic. You need to do your own research to work out for your selves what is going on, I will add some links for those who are interested. But i will say this, just because someone has been diagnosed with cancer it does not mean it will become terminal! How then have they plucked that 50% survival rate out of the air when treatments may not be necessary at all, I am not saying do not get treated, but what I am saying is not everyone needs treatment, and certainly not from the healthcare system. It has its place, but so do other things that are being suppressed.

Cancer research acquired its name very recently, however the original charity started in the 1920's and has changed title a couple of times over the years. There income from 2016/17 was £650 million, an average of £5 billion is acquired in USA for funding the cancer industry. Globally its many billions every year. Since 1920 a charity has been set up in the UK, thats almost 100 years in existence and today we have 50% of the population getting cancer and 50% of that surviving for more than 10 years. For 100 years they have been researching for cures and are now spending billions and billions every year. No one is allowed to advertise the cures, offer a treatment or offer advice unless its through the medical industry. How are they acquiring billions every year? because they advertise there is no cure, they freaking advertise there is no cure. That is what they advertise to keep us running for life day in day out funding the research for a cure they have been looking for for 100 years. They've spent billions and billions upon billions, have not found a safe and effective cure and the numbers are rising every year. Together we will find the cure, we will find the cure one day, just keep running and keep donating it is there, its just round the corner, together we can beat it.

That is my view on the subject, here is a link to some potentially life saving information. Just don't tell anyone I'm advertising!

This has been one of the most eyeopening documentaries I have seen about the medical industry... The Truth About Cancer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqJAzQe7_0g

assassin wrote:And of course they make huge profits from cancer cures which dont work.

And that will be the reason they will never want to cure cancer easily, but to only treat it.
I wonder how many people on here know of someone personally who has cured themselves of cancer without the help of big pharma. You would think there would be a good few after all these years of the cures being available.

I agree with everything you say waffle, whilst they are generating that amount of money it's not in there interest to cure cancer.
I do know one thing though 100% of people who don't have cancer will die.

I believe there is a lot of fear and uncertainty, a huge psychological challenge to overcome, to choose to take a different path. In addition because of the set up and legislation there is a lack of knowledge a readily available advertisements to direct people to ulterior methods, they are there, it takes a lot to take that avenue and it takes a lot to find the avenues. People respect the medical practitioners and most are non the wiser than what they are told and heavily restricted by what they can tell, it is literally up to the affected to seek for themselves. Maybe many would have benefitted and would benefit if the industry opened its doors to all the available treatments, but you can't patent nature.

[quote="Jinxer"]I agree with everything you say waffle, whilst they are generating that amount of money it's not in there interest to cure cancer.
I do know one thing though 100% of people who don't have cancer will die. [/quote]

Its the only thing we can be sure of in life, once we are born we will die nothing else in life is a certainty.

I think what's gone wrong with alternative cures is there are so many of them purporting to cure cancer it's hard to choose which one to trust. I'm pretty sure there would be a cure out there in nature somewhere it's knowing which one works that's the key.

From what I understand is its very dependant on personal circumstances, there is no one size fits all. nd with the lack of what should have been decades of research and statistics, as you say its very hard to home in on the most appropriate treatment. I would say one thing though there are a number of treatments that are very versatile, canabis oil, vitamin c and colloidal silver. Versatility is probably a key component and could buy valuable time to home in and identify a more specific treatment, that would most likely be how I would approach it.

Let me throw some actual factual figures at you Waffle, one course of chemotherapy costs the NHS (us) £120,000 and that breaks down to £20,000 costs to the NHS directly while the cancer company receives the remaining £100,000. In America you get exactly the same cancer treatment for around £5,000 which is made in the same place and shipped out.

Your figures cite an ESTIMATED figure of 1 in 2 will get cancer in the UK, so how have they arrived at these figures? next ask why they claim these ESTIMATED figures are being bandied about? more fear porn or not.

Next look at the hypothesis; how many people would naturally overcome this condition and how many people would die.

Next ask the real crunch question, how are so many people going to get cancer and what are the causes, and why has the Government figured out the causes and acted to stop it.

Its all in the title its an Act so how does this apply to anyone of Us? statutes and acts only have power of law by the consent to be governed ....simple just do not consent,  don't give away your power!!

Advertise/promote what you want

"Cannabinoids cure cancer, turmeric and cauliflower cure cancer, getting alkaline and dropping the deadly carbs cures cancer, oxygenating your body cures cancer, apricot kernels cure cancer etc etc"

giving away your power gives you cancer!!!!

you have two choices in life,  you can have the life you have always wanted or the excuses why you don't