Facts Unveilling

by **assassin** Thu Dec 10, 2020 3:54 am

Its been announced today that after the first ever rollout of the covid vaccine that two NHS workers have suffered allergic reactions, if two workers have suffered these reactions then how many other people have and why haven't these figures been released.

by freeland Thu Dec 10, 2020 4:49 am

my friend,s wife works in a care home and cant wait to be murdered I mean receive the vaccine,i have been explaining whats realy going on but she is brain dead and wont listen,she said she will be sacked if she doesnet take the vaccine, just another sheep..

by flyingfish Thu Dec 10, 2020 8:12 am

This looks typical of things being rushed through. The two affected both had pre-existing allergies, severe enough that they routinely carried adrenaline injectors. You would have thought the NHS would have had more sense. Indeed MHRA have belatedly updated their guidance to advise that people with history of severe allergies shouldn't received the vaccine. Quite forceful advice. Even for someone who isn't a rabidly anti-vaccine it makes a good argument for avoiding the vaccine at least for a few months to see what else crops up.

MHRA wrote:“Any person with a history of immediate-onset anaphylaxis to a vaccine, medicine or food should not receive the Pfizer BioNtech vaccine. A second dose of the Pfizer BioNtech vaccine should not be given to those who have experienced anaphylaxis to the first dose of Pfizer BioNtech vaccination.

Vaccine recipients should be monitored for 15 mins after vaccination, with a longer observation period when indicated after clinical assessment.

A protocol for the management of anaphylaxis and an anaphylaxis pack must always be available whenever the Pfizer BioNtech vaccine is given. Immediate treatment should include early treatment with 0.5mg intramuscular adrenaline (0.5ml of 1:1000 or 1mg/ml adrenaline), with an early call for help and further IM adrenaline every 5 minutes. The health professionals overseeing the immunisation service must be trained to recognise an anaphylactic reaction and be familiar with techniques for resuscitation of a patient with anaphylaxis.

I can't resist pointing out the irony, if these two had died of coronavirus then no doubt the conspiracy theorists would have been jumping on that pre-existing health condition to argue that coronavirus had in fact not killed them or that their deaths didn't matter.

by **daveiron** Thu Dec 10, 2020 10:01 am

I agree freeland, my ex is a manager of a care home, She already submits to
a weekly test along with everyone else. I have no doubt she will submit to the
vaccine as well,despite my daughter trying to wake her.
She should consider that if it all goes wrong and residents die ,who is going to
be held responsible ? Not the vax makers or the government,not her employers
she is the one with the day to day duty of care. I am glad I have been single
for 30 years.

by Broke Fri Dec 11, 2020 7:12 am

Say Sovereigns my guess is lowlife will make the first lot of vaxs fairly ok just to let the brain washed and the ones sitting on the fence, the lesser brain washed say, well there you go its all good and line up for the vax...its only my opinion I don't trust lowlife period. Got to let you know sovereigns its not going to be one vax either its ongoing, so lowlife will probably rope in some not so careful sovereigns by letting the first few vaxs easy going. My go is 'KNOW YOUR ENEMY'. And to add I'm pro choice, if you want to take the vax...knock yourself out!!!.

by **Society of the Spectacle** Mon Dec 14, 2020 5:45 pm

The vaccine may well protect against Covid, ( whatever that is actually supposed to be )
But the damage to the immune system will create an excuse for yearly if not monthly vaccines forever more.
Of course nobody will die from the desease vaccinated against. Clever huh ?

by petesomething Tue Dec 22, 2020 11:01 am

These people was being monitored how long will it take to get help if the general public suffered allergic reactions and if it was 2% out of 100 then you can say the same 2% out of millions , lots of people like to be sheep and now guinea pigs too , Hi dave my daughter works in a care home she been told she got to have it or lose her job , one way or another they will try and force us .

by **Society of the Spectacle** Tue Dec 22, 2020 2:04 pm

petesomething wrote:These people was being monitored how long will it take to get help if the general public suffered allergic reactions and if it was 2% out of 100 then you can say the same 2% out of millions , lots of people like to be sheep and now guinea pigs too , Hi dave my daughter works in a care home she been told she got to have it or lose her job , one way or another they will try and force us .

Has she thought about seeing an employment expert about a compensation payout ?
I would hope the company might prefer to pay her a lump sum rather than risk being sued ?
( forever the optimist Wink

)

by Sponsored content

Facts Unveilling

Facts Unveilling

Re: Facts Unveilling

Re: Facts Unveilling

Re: Facts Unveilling

Re: Facts Unveilling

Re: Facts Unveilling

Re: Facts Unveilling

Re: Facts Unveilling

Re: Facts Unveilling