Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» The Hawking Hoax
by Lopsum Today at 5:14 pm

» The propaganda files explained?
by ceylon Today at 4:57 pm

» Letter 1 response - CCA 1974 Fact Sheet
by Tiggy Today at 4:54 pm

» The Ledger Bait, Dead Men Have No Rights Justinian Deception Channel and ROHAN
by actinglikeabanker Today at 3:52 pm

» Councils reselling water
by Lopsum Today at 3:48 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Today at 2:29 pm

» Lowell Court Claim & Mediation
by actinglikeabanker Today at 12:13 pm

» Non-limited Business Question
by LionsShare Today at 11:23 am

» Climate change just changed!
by urchinatheart Today at 9:42 am

» UBER
by Tom Bombadil Today at 9:18 am

» remedy for P.C.N/COUNCIL TAX
by urchinatheart Today at 8:53 am

» SUBJECT ACESS REQUEST
by assassin Today at 1:52 am

» Lloyds CreditCard - Northampton Court Claim Form received.
by sam66 Yesterday at 8:36 pm

» It's a "crime" to pay tax.......
by epsom Yesterday at 7:36 pm

» Mark Ceylon & Jason Holmes on raconteurs news 19/09/2017
by ceylon Yesterday at 12:32 pm

» Licence Revoked
by Jinxer Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:55 pm

» Cabot offer
by petesomething Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:39 pm

» Boats & Ships
by Society of the Spectacle Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:18 pm

» Wim Hof
by Society of the Spectacle Sat Sep 23, 2017 9:07 pm

» WeRe bank
by QUEENISABELLA Sat Sep 23, 2017 5:29 pm

» HAS-THE-WOOL-BEEN-PULLED-OVER-YOUR-EYES?
by 7tt7 Sat Sep 23, 2017 4:25 pm

» Parsons Green - most pathetic false flag ever?
by mitch Sat Sep 23, 2017 3:51 pm

» ok so i frist to post here, a way to move froward
by Tiggy Sat Sep 23, 2017 2:34 pm

» Land Registry
by Jinxer Sat Sep 23, 2017 2:43 am

» can you wait till 2021?
by actinglikeabanker Fri Sep 22, 2017 11:46 pm

» You Tube Convertor
by Society of the Spectacle Fri Sep 22, 2017 7:20 pm

» Cabot Financial Ltd
by Tiggy Fri Sep 22, 2017 3:18 pm

» New Alternative letters for DCA's ( acting as agents)
by daveiron Fri Sep 22, 2017 2:36 pm

» Lowell & Cohen Cramer - Directions Questionnaire Received
by andyb93 Fri Sep 22, 2017 12:22 pm

» New/old Member
by Society of the Spectacle Thu Sep 21, 2017 8:12 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Lopsum Thu Sep 21, 2017 6:55 pm

» 911 Alchemy
by pitano1 Thu Sep 21, 2017 3:00 pm

» Statement from Barclaycard
by Tiggy Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:17 pm

» In plain sight.... Battleship.
by Awoken2 Thu Sep 21, 2017 12:00 pm

» HEAL YOURSELF natural remedies to all illness
by Ausk Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:26 am

» V.Important
by assassin Thu Sep 21, 2017 2:15 am

» Funds Delivered! What You Mean We Do What We Say!
by Tom Bombadil Wed Sep 20, 2017 9:34 pm


DCA Trying It On

View previous topic View next topic Go down

DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Wed Aug 02, 2017 2:30 pm

If someone could please help regarding for me some definition(s) or clarity. Currently having probs with DCA over utilities, them claiming utilities NOT covered by 1974 CCA (initially thought when starting off with new supplier then a CCA1974 would have been signed?). Anyway paid by endorsement back in Jan 2017, in July this all kicked off. They also claim thier claim has NOT been bought by them & only "given" to them by utility Co'(ie there is NO deed of assignment/novation).

My thinking is that they will proberbly have bought it, & thier cliam not been covered by CCA 1974 is erroneous. No threats of court or visit yet, but did more than inform if proven beyond reasonable doubt all monies will be paid to OC not these 3rd party plonkers.

Also with my fee schedule they are not liable to pay it!

Any thoughts would be appreciated.
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 206
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by daveiron on Wed Aug 02, 2017 3:40 pm

I can only suggest that you REQUIRE from them the exact definition they are using for 'given' re this alleged debt.
Also my understanding is they must have a deed of novation signed by all three parties. You require full clarification of who holds title to this alleged debt.

Be sure to put that you require all correspondence to be signed by a named man / woman who takes liability for its contents.

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 545
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Wed Aug 02, 2017 3:48 pm

Thanks for the reply much appreciated. On reading the posts by others & yourself thought this must be the case so will request further info from them.

Someone other than the origonal correspondant has signed but NOT stated actually taking liability (did request this in the 1st letter written)!

From your experience do you know if CCA1974 does apply to utility companies when signing for supply agreements?
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 206
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by daveiron on Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:06 pm

I would tell them that if they are not prepared to stand by what they write .
You will not give any consideration to their correspondence .
If no one is prepared to stand by what they write ,do they have something to hide ,or maybe are they not speaking the truth ?

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 545
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:11 pm

Thanks again
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 206
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by Ausk on Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:55 am

daveiron wrote:I can only suggest that you REQUIRE from them the exact definition they are using for 'given'  re this alleged debt.
Also my understanding is they must have a deed of novation signed by all three parties. You require full clarification of who holds title to this alleged debt.

Be sure to put that you require all correspondence to be signed by a named man / woman who takes liability for its contents.

..... and be signed by someone within the company who is authorized to bind the company in contract.

Ausk
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 132
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by daveiron on Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:28 am

HI ausk

Definition of signature = a mark made on a document and intended to serve as an indication of the party's execution or authentication of the document and INTENT TO BE BOUND BY IT.

They sign it they are taking liability for it ,just a good idea to remind them.

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 545
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:13 pm

daveiron wrote:HI ausk

Definition of signature = a mark made on a document and intended to serve as an indication of the party's execution or authentication of the document and INTENT TO BE BOUND BY IT.

They sign it they are taking liability for it ,just a good idea to remind them.
Hi daveiron,

With the letter last received from DCA someone has signed it from "customer care" but has NOT directly stated they are taking liability, does this mean that signiture they are actually taking liability? This was wet ink, & legible name (although it could be made up!)

What do you think based on your experience?
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 206
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by daveiron on Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:39 pm

Hi lionshare,

That quote is from Merriam-Websters Dictionary of law.

What I always try do do is stop any wriggle room from them , ie "I require all correspondence to be signed by a named man / woman who takes liability for its contents. That is clear ,no ambiguity.

Should they try signing ,'for and on behalf of' I would return it stating I only accept correspondence with the above terms.

You should find then they are very careful what they put ,as the liability is squarely with them ,not the c.e.o. or anyone else.


daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 545
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by assassin on Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:40 pm

Try ringing the company and asking for the stated person by name, this often results in one of two things happening, either you speak to that person and you can hit them with your information directly and ask some probing questions, and often put them on the spot, or that faff about and you know no such person exists.
avatar
assassin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 730
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:01 pm

Thanks for all replies much appreciated.
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 206
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by Ausk on Fri Aug 04, 2017 2:58 am

daveiron wrote:HI ausk

Definition of signature = a mark made on a document and intended to serve as an indication of the party's execution or authentication of the document and INTENT TO BE BOUND BY IT.

They sign it they are taking liability for it ,just a good idea to remind them.

Thanks for that daveiron

Ausk
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 132
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum