Display results as :

Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» I'm being sued...?
by spinsphere Today at 2:11 pm

» My first County Court Claim Form
by AgentOrange Today at 2:00 pm

» Worldwide Government Device Requests
by handle Today at 1:49 pm

» Films 1980's
by actinglikeabanker Today at 12:59 pm

» Stuck In A Loop?
by actinglikeabanker Today at 12:22 pm

» ...Is the corruption becoming so obvious even the sheep can see it?
by ceylon Today at 12:17 pm

» My credit card come back alive
by 1saberwow Today at 12:37 am

» Let's Have Some Tunes thread.
by actinglikeabanker Today at 12:34 am

» BBC TV Licensing harass the public but look what happens if we knock on their door!
by Kestrel Yesterday at 8:57 pm

» Car Rip Offs
by daveiron Yesterday at 8:07 pm

» Lowell threatening me Again !!
by daveiron Yesterday at 8:02 pm

» Court claim
by daveiron Yesterday at 7:26 pm

» Hydrogen Water
by assassin Yesterday at 6:27 pm

» Spring Onions
by assassin Yesterday at 6:26 pm

» Lowell Solictors
by Geech Yesterday at 6:21 pm

» ...The KaK & M@© Show Who else is being rapped?
by ceylon Yesterday at 6:01 pm

» Alexa records conversation and sends it to 3rd party
by jss64 Yesterday at 5:33 pm

» UK Column Friday 25/05/2018: The Trump Card or is it One.
by ceylon Yesterday at 2:25 pm

» Shocking Video: Newborn Infants Die While Mother Pleads for Help, Hospital Staff Refuse to Assist
by ceylon Yesterday at 1:25 pm

by ceylon Yesterday at 11:54 am

» time to put the silicon obsession down
by toolapcblack Yesterday at 11:25 am

» The Jo Cox Assassination (An Independent Investigation by Richard D Hall)
by toolapcblack Yesterday at 11:20 am

» New member from old GOODF, need some advice
by watevah Yesterday at 2:29 am

» A woman is arrested after asking MET Police why muslims are allowed to break the law
by midnight Thu May 24, 2018 10:37 pm

» ...The KaK & M@© Show. Are wood burning stoves the new CRACK?
by ceylon Thu May 24, 2018 5:30 pm

» County Court Claim
by 2521183 Thu May 24, 2018 3:09 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Thu May 24, 2018 3:02 pm

» Hello found you again
by 2521183 Thu May 24, 2018 2:53 pm

» COUNTY COURT CLAIM - CPR18 - Credit Agreement Provided. How to amend
by 2521183 Thu May 24, 2018 2:47 pm

» ...Is it propaganda time to attack Russia? Are you ready for the False flag on the 25th?
by ceylon Thu May 24, 2018 12:44 pm

» GDPR - might keep the banks and DCAs etc at bay (legally)
by pieintheskywhenIdie Thu May 24, 2018 12:28 pm

» Amazon selling facial recognition to police
by handle Thu May 24, 2018 10:40 am

» Lowell Providing "statement" as proof for alleged debt
by stormy121 Thu May 24, 2018 9:58 am

» Planting Radish Microgreens
by actinglikeabanker Thu May 24, 2018 8:25 am

» Super Simple DIY Router Table
by actinglikeabanker Thu May 24, 2018 8:12 am

» Dumb Policeman
by assassin Thu May 24, 2018 1:26 am

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Society of the Spectacle Wed May 23, 2018 7:36 pm

Moon phases

UK judge blocks £14bn class action suit against Mastercard

Go down

UK judge blocks £14bn class action suit against Mastercard

Post by jss64 on Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:38 pm

UK judge blocks £14bn class action suit against Mastercard.

Campaigners have lost the right to bring a £14bn ($18bn) mega class action suit against MasterCard alleging the US credit card firm had overcharged 46 million people over almost two decades.

The Competition Appeals Tribunal in London threw out the claim agreeing with MasterCard that the grievance was unsuitable to be brought as a collective action suit. This blocks the case from going to court.

The claim against MasterCard is that it allegedly infringed EU competition law by imposing high card charges that were passed on to shoppers over a 16-year period ending in 2008.

MasterCard argued the grievance did not meet the set criteria for a collective action to proceed saying the claim contained a massive class of individuals with disparate claims.

If it had gone to court the case would have been one of the largest and most complex in UK legal history. It would have tested the limits of the Britain' 2015 Consumer Rights Act, which introduced US-style class actions for breaches of British or EU competition law.

The lawsuit alleged that cross-border charges on the use of MasterCard debit and credit cards — known as interchange fees — were a significant cost for retailers. But this cost was then passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices for goods and services, it claimed.

The case was brought forward by US law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan after MasterCard lost a 2007 appeal of a European Commission ruling that its fees were anti-competitive.

The firm was retained by Walter Merricks, the UK's former financial ombudsman, who spearhead the class action claim.

Campaigners disappointed
Merricks said he was considering an appeal and told the Financial Times he was "surprised and disappointed" by the decision.

He added: "The new collective action regime was introduced by the Consumer Rights Act to overcome the difficulty for consumers seeking to recover losses from competition law infringements. I am concerned that this new regime designed to benefit consumers may never get off the ground."

The number of potential claimants involved in the proposed action was so large because the law allows individuals to be automatically included in this type of litigation unless they opt out.

Campaigners for the class action argued the suit ought to include anyone who bought goods or services from UK businesses that accepted MasterCards between May 1992 and June 2008, provided they were UK residents and aged 16 or over.

I wonder if MasterCard are big donors to certain parties

Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 54
Join date : 2017-02-06

Back to top Go down

Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum