WHO taking over

Received this from Awaking Nation

Please take the time to read this all the way through. It was sent to me and I'm forwarding on as a matter of urgency.

There is an immediate threat to your freedom. The dark controllers want to change international law indefinitely and bring one world government in via the back door.

On 20th May Our Government will be voting on whether to give the World Health Organisation (WHO) control and power over our health and our inalienable rights. To take individual health powers away from individual countries and the people and make them globalised (one step towards a one world government) to the extent that an individual freedoms and sovereignty become jeopardised.

This is been done by a three pronged method:

1, making amendments to the existing International Health Regulations (IHR)

2. International Pandemic Preparedness Treaty where the World Health Organisation (WHO)’s moves to implement a power grab in the form of a global pandemic agreement.

Finally 3. This paperwork then feeds into the UN paperwork who are trying to bring in a dark hidden industrial agenda, in the guise of Green agenda via the UN holding a Stockholm convention on June 02-03. Where Green strategies will be set out and agreements from countries signed for, that will change the way we are allowed to live our lives and the freedoms we will have in the future.

Instead of putting strategies in place that are supposed to save us and the planet, these are going to be used to enslave us instead. These are the 4 pillars of the mysterious Stockholm Declaration of 2022, which it’s suggested will be signed at the Stockholm convention in June.

Principle 1 – Protect our ‘global commons’ aka Nature, which will accelerate locking humans out of 30% of the land areas by 2030
Principle 2 – Accelerate climate action to achieve Net Zero by 2050, which will accelerate the green industrialisation of the remaining rural areas, vast electrification, 5G networks, Internet of Things, industrial healthcare, synthetic food production, more urban 'densification' and the build-up of vast wind and solar farms, mines and heavy industry as well as to greatly restrict the freedoms of common people
Principle 3 – Make sufficient finance available, which will unlock the floodgates of taxpayer money, pensions and various other channels to funnel wealth from the many to the few, and finally

Principle 4 – establish strong global governance to drive it all, which will cement the UN as the new ‘One World Government’.
The outcome of which will then be announced on the UN World Environment Day 5th June 2022. Which is conveniently the Queens platinum Jubilee, so everyone will be distracted by events and celebrations, as they are hoping what they are doing will go unnoticed by the masses.

The International Health Regulations Amendments, The International Health Regulations (IHR) was adopted by 194 member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005.

They enable the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) if it decides that an infectious disease outbreak has occurred in a member state. Also the enforcement of healthcare responsibility, but this is at the moment with the consent of the member state.

On THE 22ND -28TH May 2022 the World Health Assembly are voting to change these important international health regulations, by amending 13 IHR articles: 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53, and 59.

The amendments will remove the need for nation state consent, and gives control over the declaration of an actual or potential public health emergency in any member state to the WHO Director-General – even over the objection of the member state. The WHO will then have the power to declare a loosely defined emergency whenever it feels like it and have the authority under these amendments to come in and tell the country what action it has to take. The country won’t have any choice in the matter they will have to allow the WHO to direct how healthcare measures are implemented in their nation state. Hence The WHO can demand any country of those 194 member states to go into lockdown, without any say via the government or the people of that country. Under Article 12 amendment: when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state, the Director-General may (not must) consult with the WHO
Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern. The Director General's authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.

At the moment the IHR says any interventions have to be implemented with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons if these amendments go ahead the people’s sovereignty will weakened giving to the WHO directors and their private investors. The two main private investors of the WHO are now the Chinese Communist Party and the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation. Two institutions which we know are not known for upholding human rights and sovereign freedoms. Do we really want these investors in charge of our countries?

One person will be able to declare a state of emergency without a vote or consensus from the other member’s states. Without the need to show actual data or evidence, it could be based on predictions or other sources. Under Article 5 amendment, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modelling, simulation and predictions that exaggerated the risk from Covid-19 over two years ago. Secret sources: Under Article 9 amendment, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolise power. The WHO has not engaged in a process of public participation, which is evidence that its priority is capturing more power for
itself and its corporate accomplices, than serving the interests of the people.

Once a state of emergency is declared big pharma can start trials or can apply for emergency use authorisation so it can be distributed all over the world such as they got for the covid-19 vaccinations (most people still do not realise the covid-19 vaccinations are trials not licenced drugs) If this goes through one person will be able to authorise any emergency trial, and state whether these are mandatory or not. They will be able to say what treatments can be used and what treatments can’t.

When you take the WHO’s action in the recent past you can see that the WHO leadership has failed the people again and again. Among many examples, it approved the injurious H1N1 (swine flu) vaccine for a controversially declared pandemic. Equally, the WHO failed during the Covid-19 chapter as it encouraged lockdowns, suppressed early preventive treatments, and recommended product interventions that have proven to be neither safe nor effective.

The WHO cannot be allowed to control the world’s health agenda, nor enforce bio surveillance. While it receives funding from public sources belonging to the people, it is caught in a perpetual conflict of interest because it also receives substantial funding from private interests that use their contributions to influence and profit from WHO decisions and mandates. For example, the Gates Foundation and the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine promotion alliance, contribute over $1 billion a year.

The changes to the IHR and the pandemic treaty is unnecessary, and is a threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights. It increases the WHO’s suffocating power to declare unjustified pandemics, impose dehumanizing lockdowns, and enforce expensive, unsafe, and ineffective treatments against the will of the people. We believe that the people have a right to participate in any agreement that affects their lives, livelihoods, and well-being. Hence these amendments must not go ahead.

What can we do about this?

Please write to your own MP
Prime Minister, boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk
Attorney General, suella.braverman.mp@parliament.uk
TO: ARGAR, Edward dba MINISTER for HEALTH for UNITED KINGDOM PLC House of Commons London SW1A 0AA or Proper officer incumbent. edward.argar.mp@parliament.uk

Outlining these concerns before the 20th of May.

By EITHER:

Stating a statutory rejection notice or treason notice in which you lay out: We the people do not sanction these amendments to the International Health Regulations or the signing of the International Pandemic Preparedness Treaty / Instrument with the World Health Organisation, or the signing of the Stockholm Declaration of 2022. We will not be complicit in it and we will have lawful excuse not to abide by any laws or regulations that come from them.

Or sending a Notice from a Living Wo/Man For Example:
Notice from a Living Wo/Man
This notice does not use any private dictionaries and is written in plain simple English;
:master:firstname-middlename:
c/o Address line1,
Address Line 2,
County,
[lowercase postcode].
Registered postage number: (if applicable)
Date: ….........................
TO: JOHNSON, Boris Alexander de Pfeifell
dba PRIME MINISTER t/a BORIS JOHNSON LIMITED
Or Proper officer incumbent
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA
Notice to agent is notice to principal; notice to principal is notice to agent
Re: International Pandemic Preparedness Treaty / Instrument with the World Health Organisation, amendments to the International Health Regulations and the Stockholm Declaration of 2022.
i: master: (given name(s)), author of this notice and a living wo/man of flesh and blood native of England, hereby and henceforth forbid the signing of any documents or instruments on my behalf via any means without my explicit consent.
By: (autograph) master: (given name(s)): a living man/woman of flesh and blood Full Legal Name Beneficiary


Some more examples and information can be found from the links below:
https://clicks.aweber.com/y/ct/?l=8.l8J&m=hNgi47KTqQsOd26&b=5RBzbBnOpjOoPjUhcK_QGg
https://clicks.aweber.com/y/ct/?l=8.l8J&m=hNgi47KTqQsOd26&b=xRoEPP4KffsUrrglF9wH7A
https://clicks.aweber.com/y/ct/?l=8.l8J&m=hNgi47KTqQsOd26&b=AplHZmn3_jxBuAOcEqFyEA

Many thanks


61 Bridge Street
Kington Herefordshire HR5 3DJ
UNITED KINGDOM

Serious stuff!
I noticed on the Living wo/man notice that they advocate using :master:firstname-middlename: does this not not make you an entity and therefore how can you claim to be a wo/man?
Opinions please.

wakey wakey wrote:Received this from Awaking Nation

Please take the time to read this all the way through. It was sent to me and I'm forwarding on as a matter of urgency.

There is an immediate threat to your freedom. The dark controllers want to change international law indefinitely and bring one world government in via the back door.

On 20th May Our Government will be voting on whether to give the World Health Organisation (WHO) control and power over our health and our inalienable rights.

How can God given rights be taken away?

Statuary Rejection Notice.


Line in the sand pt 1


Line in the sand pt2

Found this petition. Not sure if it is to do with this, but here it is.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/614335

wakey wakey wrote:Received this from Awaking Nation

Please take the time to read this all the way through. It was sent to me and I'm forwarding on as a matter of urgency.

There is an immediate threat to your freedom. The dark controllers want to change international law indefinitely and bring one world government in via the back door.

On 20th May Our Government will be voting on whether to give the World Health Organisation (WHO) control and power over our health and our inalienable rights. To take individual health powers away from individual countries and the people and make them globalised (one step towards a one world government) to the extent that an individual freedoms and sovereignty become jeopardised.

This is been done by a three pronged method:

1, making amendments to the existing International Health Regulations  (IHR)

2. International Pandemic Preparedness Treaty where the World Health Organisation (WHO)’s moves to implement a power grab in the form of a global pandemic agreement.

Finally 3. This paperwork then feeds into the UN paperwork who are trying to bring in a dark hidden industrial agenda, in the guise of Green agenda via the UN holding a Stockholm convention on June 02-03.  Where Green strategies will be set out and agreements from countries signed for, that will change the way we are allowed to live our lives and the freedoms we will have in the future.

Instead of putting strategies in place that are supposed to save us and the planet, these are going to be used to enslave us instead. These are the 4 pillars of the mysterious Stockholm Declaration of 2022, which it’s suggested will be signed at the Stockholm convention in June.

Principle 1 – Protect our ‘global commons’ aka Nature, which will accelerate locking humans out of 30% of the land areas by 2030
Principle 2 – Accelerate climate action to achieve Net Zero by 2050, which will accelerate the green industrialisation of the remaining rural areas, vast electrification, 5G networks, Internet of Things, industrial healthcare, synthetic food production, more urban 'densification' and the build-up of vast wind and solar farms, mines and heavy industry as well as to greatly restrict the freedoms of common people
Principle 3 – Make sufficient finance available, which will unlock the floodgates of taxpayer money, pensions and various other channels to funnel wealth from the many to the few, and finally

Principle 4 – establish strong global governance to drive it all, which will cement the UN as the new ‘One World Government’.
The outcome of which will then be announced on the UN World Environment Day 5th June 2022.  Which is conveniently the Queens platinum Jubilee, so everyone will be distracted by events and celebrations, as they are hoping what they are doing will go unnoticed by the masses.

The International Health Regulations Amendments, The International Health Regulations (IHR) was adopted by 194 member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005.

They enable the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) if it decides that an infectious disease outbreak has occurred in a member state. Also the enforcement of healthcare responsibility, but this is at the moment with the consent of the member state.

On THE 22ND -28TH May 2022 the World Health Assembly are voting to change these important international health regulations, by amending 13 IHR articles: 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53, and 59.

The amendments will remove the need for nation state consent, and gives control over the declaration of an actual or potential public health emergency in any member state to the WHO Director-General – even over the objection of the member state.  The WHO will then have the power to declare a loosely defined emergency whenever it feels like it and have the authority under these amendments to come in and tell the country what action it has to take. The country won’t have any choice in the matter they will have to allow the WHO to direct how healthcare measures are implemented in their nation state. Hence The WHO can demand any country of those 194 member states to go into lockdown, without any say via the government or the people of that country. Under Article 12 amendment: when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state, the Director-General may (not must) consult with the WHO
Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern. The Director General's authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.

At the moment the IHR says any interventions have to be implemented with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons if these amendments go ahead the people’s sovereignty will weakened giving to the WHO directors and their private investors. The two main private investors of the WHO are now the Chinese Communist Party and the Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation. Two institutions which we know are not known for upholding human rights and sovereign freedoms.  Do we really want these investors in charge of our countries?

One person will be able to declare a state of emergency without a vote or consensus from the other member’s states. Without the need to show actual data or evidence, it could be based on predictions or other sources.  Under Article 5 amendment, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modelling, simulation and predictions that exaggerated the risk from Covid-19 over two years ago. Secret sources: Under Article 9 amendment, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolise power. The WHO has not engaged in a process of public participation, which is evidence that its priority is capturing more power for
itself and its corporate accomplices, than serving the interests of the people.

Once a state of emergency is declared big pharma can start trials or can apply for emergency use authorisation so it can be distributed all over the world such as they got for the covid-19 vaccinations (most people still do not realise the covid-19 vaccinations are trials not licenced drugs) If this goes through one person will be able to authorise any emergency trial, and state whether these are mandatory or not.  They will be able to say what treatments can be used and what treatments can’t.

When you take the WHO’s action in the recent past you can see that the WHO leadership has failed the people again and again. Among many examples, it approved the injurious H1N1 (swine flu) vaccine for a controversially declared pandemic. Equally, the WHO failed during the Covid-19 chapter as it encouraged lockdowns, suppressed early preventive treatments, and recommended product interventions that have proven to be neither safe nor effective.

The WHO cannot be allowed to control the world’s health agenda, nor enforce bio surveillance. While it receives funding from public sources belonging to the people, it is caught in a perpetual conflict of interest because it also receives substantial funding from private interests that use their contributions to influence and profit from WHO decisions and mandates. For example, the Gates Foundation and the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine promotion alliance, contribute over $1 billion a year.

The changes to the IHR and the pandemic treaty is unnecessary, and is a threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights. It increases the WHO’s suffocating power to declare unjustified pandemics, impose dehumanizing lockdowns, and enforce expensive, unsafe, and ineffective treatments against the will of the people. We believe that the people have a right to participate in any agreement that affects their lives, livelihoods, and well-being.  Hence these amendments must not go ahead.

What can we do about this?

Please write to your own MP
Prime Minister, boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk
Attorney General, suella.braverman.mp@parliament.uk
TO: ARGAR, Edward dba MINISTER for HEALTH for UNITED KINGDOM PLC House of Commons London SW1A 0AA or Proper officer incumbent.  edward.argar.mp@parliament.uk

Outlining these concerns before the 20th of May.

By EITHER:

Stating a statutory rejection notice or treason notice in which you lay out: We the people do not sanction these amendments to the International Health Regulations or the signing of the International Pandemic Preparedness Treaty / Instrument with the World Health Organisation, or the signing of the Stockholm Declaration of 2022. We will not be complicit in it and we will have lawful excuse not to abide by any laws or regulations that come from them.

Or sending a Notice from a Living Wo/Man For Example:
Notice from a Living Wo/Man
This notice does not use any private dictionaries and is written in plain simple English;
:master:firstname-middlename:
c/o Address line1,
Address Line 2,
County,
[lowercase postcode].
Registered postage number: (if applicable)
Date: ….........................
TO: JOHNSON, Boris Alexander de Pfeifell
dba PRIME MINISTER t/a BORIS JOHNSON LIMITED
Or Proper officer incumbent
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA
Notice to agent is notice to principal; notice to principal is notice to agent
Re: International Pandemic Preparedness Treaty / Instrument with the World Health Organisation, amendments to the International Health Regulations and the Stockholm Declaration of 2022.
i: master: (given name(s)), author of this notice and a living wo/man of flesh and blood native of England, hereby and henceforth forbid the signing of any documents or instruments on my behalf via any means without my explicit consent.
By: (autograph) master: (given name(s)): a living man/woman of flesh and blood Full Legal Name Beneficiary


Some more examples and information can be found from the links below:
https://clicks.aweber.com/y/ct/?l=8.l8J&m=hNgi47KTqQsOd26&b=5RBzbBnOpjOoPjUhcK_QGg
https://clicks.aweber.com/y/ct/?l=8.l8J&m=hNgi47KTqQsOd26&b=xRoEPP4KffsUrrglF9wH7A
https://clicks.aweber.com/y/ct/?l=8.l8J&m=hNgi47KTqQsOd26&b=AplHZmn3_jxBuAOcEqFyEA

Many thanks


61 Bridge Street
Kington Herefordshire HR5 3DJ
UNITED KINGDOM

Serious stuff!
I noticed on the Living wo/man notice that they advocate using :master:firstname-middlename: does this not not make you an entity and therefore how can you claim to be a wo/man?
Opinions please.

Humans, persons some interesting words with alternative meanings from what i have read, also is monopoly not illegal? Trying times for us all and not wanting to put a downer or be a miserable git but i am really struggling to live in hope that the vast majority of wo/men wont have a clue about whats goin on ( just look how many had the jab without knowing a thing about it!) just my two pence worth

Be lucky all
SS

A Monopoly is actually illegal but not unlawful and the wording is very appropriate so good spot SS and actually you do have a valid point because the majority simply sleepwalk into the scenarios and many were tried under the EU, remember the commissioners? unelected and unaccountable, totally control through the ECHR's and they just assumed these positions and all the Governments were complicit.

assassin wrote:A Monopoly is actually illegal but not unlawful and the wording is very appropriate so good spot SS and actually you do have a valid point because the majority simply sleepwalk into the scenarios and many were tried under the EU, remember the commissioners? unelected and unaccountable, totally control through the ECHR's and they just assumed these positions and all the Governments were complicit.

Wow im over the moon thanks assassin, noticing the wording is the easy bit knowing how to challenge it is a whole different ball game( well for me anyway)

I dont remember the commissioners and cant say ive heard of ECHR’s,( im not that up to speed and really need to do more reading obviously)

Regarding the monopoly (just a question here) as they are in commerce does the term ‘unlawful’ actually apply to them? (i thought that was for the private wo/man) whereas illegal is their realm? As i say just a question and not in any way doubting you or your knowledge.

Be lucky
SS

We got a problem.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2Hu8AHHKjo

Steve Baker MP is leading opposition to it in parliament ( not that i
would trust any of them)
Also Neil Oliver has put this out ,which is good as he has a large following.

Sharpysparky wrote:

assassin wrote:A Monopoly is actually illegal but not unlawful and the wording is very appropriate so good spot SS and actually you do have a valid point because the majority simply sleepwalk into the scenarios and many were tried under the EU, remember the commissioners? unelected and unaccountable, totally control through the ECHR's and they just assumed these positions and all the Governments were complicit.

Wow im over the moon thanks assassin, noticing the wording is the easy bit knowing how to challenge it is a whole different ball game( well for me anyway)

I dont remember the commissioners and cant say ive heard of ECHR’s,( im not that up to speed and really need to do more reading obviously)

Regarding the monopoly (just a question here) as they are in commerce does the term ‘unlawful’ actually apply to them? (i thought that was for the private wo/man) whereas illegal is their realm? As i say just a question and not in any way doubting you or your knowledge.

Be lucky
SS

Very interesting point as anything legal should also comply with lawful but often it doesn't and it would take a High Court challenge to shake it all up and companies know this.

World Health Organisation Treaty BLOCKED

Mahyar Tousi

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fU2U4Kw_Yp8