Paying costs from pension pot

by wakey wakey Tue Dec 22, 2020 12:30 pm

Hi
Came across this article (see attached). I do not agree with what the guy did ,but can a judge order you to pay costs from your pension pot?

Sorry image is side ways, tried to edit but still ends up this way

by falco Tue Dec 22, 2020 1:07 pm

wakey wakey wrote:Hi
Came across this article (see attached). I do not agree with what the guy did ,but can a judge order you to pay costs from your pension pot?

Sorry image is side ways, tried to edit but still ends up this way

I take it you mean the postie thief?

As far as I know pensions are a form of trust which is protected from seizure. At least this is how I comprehend that they are immune from bankruptcy or other confiscation order.

by wakey wakey Tue Dec 22, 2020 1:16 pm

Yes the postie thief. Pensions in my knowledge are also kept in trust. Is this the first time a judge as ordered cost to be payed this way? Looked on internet and can not find a precedence.

by pitano1 Tue Dec 22, 2020 4:23 pm

Hi.wakey-wakey
When postie, entered their place of business.[administrative court]
Put in a plea, he gave them...power of attorney,

Which would give access to, his trust...he becomes THE TRUSTEE.
Who ALWAYS pays
THE JUDGE BECOMES...executer-de-son-tort.=a criminal asshole/privateer.
let's look on the bright side. Smile

Prison comes under the heading.
Benefits
regards
pitano1

by Tom Bombadil Tue Dec 22, 2020 5:23 pm

pitano1 wrote:Hi.wakey-wakey
When postie, entered their place of business.[administrative court]
Put in a plea, he gave them...power of attorney,

Which would give access to, his trust...he becomes THE TRUSTEE.
Who ALWAYS pays
THE JUDGE BECOMES...executer-de-son-tort.=a criminal asshole/privateer.
let's look on the bright side.
Prison comes under the heading.
Benefits
regards
pitano1

This is all true but at any point a judge or other guy in 'charge' might give and offer that sounds like an order. Folk just follow on and take it as gospel.

by pitano1 Tue Dec 22, 2020 8:24 pm

Indeed, you are correct...tom, but that is why you question, the so called.?
AUTHORITY/JURISDICTION

You, ARE INVITED TO appear... Hmm
Is this some kind of MANIFESTATION.?
Kinda like a ship’s...MANIFEST, of a ship's goods, and chattels.?
And...they cannot speak, or be heard in a court of administration.

but...but, The COURTS cannot ignore...DOCUMENTS
Remember the courts are private companies, exactly the same as
the UK.GOVERNMENT, WHICH has been dissolved, around
about...NOW
What are the implications of the following...anyone.?
No GOVERNMENT...[thank fuck]
No royal family...[thank fuck]
the queen abdicated in 72,when she signed away our sovereignty...b.t.w
And, again around 2019,when she signed another treaty...no link at this present moment
What ARE THEY going to do...with all her MAJESTY`Shit.
Parliament Appears To Have Deposed QEII of Sovereignty

When Parliament recognised itself as ‘sovereign’ in section 38 of the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020, it did so after Boris Johnson, Ian Duncan Smith and Michael Gove spoke gushingly, in the run up to the December 2019 election, about how parliamentary sovereignty is borrowed from the People, via a democratic mandate.

I wrote this blog post on that very subject at the time, but I didn’t mention this obvious anomaly, since the in-coming government had already publicly and repeatedly declared that such sovereignty was dependent upon the democratic consent of the People that Parliament should exercise it.

Nevertheless, from this observation a question naturally arose:

If Parliament has only previously acted with the sovereign authority of the monarch, was the real intention of section 38 to depose QEII?

Since I knew that more facts would have to come to light before I could even broach the subject of a treasonous Parliament, I decided to carry on researching the matter, until the events of COVID-1984 revealed that Parliament was acting with what the constitution deems to be prohibited royal powers.

From which juncture is has become increasingly obvious that the UK government has ever since purported to exercise national sovereignty in the interests of Bill Gates, GAVI and the WHO, as per the sustainable development agendas 21 and 30.

This was enough to convince me that I’d seen enough to reasonably conclude that Parliament had created unaccountable government, upon its assumption that such an act could be deemed lawful, on the ground that it has declared itself sovereign in a statute.
Parliament Is Merely The Supreme Legislature
https://www.thebernician.net/parliament-appears-to-have-deposed-qeii-of-sovereignty/

All persons/anything registered has now been handed over to the inner temple/Vatican

regards
pitano1

by Sponsored content

Paying costs from pension pot

Paying costs from pension pot

Re: Paying costs from pension pot

Re: Paying costs from pension pot

Re: Paying costs from pension pot

Re: Paying costs from pension pot

Re: Paying costs from pension pot

Re: Paying costs from pension pot