fake warrants of entry & the so called 'process'

From a certain excellent woman who knows what she is doing - oh yes! cheers from me LS

Rights Of Entry Warrants - Word Magic Scam, Corrupt Abuse Of Process And Unlawful Modification Of Legislation

The warrants being issued for Rights of Entry under the gas and electricity acts do not follow due process.  The agents exercising the right to entry under said warrants are third parties.  Some brokers dress up the interlopers in their company fancy dress costumes and call them sub-contractors but that does not change the fact that they are third parties.  

Their badges must show their full name, photo and the company they work for (not the company they are contracting for) and should also show their job title.  This is applicable to every one present who intends to enter the property.  

Locksmiths are of particular interest because they rarely want to identify themselves.  The reason being is they will face criminal charges of breaking and entering and criminal damage as well as being liable in their private capacity for trespass to property.   Locksmiths have a duty to ensure they have fully checked the validity of the warrants they are facilitating but as they have no legal training (or moral compass) they either do not know or do not care for due process and so it is of no surprise that they are not willing to identify themself.  However their failure to do so actually voids the warrant.

Now, on to the warrants and the legislation.  

In the photos attached you will see the warrant shows that EON applied for the warrant.  EON are not the company that turns up on the doorstep though and any locksmith or dog handler in tow are not from EON either.

The legislation states, as does the warrant, that application should be made from an operator.  The operators are the National Grid.  EON are not operators so should not be applying for warrants and the revenue protection agents are not from EON nor are they from the National Grid so they actually have no right of entry under normal circumstances let alone under the fraudulent warrants they wield.

The legislation shown says:

“electricity operator" means an electricity distributor or an electricity supplier

So it would appear that this has the supplier/broker covered right?

Wrong….  The definitions given have been amended over the years and are in fact textual alterations to the original enactment.  Now whilst the original act was passed under scrutiny of Parliament,  the modifications and amendments are not subject to the same scrutiny and are in fact drafted in by a legal writer under instruction of just one appointed minister.  So technically it appears to be legislation but it is actually unlawful and corrupt.  

It is my opinion that in the face of such a corrupt abuse of process that no obligation can possibly exist for any man or woman to forfeit their right to family life and privacy and that no offence can be committed by way of defending that right.

Your home is your castle, defend it against intruders for that is surely what they are…

Meter Owners

Those who pay a qualified engineer to install their own meters are not breaking any laws.  The brokers whose existence is reliant on the men and women of the uk not knowing that they can have their own meters installed do not like the fact that this truth is becoming known and the scam of energy brokers and rental meters is finally being exposed.  

They are going to fight hard to retain their hold on your money.  You are the cash cow and they want to keep you dumb.  So do not fall pray to their bully tactics, their attempts to obfuscate your rights and their unlawful and fraudulent use of any enforcement powers they claim they have available to them.  

Be sure you are knowledgeable and prepared.  Right of access for energy brokers is only required for safety and maintenance of their equipment and unless there is a real immediate safety issue that presents an immediate danger to life then there is no right of access, even with a civil warrant, without your consent.  Consent is always required!!!

Secure your home.  The brokers are dishonest as are the revenue protection companies they pay to come bully and pester the people who decline the offer of their services.  It’s a racket so be prepared for the goons and gimps to come calling.  Do not even talk to any caller who refuses to show your their ID!!!!

Make sure your meter changes are carried out by qualified engineers.
(Never be tempted to tamper with meters or change them yourself)
Be sure that you get your appliances (including your meters) safety checked regularly if you are a home owner.

Tenants will have their meters checked for safety as part of their regular landlord safety checks.  

Stand your ground
Your home, your choice, yours to defend!!

where you see this:

We have a warrant to authorise entry:

What to do when the gimps come a calling with thier dodgy warrants…

Where is your ID?  

Anyone claiming they have a right to enter your home should have photographic ID.  Also, anyone who is with them and intends to enter should also have ID.
Showing ID is a requirement of a civil warrant.

Where is the warrant?  

Why was there no notice of a hearing to which you should have been invited to attend.  Wet ink signature and court stamp.  Has the warrant been signed by a justice of the peace?

Does the Revenue Protection Agent have “public liability indemnity insurance”?  

If they do then you require evidence of that because you may need to make a claim against them in their private capacity.  

Does the “person” exercising the warrant have the authority to do so?

Only an employee, representative or agent of the claimant can exercise a warrant.  Revenue Protection Agents do not work for Utility Brokers. If they claim they are authorised, you require a signed letter of their authority to act for the broker.

I do not consent to having a pre pay smart meter fitted.  Most importantly, you do not consent to forced fitting of a smart pre pay meter.  The End.

also to remember:

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw3/42/3

III None shall be put to answer without due Process of Law.

ITEM, At the Request of the Commons by their Petitions put forth in this Parliament, to eschew the Mischiefs and Damages done to divers of his Commons by false Accusers, which oftentimes have made their Accusations more for Revenge and singular Benefit, than for the Profit of the King, or of his People, which accused Persons, some have been taken, and [X2sometime] caused to come before the King’s Council by Writ, and otherwise upon grievous Pain against the Law: It is assented and accorded, for the good Governance of the Commons, that no Man be put to answer without Presentment before Justices, or Matter of Record, or by due Process and Writ original, according to the old Law of the Land: And if any Thing from henceforth be done to the contrary, it shall be void in the Law, and holden for Error