Lockdown Boris violated SAGE advice

As I wrote of Simon Dolan’s legal challenge to the Lockdown in WORLDS ENDS: Coronavirus, Frankenstein and Other Monsters, Chapter 9 Anarchy in The UK: “This is one of the most important legal documents to have been written this century.”
The release of the SAGE Minutes, under pressure from Simon Dolan’s legal case, has proved these words prophetic.

We now have a clear timeline which supports all that was written in Chapter 3 of WORLDS ENDS: Coronavirus, Frankenstein and Other Monsters .
At that time of writing, all that was available from SAGE was its carefully manipulated selection of pre-April 2020 documents.

However:
if one were aware that all along since 2011, Govt UK had in place a SARS-CoV2 Pandemic Plan.
If one were aware that the 2011 Plan was re-issued and endorsed by Govt UK on 27 February 2020:
If one were aware that the 2011 Govt UK SARS-CoV2 Pandemic Plan was again re-issued and endorsed by Govt UK on 3 March 2020.

If one were aware that the 2011 Govt UK SARS-CoV2 Pandemic Plan was stated in the Govt UK 26 May Plan To Rebuild, as being the plan which Govt UK had been following since Lockdown on 23 March.
Then one could see, as through a glass darkly smudged with the panicked palm-prints of Boris Johnson, the transparent reality.
The true story of how Britain was put into Lockdown,
by TV announcement on 23 March 2020.
The 3 critical days from 19-22 March when SAGE was closed.
The trio of days in which the decision was made to kill a country.

http://tapnewswire.com/2020/06/lockdown-boris-violated-sage-advice/

Addendum to fourteenth SAGE meeting on Covid-19, 10th March 2020

15. Children can be infected with Covid-19 and mostly experience mild illness, with less
incidence of fever (limited evidence, low confidence). They likely transmit Covid-19, but
there are no data on this.

16. It does not appear that Covid-19 poses more of a risk to pregnant women than other infections
Because its no more than the bloody flu!

21. Social distancing ("cocooning") is for those 70 and over, as well as those of any age in
vulnerable groups.
Not the entire population then!

22. The modelling concludes that restricting this group to 70+, rather than 65+, would not
cause a significant increase in numbers of deaths

27. Long periods of social isolation may have significant risks for vulnerable people.
Another good way to kill the elderly off.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/888782/S0382_Fourteenth_SAGE_meeting_on_Wuhan_Coronavirus__Covid-19__.pdf

if one were aware that all along since 2011, Govt UK had in place a SARS-CoV2 Pandemic Plan.

Do you have a reference for that, or is there a chance you're referring to SARS-CoV, the original "SARS" virus? Everything that I've seen says that SARS-CoV-2 was only truly identified and named this January. Any document from 2011 referring to that name would be very interesting indeed.

Was that SAGE meeting the last before the lockdown measures a couple of weeks later?

Here's a reasonably readable account of how scientific advice developed in the UK, and how it influenced government.  As always don't necessarily believe it without checking, but the SAGE minutes are available online so you can cross check ..
https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/coronavirus/2020/06/where-science-went-wrong

Just copied it as I saw it FF, don't always have time to go through everything but if worthy of posting I will.

I believe the post highlights that lockdown etc was political (we know that) & not for any medical/health issues, also 'someone else' clearly made those decisions - not government. My take on it anyway.