THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

by mitch Thu Aug 26, 2021 10:30 am

https://www.workersofengland.co.uk/latest-news/the-strategy-to-save-care-workers-jobs/

WHY? – The facts

Over 50,000 care workers from 11,300 care homes who do not wish to be ‘vaccinated’ are soon to be dismissed despite:

The regulation requiring care workers to be vaccinated being INVALID,

Employers BREACHING Workplace Health and Safety law for not performing vaccine risk assessments, and

The virus NOT being isolated prior to producing the ‘vaccines’.

WHAT? – The strategy is to pressure the CQC to abandon vaccinating care workers by flooding the CQC with enquiries from care home providers demanding assistance with formal grievances about:

The INVALID regulation to ‘vaccinate’,

The CRIMINAL OFFENCE of threatening dismissal for exercising the legal right to decline a vaccination,

Conducting risk assessments will conclude vaccines are UNSAFE for employees,

Conducting risk assessments will conclude staff shortages pose a RISK to the health and safety of residents, and

Fundamental to ordering vaccination is that the virus has been isolated to design the vaccine – so please provide the PROOF.

HOW?

Care workers request a FORMAL GRIEVANCE meeting,

A Union representative ATTENDS the meeting WITH YOU, and explains

That care home providers MUST question CQC or face criminal prosecution and paying compensation for unfair dismissal.

THE AIM – is for the CQC to crack under the pressure which will mean:

NO vaccination,

Workers KEEP their jobs, and

Employers don’t have to PAY compensation.

by flyingfish Thu Aug 26, 2021 12:26 pm

mitch wrote:The virus NOT being isolated prior to producing the ‘vaccines’.

Why do you say that? The virus has been isolated zillions of times all around the world, starting in early 2020.

by **daveiron** Thu Aug 26, 2021 1:27 pm

Do you have links for that FF please ,its my comprehention that FOI
requests have been submitted many many times worldwide & the responses
have all been the same ,No evidence exists that the virus has been isolated.
This was also admitted in court recently in Alberta.
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontlinenews/despite-that-alberta-has-no-material-evidence-isolating-sars-cov-2-patrick-king-lost-the-case/

by mitch Thu Aug 26, 2021 1:52 pm

flyingfish wrote:
mitch wrote:The virus NOT being isolated prior to producing the ‘vaccines’.
Why do you say that? The virus has been isolated zillions of times all around the world, starting in early 2020.

It's not me saying that, that's on the web page, but if you look into it, you will find that no virus has ever been isolated/purified. I would suggest reading the history of germ theory and terrain theory; also the studies cited in "What Really Makes You Ill" by Lester and Parker

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B082ZPVLZ5/

by flyingfish Thu Aug 26, 2021 2:07 pm

Sure, here's a few as a taster, from USA, Turkey, Italy, Brazil and Australia ...
Isolation and characterization of SARS-CoV-2 from the first US COVID-19 patient (Mar 2020)
SARS-CoV-2 Viral Culturing at CDC
Isolation and characterization of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in Turkey
Isolation and Full-Length Genome Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 from COVID-19 Cases in Northern Italy
SARS-CoV-2 isolation from the first reported patients in Brazil
Isolation and rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS‐CoV‐2) from the first patient diagnosed with COVID‐19 in Australia

I've seen that FOI thing and essentially what they've done is come up with a description of the only document that would ever convince them, even though their requirements are irrelevant or inapplicable to virology. Unsurprisingly the organisations do not have a document matching that exact description. Which is of course not the same as saying there is no evidence. Using the same sort of conspiracy theorists logic I expect I could prove that the Diesel engine doesn't exist.

by **daveiron** Thu Aug 26, 2021 3:24 pm

I've had a quick look through most of those links and funding appears
to come from the usual suspects ; WHO ,UN ,GOV & links to big pharma.

by mitch Thu Aug 26, 2021 3:56 pm

daveiron wrote:I've had a quick look through most of those links and funding appears
to come from the usual suspects ; WHO ,UN ,GOV & links to big pharma.

Yep, clear conflict of interest

by flyingfish Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:24 pm

That's the beauty of a conspiracy theory. You can always find some reason to dismiss anything that doesn't support your agenda.

by **daveiron** Thu Aug 26, 2021 5:24 pm

The conspiracy as i see it is from TPTB conspiring against the people.
The FOI requests were very simple .They required INDEPENDENT studies.
If as you say there are zillions of documents proving its existance, there
should be no problem whatsoever in providing independent peer reviewed
evidence.
So why do they reply that they cannot provide them ?

by **Mrblue2015** Fri Aug 27, 2021 11:36 am

Many thanks for that info / link Mitch. I shall pass it onto a friend of mine who is a carer.

To quote him: “I feel like a fkn rat backed into a corner!”

by **daveiron** Fri Aug 27, 2021 11:44 am

You may wish to show him this also;
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/cdc-now-admits-no-gold-standard-for-the-isolation-for-any-virus

This second one i am watching for the response.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/evidence_for_use_of_kochs_postul

In the US public record requests are complied with & in a timely manner
in the Uk its clear every effort is made to avoid disclosure.

by **Mrblue2015** Fri Aug 27, 2021 12:52 pm

Cheers mate!

by **daveiron** Fri Aug 27, 2021 1:26 pm

And more.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/766314/response/1828786/attach/html/3/FOI2021%2013240%20REPLY.pdf.html

by **Mrblue2015** Fri Aug 27, 2021 3:22 pm

Thank you.

by **daveiron** Fri Aug 27, 2021 4:14 pm

by **Lopsum** Fri Aug 27, 2021 8:50 pm

flyingfish wrote:That's the beauty of a conspiracy theory. You can always find some reason to dismiss anything that doesn't support your agenda.

Do you think that is happening here FF? look at the bigger picture with a consistent bias assessment? Then you would also at times fall under the same category so why try to insult yourself?

I think that because of the huge weight of evidence that we all get to see simply by living in the system that it is against us ,it uses any excuse it can to gain. this can lead to bias thinking at times, especially when something seems to be following an established pattern.
Dont you think that there are conspirational elements to the covid 19 pandemic FF??? Which means someone has plotted/schemed with atleast one other person to take advantage for themselves of others by manufacturing or manipulating the situation or information and the MSM, if not the virus too and the entire scenario 100%? If the answer to any of this is yes then YOU too are a "conspiritard" if it is no then you simply fail to recognise patterns.(actual retard! What a Face

)

by **urchinatheart** Tue Sep 14, 2021 11:47 pm

Okay, flyingfish, you've caught us. We have an agenda that will make us no money, has already cost some of us a lot of money, friends and family. We are shunned and chastised in public, mocked and scorned by some also.
Its a carefully designed plan to keep ourselves poor, sad and lonely. Aren't you glad you don't suffer so ?

by Sponsored content

THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS

Re: THE STRATEGY – TO SAVE CARE WORKER’S JOBS