Display results as :

Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Is there any news?
by ceylon Today at 12:00 pm

» 3 letter process
by LionsShare Today at 11:35 am

» Little help with lost item in post and hermes refusing to help!
by Kestrel Today at 11:17 am

» Lasers used in the California fires.
by Ausk Today at 9:12 am

» Veal
by assassin Today at 3:25 am

» Who wants more of the PARASITES?
by Kestrel Yesterday at 3:17 pm

» Are hospitals killing the elderly?
by ceylon Yesterday at 1:10 pm

» The Secret Masonic Victory of World War Two Part 9
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 1:02 pm

» Quince
by Ausk Yesterday at 8:48 am

» Why won't grenfell go away?
by assassin Yesterday at 1:54 am

» Let's Have Some Tunes thread.
by Awoken2 Fri Dec 15, 2017 10:01 pm

» Judge slams the Police in rape trial
by assassin Fri Dec 15, 2017 6:43 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Fri Dec 15, 2017 5:02 pm

» Predictive programming and the music industry.
by Awoken2 Fri Dec 15, 2017 9:06 am

» The Wizard of OZ – an allegory…
by ceylon Thu Dec 14, 2017 7:05 pm

» It looks like smoke & mirrors time don't it?
by LionsShare Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:00 pm

» Opening up the Gates to Hell?
by toolapcblack Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:21 am

» sent sar request and got back 1000 pages of bs
by Ausk Thu Dec 14, 2017 8:30 am

» Chris Riddell -The Underbed
by handle Thu Dec 14, 2017 1:12 am

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:04 pm

» tv licence
by daveiron Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:46 pm

» Star wars rape & the Tories?
by ceylon Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:12 pm

» Getting credit cards when unemployed
by TommyI666 Wed Dec 13, 2017 1:04 pm

» Cabot and Restons Conspiracy to Defraud
by barnwebb Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:56 am

» Is it time to attack the internet?
by mitch Wed Dec 13, 2017 11:00 am

» What really SCARES Big Pharma? People who know how to CURE their own DISEASE!
by assassin Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:33 am

» More Interesting People - Diabetes
by assassin Wed Dec 13, 2017 2:17 am

» ok so i frist to post here, a way to move froward
by Whymeok Tue Dec 12, 2017 6:21 pm

» Reply to my 3rd letter has just arrived
by Kestrel Mon Dec 11, 2017 9:01 pm

» Love what you've done with the place!!
by Tom Bombadil Mon Dec 11, 2017 8:35 pm

» sol excalibre with cookiemonster
by Society of the Spectacle Mon Dec 11, 2017 8:01 pm

» Cabot - Catalogue
by Tiggy Mon Dec 11, 2017 7:42 pm

» Brian Harvey,
by Society of the Spectacle Mon Dec 11, 2017 1:16 pm

» Snow joke its December init?
by ceylon Mon Dec 11, 2017 11:18 am

» Natorial Protest
by LionsShare Sun Dec 10, 2017 5:49 pm

» Pursuit now by Insurance Company!
by steve chapman Sun Dec 10, 2017 1:57 pm

» Is snow news good news?
by ceylon Sun Dec 10, 2017 1:44 pm

Possible improvement to the estopple letter.

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Possible improvement to the estopple letter.

Post by Ausk on Thu Aug 10, 2017 2:28 am

Perhaps the following could included into the Estopple letter as it have more 'go away' power.

"You have been given a reasoanble opportunity to prove liability exists but you have failed to do so. Continued contact in relation to this matter may not only constitute harassment but may also constitute fraud which is a crime. Fraud vitiates all contracts and there is no statute of limitation on fraud."

Continued attempts to defraud me may result in legal action being taken against you."

Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 208
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Possible improvement to the estopple letter.

Post by actinglikeabanker on Thu Aug 10, 2017 5:34 am

Hey Ausk,

Which Estopple are you referring to, the one titled "bankestopple"?.

As far as I am aware you can add whatever is legally accurate in the estopple, if I were to add something like you have put, I would consider citing the relevant laws for harassment/fraud, it is possibly not worth including the statute of limitations for fraud or an accusation "Continued attempts to defraud....." as it is just a waste of paper and doesn't really prove anything. A court would be the judge on any limitations or attempts to defraud.

With the first line "You have been given a reasonable opportunity to prove liability exists but you have failed to do so." if I were to add it, I may consider stating the exact number of days (should be 60 days presuming the ten day letter process was used) as it is an ambiguous statement/allegation and, without a specific legal definition, legislation, guideline or rules etc of "reasonable opportunity" then it could mean anything, they and a court may see "reasonable opportunity" as anytime from default to statute barred clock. I may also consider turning the sentence around slightly so that it is you, who is the one who has been reasonable by providing them 60 days to demonstrate liability, again this is just so it is a factual statement (you don't need a legal definition, legislation etc to tell a court how valuable your own time is) being made and not a claim or accusation etc.
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 485
Join date : 2017-05-10

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum