Travelling abroad without a pcr test

This morning I went to a ferry port and stood my ground as a woman on the land to state that I do not consent to the regulations and that I would be holding the ferry company's CEO Mr **** personally responsible for any loss, harm or injury I might incurr whilst journeying to France. I bought my ticket and set off for the port in the UK. I was met with agressive abuse and finger pointing, orders to go here and do this and do that. I tried to stay in honour and explain the situation, but in the end I just gave them notice. I got the name of the ferry manager and served him this.

I'd be very grateful for any input. I was intending now to send the notice by recorded delivery to the CEO of the ferry company, then, I'm not sure what. I just want to push back. My mother is in France, I need to see her, I will not take a test. I know a way to get the paperwork, so I could just fake it and travel. but for the sake of the children we need to push back.

forgive the cut and paste but i'm struggling to upload the document.

master *** of the family *****
1 **** ****
**** ********
R*** **L

21st April 2021

Notice to agent is notice to principle.
Notice to principle is notice to agent.

For the attention of: Mr ******** *** Company Director
**** ******* Holdings Ltd
*** **** Road
**** *******
******e
D*8* **Z


NOTICE

Dear Mr ******,

This notice is to clarify my position on testing for a virus, and that not having a valid test certificate (according to an Act, Statute, Regulation or Law) may potentially be used against me, to coerce and extort, as I move freely, as is my right as a woman of the land.

It is entirely without dishonour that I decline the offer of a test for a virus, due to an aversion to the materials used and my medical status.

According to the Equalities Act 2010 it is illegal to enquire after anyone's medical information, and discriminating against anyone for withholding medical information,
may be used as evidence in a court of law.

Furthermore, any medical interventions and procedures must have the informed and voluntary consent of the subject, as stated in the Nuremberg Code 1947. I am informed and I do not consent to any form of testing for a virus.

To be clear, kindly provide any evidence you may have to suggest that the testing methods are accurate and cause no harm.

Kindly provide evidence that you have any juristiction over me as a woman on the land.

If, for any reason, I am held up or detained as I journey to France from England or from England to France on the ferry, on private business and If I am discriminated against due to freely expressing these views, as is my right, I am giving you notice that I will make a claim and privately prosecute. I include my schedule of fees for your perusal.

I would like to remind you that on my British passport it states that the Secretary of State requests and requires "all those it may concern to allow the bearer to pass freely without let or hindrance and to afford the bearer such assistance and protection as may be necessary"

Please note that any damages I suffer whilst travelling, due to virus regulations, and any honourable disinclination to aquiesce to the port authorities, or your agents requests, that meets with unlawful actions will be claimed against and I will be making a claim against you personally, not your companies insurance policy.

Schedule of fees.

For unlawful detention £10,000. per hour or part thereof
For unlawful confiscation of property value of the item when new x 2
For distress and mental anguish £10,000
For loss of time causing loss to private business £20,000
For extracting a signature under duress
to force a contract £20,000
Yours sincerely,

master **** of the family *******

ERRORS AND OMISSIONS ACCEPTED. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
WITHOUT PREJUCICE.

I like this a lot, the only change i personally would make is to drop the
'without predudice'

daveiron wrote:I like this a lot, the only change i personally would make is to drop the
'without predudice'

I read that it signifies that none of the rights or privileges of the individual involved are considered to be lost or waived. I thought that was a good idea. Also the thought
crossed my mind that they might barr me from travelling with them?? is that even possible.

Any ideas on next steps? I was going to send it to the CEO recorded delivery. shouldn't I have a call to action for him? a within 30 days, if i havn't heard from you I will take it as tacit agreement that you waive the regulations and let me travel freely hahahaaa. I don't know, i'm blue sky thinking. Any hot tips? x

Yes keep the 'All rights reserved' I would drop the WP words because
that means your notice would not be admissable in court.

30 days to rebut your notice is generous, also remember if its unrebutted
it stands

wp words? word processor?

Without Predudice

If unrebutted it stands. So that means what exactly, that I can take him to court and make a claim? or that I can travel without the test? forgive my lack of knowledge

[quote="sharman"]wp words? word processor?

Without Predudice

daveiron wrote:

sharman wrote:wp words? word processor?

Without Predudice

i'm such a numpty. of course

[quote="sharman"]If unrebutted it stands. So that means what exactly, that I can take him to court and make a claim? or that I can travel without the test?  forgive my lack of knowledge

Any statement or assumption/presumption you make ,stands as truth in law unless
its rebutted in substance by the other side.

A good place to look ,regarding your situation ,Prof Delores Cahill from the
World Doctors Alliance is travelling without restriction ,she has done many
interveiws on this ( sorry not got any links off the top of my head)

so shall i send it recorded (now i've spell checked it) and say somthing like "If i havn't heard from you in 10 days with substansive evidence against my Notice, within 10 days I will take it that you agree?"  how do i stay in honour? and give them a deadline? (thank you so much for your time @daveiron) Yes Dolores Cahill, i've been following her, she is so uplifting, i will look

Yes send Recorded Delivery, personally i would just keep it short.
" I require your response if any ,within 10 days" or something along those
lines

daveiron wrote:I like this a lot, the only change i personally would make is to drop the
'without predudice'

Found this:

https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/without+prejudice

When a lawsuit is dismissed, the court may enter a judgment against the plaintiff with or without prejudice. When a lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice, it signifies that none of the rights or privileges of the individual involved are considered to be lost or waived. The same holds true when an admission is made or when a motion is denied without prejudice.

The inclusion of the term without prejudice in a judgment of dismissal ordinarily indicates the absence of a decision on the merits and leaves the parties free to litigate the matter in a subsequent action, as though the dismissed action had not been started. Therefore, a dismissal without prejudice makes it unnecessary for the court in which the subsequent action is brought to determine whether that action is based on the same cause as the original action, or whether the identical parties are involved in the two actions.

Consideration - 'value' on each side? liability? If 'without predudice' it could mean without liability so a judge may not allow it to be entered into court if relied on as evidence?

Without Prejudice meaning The legal term "without prejudice" is a rule which allows parties to engage in private discussions to settle their disputes. "Without prejudice" discussions whether in letters, emails or conversations are able to be withheld from courts and excluded from evidence when they qualify for protection.

daveiron wrote:Yes keep the 'All rights reserved' I would drop the WP words because
that means your notice would not be admissable in court.

30 days to rebut your notice is generous, also remember if its unrebutted
it stands

Do I have to give them 3 strikes and your down, like the 3 debt letters? give them 3 chances to rebutt? so write again after 10 days? and once more 10 days later? I posted the letter today.

No there is no need for that ,just keep a copy of the delivery signature
from Royal Mail.

Here's a bitchute link to a video featuring Professor Delores Cahill discussing her experiences of travelling abroad during lockdowns.

Very good notice. I would just change the "principle" you have used to "principal" instead...I was making the same mistake in my notices until a friend had pointed it out to me recently.


https://www.bitchute.com/video/xrSRe7n9zkAW/