Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Ceylon on debts, courts & corruption
by ceylon Yesterday at 8:58 pm

» Lowell threatening me Again !!
by warwick65 Yesterday at 8:49 pm

» Proof DCA Buy and Sell Your Debt
by warwick65 Yesterday at 6:40 pm

» Hoist Portfolio Holding Limited
by warwick65 Yesterday at 6:38 pm

» Behind A4V and settling utility bills
by LionsShare Yesterday at 6:35 pm

» Littering 'accusation'
by Theatchet Yesterday at 2:27 pm

» Vets Stealing Cats By Fraud
by andybreck Yesterday at 12:34 pm

» living on holiday park and council tax
by Kestrel Yesterday at 11:24 am

» Is there anything to see here if not should we move along?
by ceylon Yesterday at 10:59 am

» Not sure which letter to send !
by Tiggy Yesterday at 10:05 am

» Debt ban from travelling abroad?
by 1saberwow Yesterday at 12:34 am

» Do I rant a lot?
by freeland Sat Jan 20, 2018 9:02 pm

» DOOMWATCH Wednesdays with Alex G every 3rd Wednesday of the month
by freeland Sat Jan 20, 2018 8:52 pm

» Setting Up New Financial Identity
by pipsaholic Sat Jan 20, 2018 6:25 pm

» Vegas False Flag
by Awoken2 Sat Jan 20, 2018 3:12 pm

» Let's Have Some Tunes thread.
by Awoken2 Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:09 pm

» Predictive programming and the music industry.
by Awoken2 Sat Jan 20, 2018 11:42 am

» Is there anything going on?
by ceylon Sat Jan 20, 2018 10:35 am

» A Reminder for everyone.
by daveiron Sat Jan 20, 2018 8:30 am

» The Honest Po-lice
by assassin Sat Jan 20, 2018 2:28 am

» Fighting the Banks in Other Countries,
by Society of the Spectacle Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:34 pm

» Want to save money? WATCH THIS
by Tom Bombadil Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:00 pm

» Are you a slave? Yes but a free range slave.
by ceylon Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:44 pm

» i hope this is correct
by Lopsum Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:29 pm

» Been sent a fake default notice
by Tiggy Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:21 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Fri Jan 19, 2018 2:49 pm

» ...Is this the BIG ONE or is there more to come?
by ceylon Fri Jan 19, 2018 1:09 pm

» Silence Is Golden
by Ausk Fri Jan 19, 2018 8:16 am

» Planning ahead for 25k debt
by warwick65 Fri Jan 19, 2018 7:08 am

» Claim from court finally arrived. Quick Q
by Stevro Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:17 pm

» Qanon taking down the elites
by Tradesman Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:05 pm

» Giro Slip For Council Tax???
by LionsShare Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:56 pm

» Main stream covers council apology
by ceylon Thu Jan 18, 2018 7:49 pm

» Do Nottingham criminal cartel have any comment on todays apology by the county council?
by ceylon Thu Jan 18, 2018 5:39 pm

» Acting agent or debt purchaser?
by Indebttoo Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:54 pm

» Crime Farming
by daveiron Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:29 pm

» Nottingham County Council apologies ┬áNottingham criminal cartel remain in denial but there time is almost up :)
by Society of the Spectacle Thu Jan 18, 2018 2:16 pm


DCA Trying It On

View previous topic View next topic Go down

DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Wed Aug 02, 2017 2:30 pm

If someone could please help regarding for me some definition(s) or clarity. Currently having probs with DCA over utilities, them claiming utilities NOT covered by 1974 CCA (initially thought when starting off with new supplier then a CCA1974 would have been signed?). Anyway paid by endorsement back in Jan 2017, in July this all kicked off. They also claim thier claim has NOT been bought by them & only "given" to them by utility Co'(ie there is NO deed of assignment/novation).

My thinking is that they will proberbly have bought it, & thier cliam not been covered by CCA 1974 is erroneous. No threats of court or visit yet, but did more than inform if proven beyond reasonable doubt all monies will be paid to OC not these 3rd party plonkers.

Also with my fee schedule they are not liable to pay it!

Any thoughts would be appreciated.
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 347
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by daveiron on Wed Aug 02, 2017 3:40 pm

I can only suggest that you REQUIRE from them the exact definition they are using for 'given' re this alleged debt.
Also my understanding is they must have a deed of novation signed by all three parties. You require full clarification of who holds title to this alleged debt.

Be sure to put that you require all correspondence to be signed by a named man / woman who takes liability for its contents.

daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 757
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Wed Aug 02, 2017 3:48 pm

Thanks for the reply much appreciated. On reading the posts by others & yourself thought this must be the case so will request further info from them.

Someone other than the origonal correspondant has signed but NOT stated actually taking liability (did request this in the 1st letter written)!

From your experience do you know if CCA1974 does apply to utility companies when signing for supply agreements?
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 347
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by daveiron on Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:06 pm

I would tell them that if they are not prepared to stand by what they write .
You will not give any consideration to their correspondence .
If no one is prepared to stand by what they write ,do they have something to hide ,or maybe are they not speaking the truth ?

daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 757
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:11 pm

Thanks again
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 347
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by Ausk on Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:55 am

@daveiron wrote:I can only suggest that you REQUIRE from them the exact definition they are using for 'given'  re this alleged debt.
Also my understanding is they must have a deed of novation signed by all three parties. You require full clarification of who holds title to this alleged debt.

Be sure to put that you require all correspondence to be signed by a named man / woman who takes liability for its contents.

..... and be signed by someone within the company who is authorized to bind the company in contract.

Ausk
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 235
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by daveiron on Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:28 am

HI ausk

Definition of signature = a mark made on a document and intended to serve as an indication of the party's execution or authentication of the document and INTENT TO BE BOUND BY IT.

They sign it they are taking liability for it ,just a good idea to remind them.

daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 757
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:13 pm

@daveiron wrote:HI ausk

Definition of signature = a mark made on a document and intended to serve as an indication of the party's execution or authentication of the document and INTENT TO BE BOUND BY IT.

They sign it they are taking liability for it ,just a good idea to remind them.
Hi daveiron,

With the letter last received from DCA someone has signed it from "customer care" but has NOT directly stated they are taking liability, does this mean that signiture they are actually taking liability? This was wet ink, & legible name (although it could be made up!)

What do you think based on your experience?
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 347
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by daveiron on Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:39 pm

Hi lionshare,

That quote is from Merriam-Websters Dictionary of law.

What I always try do do is stop any wriggle room from them , ie "I require all correspondence to be signed by a named man / woman who takes liability for its contents. That is clear ,no ambiguity.

Should they try signing ,'for and on behalf of' I would return it stating I only accept correspondence with the above terms.

You should find then they are very careful what they put ,as the liability is squarely with them ,not the c.e.o. or anyone else.


daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 757
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by assassin on Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:40 pm

Try ringing the company and asking for the stated person by name, this often results in one of two things happening, either you speak to that person and you can hit them with your information directly and ask some probing questions, and often put them on the spot, or that faff about and you know no such person exists.
avatar
assassin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1133
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:01 pm

Thanks for all replies much appreciated.
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 347
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by Ausk on Fri Aug 04, 2017 2:58 am

@daveiron wrote:HI ausk

Definition of signature = a mark made on a document and intended to serve as an indication of the party's execution or authentication of the document and INTENT TO BE BOUND BY IT.

They sign it they are taking liability for it ,just a good idea to remind them.

Thanks for that daveiron

Ausk
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 235
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum