No Law!

by Solosmurf Mon Apr 17, 2023 5:45 pm

Halsbury's Law states that not only are administrative courts illegal, there is no law that parliament can enact that would make them legal.

by Solosmurf Mon Apr 17, 2023 7:47 pm

More of the same:
Administrative Courts

Ask if the court is getting its authority from the Magistrates Court Act 1980 and if the equity used in the court is British Pound Sterling. If yes to both

Due to the UK joining the EEC on 1st January 1973, sovereignty was surrendered, the monarch deposed and given a new title. Therefore any Act of Parliament, statute or law implemented post 1st January 1973 is treason.

If using Pound Sterling as equity - the Pound Sterling was backed by the USD which was backed by gold until Richard Nixon took the USD off the gold standard. Now the USD is printed by the Federal Reserve which is a non-government, independent US Corporation with shareholders meaning that anybody paid in GBP cannot uphold their judicial oath because they are being paid and economically motivated by a foreign, independent Corporation.

If they are acting under authority from the Magistrates Court Act of 1980, they are committing treason because the Superior statute of the 1688 Coronation Oath, the 1689 Bill of Rights 1700, Act of Settlement 1701 and Treason Act of 1795 says no fine or forfeiture without conviction with a jury of your peers.

The only purpose of Administrative Courts is to try to get you to take responsibility for your legal fiction and make you Trustee of the Trust you are Beneficiary of, trying to get your consent to accept corporate governance.

by **LionsShare** Mon Apr 17, 2023 7:57 pm

if you can find a download for Halsbury's 2011 look for the volume titled Administrative Law page 130-140, Lord Denning & others comment as you have.

(3135)

by Solosmurf Mon Apr 17, 2023 10:17 pm

I'll definitely be looking for that. Will come in handy when I go to the police station to see about getting my car back.

by flyingfish Tue Apr 18, 2023 7:23 am

I don't think the Administrative Court would have played any part in the seizure.

by badvoc Tue Apr 18, 2023 2:43 pm

They use Administrative Courts , Agency's etc etc to do what they want " watch this www.bitchute.com/video/rPoT9pybYCqa/ " you may start to comprehend what they will do, the clip is very very mild , now think Wacko an anywhere in-between, i have seen an heard of some really bad s,,t they have done to people, not to put you in fear but to try to expand you comprehension so that you are not going into something blind, best of luck,

by flyingfish Tue Apr 18, 2023 3:50 pm

Solosmurf wrote:If they are acting under authority from the Magistrates Court Act of 1980, they are committing treason because the Superior statute of the 1688 Coronation Oath, the 1689 Bill of Rights 1700, Act of Settlement 1701 and Treason Act of 1795 says
no fine or forfeiture without conviction with a jury of your peers.

Do you know which of the items you cite actually contains those words? I seem to recall something similar being quoted maybe in a different context, but in that case the actual source went on to say "or by due process" or something.

by Solosmurf Wed Apr 19, 2023 12:49 am

I haven't looked into it as yet, transcribed from a video. Once done with car situation I'll see what I can find

by **daveiron** Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:31 am

Bill of Rights 1688;

Juries.

That Jurors ought to be duely impannelled and returned . . . F1

Grants of Forfeitures.

That all Grants and Promises of Fines and Forfeitures of particular persons before Conviction are illegall and void.

Frequent Parliaments.

And that for Redresse of all Grievances and for the amending strengthening and preserveing of the Lawes Parlyaments ought to be held frequently.

by **LionsShare** Wed Apr 19, 2023 11:06 am

just a few site to look at, if you wish look at & get a general idea:

http://steven-kirk.com/%EF%BB%BFhalsburys-law-states-administrative-courts-unlawful/

https://www.scribd.com/document/142227954/Administrative-Courts-Unlawful-Halsburys-Law

https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2021/05/24/4936/

https://windowsontheworld.net/administrative-courts-unlawful/

https://vdocuments.mx/administrative-courts-unlawful-halsburys-law.html

https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/commentary/halsburys-laws-of-england/rights-freedoms/unlawful-acts-of-public-authorities

https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/legal-research-and-mooting-skills-programme/halsburys-laws-online

https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/products/halsburys-laws-of-england.html

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/cy/request/summons_96

this may be good for download?
https://archive.org/details/halsburyslawsofe0024unse

please note the attachment I tried to find on line but could not, its from my own archive. Its about that page 130-140 I mentioned above:

Attachments

: Administrative Courts Unlawful Halsburys Law _ Land of the Free_files.zip You don't have permission to download attachments.(107 Kb) Downloaded 3 times

by Solosmurf Wed Apr 19, 2023 2:25 pm

flyingfish wrote:I don't think the Administrative Court would have played any part in the seizure.

I wasnt sure who would be dealing with this but now I know it's the DVLA I will be looking at that too. Too late for today though.

by Solosmurf Wed Apr 19, 2023 2:26 pm

LionsShare wrote:just a few site to look at, if you wish look at & get a general idea:

http://steven-kirk.com/%EF%BB%BFhalsburys-law-states-administrative-courts-unlawful/

https://www.scribd.com/document/142227954/Administrative-Courts-Unlawful-Halsburys-Law

https://www.administrativelawmatters.com/blog/2021/05/24/4936/

https://windowsontheworld.net/administrative-courts-unlawful/

https://vdocuments.mx/administrative-courts-unlawful-halsburys-law.html

https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/legal/commentary/halsburys-laws-of-england/rights-freedoms/unlawful-acts-of-public-authorities

https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/legal-research-and-mooting-skills-programme/halsburys-laws-online

https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/products/halsburys-laws-of-england.html

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/cy/request/summons_96

this may be good for download?
https://archive.org/details/halsburyslawsofe0024uns
please note the attachment I tried to find on line but could not, its from my own archive. Its about that page 130-140 I mentioned above:

Thanks I have found one now.

by flyingfish Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:06 pm

daveiron wrote:Bill of Rights 1688

Cheers. I was searching for the actual phrase quoted, which doesn't appear, i should ha e had a search for reference to "jury".

I would still point out that it does not say that conviction must be by jury. That kind of makes sense because the main thrust was to reverse the excess powers that James II took upon himself, so it was really a bit of a latter day Magna Carta, reigning in the monarch and restating the sovereignty of parliament.

However it's good to drill down to the source of these oft quoted phrases.

by Sponsored content

No Law!

No Law!

Re: No Law!

Re: No Law!

Re: No Law!

Re: No Law!

Re: No Law!

Re: No Law!

Re: No Law!

Re: No Law!

Re: No Law!

Re: No Law!

Car seized not insured

Re: No Law!

Re: No Law!

Re: No Law!