Display results as :

Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Barclaycard
by Jinxer Yesterday at 11:38 pm

by Jinxer Yesterday at 11:12 pm

» Lowell Court Claim & Mediation
by petesomething Yesterday at 9:57 pm

» Barcelona Attack ??
by Awoken2 Yesterday at 8:26 pm

» Robinson Way
by curvy63 Yesterday at 8:18 pm

» Unlawful / Unjust Enrichment
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 7:58 pm

» 3 Letters Posted - Credit Agreement
by daveiron Yesterday at 6:14 pm

by iamani Yesterday at 3:48 pm

» Deed of Assignment Vs Notice of Assignment
by Tiggy Yesterday at 1:05 pm

» SATIRE--Man Sends Audition Tape To Globalists To Be Crisis Actor in Next False Flag
by handle Yesterday at 11:32 am

» Copyright declaration & notice
by joedalton Yesterday at 9:54 am

» Nottingham Meeting for Free Thinkers 19 August 2017
by Boudica Yesterday at 9:44 am

» Moorcroft chasing 1200
by LionsShare Yesterday at 8:47 am

» What If We Merge Human and Machine
by daveiron Yesterday at 7:56 am

» Processed meats or cigarettes – which gives you cancer more quickly?
by Waffle Yesterday at 7:32 am

» 'Help needed' standardised questionnaire
by 1saberwow Yesterday at 7:29 am

» Removing splinters with bicarbonate of soda
by Lopsum Yesterday at 6:29 am

» Good afternoon
by joedalton Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:05 pm

» The 12 biggest SCIENCE LIES you’ve been told by corporations, government and the corrupt media
by epsom Thu Aug 17, 2017 7:47 pm

» The 3 Letters
by petesomething Thu Aug 17, 2017 6:04 pm

» University fees a Ponzi scheme
by ceylon Thu Aug 17, 2017 4:23 pm

» Urgent one!!! Debt Managers.
by Stevro Thu Aug 17, 2017 3:49 pm

» Is this evidence of liability?
by Stevro Thu Aug 17, 2017 2:46 pm

» I need your help
by curvy63 Thu Aug 17, 2017 2:29 pm

» ccscollect
by iamani Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:06 pm

» Liability order council tax
by sirus0 Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:43 pm

» Principles of Private Law - Australia
by actinglikeabanker Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:30 pm

» Court Claim Forms
by Tiggy Thu Aug 17, 2017 11:45 am

» Communication after Estoppel
by Stevro Thu Aug 17, 2017 9:37 am

» Anyone won in court using the 3 letters as a defence?
by Stevro Thu Aug 17, 2017 6:20 am

» Are they gearing up to go to war?
by Jinxer Wed Aug 16, 2017 10:59 pm

by Waffle Wed Aug 16, 2017 9:19 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Lopsum Wed Aug 16, 2017 8:04 pm

» The Ledger Bait, Dead Men Have No Rights
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Aug 16, 2017 7:27 pm

» CC debt already got CCJ.. 3 letter process?
by Tiggy Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:21 pm

by ceylon Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:32 pm

» old get out of debt site
by daveiron Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:09 pm

UK judge blocks £14bn class action suit against Mastercard

View previous topic View next topic Go down

UK judge blocks £14bn class action suit against Mastercard

Post by jss64 on Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:38 pm

UK judge blocks £14bn class action suit against Mastercard.

Campaigners have lost the right to bring a £14bn ($18bn) mega class action suit against MasterCard alleging the US credit card firm had overcharged 46 million people over almost two decades.

The Competition Appeals Tribunal in London threw out the claim agreeing with MasterCard that the grievance was unsuitable to be brought as a collective action suit. This blocks the case from going to court.

The claim against MasterCard is that it allegedly infringed EU competition law by imposing high card charges that were passed on to shoppers over a 16-year period ending in 2008.

MasterCard argued the grievance did not meet the set criteria for a collective action to proceed saying the claim contained a massive class of individuals with disparate claims.

If it had gone to court the case would have been one of the largest and most complex in UK legal history. It would have tested the limits of the Britain' 2015 Consumer Rights Act, which introduced US-style class actions for breaches of British or EU competition law.

The lawsuit alleged that cross-border charges on the use of MasterCard debit and credit cards — known as interchange fees — were a significant cost for retailers. But this cost was then passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices for goods and services, it claimed.

The case was brought forward by US law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan after MasterCard lost a 2007 appeal of a European Commission ruling that its fees were anti-competitive.

The firm was retained by Walter Merricks, the UK's former financial ombudsman, who spearhead the class action claim.

Campaigners disappointed
Merricks said he was considering an appeal and told the Financial Times he was "surprised and disappointed" by the decision.

He added: "The new collective action regime was introduced by the Consumer Rights Act to overcome the difficulty for consumers seeking to recover losses from competition law infringements. I am concerned that this new regime designed to benefit consumers may never get off the ground."

The number of potential claimants involved in the proposed action was so large because the law allows individuals to be automatically included in this type of litigation unless they opt out.

Campaigners for the class action argued the suit ought to include anyone who bought goods or services from UK businesses that accepted MasterCards between May 1992 and June 2008, provided they were UK residents and aged 16 or over.

I wonder if MasterCard are big donors to certain parties


Posts : 22
Join date : 2017-02-06

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum