A lot of interesting stuff in this one

Something for everyone in this one from Mark windows.

yes there certainly is a lot.

Perhaps to help everyone comprehend, do we all need to take control of our birth certificate trust estate?

Another Mark Windows Video


Sorry lads , but my suspicions of Mark appear to be born out.

I have never seen anyone Provably Gain Control of their Trust.

The most you can do is Opt out by Obtaining a Certifcate of Live Birth,
Info I saw on the Justinian Deception Channel.

I think the trust thing is a Red Herring that is designed to appeal to those who think they can Work the System.
"George Carlin"
Its a Big Club , and you aint in it .

I cant find the video where he shows the copy of his Live Birth Record,
but it is different.
Some good info in this one.

sots ,he said in the video he knows of no one who has gained their trust,
he said its only hearsay & he does not believe it,& it will never happen.

daveiron wrote:sots ,he said in the video he knows of no one who has gained their trust,
he said its only hearsay & he does not believe it,& it will never happen.

Sorry Dave ,
I have to admit I wont listen to Windows anymore.

I tried to tell him about Mark Steele many times and was blocked.

Not long after he started Running his shows at the same time as Sol Excaliber and reality Chat.
I dont think that was a coincidence.

on yt in 2018 a certain yt channel did give (what appeared) fully documented evidence presented of yorkshire water running away when the stamped & autographed commercial instrument was presented. This was the eclastical trust declared used. As to whether these trusts are correct that is another matter.

Hence why I suggested the above.

Im sorry for sounding so negative.
But the wannabe gary glitter ticked me off Royally.
Then Raconteurs told me they had some bad relations with him too.

Very likely some kind of agent.

No problem sots,
Tbh I dont pay a great deal of attention to him myself,although sometimes
he does have some good info.
I think you are right to be a bit wary, I notice in his chat room many of his
followers are the same ones who are Ian Crane groupies.

LionsShare wrote:yes there certainly is a lot.

Perhaps to help everyone comprehend, do we all need to take control of our birth certificate trust estate?

"do we all need to take control of our birth certificate trust estate?"

Our Birth certificate ? You were not birthed, be careful here, no Baby has been birthed (contrary to colloqiual useage the legal term is an "Event" that is registered, which leads to a recording of a Birth, meaning no recording of birth:- no birth, but Baby was still borne out of the womb)... the fee is the estate created via a live birth deposit/sacrifice of blood cord cutting, which is something the Hebrews (the guys controlling the International Banking System) have been doing for a long time. its the jesus scapegoat put on the X to pay for our sins/debts ..... but you do not have access to the value of that forgiven credit .... because of an instilled belief system which is in reality false and also because that world does not exist in the AD calendar.

See my reply to urchinatheart in earlier post.

Here is your problem:

My Birth Certificate ..
My Birth Date ...
My Trust Account ......

None of which is true, unless you claim it to be... yeah if only it were that simple well it is but the system is set up so you cannot leave, its like Hotel California, you can check in any time but you cannot leave .... i think those Eagles guys knew some stuff, a bit like Led Zepelin did ... My Dads Music when i was younger seems to have left an impression .

Take it as you will, but its a sincere reply on my part, and all of what i stated i know to be true, through research and direct experience dealing with the Registrar General.

Mark Windows .. Hmm

Wannabe Gary Glitter .... LMFAO

I think this guy has some credibility questions that are outstanding, How many are still under water after following his CTAX woo a few years back ? shill/agent i am not sure (we need to be careful saying that about folks we dont like or agree with), maybe a tad baldrickian with his statements and pronouncements ? ... i think so.

Caveat Emptor !

@Libelresponse

You raise some very good points. I know from my research none of us being the species Man can really own anything in this system as it currently stands.

Everything is all a play on words - etimology, as long as people answer to thier b'cert name(s) then in administrative courts will be done over for...

All there really is are men & women, nothing else, its all make beleive.

You cannot inherit after 1925 in this Equity system, a fee simple is in fact what they term a mere freehold meaning a life Estate.

Mere = Mother (Fr)

All Hereditaments are deemed passing upon intestacy, see definitions in 1925 LoPA and supreme court case law.

The Man thing is not really the issue its an issue of "Being or presence" which the BC person is by default lacking, meaning they create a 3rd person.... how can you have a 3rd person unless you are in some way deemed as split ?

The Name thing is a bit of a red herring tossed out there by some knowingly or unknowingly to distract others on the path of enquiry, a common law legal name is simply your given name and your family or fathers name, it is a conjunction and it is supposed to be, it represents your dignity, perhaps it should be Fathers Name followed by first name as Daddy comes first doesn't he ? and then why some folks would want to run from their fathers name is beyond me, in fact i think it is insane.

The Middle or Baptismal name is for the BC child and that is the phoney part and if you look at it as a bridge between your father and you that the Church controls you can see how everyone is deemed illegitimate and intestate, because property cannot pass to illegitimate blood, btw Statute today treats legitimate and illegitimate children the same now, in other words everyone is deemed unable to inherit ... make sense ?  

The real problem you overlook is the DOB, and this is where Justinian Deception and others are leading themselves and others off track. I am not poo pooing their excellent research on the Glossa and the outlying foreign jurisdiction etc etc .. but it is peripheral stuff and none of that is possible once you tackle the root cause which is time based not letters, styles and conventions which are all a by product of the cause, not the cause itself.

The concepts of Debt and Credit are Time based, its a divison or measurment of a change in time, their is no Credit unless their is a passage of time, you can fictionally create that effect by using two calendars in parallel which is what they have done, they just forgot to tell us ... and we lets face it did not notice or chose not to.

I have a question for you: When does your life begin ?

Libelresponse wrote:I have a question for you: When does your life begin ?

I suppose the meaning of life is derived from philosophical and religious contemplation.

As for your question: when conseption was completed, although possibly when I started to have consciousness.

begins at fertilisation

@Libelresponse

Certainly without the passage of time - the cycle of death & new life, your point: "The concepts of Debt and Credit are Time based" is more than conceivable.

For me everything is run as a Trust, b'cert, anything public eg utilities, & the list goes on. What we are in (system) today is what we are expected to participate in whether we like it or not. Gaining knowledge of what we are/are not is important & to use that to our advantage.

Claiming the Trust Estate if it can be done, anecdotally there may evidence to prove, then perhaps we should, after all the yt vid (its been taken down) I mentioned above there was some anecdotal proof.

Claiming the Trust Estate should give us all control of what is ours in this system, without our creation there would be no economy, no commerce, no man (species).

It is fairly well known banks don't lend monies, we create it & are the creditors to this economy.

(1200)

man wrote:begins at fertilisation

hah you are the man, yes you nailed it !

Fertlisation is of course unnacounted for and pre-time, i trust you see the profound significance of this.

Beware of the redefined term conception though !

@Libelresponse

Have you ever heard of Kurtis Richard Kallenbach on youtube?

I just wondered as your rhetoric seems very close to the over all message put out by Kurtis Richard Kallenbach?

LionsShare wrote:@Libelresponse

Have you ever heard of Kurtis Richard Kallenbach on youtube?

I just wondered as your rhetoric seems very close to the over all message put out by Kurtis Richard Kallenbach?

Yes i know him very well in fact and have learned an enormous amount from him .. one of the very few folks whose intellectual acumen i actually trust.