Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Is it time the poor paid again?
by ceylon Today at 11:57 am

» History Of The Saudi Royal Family
by Kestrel Today at 11:33 am

» Arrow Global ... reared their ugly head again!
by petesomething Today at 10:22 am

» Predictive programming and the music industry.
by Awoken2 Today at 9:58 am

» Geo Engineering, are we seeing another avoidable tragedy?
by Awoken2 Today at 9:46 am

» jacobs/council tax
by pitano1 Today at 9:10 am

» Bankruptcy
by daveiron Today at 8:24 am

» What really SCARES Big Pharma? People who know how to CURE their own DISEASE!
by assassin Today at 2:12 am

» Lent Van
by assassin Today at 2:06 am

» Took me a while
by andybreck Yesterday at 10:41 pm

» Assignment
by Tiggy Yesterday at 9:20 pm

» Hedgerow Food Plants that Grow WILD
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 8:50 pm

» Lowell vanquis - Tiggy?
by petesomething Yesterday at 8:25 pm

» Is it proof..
by petesomething Yesterday at 7:57 pm

» Hello Again,
by Philchef34 Yesterday at 7:37 pm

» UK Column
by LionsShare Yesterday at 5:18 pm

» Joint Bank Giro Credit Slip Missing Utility Company Has Not sent with their fake bill/s Need advice please .
by LionsShare Yesterday at 2:53 pm

» George Soros Confirms Take Over Of Europe
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 2:37 pm

» County Court Claim
by Jay Yesterday at 12:30 pm

» Cabot and Restons Conspiracy to Defraud
by barnwebb Yesterday at 12:12 pm

» Are they just making it up?
by Lopsum Yesterday at 11:35 am

» The Secret Masonic Victory of World War Two Part 8
by Kestrel Yesterday at 10:58 am

» 3 LETTER COCK UP
by hoopoe22 Yesterday at 8:45 am

» Legal firm calling
by 1saberwow Yesterday at 6:44 am

» Car accident
by Jinxer Yesterday at 3:08 am

» Yell.com / Hibu Crooks - HELP PLEASE!
by FreedomNow Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:15 pm

» Private parking firms CANNOT fine you Daniel Bostock on the BBC
by assassin Thu Nov 16, 2017 6:56 pm

» More Brexit
by assassin Thu Nov 16, 2017 6:54 pm

» Yellow Junction box penality ticket
by petesomething Thu Nov 16, 2017 5:54 pm

» YOU SIMPLY HAVE TO LOVE our BOYS [and gals] in Blue. Here they are at FINCHLEY PARK MOSQUE
by epsom Thu Nov 16, 2017 5:04 pm

» Vegas False Flag
by Society of the Spectacle Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:08 pm

» Landlord problem
by handle Thu Nov 16, 2017 1:37 pm

» School Detention
by janloot Thu Nov 16, 2017 12:43 pm

» Mugabes gone what next?
by ceylon Thu Nov 16, 2017 12:26 pm

» Reporting the Police
by assassin Thu Nov 16, 2017 1:53 am

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:58 pm

» Paying By Endorsement
by LionsShare Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:07 pm


DCA Trying It On

View previous topic View next topic Go down

DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Wed Aug 02, 2017 2:30 pm

If someone could please help regarding for me some definition(s) or clarity. Currently having probs with DCA over utilities, them claiming utilities NOT covered by 1974 CCA (initially thought when starting off with new supplier then a CCA1974 would have been signed?). Anyway paid by endorsement back in Jan 2017, in July this all kicked off. They also claim thier claim has NOT been bought by them & only "given" to them by utility Co'(ie there is NO deed of assignment/novation).

My thinking is that they will proberbly have bought it, & thier cliam not been covered by CCA 1974 is erroneous. No threats of court or visit yet, but did more than inform if proven beyond reasonable doubt all monies will be paid to OC not these 3rd party plonkers.

Also with my fee schedule they are not liable to pay it!

Any thoughts would be appreciated.
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 290
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by daveiron on Wed Aug 02, 2017 3:40 pm

I can only suggest that you REQUIRE from them the exact definition they are using for 'given' re this alleged debt.
Also my understanding is they must have a deed of novation signed by all three parties. You require full clarification of who holds title to this alleged debt.

Be sure to put that you require all correspondence to be signed by a named man / woman who takes liability for its contents.

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 646
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Wed Aug 02, 2017 3:48 pm

Thanks for the reply much appreciated. On reading the posts by others & yourself thought this must be the case so will request further info from them.

Someone other than the origonal correspondant has signed but NOT stated actually taking liability (did request this in the 1st letter written)!

From your experience do you know if CCA1974 does apply to utility companies when signing for supply agreements?
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 290
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by daveiron on Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:06 pm

I would tell them that if they are not prepared to stand by what they write .
You will not give any consideration to their correspondence .
If no one is prepared to stand by what they write ,do they have something to hide ,or maybe are they not speaking the truth ?

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 646
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:11 pm

Thanks again
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 290
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by Ausk on Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:55 am

@daveiron wrote:I can only suggest that you REQUIRE from them the exact definition they are using for 'given'  re this alleged debt.
Also my understanding is they must have a deed of novation signed by all three parties. You require full clarification of who holds title to this alleged debt.

Be sure to put that you require all correspondence to be signed by a named man / woman who takes liability for its contents.

..... and be signed by someone within the company who is authorized to bind the company in contract.

Ausk
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 188
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by daveiron on Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:28 am

HI ausk

Definition of signature = a mark made on a document and intended to serve as an indication of the party's execution or authentication of the document and INTENT TO BE BOUND BY IT.

They sign it they are taking liability for it ,just a good idea to remind them.

daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 646
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:13 pm

@daveiron wrote:HI ausk

Definition of signature = a mark made on a document and intended to serve as an indication of the party's execution or authentication of the document and INTENT TO BE BOUND BY IT.

They sign it they are taking liability for it ,just a good idea to remind them.
Hi daveiron,

With the letter last received from DCA someone has signed it from "customer care" but has NOT directly stated they are taking liability, does this mean that signiture they are actually taking liability? This was wet ink, & legible name (although it could be made up!)

What do you think based on your experience?
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 290
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by daveiron on Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:39 pm

Hi lionshare,

That quote is from Merriam-Websters Dictionary of law.

What I always try do do is stop any wriggle room from them , ie "I require all correspondence to be signed by a named man / woman who takes liability for its contents. That is clear ,no ambiguity.

Should they try signing ,'for and on behalf of' I would return it stating I only accept correspondence with the above terms.

You should find then they are very careful what they put ,as the liability is squarely with them ,not the c.e.o. or anyone else.


daveiron
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 646
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by assassin on Thu Aug 03, 2017 12:40 pm

Try ringing the company and asking for the stated person by name, this often results in one of two things happening, either you speak to that person and you can hit them with your information directly and ask some probing questions, and often put them on the spot, or that faff about and you know no such person exists.
avatar
assassin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 942
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by LionsShare on Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:01 pm

Thanks for all replies much appreciated.
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 290
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: DCA Trying It On

Post by Ausk on Fri Aug 04, 2017 2:58 am

@daveiron wrote:HI ausk

Definition of signature = a mark made on a document and intended to serve as an indication of the party's execution or authentication of the document and INTENT TO BE BOUND BY IT.

They sign it they are taking liability for it ,just a good idea to remind them.

Thanks for that daveiron

Ausk
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 188
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum