Obtaining remedy Its Easier Than You Think

Getting remedy is not as difficult as people think and this is a brief overview of how to get remedy and how not to get caught up in their traps of deflection which is merely to force you away from the truth and your lawful rights; we will begin with law and its pecking order in order of superiority:

Natural Law, this is the highest form of law.

Commercial Law, this is the laws of how to survive in life as we all have to obtain things, we buy or we barter, hence commerce and we all act in commerce.

Contract Law, this was around over 6000 years ago and well before our next form of law.

Common Law, this came in in the mid 1100’s and was the Plantagenet King making law COMMON to the entire country.

These are known as superior law and always classed as LAWFUL as anything below them is bound by them.

Government Law, the Acts and Statutes made by Governments.

Acts, more commonly known as Acts of Parliament.

Regulations

Orders and Determinations

Manufacturing Principles, more commonly known as standards such as EN or ISO, common standards across an industry or industries.

Codes, more commonly known as Codes of Practise.

Guidance

These are man made laws and classed as “LEGAL” and are always inferior law as anything in the pecking order of law means something inferior is always bound by something superior.

Now we move onto Maxims as they date back to pre Roman times  and are unchanging, unchangeable and are the foundations of all laws, judgements, and determinations and this is why they are so powerful. As precepts and maxims are the foundations of law we always use them as they instantly thwart anything else as everything is built on a foundation.

No judge can change a maxim of law, yet they have to adhere to these maxims as they are the principles on which all laws are based, and any or every Judge will, and has to adhere to them and it is this which makes them so powerful as they are unwavering. Therefore it is important to understand Commercial Law and Maxims as they are the foundations. It is also prudent to read and understand Mosaic Law as they are Jewish Law and the Jews have always been recognised as the leading experts in law. We also have to understand this is consensual law and for this to function YOU have to consent to it, so have you consented to it, and how?

In life you have a birth certificate and this sets up your trust and this trust means you are the beneficiary, and this is important to remember “YOU ARE THE BENEFICIARY” so never forget this important aspect of being a sovereign being.

Courts are there to deal with disputes and the legal profession loves disputes as this makes them money, therefore a court is only there to resolve a dispute, so what happens if there is no dispute? There is nothing to resolve. Courts are the modern version of duels, once you entered a duel to resolve a dispute using pistols, hence pistols at dawn, you always had a second as they were witness to this duel and could give first hand knowledge of the duel, and the winner. Prior to this the disputing parties used swords and you had to draw your sword; many aspects of law still revolve around the drawing of the sword and its swishing motion.
Remember, many of these maxims of law were set in a period of time when there were swords or pistols and they are a product of that time and have been in force for centuries and millennia and been updated to replace swords and pistols with courts.
Therefore, solicitors and Barristers are there to create as much conflict as possible as the more conflict there is, the more billable hours they can claim so they have a financial interest in creating more conflict for you and have well-rehearsed rhetoric to create, or keep conflict alive. If you have ever been divorced and used solicitors you would have seen solicitors urging you to fight the other party, this is conflict creation in action.

Let’s look at the pecking order of UK courts:

Supreme court, this is the highest court in the UK and every other court is bound by its rulings (precedents).

High Court, now incorporated into the Royal Courts of Justice and has three main divisions:
Queens Bench, Chancery, and Family Division and these are all of equal status. There is also a fourth division and these act as local courts in resolving disputes; County Court, and these are held locally all around the country. Queen’s bench originated from the Kings bench and its name changes, dependent upon who is the monarch, a king or queen. Prior to this all disputes were resolved by the king and you had to have an audience with the King in London; this meant first you had to be granted an audience, then get to London to have the audience. This took up a lot of the Kings time so when common law came in the King had 20-30 travelling judges who travelled with him (royal Court) and they undertook these duties on behalf of the King and travelled back to London and discussed their judgements with other judges so you got some consistency. Latterly these judges travelled from London and heard a case and travelled back to their base in London; this still happens today but they record their judgements by writing them down, hence the court of public record. High Courts only ever deal with superior law.
Prior to common law the three main types of law were Roman Law, Canon Law, and Manorial Law, there were others also. Roman Law was taught to scholars of the day and was the most commonly practised; Canon Law was the law of the catholic church and Manorial Law was the law of the barons or large land holders who implemented their own laws on their lands, and enforced them. When England introduced the Church of England, Canon law became obsolete as Catholic law could not overrule Church of England law and this was changed to ecclesiastical law with the laws of the Church of England becoming predominant, but with elements of Canon law remaining. Hence Notaries or Commissioners for Oaths who operate under ecclesiastical law and take oaths based upon someone swearing before God.

Next we come to our most important tool the Affidavit; this is unbelievably powerful and people never realise how powerful this is, and how easy they are to do, you must also make affidavits out and be totally honest and truthful and state only facts based upon first hand knowledge. This is crucial because anything else is hearsay and inadmissible, so never include something someone has told you; stick only to first hand knowledge based upon own actions. Once you have written a clear and concise affidavit based upon your first hand knowledge it needs signing, your signature means you are swearing before god that it is honest and truthful, hence your two witnesses (your duelling seconds) to witness your signature. Hence why affidavits are superior law and cannot be dealt with by inferior law.

Crown Court

Magistrates Court

Tribunal Services

These are consensual courts and are run by a private company called HMCTS or Her Majesty’s Courts and tribunal services and are “star” chambers and not actually courts, they are a private company or a company looking to make a profit, hence biased to getting money from you in fines so they get their percentage of this fine as profit.

No judge can dismiss or abrogate your sworn affidavit and they can only adhere to the foundations of law, hence the reason that affidavits are non judicial and pre judicial.

Only a living human being can write an affidavit and corporations are dead entities or corpses, hence the terms corporate, corporation, they tell you they are a corpse or dead entity, Natural law also says dead people cannot write anything because they are dead. Its basic common sense.
Hence, the reason only a living human being can write an affidavit, but superior law also says that for any benefit there is a liability and this is reiterated in Contract Law, so, if anyone makes a claim against you then they are liable for their own actions, hence the human being making the claim is also liable for their claim. This is why any unsigned claims are null and void, most corporations make these claims against human beings and the reason they are unsigned as they know they are an unaccountable dead entity and hope to play on your ignorance, by reading this you should not be quite so ignorant now and not fall for this fraud.

If we refer to Commercial law, the second highest in our pecking order of law, we can quote two powerful maxims of commercial law:

Maxim 2) Equity Before The Law – this means we are all equal before the law.

Maxim 4) Truth is Expressed in the Form Of an Affidavit, which means it must be true, correct and complete. It also means it has to be signed by a living Human being accepting liability, and that it is not true, correct, and complete then it has no voracity.
This is where companies try to deceive you as they send letters and not affidavits, instant breach of Commercial Law, they are never true or complete as they are unsigned, second breach of Commercial Law, and they never give you FULL ACCOUNTING, breach three of Commercial Law. This means their claim is null and void as it has no voracity in law, and the reason companies try to stay in inferior law despite the fact that inferior law is bound by precedents in superior law; they ignore this and hope to play on your ignorance and force you to pay them.

Equity is defined as anything with an equitable value and this is usually financial, but it extends beyond money as it is defined as anything with a tangible value and can include anything, hence tech companies claiming “intellectual property” as this has a tangible value; i.e. they can develop that intellectual property into a cash value by selling it or developing it into saleable goods.

Where equity is concerned there are two main stages, the assessment stage and the collections stage and most people focus solely, or predominantly on the collections stage and ignore the assessment stage, this is a mistake commonly made as they only ever get letters stating the bailiffs are coming to collect goods. People need to fully understand the assessment stage as this is the weak areas as corporations ignore this stage, hence why you shouldn’t, and why you should apply the law to this stage.

Under the assessment stage they should provide you with an affidavit and this must be true, correct, and complete; they never supply this because no individual will sign it and accept liability for the claim, and no corporation can issue an affidavit. They never supply a contract as often you never have contracted with them, your only contract is with the party concerned with the original debt, be this the original lender of finance and not any third party debt collector or solicitor, so no breach of contract. Third parties never have the foundational instrument which created the debt as often they are sold off or securitised and this foundational instrument must contain both signature and the signature of the original party.

This applies to anyone from HMRC, Councils, banks through to debt collectors and leaves them with harm or loss, lets deal with example of HMRC and ask what harm have you done to them, actually they cannot answer this as you have done them no harm or incurred them any losses, so what benefit have they given you, actually none as they haven’t provided you with goods or a service. Now they have to ty deflection and they state that schools and hospitals are provided with your money, now ask yourself a simple question; do HMRC provide these services? The simple answer is NO as they pass this money onto Government and Government provide these services, not HMRC. This applies to anything and debt collectors are providing a service to a client, NOT YOU.

By constructing a commercial affidavit you first state that you have seen no commercial paperwork to substantiate their claim followed that they have not supplied a commercial affidavit to support their claim, your commercial affidavit is now becoming very powerful. If they employ a debt collector it turns them from an implicit to explicit entity and forces them to provide this paperwork, which of course they cannot, and you are putting your claims onto them, now think carefully about this. As a corporation they cannot issue an affidavit so you already know that no true, correct and complete paperwork exists so their claim is fraudulent. You state this in your commercial affidavit, they have provided no commercial paperwork to substantiate their claim and cite maxims of commercial law.

Maxim 3) In Commerce Truth is Sovereign[/b]

Followed by maxim 4)Truth Is Expressed In The Form Of An Affidavit

Instantly you have shown they haven’t told the truth as that haven’t provided this affidavit so they are instantly breaking the law themselves and their claims are invalid. If they cannot issue an affidavit because they are a corporation or corpse, they cannot rebut your claims in contravention of maxims 5 and 6 which are:

Maxim 5) An Unrebutted Affidavit Stands As Truth

Followed by Maxim 6) An Unrebutted Affidavit Becomes Judgement In Commerce

As they cannot issue an affidavit they cannot rebut your affidavit and you give yourself judgement or they give you judgement by providing you with the fraudulent paperwork which is not an affidavit and even if it was it is unsigned. Is the penny dropping yet?

Maxim Whoever Leaves The Battlefield First Loses By Default

Maxim 10) A Lien Or Claim can Only be satisfied Through Rebuttal By Counter Affidavit Point By Point, Resolution By Jury, Or Payment

They cannot issue a Counter Affidavit as they are a corporation and this leaves them with two options, put this into a court with a jury or pay up, its that simple. Now ask yourself a simple question, will they go to court with all that negative publicity and massive expense, or pay up. They can only go through the High Court which costs around £5,000 per hour plus barrister fees. If they are chasing you for money are they ever likely to get this massive amount of money from you; NO.

This gives you other options, you create a commercial lien against them and begin by finding all the criminal offences they have committed and maximum fines for each offence and add them together along with offences with jail terms, and then report them for each criminal offence through the Attorney General. It’s unlikely they will be prosecuted but you can attach them to your commercial lien against them and register this lien with the local court or Public records Office and add the costs of registering your lien, to your lien. If you are careful in your wording you include each and every director as well as every employee as they are complicit as someone has typed their paperwork, someone has printed their paperwork and someone has posted their paperwork to you and these along with the company are liable for their individual actions.

Now you have turned their fraud against them and you can create your own accounting for your time and costs of dealing with their fraudulent claims and offer them the opportunity to cure in the form of a full and final settlement in this matter. You can add in the obvious costs such as postage and substantiate this with receipts, but also add in your time on an hourly basis, your fuel and wear and tear costs for your vehicle as well as any telephone costs. Think about this for a moment, you can claim for hours spent researching the law and with a meagre hourly rate it can soon add up to several thousands of pounds and they cannot disprove your claims so they pay up as “settlement” in full and final resolution of this matter. They have caused you harm and loss by trespassing on your private affairs, made fraudulent and unsubstantiated claims against you and given you the evidence in the form of their paperwork, now you are taking a dump on them from a great height and put your hand on their wallet.