Process that are proven to work...

Hi all, after looking into various methods all over the internet there are so many convincing reads and many make so much sense and are written so convincing they must be right. And so many corroborate over and over.

i wanted to ask what's worked? We're mad to find a solution and ask and learn, soon as the problem is gone most backs are turned.

I've had a speeding thing go away because they got their charge statement with wrong information.
A PNC also was contested and contested, the council sent it to the courts and the courts technology failed so that went away.
Both matters are documented in this site.

What I conclude is these victories (by their error) were won because of luck, yet persistence in questioning them caused slip ups.

This is actually an awkward question to answer as different organisations operate differently across the country, and indeed the world, this is often because of the tactics they employ and this generally comes down to ignorance and the fact they employ methods which work for them and share them among others.

If for example you work for a council you connect to their intranet which is only open to full council employees (and not temporary or cleaners for example) and they communicate on this network among any council in the country and share their ways of defeating legislation, and indeed the law.

Hi assassin, i agree...it's as 'kin complicated as possible !! It has to be doesn't it...or we'd have nailed it. But no, round and round we go.

So they keep tripping us and we keep tripping them, like virus and anti-virus...oops!...related to PCs here, but..errr MS does virus and anti-virus - in both PC and sheeple!

My train of thought is, this legal / lawful game isn't cat and mouse or natural bacteria...it does NOT evolve, what they say is only correct if...a brain allows it and is therefore tricked.

The lawful law (Common Law or Law of Nature is immutable) and jurisdictions remain the same don't they. How we are tripped varies greatly, but they are bound to law (and swear to the bible) and "A" jurisdiction. So, they have to adhere to a process that is just, thus if they do anything outside of that, they are wrong...accountable and liable.
Affidavit & lien them all...ALL of them urgently!

Trying to boil things down, examples/thoughts of wrongs
banks = debt slavery
5G = health issues
5G = control by tracking (IoT coming to an antenna near you soon!)
governments (mind control) = you will do as you are told
media (false flags/BS) = backing up mind control
banks (2 mentions) = bankruptcy and lose your land and property
etc........
they get all their cards laid on the table we might as well all be called Winston Smith & Julia!

Boiled down, what cards have we got?
Common Law because some tw@t did this before and he was told off for it.

What they also have had is a collective organisation, gathering everything...inc data on habits, movement & spend to psychology patterns.
What we don't have is a collective organisation/group, to collect data and make comparisons to what has worked and what hasn't and why it failed... when we do i think we can put processes together bit by bit and keep the pressure on and evolve correctly. Elect some one to govern according to the peoples wishes and disclose ALL financial expenditures and vote on what is needed. Ah, a democracy.

One thing i think is a hinge is "consent" it keeps cropping up...

"Every Man is independent of ALL LAWS except those prescribed by nature. He is NOT bound by any institution formed by his fellow Men WITHOUT his consent."
Cruden V Neale ZNC 338 May Term 1796

Maxim "Consensus facit legem"

the Affidavit i have used in my case is unrebutted - so stands as judgment.

to quote:
We would direct your attention to the said affidavit which has been legally agreed by 657 M.P.’s in the U.K. Government Office, specifically Exhibits B & C.

In Exhibit B there is Case Law by Tribunal where Mr David Ward has no liability under the Act because the 63.5 million people in the U.K. have never formally signed a legal consent agreeing to be governed. This is prima facie evidence that government is illegal and criminal, ergo any order or judgement made by The County Court must be removed. Unless The County Court can prove consent has been freely given.

We also direct your attention to Exhibit C where it has been legally confirmed by Chandran Kukathas PHD and his doctrine which can be cited by any Law University Student in his or her thesis that a State is a Company no different to McDonalds and it is also confirmed by the Lord Chief Justice Sir Jack Beatson FBA that the office of the Judiciary is sub office of the State/COMPANY and that the Lord Chief Justice and all judiciary Judges are therefore Company Staff.

Are you ready for natural law ?

Exactly di, saw it after writing.
To fight is what we gotta do or we're already dead "they get all their cards laid on the table we might as well all be called Winston Smith & Julia!" they have the power but lots of them wielding it don't "get" it yet, they'll turn too.
The elites are phycos, no empathy, so they'll always creep to the top, but like any weed that gets a strange hold it but be cut back now and then

Agreed Itheman and the problem are the sheeple as its a numbers game and nothing more, whilever a small minority are passed off as cranks and morons then they win, so reverse the situation, if many more people were switched on and clued up there would be more pressure put upon them and they would fall away one by one.

Interesting, but is there any proof of his successes,or is it just another case
of we have heard it all before. As he claims to have been doing this for some
considerable time has anyone else come forward with their results after trying
it?
Not having a go, just questioning everything.

di, this is the same affidavit i have presented to HMCTS for them to prove consent https://goodf.forumotion.com/t2086p150-brown-all-caps-window-letter-with-defendant-visible#30339 time will tell

Thanks itheman, please keep us informed of the outcome.

Will do of course mate, let me know what you think to the affidavit too. Looks very powerful and as unrebutted...stands as judgment.

Did you ever get to see the one from Mark Windows (i think was his name)?

No I have not seen MW's affidavit .He kept saying he was going to show it but
so far I have not come across it.