READ THIS IF YOU HAVE BANK PROBLEMS
Unlawful treasonous practices of Companies House, criminalising Company directors for non-indictable administrative events
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/unlawful_treasonous_practices_of
Liz Watson 11 June 2016
Delivered
(11 June 2016)
Dear Companies House,
Why are Companies House ignoring Serious Organised Crime of major financial institutions and Law firms, yet criminalising small company directors for non-events?
I returned from a period of nearly 6 months abroad where I have been tackling from a safe distance the most serious UK financial frauds perpetrated against my home and family Estate and a much wider community in England (which Companies House have oddly categorised as
" the United Kingdom PLC"), which has inadvertently resulted in late filing of my company accounts, due to the distraction of dealing with spurious and vexatious litigation by Eversheds LLP initiated nearly 8 years ago in what turns out to be a complete hoax and Fraud upon the Court.
Not only this, it involves (as I am sure Companies House must, by now, realise, through my recent approach to the disconcertingly indifferent PRA and Bank of England), the startling widespread practice of major financial institutions within the UK (including HBOS PLC and their various 'clone' trading entities and shell companies which includes IN PARALLEL SOLUTIONS set up in April 2000 as a mere domain name), operating fake bank accounts using void sort codes and account numbers with no records kept on the Bank's ledger.
In addition, operating these fake accounts from rogue trading addresses (evidently undetected by Companies House nor, to date, any of the named Authorities, entrusted with tackling such matters) without any forensic audit trail off balance sheet due to no filing of such fraudulent transactions being possible because of the deceitful scam set ups being used - apparently all being condoned by Companies House and others?
I note that Companies House have issued a "Statutory Notice" threatening me with a criminal prosecution for being just over a month late with the filing of my accounts, something I have never seen before in 31 years of trading.
I therefore request under the FOIA, the following information from Companies House, to please advise:-
1. The number of company directors facing Criminal Prosecution (as they say we will be in 4 weeks) for non-submission of accounts after the same small time period lapse as us.
2. The number of Criminal Prosecutions issued for non-submission of accounts after the same small time period as us.
3. The number of companies whose Accounts are currently as late as ours (just over one month).
4. The number of those companies who have been threatened with prosecution already.
5. How does Companies House construe a "criminal" offence over a commonplace administrative event where no party is harmed and no 'mens rea' nor 'actus reus' has occurred?
6. How does this square up with all of the UK companies of solicitors and dishonest White Collar workers who are engaging in Crime Syndicates and Serious Organised Crime, who are being ably assisted by Companies House through lax controls, poor monitoring, no-touch regulation over the relevant professions, and turning a Nelsonian blind eye to their asset-stripping and unlawful practices for their "business"?
7. Why is it that thousands of unscrupulously-run UK companies in the category of (6) above are known to be running offshore shell companies and running their 'unclean business' through their offshore companies in order to avoid the scrutiny of their UK regulators like the SRA or the FCA? This includes Redstone Mortgages who are running TWO versions of registered companies, one in Skipton, Yorkshire, and the other in London Wall - with one digit different in the latter (notified by the FCA to be a CLONE company) which is being used to steal houses and properties from rightful owners on a monstrous massive scale across the UK - tying directly in to HML (Home Mortgage Loans) operating from the same Skipton Address? This is a scam of incredible proportions.
8. How many decisions and rulings are being made which hugely adversely affect small and medium business owners and enterprises, by the secret form of 'government' that exists through the PRIVY COUNCIL - aptly described by Peter Oborne as a "the shadowy insidious Establishment Mafia that have covered up torture, led us to an illegal war, and are now placing the Press under State control"? (namely without any say from the Electorate)
Doesn't this make a mockery of British politics, whose decisions Companies House rely upon through Parliament, and who pay your wages?
see the link below:
It's time to kill off the shadowy mafia that is the Privy Council - Daily Mail
www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Secret-Smug-Sini......
16 Oct 2015 - PETER OBORNE explains why the Privy Council is one of the most sinister ... They changed the statutes of the Chartered Institute of Public ...
9. Why the hypocrisy of Companies House (who've taken their legislation from the corrupt EU who've rammed unenforceable statutes down our gullets with a mere show of hands, never ratified by the Electorate let alone voted for, who themselves have never signed off or properly audited their accounts in at least two decades - directing Companies House's actions), in turn invoking Companies House to engage in the unacceptable practice of meting out injustice to honest Company directors who are seeking reasonable support and help from the Government in going about their business, but instead receiving vexatious unwarranted threats and Draconian proposed measures for minor administrative blips? Is this not a sign of corporate insanity?
Where are you taking your authority from, without the Electorate's consent?
How is Companies House benefitting by criminalising innocent directors over minor administrative lapses and what is the scale of this?
What is the purpose of doing so?
What steps are Companies House taking to SUPPORT small and medium business enterprises, which have been robbed, interfered with, bullied, oppressed, dictated to, and pillaged and stripped by unscrupulous banksters and White Collar criminal activity for at least 2.5 decades now? Your priorities seem to all be upside down, with due respect. I submit that Companies House should be made the subject of a Public Enquiry and full national review by the People of England.
I await your responses.
Yours truly
Elizabeth: watson
Managing Director - Discoveries International Limited
Founder - ONE UNITED VOICE ACTION GROUP
www.one-voice-action-group.com
Information Rights, Companies House 13 June 2016
Dear Ms Watson
With reference to your email dated 11 June 2016.
The Information Rights Team is in the process of dealing with your request and a response will be sent as soon as possible.
Yours sincerely
Information Rights Team
Companies House
show quoted sections
Liz Watson 13 June 2016
Delivered
Dear Information Rights,
thank you for your communication and update. This is obviously a very serious matter, because of the frauds which have been masked by the inappropriate attacks, targetting my company instead of helping it. The companies who should be criminally prosecuted are Eversheds and HBOS PLC and their army of cohorts involved in the criminal conspiracy to defraud.
please see the communication below, too., which has just today elicited an actual response from the Criminal Justice department of the local magistrates court, who are passing the matter over to escalate things..
Yours sincerely,
Liz Watson
For your urgent attention.
I am being targetted by Companies House now - because my Action Group is set up through my company of 31 years standing, and it is exposing Serious Organised Crime that is involved in this matter.
It involves major PUBLIC INTEREST issues in particular fraudulent and fake "bank accounts" not run on any bank ledger! I wonder how many thousands of these are in existence and being used to rob people and eat them alive and steal their assets and homes? Why is nothing being done? The Bank of England and the PRA are saying the relevant government departments "will deal with it" - but they are not doing so!
Why is nobody listening? Is the UK really this corrupt?
I realise that the Criminal Justice system may be in 'meltdown', but that surely isn't an excuse for doing nothing!
I am being stone-walled by the Civil Courts, the Judiciary, the police, the FCA, the SRA, the Ombudsman (who is passing the buck to the civil courts!), the Land Registry, and all those complicit in the shocking frauds that have been perpetrated against our property and ourselves are withholding disclosure which is a criminal offence as well!
What does it take to break this iron fist death grip of corruption?
Since I am now back in the UK, please can I have an appointment to appear before the Magistrates in the latter part of next week? This is become extremely urgent
thanking you -
Elizabeth: watson
Your Ref
Our Ref COMP/01923485/JL
Date 09/06/2016
Dear Elizabeth Watson
DISCOVERIES INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Thank you for your email of 09/06/2016 concerning the overdue accounts for the period ending 31/07/2015.
I am sorry to hear of the difficulties that you have been experiencing.
As the company is required to remain on the register, the proposed strike off action has been discontinued. The failure to file accounts within the statutory time allowed is a criminal offence but I will defer any prosecution action for 28 days from the date of this letter.
If the company record is not brought up-to-date by that time, the directors may face criminal proceedings. Conviction for this offence will result in a criminal record and a potential unlimited fine for each document not delivered on time.
Please note that this deferral of prosecution action does not extend or alter the original statutory filing deadline. As the accounts are already late, a civil late filing penalty will automatically be incurred when they are received and accepted at Companies House. The amount of the penalty increases with the length of delay in delivery and is separate to any criminal proceeding being considered against the directors. Failure to comply with the filing requirements of the 2006 Companies Act in consecutive years will result in the penalty being doubled for the current year's accounts.
You can deliver certain types of accounts online via our Web Filing service, which has in-built checks to ensure that you get it right first time. Our web-site www.companieshouse.gov.uk gives information on this along with a full range of guidance booklets and forms.
Please note the annual return (Form AR01) for 02/06/2016 is due by 30/06/2016.
Yours sincerely
J Logue (Mr)
Compliance Case Officer
Liz Watson left an annotation (13 June 2016)
FYI - in the Public Interest
This is what its like to be targeted by a nationally circulating but hidden, criminal cabal, for posing a threat of Public exposure to dark concealed secrets of established UK Corporations (presumed to be upstanding), disowning and stone-walling documented proof of:
* fake bank accounts, not held on a banks ledger (but such practices are evidently condoned by Cos. Hse)
* Counterfeit "bank statements" being printed from inside the "bank" & condoned by Govt & the Bank concerned;
* spoof (fake) trading addresses used, unauthorised by the Bank concerned but condoned by Companies House
* the 'author' of the foregoing being co-conspirators: HBOS' ex-CEO James Crosby and his side-kick ex-Head Auditor & Director of Private Banking unit of HBOS PLC, Fraser Mackay of 34 yrs standing, soon to be publicly exposed for the serial criminal and perjurious CROOK that he is - making tens of thousands of victims and "clients" PAY for his lies and criminal concealment of all these years!
* the above being the easy-to-understanding explanation of how over $200 million disappeared in 2001 (worth ten times as much by today's values), vanish without a trace thanks to the above 'structure of fraud'! (yet diverted and denied by the Authorities for over 15 years so far...)
whereby the operative Cabal resort to deploying and infiltrating all Govt departments and HMCTS masquerading as "government", taking out or taking down all whistleblowers or truth-speakers by targetting them and directly working AGAINST their interests - including malicious efforts to sabotage their business: in this case, small and medium size businesses, (and mine has been kept small because of criminality for the past 20 years, because of 'distraction litigation' and queer mummery in HMCTS), and using Draconian and punitive tactics to intimidate and impinge on the civil rights and liberties of small corporations who have made a minor clerical omission (in this case, my small corporation, Discoveries Int'l Ltd) - and for filing the accounts a couple of weeks late, is now being criminalised, ladies and gentlemen!
This publicly posted letter that I prepared was prompted by a scurrilous 'statutory notice' threatening a "criminal prosecution" in a victimless "crime", sent vexatiously by incompetent Companies House, over the accounts being filed 4 weeks late due to tackling the serious frauds against our property! Have you ever heard of such nonsense in all your life? It's bureaucracy gone mad.
I've run the Company for 31 years without any such event, and have been prevented from doing any business because of the vexatious spurious litigation of a nullity 'claim', though have never been threatened with being criminalised before when the accounts have a minor delay! Its clearly suspicious activity by the private corporation known as 'Companies House' - I wonder who audits and files THEIR accounts? Or for "UK PLC" ? Why this mis-use of presumed authority and assumed power over the small businesess and honest traders? Whilst they ignore openly all of the criminals operating the big legal and accounting giants with their offshore slush funds and offshore accounts set up to disable the impact of 'regulation' as they continue to fleece the SME's and hoover up money and assets from upstanding members of the Public?
They, of course, want the company shut down so that they can dispense with the national problem of exposure of White Collar fraud in which they, too, are complicit. Because solicitors are companies are they not? And solicitors are causing shocking injustices through their hypocrisy and pure unadulterated theft attempts by pen & paper and queer mummery. Below is what I wrote this evening :
The White Collar criminals are totally out of control
The liar lawyers foist burdens on to all of us which they deceitfully ensure they do not have to bear themselves
The Law has been contorted and twisted into queer mummery.
Mummery is defined on Wikipaedia as "ridiculous or extravagant ceremonial procedures"
And I cite the Holy Bible here:-
"Woe unto you lawyers! For ye have taken away the key of knowledge: you entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered." (Luke XI 52)
WOE UNTO YOU, LAWYERS!
A last, gutsy attack on The Law as a curious, antiquated institution which, through outworn procedures, technical jargon and queer mummery, enables a group of medicine-men to dominate our social and political lives and our business, to their own gain.
(Professor Fred Rodell, Yale university written in 1939)!
http://www.clrg.info/wp-content/uploads/...
"We are being dominated by a handful of fascist dictators parading as "officers of the Court" but having removed due process of Law from the Court and by-passing all human rights and common sense, we have been steered and coerced into being expected to cooperate in playing the role of heir fodder".
(By Elizabeth watson)
I agree with what Patrick Cullinane has written:-
"OUR CONSTITUTION HAS BEEN HIJACKED, FROM WITHIN, BY ZIONIST TERRORISTS WHO INFILTRATED OUR GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS' TO ROB US VIA "SUMMARY JUDGEMENT" WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF OUR PROPERTIES', CHILDREN & POSSESSIONS: = AN ISRAELI FOREIGN POWER, WHICH IS HIGH TREASON:
Constitutional Conundrum: A Question of Consent?
What did the case of Joyce v Director of Public Prosecutions [1946] say?
“The natural born subject owes allegiance from his birth, the naturalised subject from his naturalisation, the alien from the day he comes within the realm. By what means and when can they cast off allegiance? The natural born subject cannot at common law at any time cast it off….nor can the naturalised subjects at common law ”.
Of all the mysterious processes involved in Britain`s political integration with Europe, initiated by Macmillan and engineered by Heath from 31 July 1961 to 17 October 1972, none is more remarkable than the absence of a single measure repealing any part of any of the four great Constitutional Statutes -
Magna Carta of Edward 1,
the Petition of Right (1627),
the Bill of Rights (1688 ) and
the Act of Settlement (1700).
Neither have the Coronation Oath Act, the Promissory Oaths Act nor the Treason Statutes been repealed.
Constitutional Conundrum: A Question of Consent? | UK Column
image
Constitutional Conundrum: A Question of Consent? | UK ...
What is the historical relationship between Her Majesty the Queen and her subjects? Actions to undermine the British Nation State have rarely been brought to the a...
View on www.ukcolumn.org
Preview by Yahoo
(Sent to the WHAT DO THEY KNOW website)
To: Companies House,
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Unlawful treasonous practices of Companies House, criminalising Company directors for non-indictable administrative events
(11 June 2016)
Dear Companies House,
Why are Companies House ignoring Serious Organised Crime of major financial institutions and Law firms, yet criminalising small company directors for non-events?
I returned from a period of nearly 6 months abroad where I have been tackling from a safe distance the most serious UK financial frauds perpetrated against my home and family Estate and a much wider community in England (which Companies House have oddly categorised as
" the United Kingdom PLC"), which has inadvertently resulted in late filing of my company accounts, due to the distraction of dealing with spurious and vexatious litigation by Eversheds LLP initiated nearly 8 years ago in what turns out to be a complete hoax and Fraud upon the Court.
Not only this, it involves (as I am sure Companies House must, by now, realise, through my recent approach to the disconcertingly indifferent PRA and Bank of England), the startling widespread practice of major financial institutions within the UK (including HBOS PLC and their various 'clone' trading entities and shell companies which includes IN PARALLEL SOLUTIONS set up in April 2000 as a mere domain name), operating fake bank accounts using void sort codes and account numbers with no records kept on the Bank's ledger.
In addition, operating these fake accounts from rogue trading addresses (evidently undetected by Companies House nor, to date, any of the named Authorities, entrusted with tackling such matters) without any forensic audit trail off balance sheet due to no filing of such fraudulent transactions being possible because of the deceitful scam set ups being used - apparently all being condoned by Companies House and others?
I note that Companies House have issued a "Statutory Notice" threatening me with a criminal prosecution for being just over a month late with the filing of my accounts, something I have never seen before in 31 years of trading.
I therefore request under the FOIA, the following information from Companies House, to please advise:-
1. The number of company directors facing Criminal Prosecution (as they say we will be in 4 weeks) for non-submission of accounts after the same small time period lapse as us.
2. The number of Criminal Prosecutions issued for non-submission of accounts after the same small time period as us.
3. The number of companies whose Accounts are currently as late as ours (just over one month).
4. The number of those companies who have been threatened with prosecution already.
5. How does Companies House construe a "criminal" offence over a commonplace administrative event where no party is harmed and no 'mens rea' nor 'actus reus' has occurred?
6. How does this square up with all of the UK companies of solicitors and dishonest White Collar workers who are engaging in Crime Syndicates and Serious Organised Crime, who are being ably assisted by Companies House through lax controls, poor monitoring, no-touch regulation over the relevant professions, and turning a Nelsonian blind eye to their asset-stripping and unlawful practices for their "business"?
7. Why is it that thousands of unscrupulously-run UK companies in the category of (6) above are known to be running offshore shell companies and running their 'unclean business' through their offshore companies in order to avoid the scrutiny of their UK regulators like the SRA or the FCA? This includes Redstone Mortgages who are running TWO versions of registered companies, one in Skipton, Yorkshire, and the other in London Wall - with one digit different in the latter (notified by the FCA to be a CLONE company) which is being used to steal houses and properties from rightful owners on a monstrous massive scale across the UK - tying directly in to HML (Home Mortgage Loans) operating from the same Skipton Address? This is a scam of incredible proportions.
8. How many decisions and rulings are being made which hugely adversely affect small and medium business owners and enterprises, by the secret form of 'government' that exists through the PRIVY COUNCIL - aptly described by Peter Oborne as a "the shadowy insidious Establishment Mafia that have covered up torture, led us to an illegal war, and are now placing the Press under State control"? (namely without any say from the Electorate)
Doesn't this make a mockery of British politics, whose decisions Companies House rely upon through Parliament, and who pay your wages?
see the link below:
It's time to kill off the shadowy mafia that is the Privy Council - Daily Mail
www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Secret-Smug-Sini......
16 Oct 2015 - PETER OBORNE explains why the Privy Council is one of the most sinister ... They changed the statutes of the Chartered Institute of Public ...
9. Why the hypocrisy of Companies House (who've taken their legislation from the corrupt EU who've rammed unenforceable statutes down our gullets with a mere show of hands, never ratified by the Electorate let alone voted for, who themselves have never signed off or properly audited their accounts in at least two decades - directing Companies House's actions), in turn invoking Companies House to engage in the unacceptable practice of meting out injustice to honest Company directors who are seeking reasonable support and help from the Government in going about their business, but instead receiving vexatious unwarranted threats and Draconian proposed measures for minor administrative blips? Is this not a sign of corporate insanity?
Where are you taking your authority from, without the Electorate's consent?
How is Companies House benefitting by criminalising innocent directors over minor administrative lapses and what is the scale of this?
What is the purpose of doing so?
What steps are Companies House taking to SUPPORT small and medium business enterprises, which have been robbed, interfered with, bullied, oppressed, dictated to, and pillaged and stripped by unscrupulous banksters and White Collar criminal activity for at least 2.5 decades now? Your priorities seem to all be upside down, with due respect. I submit that Companies House should be made the subject of a Public Enquiry and full national review by the People of England.
I await your responses.
Yours truly
Elizabeth: watson
Managing Director - Discoveries International Limited
Founder - ONE UNITED VOICE ACTION GROUP
'One Voice' action group
www.one-voice-action.group.com
Report
Jan Lumsden, Companies House 30 June 2016
Dear Ms Watson
With reference to your email dated 11 June 2016.
I have responded to the questions in the order they appear in your
request.
1. The number of company directors facing Criminal Prosecution (as
they say we will be in 4 weeks) for non-submission of accounts after the
same small time period lapse as us.
This information is not held by CH.
Companies House (CH) operates an active compliance programme and the first
statutory overdue accounts notice (DEFSTAT) is issued to the company
within 7-10 days of it falling into default of its filing obligation. This
applies to both accounts and annual returns which are required by law to
be filed at CH. This letter is the first of two statutory letters issued
to a company which is in default of its filing obligations to enquire if
the company is in business and operation.
2. The number of Criminal Prosecutions issued for non-submission of
accounts after the same small time period as us.
This information is not held by CH.
However, to be of assistance, we publish statistics in the Companies
Register Activities report, which can be accessed via the following link.
Section D, Table D2 are statistics for charges laid for failure to deliver
Accounts and Annual Return.
[1]https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics...