BBC CALLS FOR MORE CENSORSHIP BECAUSE OF LAS VEGAS CONSPIRACY VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMFdwuBp3YA

jeffc has been doing videos calling out the same events for years , he has had all those channels shut down by youtube , and yet youtube are promoting other "conspiracy" channels , which get lambasted on the bbc . They allow the controlled ones but shut down any real research . The hegelian dialectic at work.

The speed at which we are sliding into that big black, dark hole of tyranny is picking up speed.

When you see how just this one single thread has been totally decimated with "censorship" it makes it patently obvious what the game is.

https://goodf.forumotion.com/t1224-vegas-false-flag

yup.
Its a good tell if you see a youtuber with alot of that in their likes list. They on the right track.
more importantly it shows blatantly all the psyops like flat earth and mandela effect that get trending views on youtube. Same plan , so the bbc ect can have a good laugh at them while they shut genuine people down .

Just heard Infowars channel (which I haven't been on since 2012) has been taken down by the usual suspects Spotify, Youtube, Apple, Facebook.
Whether you agree with Infowars or not it is obvious to me that ALL sites that question the mainstream narrative are in the crosshairs including this one.
If someones speech is disrupted because you don't like it what will happen when they came after yours?

this was more political perhaps.
alex jones has had far too much to say while the real ones get banned, its not the same . He is a trump propagandist, and more , there is also a purge of channels that are manipulating politics .

How long before criticizing bailiffs, courts, debt collectors is designated "hate speech"?

its timed to cause confusion . The alt right are calling the "freedom of speech is being attacked" when you wouldn't really expect freedom of speech on a private platform. Jones has been pushed and trended on youtube, so its internal as i suggest, more of a fall out.
we dont have freedom of speech on youtube , its been clear for the past 10 years .Real people doing any kind of real analysis will get shut down over night, not after 20 years of being pushed like jones.

edit: cips clips

That's the whole point of having controlled opposition in the first place. It will be "shut down" at some time, not for what is being said because that's irrelevant but because of the impact it will have.

If only the smaller, genuine truther channels gets shut down then people would soon twig what was going on. So a whole lot of shill sites get closed down also. The reason for this I think is because a lot of people who just start off questioning the official narrative will end up subbing to channels like Infowars because they think it is a platform that is anti establishment and pro conspiracy theory. It's talking about things that the mainstream isn't so the curious but naive get caught up listening to the likes of Alex Jones who's just spouting off about about real issues that have been problematic for TPTB.

As soon as the subs start dropping off then that's the time to shut it down. I think Infowars peaked at 2.2 million subs but started losing large numbers after Jones done a ridiculous on air u turn over Trump. I saw the episode, it was Jones in full thesbian mode, it was just comical.

So now you have over 1.8 million potential unwoolen people all thinking that there is a war on truth, which there most certainly is, who didn't realise Alex Jones was on the enemies side and not theirs.

There is a psychological impact because those 1.8 million people all now have the feeling that speaking up against the system is a futile exercise. If somebody as big as Alex Jones gets shut up then what chance will they have of spreading the word?...So they don't bother.

You have to fully subvert into a community before you can effectively break it up and that goes for any potential truther communities also.

With Infowars going down in this second purge it's just part of the psy-op. You now have the likes of Blackstone Intelligence on the scene. He's got exactly the same M.O as Jones.

He'll tell you all the truth you want to know... but he is not disclosing anything original, it's just a well financed and organised collation of other people's findings presented in such a way that the Infowars net will be cast again and more people get took in.

exactly awoken ! well explained , its all part of the main thing to discredit people who actually do the things that jones and his ilk ride the backs of in the beginning to gain support , weve been pointing it out for years , now its becoming obvious more and more. But its a cunning twist that many will fall for .
heres jeffC's take on it

JeffC talks a lot of sense, his channel is doomed....

...if you read the very first comment under the video I think it kind of reiterates what I mentioned in my last post....The perfect example right there.

Lopsum
"there is also a purge of channels that are manipulating politics"
From your first reply to my comment
Don't all the mainstream channels manipulate politics?
Don't all the social media sites manipulate politics?
Don't individuals on sites try to manipulate other individuals politics?
Isn't having any type of debate on politics in any forum a form of manipulation?
Where does it end?
What do you think is the ultimate endgame here?

it wasnt really a reply to your question, how long, i dont think it will get to that stage so never.
are you saying that someone pro party discussing politics is the same as two people discussing politics?
for starters alex isnt debating politics he is pushing it. so your question needs more thought .
We are all capable of manipulation to some extent but you cant compare jones to any normal person, lol. If you were to make the statement that " all discussions on politics are manipulative and designed to sway opinion" that would be false . When i discuss politics i dont try to sway the opinion of the other person, that wouldnt be my goal anyway.Though it could happen if i say something that the other person finds agreeable. My goal in discussing something is to air my views, receive criticism / feedback so i can refine my own views if it is flawed or find agreement when it is strong.
the ultimate goal , like i say , discredit those who are capable of critical thought who exercise their free speech . Is what they have been doing all along.

Thanks Lopsum.

Your last sentence mirrors my thoughts exactly.
Although lots of sites are pushing politics which they are perfectly entitled to do even the ones I despise and I would never try to prevent them from doing so.

What we have in my opinion is basically an online war, between those who support the idea of a completely free and open web, regardless of opinion and those who don't.
With regards to the opinion that private companies can ban whoever they like, yes that's true, but how far do you take it?
If for example a high street bank or a major supermarket decided to refuse to serve Brexit voters, technically they could do it but it would backfire on them massively.
I think this will backfire on them massively in the long term.