Display results as :

Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Cabot incoming..
by assassin Today at 2:15 am

» Hello and a little help please for loan debt
by homerishome Yesterday at 10:52 pm

» Predictive programming and the music industry.
by Awoken2 Yesterday at 10:34 pm

» Fighting a small claims fine
by WokeBro Yesterday at 10:09 pm

» May i tell a pack of lies AGAIN?
by ceylon Yesterday at 7:46 pm

» MBNA - sold to Arrow - offer of settlement
by homerishome Yesterday at 7:38 pm

» Service Agreements
by Benjisaurus Yesterday at 7:27 pm

» Meeting
by Ain'tNoBaby Yesterday at 7:22 pm

» Brown all CAPS window letter with "Defendant" visible!
by itheman Yesterday at 6:56 pm

» Resolvecall
by Ukmets Yesterday at 5:53 pm

» Enforcement services
by meeko Yesterday at 5:39 pm

» UK Column
by ceylon Yesterday at 4:08 pm

» bailiffs letter, given me little/no time - what can i do?
by itheman Yesterday at 3:03 pm

» Question about statutebared
by Tiggy Yesterday at 2:10 pm

by ceylon Yesterday at 1:29 pm

» soylent is real!
by Lopsum Yesterday at 10:58 am

» Telford 40 years of grooming gangs, just another in a growing list :-(
by ceylon Yesterday at 10:19 am

» Help - I'm being told letters have no relevance
by meeko Yesterday at 9:14 am

by Ausk Yesterday at 9:01 am

» Hi everyone , found you again !
by Ausk Yesterday at 8:43 am

» Claimant Replies after long time
by Tiggy Thu Mar 15, 2018 7:31 pm

» Notice of sums in arrears
by Tiggy Thu Mar 15, 2018 7:29 pm

» My credit card come back alive
by Mikeyjohn Thu Mar 15, 2018 6:51 pm

» If You Work Cash In Hand Then....
by assassin Thu Mar 15, 2018 6:17 pm

» A picture is worth a 1000 words
by assassin Thu Mar 15, 2018 6:10 pm

by ceylon Thu Mar 15, 2018 5:31 pm

» GOODF ebook
by LionsShare Thu Mar 15, 2018 2:11 pm

» Supermarket Disabled Parking "Fine"
by Lopsum Thu Mar 15, 2018 1:48 pm

» Learn About The Sun
by Society of the Spectacle Thu Mar 15, 2018 1:02 pm

» Homeless
by mitch Thu Mar 15, 2018 11:10 am

» Latest from CrimeBodge
by Kestrel Thu Mar 15, 2018 10:25 am

» sar request update please help
by Ausk Thu Mar 15, 2018 7:41 am

» You Can Now Be Arrested for Sexism in Belgium
by Kestrel Wed Mar 14, 2018 8:52 pm

» Transhumanism?... We are half way there already!
by Awoken2 Wed Mar 14, 2018 8:47 pm

» Helping the disabled
by Kestrel Wed Mar 14, 2018 8:18 pm

» Reality chat with peter howard and company
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Mar 14, 2018 7:35 pm

» The Smith-Muntd Modernization Act 2012
by Awoken2 Wed Mar 14, 2018 4:42 pm

Moon phases

Sophistical Refutations

Post new topic   Reply to topic

Go down

Sophistical Refutations

Post by actinglikeabanker on Sat Jun 17, 2017 1:55 am

Sophistical Refutations

By Aristotle

Written 350 B.C.E

Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge

Let us now discuss sophistic refutations, i.e. what appear to be refutations but are really fallacies instead. We will begin in the natural order with the first.

That some reasonings are genuine, while others seem to be so but are not, is evident. This happens with arguments, as also elsewhere, through a certain likeness between the genuine and the sham. For physically some people are in a vigorous condition, while others merely seem to be so by blowing and rigging themselves out as the tribesmen do their victims for sacrifice; and some people are beautiful thanks to their beauty, while others seem to be so, by dint of embellishing themselves. So it is, too, with inanimate things; for of these, too, some are really silver and others gold, while others are not and merely seem to be such to our sense; e.g. things made of litharge and tin seem to be of silver, while those made of yellow metal look golden. In the same way both reasoning and refutation are sometimes genuine, sometimes not, though inexperience may make them appear so: for inexperienced people obtain only, as it were, a distant view of these things. For reasoning rests on certain statements such that they involve necessarily the assertion of something other than what has been stated, through what has been stated: refutation is reasoning involving the contradictory of the given conclusion. Now some of them do not really achieve this, though they seem to do so for a number of reasons; and of these the most prolific and usual domain is the argument that turns upon names only. It is impossible in a discussion to bring in the actual things discussed: we use their names as symbols instead of them; and therefore we suppose that what follows in the names, follows in the things as well, just as people who calculate suppose in regard to their counters. But the two cases (names and things) are not alike. For names are finite and so is the sum-total of formulae, while things are infinite in number. Inevitably, then, the same formulae, and a single name, have a number of meanings. Accordingly just as, in counting, those who are not clever in manipulating their counters are taken in by the experts, in the same way in arguments too those who are not well acquainted with the force of names misreason both in their own discussions and when they listen to others. For this reason, then, and for others to be mentioned later, there exists both reasoning and refutation that is apparent but not real. Now for some people it is better worth while to seem to be wise, than to be wise without seeming to be (for the art of the sophist is the semblance of wisdom without the reality, and the sophist is one who makes money from an apparent but unreal wisdom); for them, then, it is clearly essential also to seem to accomplish the task of a wise man rather than to accomplish it without seeming to do so. To reduce it to a single point of contrast it is the business of one who knows a thing, himself to avoid fallacies in the subjects which he knows and to be able to show up the man who makes them; and of these accomplishments the one depends on the faculty to render an answer, and the other upon the securing of one. Those, then, who would be sophists are bound to study the class of arguments aforesaid: for it is worth their while: for a faculty of this kind will make a man seem to be wise, and this is the purpose they happen to have in view.

Clearly, then, there exists a class of arguments of this kind, and it is at this kind of ability that those aim whom we call sophists. Let us now go on to discuss how many kinds there are of sophistical arguments, and how many in number are the elements of which this faculty is composed, and how many branches there happen to be of this inquiry, and the other factors that contribute to this art......
Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 549
Join date : 2017-05-10

Back to top Go down

Re: Sophistical Refutations

Post by Guest on Sat Jun 17, 2017 5:10 pm

Hi actinglikeabanker

So the root of sophistry lies in pride?



Back to top Go down

Re: Sophistical Refutations

Post by actinglikeabanker on Sat Jun 17, 2017 5:57 pm

Hey iamani, I suppose it depends on your viewpoint.

First and foremost, you would need to define the context of 'pride'. Laughing

Not so newb
Not so newb

Posts : 549
Join date : 2017-05-10

Back to top Go down

Re: Sophistical Refutations

Post by Guest on Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:02 pm

Hi actinglikeabanker

Oh yes, i see... i think....



Back to top Go down

Re: Sophistical Refutations

Post by Sponsored content

Sponsored content

Back to top Go down

Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum