Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Proof DCA Buy and Sell Your Debt
by warwick65 Today at 2:43 pm

» Hoist Portfolio Holding Limited
by warwick65 Today at 2:40 pm

» Littering 'accusation'
by Theatchet Today at 2:27 pm

» Lowell threatening me Again !!
by warwick65 Today at 1:09 pm

» Vets Stealing Cats By Fraud
by andybreck Today at 12:34 pm

» living on holiday park and council tax
by Kestrel Today at 11:24 am

» Is there anything to see here if not should we move along?
by ceylon Today at 10:59 am

» Not sure which letter to send !
by Tiggy Today at 10:05 am

» Debt ban from travelling abroad?
by 1saberwow Today at 12:34 am

» Do I rant a lot?
by freeland Yesterday at 9:02 pm

» DOOMWATCH Wednesdays with Alex G every 3rd Wednesday of the month
by freeland Yesterday at 8:52 pm

» Setting Up New Financial Identity
by pipsaholic Yesterday at 6:25 pm

» Vegas False Flag
by Awoken2 Yesterday at 3:12 pm

» Let's Have Some Tunes thread.
by Awoken2 Yesterday at 12:09 pm

» Predictive programming and the music industry.
by Awoken2 Yesterday at 11:42 am

» Is there anything going on?
by ceylon Yesterday at 10:35 am

» A Reminder for everyone.
by daveiron Yesterday at 8:30 am

» The Honest Po-lice
by assassin Yesterday at 2:28 am

» Fighting the Banks in Other Countries,
by Society of the Spectacle Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:34 pm

» Want to save money? WATCH THIS
by Tom Bombadil Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:00 pm

» Are you a slave? Yes but a free range slave.
by ceylon Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:44 pm

» i hope this is correct
by Lopsum Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:29 pm

» Been sent a fake default notice
by Tiggy Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:21 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Fri Jan 19, 2018 2:49 pm

» ...Is this the BIG ONE or is there more to come?
by ceylon Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:09 pm

» Silence Is Golden
by Ausk Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:16 am

» Planning ahead for 25k debt
by warwick65 Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:08 am

» Claim from court finally arrived. Quick Q
by Stevro Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:17 pm

» Qanon taking down the elites
by Tradesman Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:05 pm

» Giro Slip For Council Tax???
by LionsShare Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:56 pm

» Main stream covers council apology
by ceylon Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:49 pm

» Do Nottingham criminal cartel have any comment on todays apology by the county council?
by ceylon Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:39 pm

» Acting agent or debt purchaser?
by Indebttoo Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:54 pm

» Crime Farming
by daveiron Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:29 pm

» Nottingham County Council apologies  Nottingham criminal cartel remain in denial but there time is almost up :)
by Society of the Spectacle Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:16 pm

» Should we bother?
by ceylon Thu Jan 18, 2018 11:41 am

» Geo Engineering, are we seeing another avoidable tragedy?
by Awoken2 Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:43 am


UK judge blocks £14bn class action suit against Mastercard

View previous topic View next topic Go down

UK judge blocks £14bn class action suit against Mastercard

Post by jss64 on Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:38 pm

UK judge blocks £14bn class action suit against Mastercard.

http://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/companies/uk-judge-blocks-%C2%A314bn-class-action-suit-against-mastercard/ar-AAoym1p?li=AA54rU&ocid=mailsignout

Campaigners have lost the right to bring a £14bn ($18bn) mega class action suit against MasterCard alleging the US credit card firm had overcharged 46 million people over almost two decades.

The Competition Appeals Tribunal in London threw out the claim agreeing with MasterCard that the grievance was unsuitable to be brought as a collective action suit. This blocks the case from going to court.

The claim against MasterCard is that it allegedly infringed EU competition law by imposing high card charges that were passed on to shoppers over a 16-year period ending in 2008.

MasterCard argued the grievance did not meet the set criteria for a collective action to proceed saying the claim contained a massive class of individuals with disparate claims.

If it had gone to court the case would have been one of the largest and most complex in UK legal history. It would have tested the limits of the Britain' 2015 Consumer Rights Act, which introduced US-style class actions for breaches of British or EU competition law.

The lawsuit alleged that cross-border charges on the use of MasterCard debit and credit cards — known as interchange fees — were a significant cost for retailers. But this cost was then passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices for goods and services, it claimed.

The case was brought forward by US law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan after MasterCard lost a 2007 appeal of a European Commission ruling that its fees were anti-competitive.

The firm was retained by Walter Merricks, the UK's former financial ombudsman, who spearhead the class action claim.

Campaigners disappointed
Merricks said he was considering an appeal and told the Financial Times he was "surprised and disappointed" by the decision.

He added: "The new collective action regime was introduced by the Consumer Rights Act to overcome the difficulty for consumers seeking to recover losses from competition law infringements. I am concerned that this new regime designed to benefit consumers may never get off the ground."

The number of potential claimants involved in the proposed action was so large because the law allows individuals to be automatically included in this type of litigation unless they opt out.

Campaigners for the class action argued the suit ought to include anyone who bought goods or services from UK businesses that accepted MasterCards between May 1992 and June 2008, provided they were UK residents and aged 16 or over.

I wonder if MasterCard are big donors to certain parties




jss64
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 39
Join date : 2017-02-06

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum