Latest from CrimeBodge

Similar type of Incident , the other day,
Cop throws a Punch in Rochdale.

Society of the Spectacle wrote:Similar type of Incident , the other day,
Cop throws a Punch in Rochdale.

As nationalistic as I am I can see that the couple were the victims of absolutely 'normal' behaviour from the police, firstly it was a civil matter, secondly the man who was assaulted approached the police, the conditioning of the police has worked wonders in creating an aggressive useful idiot.

Lies of the event in the media here:
https://metro.co.uk/2018/09/27/couple-attack-police-officer-after-tesco-refuse-to-sell-them-over-20-water-bottles-7984237/

It just shows the first responce of po-lice scum is violence towards the people they allegedly serve and protect, why did this scum punch a man for nothing and was Tesco security camera evidence taken or was it suddenly malfunctioning and not recording.

And yet again

But crimebodge says at the end that a policeman CAN ask for your details under S164, it’s just the policeman got it wrong and said s163 - no biggie

It says he can ask, but nowhere does it state that you are legally OR lawfully obliged to answer him, in law or more commonly, Common Law we also have the right to remain silent.

Wasn't that "Right To Silence" approach quashed by the Europeon Courts?

Hi Mike,
bottom of page one.
https://www.gov.uk/arrested-your-rights

More good info.

This raises several issues, firstly this is a civil matter and nothing to do with the po-lice so by simply attending they are in breach of their own codes of conduct by attending a civil matter, want proof? call them about something clearly a civil matter and they will refuse to attend. To begin with they will attend and take the side of the corporate robber and take their side which immediately contradicts their impartiality and effectiveness to deal with a situation which they shouldn't be attending anyway.

In one recent case this happened to someone I know, he was detained by a council enforeskinment agent who has no rights to detain him, he recorded the incident on a covert camera with audio.

It clearly showed the foreskin agent using physical force to detain him against his will and he used his right to defend himself and he threw this mindless thug of himself and walked away, as he did so the mindless moron called the Po-lice and claimed assault and they attended. He was arrested and taken to the pig sty and questioned, they took his mobile device from him and looked at the footage, it clearly showed him as the victim of assault by the idiot and him clearly using the right to defend himself and walk away, guess what happened next, yes you guessed it, the video evidence disappeared from his phone.

What they didn't realise was this was live streaming to another server and they thought they had removed the evidence, yes they had, but only from his phone and a copy of the live streaming was immediately made; then, they passed his personal information onto the council and breached his Human Rights, particularly to privace and the Data Protection Act.
Then it hit them both as he bought a claim against them both and both the council and Po-lice carried on thinking they were in the clear, but it went further, to court and at disclosure the footage was revealed and their elaborate scam and subsequent cover up was exposed, now they had to keep it quiet and they agreed to settle with substantial sums with a confidentiality clause.

Arrested for saying 'no shit'

Taken directly from the you gov website which Daveiron provided the link for:

Your rights when being questioned

The police may question you about the crime you’re suspected of - this will be recorded. You don’t have to answer the questions but there could be consequences if you don’t. The police must explain this to you by reading you the police caution:

“You do not have to say anything. But, it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.”

If you are telling the truth there should be no problem.

If you want to lie (for whatever reason. Lying is not necessarily a crime or a sin - maybe to protect a member of parliament or a High Court Judge - ) then state "no comment" at every question.

And the outcome.

I'm glad he won and is now going to sue. But nothing in this world will change by sueing the police force. He has his name. Get his home address and then sue him not the police force. Once this starts and becomes the norm things will turn around for the better I feel. We need to learn this process and I wish he would have said he was going to sue him and not the force.

Agree 100% phillpots,

From FOIs I have done ,if they break the law they lose their immunity and are open to a personal liability claim.

If they act outside the jurisdiction of their defined role they are not acting as Po-lice c*ntstables and are no different from anyone else, so they are a normal person and nothing more and a case can be bought against them as individuals in just the same way you bring a case against another individual.

https://crimebodge.com/how-to-complain-about-a-judge/

We can all complain to the cows come home but nothing will ever change, unless and I have said it before. Get their name and home address and serve them up with personal litigation. Nothing will EVER EVER change until we all start to learn this process of sueing them personally, not the corporation they hide behind. He's doing a grand job following the system.

An important one to watch

I was arrested by armed police for saying ‘no s**t’ to a cop'

But magistrates threw out the case

A father claims he was arrested and taken to court for saying "no s**t" to a policeman.
Rob Warner, 45, says he was trying to pick his daughter up from her school when he couldn’t find her.

Mr Warner, of Alvaston, says he became angry with school staff that she was missing.
A nearby police officer attempted to get involved. Mr Warner said the officer said: “I can see you’re angry,” to which Mr Warner says he replied with “no s**t!”.

No action was taken against Mr Warner, a freelance legal advisor, until three weeks later when he received a letter asking him to attend a voluntary interview with police in relation to a breach of public order.
When he did not go to that interview, he said he received a postal summons to magistrates’ court some weeks later.
Armed police eventually turned up at his door with a battering ram to carry out a court-ordered warrant for his arrest, which he filmed on his Youtube channel.

In total, five police were involved in taking Mr Warner to court.
But the case was not upheld and magistrates dismissed it. Mr Warner said it should never have gone to court in the first place.

He said: “I was at an induction day for my daughter at her school. I turned up to collect her and she was missing.
“I was beside myself with worry and I was furious that the teachers had not kept a list of the people who were there taking children.

“I told them ‘you are incompetent’ then all of a sudden the PC turned up out of nowhere.
“He said ‘I can see you are angry’ and I said ‘no s**t I’m angry’. At the time, no one seemed bothered and no one complained about it at all.

“Not a single person from the school complained.

“The first I know about this is over three weeks later when the PC knocks on my door asking me to attend a voluntary interview.”

Mr Warner said he was asked to attend the interview for an alleged breach of the Public Order Act 1986.
Under Section 5 of that act, it is illegal to use “threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour”.

Mr Warner didn’t attend the interview as he said he was not legally required to, meaning police did not have a chance to question him.
He said: “So the police left it for another two or three weeks and then I get a postal requisition for summons to court.
“Then four chaps turn up at my door with a battering ram. They refused to show a warrant but they were going to batter down my door so I was arrested and taken to the police station.

Mr Warner was dealt with at Southern Derbyshire Magistrates’ Court on November 2, after being held in prison cells for hours.

He said: “The magistrates were very reasonable. I could not fault the court – they were wonderful.
“They said: ‘Your behaviour was perfectly reasonable given the circumstances.’

“The officer who arrested me said that other people had complained but it was unused evidence so it didn’t stand up.”
Mr Warner runs the website Crimebodge, which offers advice and legal services to people struggling with police prosecutions.

He has been studying common law, case law and police law for the past six years, although he is not formally legally-trained.
He said: “ It’s all about protecting people from abuse of power from the police. I love doing it.”

A Derbyshire police spokesperson said: “Following an incident at the school on July 3, 2018, Mr Warner was charged with a section 5 public order offence.
“Derbyshire Constabulary’s role is to place this evidence before the court and it is the court’s role to decide the outcome of any case that comes before it.

“We do not comment on the outcome of court cases.”

The spokesperson also confirmed that the reason armed police were called was because they are the officers who have the quickest access to the equipment required to force entry to a property.

I overlooked this one from crimebodge, showing once more what utter Marxist scum the police are, worth mentioning I saw one of the kidnap conveyances the domestic terrorists use a while back with the stolen rainbow down its side, unnatural sexual behaviour all promoted via the Marxist doctrine.

Anyway more proof the police are political footsoldiers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAnKJ8y9ZNY