Know who you are

by **daveiron** Thu Dec 31, 2020 12:44 pm

Now more than ever its becoming very important to comprehend the difference
between a man/woman and a person.
Please add to this thread relevant info on the subject.
Please do not post anything here that takes the subject off on a tangent.
Its very important for new members to be able to grasp and have knowledge
of this subject and hopefully all they need can be found in this thread.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://livingintheprivate.blogspot.com/p/home.html

Romans 2:11 "There is no respect of persons with GOD"

Job 32:21 " Let me not,I pray you,accept any mans person,neither let me give
flattering titles unto man."

by **daveiron** Thu Dec 31, 2020 2:07 pm

This is brilliant.

by freeland Thu Dec 31, 2020 2:48 pm

Dave this is absloutley fantastic cheeres

by **LionsShare** Thu Dec 31, 2020 3:43 pm

always challenge the commerce.

if there is NO evidence of exchange of goods/services & cash then where is the commerce?

How can commercial rules & regulations be applied/sanctioned where there is no evidence of commerce taking place?

by **daveiron** Thu Dec 31, 2020 4:40 pm

"Every man is independant of all laws,except those prescribed by nature.
He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellow man without his
consent" [Cruden v Neale,2N.C.338(1796) 2 S.E.]

"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person,an abstraction,and a
creature of the mind only,a government can only interface with other artificial
persons. The imaginary,having neither actuality nor substance,is foreclosed
from creating and attaining parity with the tangable.The legal manifestation
of this is that no government,as well as any law,agency,aspect,court,etc.
can concern itself with anything other than corporate,artificial persons and
the contracts between them" [Penhallow v Doane's Administrators,(1795)
Supreme Court of the United States]

by **LionsShare** Thu Dec 31, 2020 11:13 pm

LionsShare wrote:always challenge the commerce.

if there is NO evidence of exchange of goods/services & cash then where is the commerce?

How can commercial rules & regulations be applied/sanctioned where there is no evidence of commerce taking place?

wish (too late now) I had used this very argument when I had my last speed ticket.

(1843) last post of 2020? Very Happy

by **daveiron** Sat Jan 02, 2021 1:08 pm

As it is now becoming clear ,they will be attempting to mandate vaccinations,
and as we know they can only impose their will onto persons. Therefore I would
strongly advise members to seriously consider obtaining their certificate of
live birth. The video below gives a very good explaination,& as we dont know
if this video will be deleted by you tube I would advise folks to download it.
I personally shall this week attempt to obtain my certificate of live birth.
( at my age its probably its prob on parchment)

by **LionsShare** Mon Jan 04, 2021 10:36 am

DI it may help if you can get a 'certified copy of an entry in births...', without a surname wriiten on, it could be simply column 2 as per the vid below. I did post this a while back but cannot find the post - sometime Oct/Nov.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD4fNy2T3cg&t

by **daveiron** Sun Jan 10, 2021 3:49 pm

More very good info on this subject.
As I see it there are only three ways out of what is comeing via the CV bs
1 mass non compliance
2 violent push back
or 3 enough of us taking the route of Man.

by freeland Sun Jan 10, 2021 6:46 pm

dave,another fantastic video cheeres for posting.

by Highlander72 Mon Jan 18, 2021 1:03 am

I found this video to be quite informative....

https://www.bitchute.com/video/H1gzAheaO6Pw/

by **LionsShare** Mon Jan 18, 2021 2:54 pm

here is the origonal YT vid highlander72's posting refers to:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOOF5uOcah0

by **LionsShare** Thu Jan 21, 2021 6:37 pm

this is for all but I think DI could relate to this, please watch the 1st 10 mins, its 3 hours long to see in full:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IEpaTGRDCo

by **daveiron** Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:03 am

by **daveiron** Thu Jan 28, 2021 1:39 pm

by **LionsShare** Thu Jan 28, 2021 3:23 pm

here is chrisopther's site:

https://awarriorcalls.com/home/

by **LionsShare** Thu Jan 28, 2021 8:00 pm

here is christopher's YT:
looks good.
https://www.youtube.com/user/CousinC/videos?view=0&sort=dd&flow=grid

by **LionsShare** Fri Jan 29, 2021 3:16 pm

this looks very good to know who you are?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpOU8elkNHk

the whole YT channel might be worth a look:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJCyzKP3iuDsCf1rYr68iSA

by **daveiron** Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:07 am

More on the name.

Are we giving too much away when instead of giving the full slave name;
John Henry Doe or any devivation of that,we are using John Henry of the family
Doe.
We know that the King James bible is the bible they use,& putting religious
beliefs to one side,that book in fact sets out ,albeit in story form the rules of
the game. We just need to interpret them.
Does the book not refer Jesus of Nazareth or Joseph the carpenter ? Nowhere
does that book contain surnames.

With the growing number of people stopped by plod,& when you watch those
interactions its very very clear the number one priority of plod is to get your ID
because as we know unless you have commited a crime ( not broken a statute)
without joinder they are screwed.
I recently watched with utter disbelief a couple of days ago when Piers Corbyn
was arrested yet again,not only when asked his name ,he went as far as to spell
it for them. That gave them all the joinder they needed and he was carted away
again.
Should we not , when asked by plod or when using 'of the family' in letters.
instead use 'John Henry of Bedford',or 'John Henry the plumber' or ' John Henry
son of Bob' ?
Using John Henry of the family Doe ,whilst not giving joinder is telling who you are
and from that point on its very easy to be tricked into joinder by the slightest
slip on your part.
Unless anyone can give me reason why I am wrong, I will in future be using one
of the 3 above.

Comments please.

by El E Mentary Thu Mar 04, 2021 2:37 pm

interesting Dave On my BC there is no surname only christian names, going by that, one would think that I have no surname as it is not mine but another entities.

by **daveiron** Thu Mar 04, 2021 2:49 pm

Absolutely right, Never use a surname unless its to your advantage,ie,
by claiming your share of the planets resorces by being the creditor.

by Sharpysparky Thu Mar 04, 2021 5:08 pm

Just today I have ordered the short version of the birth certificate/ copy of entry from the GRO, lets see what turns up, the lady said ‘you do know you cant use it anywhere dont you’ I just said it was my own use now please send me a copy, I am interested what shall turn up

by **urchinatheart** Thu Mar 04, 2021 8:10 pm

The serf-name, I heard, began after Great Fire of London 1666. Anyone trying to reclaim the bit of land their house used to be on was told they needed a name that represented their trade, carter, smith etc. to make their claim valid and record the property as theirs. Before that no record of surnames except for nobility or fake history.
Does anyone know more ?

by **assassin** Fri Mar 05, 2021 2:06 am

Possibly, land in London was always at a premium and even the Thames was nearly a mile wide at its widest point, it being a number of small streams and not a single river.

Go back to the fire of London and look at housing then, the fire spread because houses were packed in and in very close proximity, it certainly was about money then as it is now.

If you had land you built on a portion of it and rented houses out, you retained the rest for yourself, tenants paid rents and taxes to the land owner and he paid them to the relevant people, this made the land owner liable for these payments and not the tenants and made it a one stop shop for the relevant authorities, the landowners didn't want the liability and wanted it transferred back to the tenants and the authorities wanted there cash.
Tenants could be notoriously difficult to catch and even more difficult to trace as they could do a moonlight flit and couldn't be traced to a new property which left the landowner liable for the tenants debt and as landowners didn't want this and the authorities wanted their money it left them with two people to chase. Registration of land was nothing more than revenue gathering.

As this expanded the landowners still didn't want this liability and forced a system for tenatnts to register themselves at an address and made the tenant liable for all their liabilities and not the landowner, this was supported in Parliament as most of the landowners were MP's and this got massive support and made the tenant and not the landowner responsible for the tenants debts, if the tenant did a moonlight flit they now had a mathod of tracking them to another property and claiming their cash, also, the landownercould trace the debtor and claim their unpaid rents and use the courts who always sided with the landowners.

by **daveiron** Fri Mar 05, 2021 9:20 am

All very convenient,

Great fire of london 1666 Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 .Just look
where that has lead us to today. Everyone now registered and accounted for.

New York September 2001 world Trade Ctr, October 2001 Patriot Act
already written and ready to go. Massive state control and surveillance.

Scamdemic 2020 . World wide self imprisonment total control of everyone.

What a great trilogy. Why change something that works so well.

Of course all that leads to the final objective, Genocide of the vast majority
of the worlds population.

No none of that ever happened ,I must be one of those conspiricy theorist.

by Sponsored content

Know who you are

Know who you are

When you comprehend .

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

One Law

This is the best one yet

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are

Re: Know who you are