Strange Week

Its been a strange wek and if anyone is in doubt about what is happening them simply look around you.

Boris was given a PCN for allegedly partying and has agreed to pay the £50 so why? is this to reinforce the impressions people have that they are fines when they are nothing more than an offer to contract and to reinforce the impression that they have to be paid, but it gets worse. Barn Stormer was calling Boris mercilessly about this alleged Partygate and saying he should be removed and should be removed as an MP as well as PM as he cannot be trusted.

Now after this idiot calling Boris about partying he is also being investigated for doing exactly the same thing so clear evidence of gutter politics based solely upon politicians acting like petulant children and showing why they are not worth my, and many others vote and as parliament is a company they are corporate entities and work for themselves and not the public they claim to represent. lets look at some more evidence; Barn Stormer failed to investigate and prosecute Jimmy Saville and is now claiming they were threatened with POTENTIAL libel claims against them so why do they think this latest fraudulent rhetoric has any merit because if they did investigate and he bought charges and was found guilty there would be no libel claims and would he care if there was because its only taxpayers money and they only squander £millions every year so this claim has no merit and doesn't hold water.

Meanwhile we have the flasher on the front benches and again its Angela Raynor flashing at the opposition bench so what credibility has she got and why does she can represent people? actually she left school at 16 because she was pregnant and if she was pregnant at 16 did she conceive when she was 15 because this is a criminal offence and why did the standards and ethics committee even allow her to become a politician because under age sex is still a criminal offence even if the police don't really enforce it. She has absolutely no experience of politics and came from a profession of working for a trade union called Unison and we know how they like being militant and fail to represent their members but push their personal agendas.

Now we have a current MP watching porn in the house of commons and this intrigued be, particularly the responsed from women with their fake responses claiming it was offensive to women and this led to me asking the question "do only men watch porn" as various evidence suggests the opposite but I am prepared to be proven wrong; so lets think about this logically, pornography is sex and unless it is DIY or homesexual sex it must include both men and women so why are the women playing this faux shame card.
I have to wonder why he is watching porn when he is in the house as he is surrounded by c*nts and doesn't need his phone to watch them, just swivel your head and you can't fail to see them.

Now we have the cost of living spiralling out of control so what response do we get??? yes, hit them with a windfall tax and this is the tried and tested rhetoric which the majority are so stupid that they fall for it so lets look a little closer; consumers pay their bills if they can afford to and the energy companies make huge profits, Government see this and need to appease the people and trot out the windfall tax so who actually wins? the energy company as they are making record profits and Government as they hit them with a windfall tax and snatch some of that profit for themselves and in the meanwhile the consumer is paying their overinflated prices and nothing is done to prevent this so why?

Now its quote of the week time from a local media story I was shown and remember I live in Derbyshire which i landlocked or so I thought, the weather gave a warning if high tides and large waves for Derbyshire so where is our coastline and is erosion really that bad. This is typical of todays media where one person writes an aticle and every outlet takes the article and simply replaces the county name with their county name and one story is shared around the country and no journalism actually takes place.

My all time story of the week centres around subliminal messaging and the fact they are not even trying to be subtle about indoctrinating you into paying and this was yet another media story claiming you would be fined £5000 if your car had air conditioning and you didn't use it and this really interested me.
Issue one is HOW do they know your air con isn't switched on and unless they stop you how can they tell when you drive past, they can't.
What authority do they think they have to enter your vehicle? once again they cannot unless you are being subjected to a drugs search or being arrested and the High Court has this precedent down as judgement so any entry into your vehicle would be illegal and any charges bought would be voided.
How are they going to check the temperature inside your car unless they all carry calibrated thermometers around with them and if they did I am sure more plod would end up with them shoved up their own rectums by the public, and as most plod have very restricted powers when it comes to vehicles anyway it would be lft to the traffic idiots to enforce and they would need to have their powers extending to allow them to measure the temperature inside your vehicle and they would need to get the consent of the vehicle owners to allow them access and very few of the sheeple would allow them access to delf incriminate so this is pure fraud and subliminal mesaging.
Running air con or climate control costs the driver money as they use fuel to run them and many people switch them off to save money and fuel and as a vehicle running these systems generate more emissions many people choose to leave them off and open a window instead. I have climate control and mine is posh as it has two systems, front and rear and I simply dont care how much it costs to run.

I any more proof were needed that politicians are not fit for purpose and the media are constantly playing the fear card it is all around us so I am off to bury my head back into the sand.

Well do any of us believe it??? Kier Homes Barn Stormer has said that if police issue him with a fine he will pay it as despite him slating Boris Johnson he has done the same and much worse.

Lets look at this, he is a solicitor and knows it is not a fine as its a penalty charge notice and merely an offer to contract and one he can refuse and he can mislead the public into their systems lies and disinformation by actually paying it to give the myth some credibility and it will go on his expenses and the taxpayer ends up paying it.

Will he go????????????????? I doubt it.

Hypocrisy runs rife. Worse than that, the blatant lies, even within public view ie when the House of Commons is filmed.

assassin wrote:.. yet another media story claiming you would be fined £5000 if your car had air conditioning and you didn't use it and this really interested me.

I thought you'd know better than to believe everything you read in the Sun!

Although maybe you just saw the headline. The actual article refers to the Highway Code which advises you to keep the car "well ventilated" and says nothing about air conditioning at all. I guess the Sun editors and reader don't know the difference either between ventilation and air conditioning, or between advice and a legal requirement.

6. Hot weather (237)
237
Keep your vehicle well ventilated to avoid drowsiness. Be aware that the road surface may become soft or if it rains after a dry spell it may become slippery. These conditions could affect your steering and braking. If you are dazzled by bright sunlight, slow down and if necessary, stop.

I don't know about anyone else but to me that HC rule seems banal and pointless restating what should be common sense anyway.

flyingfish wrote:

assassin wrote:.. yet another media story claiming you would be fined £5000 if your car had air conditioning and you didn't use it and this really interested me.

I thought you'd know better than to believe everything you read in the Sun!

Although maybe you just saw the headline. The actual article refers to the Highway Code which advises you to keep the car "well ventilated" and says nothing about air conditioning at all. I guess the Sun editors and reader don't know the difference either between ventilation and air conditioning, or between advice and a legal requirement.

6. Hot weather (237)
237
Keep your vehicle well ventilated to avoid drowsiness. Be aware that the road surface may become soft or if it rains after a dry spell it may become slippery. These conditions could affect your steering and braking. If you are dazzled by bright sunlight, slow down and if necessary, stop.

I don't know about anyone else but to me that HC rule seems banal and pointless restating what should be common sense anyway.

It wasn't in the Sun and I am well aware of the laws surrounding it but my point still stands, who says it is too hot or cold and what effects it may have on an individuals performance.