A good take on viruses

by Kestrel Wed Apr 01, 2020 12:13 pm

https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=638176716728974&id=100016099539778

by flyingfish Wed Apr 01, 2020 1:43 pm

Am i missing something? It appears to be a guy in a video contradicting over a hundred years of medical and biological science. What is he basing his assertions on?

by Kestrel Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:19 pm

Well the general thinking is good for the vaccines industry!

This was posted elsewhere on here but he also speaks about the same regarding viruses
http://stateofthenation.co/?p=9286.

by **Lopsum** Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:23 pm

correct mrFish, we need to listen to him because ,by his own words, he has some phds and has done years of research and shit.
It works like the flat earth, it only works on people who dont have anything but what they were "told" in the first place.And now those peoples brains have fallen out anything goes!
shudder!

by **Lopsum** Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:27 pm

well maybe no so harsh but i have a point!

by **Lopsum** Wed Apr 01, 2020 3:58 pm

Its officially still up in the air , granted ! we can trade in "belief", scientists only look at dead blood in their slides for 100 years.There is a lack of evidence all around which has been manipulated by the corporations ,science doesnt really know , but wheres the evidence of this shedding detoxifiying theory?
http://maronewellness.com/pasteur-vs-bechamp-an-alternative-view-of-infectious-disease/

by flyingfish Wed Apr 01, 2020 4:22 pm

I think this is an example of science vs non-science. Scientists almost never state anything to be a fact, it's always a theory like the theory of relativity, or quantum theory. Actually those are good examples, relativity explains very large things, quantum explains very small, but the two cannot be unified. So scientist will work with a theory because it fits into existing established theory and because it is the best explanation that has been found both to explain things and to predict other things. Calling it a "theory" does not mean a vague idea, it means that science is open to alternatives should anyone come up with something that better explains the real world. Like Newtonian physics worked perfectly well until we scaled right up and needed relativity, or later scaled right down to the quantum world. However such alternative theories would be subject to extreme scrutiny before anyone considered accepting them - what's the evidence, does it explain observations better than current theory, does it work to predict results?

So contrast that with conspiracy theorists who feel free to state their beliefs as absolute fact and don't need to back them up with evidence. Preferably in a video. And even to persist in the face of evidence to the contrary.

For example "coronavirus is caused by 5G", even though it's appeared in places without 5G, and in other places where there's been 5G for almost a year.

by Sponsored content

A good take on viruses

A good take on viruses

Re: A good take on viruses

Re: A good take on viruses

Re: A good take on viruses

Re: A good take on viruses

Re: A good take on viruses

Re: A good take on viruses

Re: A good take on viruses