fiduciary responsibility

by **LionsShare** Sun Feb 10, 2019 12:18 pm

please read the following & see the blatant arogance of the council(s) when someone asked a small series of very important questions.

Dated Dec 2018 & Jan 2019 - very recent.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/legislation_17#outgoing-853045

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/legislation_17

This may have been posted here, not too sure!

This may also be of interest.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_OgPzA-EE4&feature=youtu.be

by **daveiron** Sun Feb 10, 2019 12:51 pm

Hi LS

That is pretty much the standard type of response being churned out by all government agencies.
Its very important to choose the wording carefully so as not to give them wriggle room.
I also find its an advantage if you can make the same request to at least 3 different branches ,
example ,3 different councils or police forces etc.

by **LionsShare** Sun Feb 10, 2019 1:06 pm

Hi DI,

suppose if the same request were made to ALL councils & copper forces then then pretty much the same answer would be forth coming.

& agree over wriggle room!

LS

by **daveiron** Sun Feb 10, 2019 1:44 pm

Hi LS

Not in my experience ,some will answer the questions, others will not,and sometimes
you can get differing answers ,which could be useful as you can play one against the other.

by **assassin** Sun Feb 10, 2019 6:35 pm

I would agree with Dave here and one thing I advocate people do is to write to them and get a written response, this will be written in a specific language and by someone who actually takes a defined position or stance; then ring them up and ask the same questions and record them, you will find a different person is answering and they often contradict the written response.
This gives you wiggle room and shows inconsistencies on their part and this plays into your hands.

by Sponsored content

fiduciary responsibility

fiduciary responsibility

Re: fiduciary responsibility

Re: fiduciary responsibility

Re: fiduciary responsibility

Re: fiduciary responsibility

Re: fiduciary responsibility