HMCTS Fraud

The latest fraud is apparently coming from the fake courts and specifically the Crown Courts who are making fictitious claims against people they determine as easy targets and likely to pay up under fear of bailiffs and possibly prison and everyone who has dealt with any crown court within the last 2 decades, yes 20 years needs to be aware of this as these frauds are occuring over 6 years following a crown court appearance and it is a numbers game as following covid their coffers have shrunk and they are making a loss for themselves and the Government.

This begins with a claim arising from Port Talbot in Wales for England and Wales and the first you know about it is them writing to you with their threat o gram and claiming you owe them money following a RECENT AUDIT and this is their first contradiction as evry case I have seen are claims from people who were in the Crown Court and this was over 6 years previous to the claims so it cannot be a recent audit as companies audit their books at least once a year, and some more often; and they include a lot of paperwork they claim is for "YOUR CONVENIENCE" and this is a smokescreen to deflect away from the fact hey never sign any of their paperwork and never actually provide substantiation of their claim.

Points:

Time of over 6 years.
Recent audit
Fraudulent and deceptive paperwork as it is not relevant and unsigne.

The Law:

Only a person can make a claim and it has to be signed as he making the claim also accepts full liability for the claim.
Unsubstiantiated claims are void.
All paperwork must be complete and honest and conplete includes a signature to accept liability, unsigned means no voracity.

One piece of paper includes contact telephone numbers and they give you full instructions of how to contact them, but one problem, they never answer the phones and I have acted for people and continually rang them for 3 days solid and selected all four options in rotation and still no answer, so unacceptable incompetence from public servants working for us.

You write back to point out their paperwork is not substantiation and they are making unlawful claims by not signing documents meaning they are void and have no voracity and demand they substantiate their claim and you get an interesting and usually incriminating document back stating a (NAMED) court has made the financial order and they will continue enforcing the orser while it is in dispute, OOPS, unlawful and in writing, and they never provide substantiation as they try to bluff their way out ofit by skirting around the issue and not actually adressing it.

You write to the named court and they have 15 days to rsolve this dispute and they never respond and this is to continue the money coming in and they expect you to tell them what you want to resolve this dispute and in many cases people dont demand compensation and they ignore it.
You write to them again and the bullsh*t rhetoric begins and they claim they didn't get your correspondence (did this for someone and hand delivered it and filmed it) and they blame Royal Mail and cite their mail handling centre or nay other excuse they think they can get away with to fob you off, I also recorded them with audio as well, if you get this you need to do a specific FOI request.

If you go to magistrates court and they find you guilty (which they do to bring in their money to top the coffers up) and you appeal their decision it is straight to crown court with a district twat, sorry pretent judge and two magistrates, so no nepotism there then and they rarely find for you as they shout you down and try to stop you saying things by railroading you and say they see no cnagges and uphold the conviction and then comes their costs, £300 per hour or part hour.

Your FOI should always include the following and dont miss anything or be fobbed off, if you ask for it you get it and if they do not provide it write to then demanding to know why they havent provided (list specific information) and who is denying it.

You always keep the date of any magistrates court hearing, any crown court appeal date and the number and even if it was a morning or afternoon hearing.
You will get a letter from the court regarding their decision, a FULL list of accounts and if a financial order was made and by which court.

You always ask for:

Name of person making the financial order.
Date they made the order.
What position they hold.
What their insurance details are, company name and policy number.

Name of the person passing thei alleged financial order for enforcement.
Date this order was passed for enforcement.
Insurance details including insurance company and policy number.

Usually they will scuttle off like rats on a sinking ship and if they persist then the devil really is in the detail as any financial order made against you must be made in front of you in court and signed by the judge; many are made the following day and often signed by a clerk and not the judge, some are made at dinnertime when they go for lunch even though they continue into the afternoon, so clear fraud, and many are simply sent en masse for enforcement knowing the majority of people will be frightened into paying and will pay.

How do you deal with this? you get a specialist solicitor and make a claim for Professional Negligence and also make a report against the judge, clerk, or court to the appropriate osy and watch of grow.

In a little follow up to this interesting anomoly, everyone who received a demand for money from HMCTS had one thing in common and I have just verified it, and thet everyone of them had a claim for compensation in the County Court and the County Courts used the HMCTS buildings which housed the crown courts and the same HMCTS staff who deal with the paperwork for both courts.
In every case every claim was received from NCCBC as a money claim and in every case bodies such as DWP shared this information with NCCBC and other bodies so they all get their pound of flesh and their claims were normally 40% of your compensation claim.