Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» …Gis 20 billion and you can stay minister to Mrs may… sounds like bribery and corruption don’t it?
by ceylon Today at 10:03 am

» Duped into guarantor, severe mental health issues
by waylander62 Today at 9:13 am

» Prisoner, Documentary + Bonus
by Lopsum Yesterday at 9:03 pm

» ...The KaK & M@© Show Do PAEDOPHILES want to make cannabis legal or not?
by ceylon Yesterday at 3:51 pm

» Do banks destroy credit agreements ?
by daveiron Yesterday at 2:51 pm

» ...Are the paedophiles getting treated too good?
by ceylon Yesterday at 12:33 pm

» Potential legal action letter from mortimer clark solicitor
by Jai786 Fri Jun 22, 2018 9:29 pm

» ...The KaK & M@© Show. Has the WAR on CANNABIS been lost?
by ceylon Fri Jun 22, 2018 7:22 pm

» Court claim
by Jai786 Fri Jun 22, 2018 4:59 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:33 pm

» Single Justice Procedure Notice
by pieintheskywhenIdie Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:15 pm

» ...Is Zionist tube censoring AGAIN? Are the commons censoring as well? wJFP7IH25Po
by ceylon Fri Jun 22, 2018 1:12 pm

» ARE WE BEING BETRAYED?
by ceylon Fri Jun 22, 2018 10:39 am

» 24 Storey Tower on Fire in Kensington - dies
by Awoken2 Fri Jun 22, 2018 8:49 am

» New 3 Letters. Any Success?
by discodave4093 Fri Jun 22, 2018 4:42 am

» ...Is it time to end the monarchy?
by El E Mentary Fri Jun 22, 2018 4:00 am

» Lowell
by assassin Fri Jun 22, 2018 3:01 am

» DW Fitness, Parking eye and Debt recovery plus
by assassin Fri Jun 22, 2018 2:48 am

» Clean up.
by midnight Thu Jun 21, 2018 9:56 pm

» Strange new symbol at speakers corner
by daveiron Thu Jun 21, 2018 8:09 pm

» Advice for partner - LOWELL
by DRAGONBORN11 Thu Jun 21, 2018 7:16 pm

» Parking Eye now DRP on my back
by daveiron Thu Jun 21, 2018 7:00 pm

» ...The KaK & M@© Show. £10 a car How much are they scamming out of the public?
by ceylon Thu Jun 21, 2018 6:32 pm

» INFO - NEW Civil Procedure Rules Pre-Action Protocols introduced OCTOBER 2017
by barnwebb Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:42 pm

» Lowell threatening me Again !!
by waylander62 Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:41 pm

» Directions questionaire from lowells solicitors
by jack Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:33 pm

» AMIGOS LOANS ON MY BACK
by waylander62 Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:31 pm

» HELP Demand? I think I have a CCJ!
by Andee Thu Jun 21, 2018 3:13 pm

» Single Justice Procedure Notice
by Winston Thu Jun 21, 2018 2:32 pm

» MORTGAGE FRAUD
by handle Thu Jun 21, 2018 1:46 pm

» ...Did the government protect serial killer doctor?
by ceylon Thu Jun 21, 2018 10:58 am

» ...The KaK & M@© Show. What is value added theft?
by ceylon Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:10 pm

» Are you the only one awake in your family ?
by Tom Bombadil Wed Jun 20, 2018 9:56 pm

» Helping a friend
by waylander62 Wed Jun 20, 2018 8:05 pm

» What are the three foundation documents?
by jack Wed Jun 20, 2018 5:14 pm

» Essex & Suffolk Water
by Sharpysparky Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:58 pm

» Natorial Protest
by Sharpysparky Wed Jun 20, 2018 4:56 pm

Moon phases


Alternate solutions Case Law

Go down

Alternate solutions Case Law

Post by Waffle on Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:19 pm

This is a transfer from a Barclaycard thread but relevant to all debts that are unsecure

First I would suggest learning what relationship is being construed against you.

They treat you as though your in a debtor creditor relationship, you should be operating in equity, which is a different world to the legislative one.

Option 1 Legal world

To request the 'deed of assignment' (you will never see one because there is no deed for property, your debts are property, choose in action), you should be asking for 'documents of title'.

To do this legally quote case law (look this up too) Van Lynn Developments v Pelias Construction Co Ltd 1968. This judgment was by Lord Denning.

Further to this is the Webster v Ridgeway (2009) whereby a 'debtor' is entitled to see a redacted version.

Option 2 Equity

I hereby request disclosure of the true copy of the original documents of title Birch v Treasury Solicitor (1951), Schmidt v Rosewood Trust Ltd (2003).


To tell a third party they are not entitled to enforce any benefit of an agreement.

"For a party to be eligible to enforce any condition of a covenant, agreement or contract they must be a sign party to the agreement"

Legally

Quote Contracts (rights of thirds parties) Act 1999 and if you want quote Woodar Investment Developments Ltd v Wimpy Construction (UK) Ltd (1980)

Equitably
Re: Cavendish-Browne (1916) which the principles of are endorsed into the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, Cannon v Hartley (1949)


There is also this case in relation to telling a third party to do one Laughing Laughing

3. At common law the doctrine of privity of contract entailed that as a general rule a contract
cannot confer rights or impose obligations on any person except the parties to it, even when the contract was directed at conferring a benefit on a third party: see Beswick v Beswick [1968] AC 58.


Last edited by Waffle on Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:05 pm; edited 1 time in total

Waffle
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 786
Join date : 2017-03-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Alternate solutions Case Law

Post by Ausk on Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:34 am

Thanks Waffle, good stuff there, definately a move forward. We need to adjust the letters to suit.


Ausk
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 322
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Alternate solutions Case Law

Post by LionsShare on Mon Sep 11, 2017 12:20 pm

Thanks waffle great info!
avatar
LionsShare
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 414
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

Re: Alternate solutions Case Law

Post by debt-less on Sun Nov 12, 2017 8:06 am

Agree with waffle and the chose in action doctrine, one should be at a Court of equity, not in a Court that may only see you as a Debtor (County, QB etc.)

Most eloquent and accurate information.

LionsShare, was the OC Barclaycard and have you made (incorrectly so as Beneficiary) any repayments upon the account?

debt-less
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 13
Join date : 2017-11-12

Back to top Go down

Re: Alternate solutions Case Law

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum