Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Help required with CCJ defence
by Ausk Today at 7:47 am

» 700+ MEMBERS
by popey Today at 1:23 am

» Statute Barred
by popey Today at 1:12 am

» The Smith-Muntd Modernization Act 2012
by Awoken2 Today at 1:00 am

» Predictive programming and the music industry.
by Awoken2 Yesterday at 11:58 pm

» NIP
by Tom Bombadil Yesterday at 10:10 pm

» fine at old address.
by Tom Bombadil Yesterday at 10:01 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Yesterday at 8:06 pm

» Is no news good news?
by ceylon Yesterday at 6:10 pm

» No wet signature
by actinglikeabanker Yesterday at 4:00 pm

» Cbd Oil
by Lawful rebel Yesterday at 3:47 pm

» Can stage 4 cancer be cured naturally?
by Lawful rebel Yesterday at 10:15 am

» Court Scam
by El E Mentary Yesterday at 8:31 am

» Letter Process / Debt transfer to new company
by Ausk Wed Feb 21, 2018 11:51 pm

» Let's Have Some Tunes thread.
by Awoken2 Wed Feb 21, 2018 11:17 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:40 pm

» Hello and a little help please for loan debt
by homerishome Wed Feb 21, 2018 5:29 pm

» Did Robin Hood Loose ¬£7 6 MILLION in it's second year That's OK YOU can PAY
by ceylon Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:08 pm

» Florida School Shooting - TWO Shooters..?
by Awoken2 Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:17 pm

» ...Is that the perfect royal shit?
by Lopsum Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:46 pm

» Any advice - STA international - Student Loan - OUSBA
by Tiggy Wed Feb 21, 2018 1:09 pm

» The Supreme Court throws out an appeal by Scotland Yard.
by midnight Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:35 am

» Homeless
by Tom Bombadil Tue Feb 20, 2018 9:00 pm

» Latest from CrimeBodge
by assassin Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:20 pm

» The KaK & M@C Show Do NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL
by ceylon Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:02 pm

» Dealing With Corrupt Po=lice
by assassin Tue Feb 20, 2018 6:59 pm

» RBS admits forging customer signature
by El E Mentary Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:24 pm

» ...Fancy paying for another parasite? Is KFC closed?
by ceylon Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:07 pm

» ho'oponopono
by Tvarred Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:01 pm

» The 7 Principles of Hermes ( Tehuti)
by urchinatheart Tue Feb 20, 2018 8:39 am

» ...Hippocratic of the royals
by ceylon Mon Feb 19, 2018 8:50 pm

» sol excalibre with cookiemonster
by Society of the Spectacle Mon Feb 19, 2018 7:38 pm

» Long time lurker
by assassin Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:13 pm

» Are you a pauper ?
by LionsShare Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:31 pm

» 24Studio Catalogue Debt - Need Some Advice Please
by actinglikeabanker Mon Feb 19, 2018 12:15 pm

» Collection Of Useful Documents Free Download
by actinglikeabanker Mon Feb 19, 2018 11:53 am

» Farcebook
by El E Mentary Mon Feb 19, 2018 11:06 am

Moon phases


Arguments

Go down

Arguments

Post by assassin on Sun Mar 19, 2017 4:16 am

How many people go online to sites with comments sections? I bet a lot of people do and in many cases this is another form of psychological conditioning to create arguments among people and to get them arguing over things they know little about, but it has a function or two.

Look at any newspaper and they have a comments section and many people post their comments and in many cases people are scathing about someone in the article they are commenting on, but why? they design them this way by presenting only one side of a story and presenting it in a way using inferrence and suggestion and by alluding to something they are portraying an individual in any story in the worst possible light without directly making a claim against them by the clever use of words, in any case bought against them they can show they suggested something and didn't actually say it.
Posters on the site read a misleading and spurious story and comment on it, usually in the worst possible way and with only one side of a highly manipulated story full of inference and suggestion; but how often do they bother to try to find out the other side of the story or even look at the way the article is written and see through the spurious language reporters use and see through the drivel they post and see it for what it is.

Look at an article closely for yourselves and you will notice claims such as "a source confirmed" which means they made it up and they hide behind the freedom of the press argument, or "in a statement issued by" which means they are lazy and accept a written claim by someone who is willing to make a claim against somebody and not be answerable for that claim and accept it as fact without speaking to the other party/parties involved, or "we have heard from" which means they are making a claim by proxy and passing the blame onto someone else. These are just a few examples and if you look closely you will find many more for yourselves.

There is a hidden agenda at work here and this is psychological profiling by any number of people and its no secret that certain social networking sites are constantly monitored by numerous authorities and corporations alike and when an argument is created people reveal a lot of information about themselves and over a period of time this information can be gathered and collated to form a realistic picture of someone, and instead of someone such as the police getting a warrant they will use information they have gathered from a social networking site and have a paid psychologist give their opinion which always biases the police as they are paying them.
Imagine a simple scenario, someone studies politics and has a lot of books and research into political parties in their property and the police build up a picture of them and monitor their internet usage while they are researching something such as Combat 18, allegedly a part of the BNP, and they suspect them of a crime, they go to get a warrant and supply some vague excuse which would not normally see a warrant being granted, they then use Combat 18 as this is often enough to sway a judge into signing a spurious warrant they would normally decline. They produce a lot of internet traffic showing someone doing little more than researching political parties, but they only produce the paperwork showing research into Combat 18 and nothing else they have researched and they portray it as something having sympathy with Combat 18 which is a totally unfair representation.

How many times have we all heard the police say "we raided a property at ******* today and found a book about Nazis and Combat 18 in the premises", they mention nothing about any books relating to the Labour, Conservative, green, or any other political parties they find there as its all about misleading the public; they never mention the Mills and Boon books they find as it cannot be manipulated into a contentious issue.
We could go even further and use an avid sword collector as an example, sword collector goes about his lawful business and you get one of those plods who is intent on stopping his vehicle even though they have no reasonable cause to stop his vehicle, but they are going to stop it anyway as they think they are the police; information comes back that they have reasonable suspicion that he may be armed and carrying a weapon, another play on words as they know he is an avid sword collector and some of these can cost £thousands. Note the wording here, suspicion of being armed and NOT he is a collector of swords, their version has more impact and police can use this to mobilise a firearms unit, use all sorts of force against him and any court will back the police every time, and the guy in question may only be coming back from friends.

Ask yourself why Government fund large internet projects and not corporations, ask yourself why Government have funded numerous telephone masts and not the mobile phone companies, and this is for good reason, the young are being indoctrinated into using mobile networks and giving every detail of their lives away and Government dont need warrants to ccess their information as they can simply intercept all the information in real time as any transmission can be intercepted easily and cheaply and they dont have to spend time and money producing evidence to put before a judge with the possibility of it being refused.
People voluntarily give away their information and the conditions are in place for them to do it.
avatar
assassin
Admin
Admin

Posts : 1219
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head

Back to top Go down

Re: Arguments

Post by urchinatheart on Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:09 pm

Good observations there. A site such as this can give great examples of helpful, wise and peaceful communication. Indeed it already does, and will continue, I hope, to do so.

urchinatheart
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 38
Join date : 2017-02-05

Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum