Referendum

Let me ask a simple question, should this country have more referendums and should they be legally and lawfully binding?????
The last referendum we had in the UK was Brexit and the people spoke and said OUT but the politicians tried everything they could to keep the UK as part of the great EU scam which is really nothing more than the Fourth reich reincarnated and a project which cost the UK a lot of money for very little return and those in the EU were judge and jury despite their pretence of working for the people they represented.
Everyone knew the EU hadn't provided accounts for over 20 years and no reputable company would sign them off and accept liabilities for this and if reputable companies couldn't be found then what about disreputable companies, they couldn't find any of them either and if you cannot find a disreputible company to sign off on your accounts then there are some very serious problems and one of these was paying MEP's 300 Euros per day, cash in hand with no tax to pay and in many member states people were being repeatedly taxed and often investigated in scenes more reminiscent of the film Robin Hood Prince Of Thieves.

Why don't we have a referendum on major issues then??? because we the people are governed by CONSENT and this means with our consent and if this consent is removed them Government has no power and this is what it is all about, POWER and power equals control and only narcisists and egotists want to control people and enforce their wishes on others and try to stop people thinking for themselves as what people think flies in the face of power and control of Government and they have their pockets to continually line with our (public) cash.

What would people like a say on, well the current green agenda is one I would like to see a referendum on because its another manipulation and control exercise by the Government and backed by most other world Governments who are using climate change as the propoganda tool to whip the people with to extract their cash. What exactly is the so called NET ZERO and what does it entail, actually nobody can define what net zero is and what it entails but it is being used to dismantle British industry and make us fall into line with another EU agenda of control by preventing any country be self sufficient and make them reliant on other countries and we can see one prime example of this in operation. Why did the EU ban coal mining, a simple question and one which closed down the UK's coal mining industry and over several years turned the UK from being a country self sufficient in power to one which became reliant upon Russia for gas and the EU for a proportion of our electricity supplied from the EU supergrids and while EU member states were banned from coal mining Germany was not only mining coal but they were mining and burning brown coal which is the most toxic and polluting coal. Every other country had to stop mining and Germany were allowed to break the EU legislation, well no surprises there as the Fourth Reich was originally a German ideology.
Meanwhile in the UK the green agenda is constantly failing and this is shown by how many times coal fired power stations have to be bought online to keep the base load constant when green energy constantly fails and despite all the rhetoric and diatribes green energy is shown to constantly fail and we fall back onto coal fired power stations to keep our country in electricity, meanwhile another facet of this agenda is electric cars which have also been shown to constantly fail and if we cannot provide enough electricity at the current time then what is going to happen when we get swamped with electric cars. In reality this is all tentacles of the same issue, promoting the same lie of climate change and yes it is a lie as to date no credible evidence can be provided to prove or disprove climate change and it is yet another means of getting private cars off the road by pricing electric cars out of reach of the normal person and keeping one foot in the camp of world control by maintaining the reliance on European electricity for our homes and cars.

Would the public actually support any of this? no because enough people would ask enough questions to change the perceptions of what is allegedly happening and what is really happening, petrol and diesel would stay, coal mining would be reinstated and we could provide all our own electricity and town gas as well as petrol, diesel, synthetic oils, and most industrial gases the country needs and all without the intervention of other countries.

Looking at NET ZERO is interesting in itself and the general consensus is that we can trade carbon emissions with other countries and make our emissions look lower than they really are so its nothing more than a superficial PR exercise to make the Government look good and syphon off more public money for their friends in environmental issues.
In basic parlance it means we can produce any amount of carbon emissions as long as we can hide it somewhere where the people cannot see it and the Government can openly lie to populations and get away with it.

None of this makes any environmental sense or reason as we are still burning coal because we have to and yet we cannot mine it despite having over 1000 years of viable coal reserves left and we have to let others mine it for us and transport it thousands of miles, yet in Germany they can mine coal and burn it on site and brown coal at that. If all member states are equal then why have the UK had to close all deep coal mines down, Poland are in the process of closing their coal mines and yet Germany can mine and burn coal unmolested by the EU. In reality others mine coal in much dirtier ways than the UK did and produce more coal pollution and yet they can carry on doing this and pollute the environment more that the UK ever did, then it has to be transported to the docks by lorry and loaded onto inefficient ships for transportation to the UK and then onto lorries to power stations.

Not only do we have the country polluting the environment and fobbing us off with carbon trading, and now we have environmental pollution being created elsewhere and it doesn't matter as long as we don't produce it and we can blame them, see a pattern emerging.

100% agree on more referendums. What ‘democratic logic’ could possibly apply when, upon voting a party in, they rarely fulfil election campaign promises and then have carte blanche to do whatever the hell they decide for five years. We’ve had the technology for years to allow for quick and accurate voting on anything and everything within the five year term. So, go figure, ask yourself why they can’t deploy that…

As for net zero. More b*llocks. Save the planet and get back to the offices in the same breath. ie driving or sitting in traffic, p*ssing away carbons and polluting the air with ZERO justification, because we’ve proved so many people can work from home with current technologies. So ask yourself why the contradiction / hypocrisy… Again, it’s not rocket science for a few of us…