Display results as :

Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Halifax overdraft victory!
by waylander62 Yesterday at 9:40 pm

» Threatened bankruptcy proceedings
by ande Yesterday at 8:26 pm

» sol excalibre with cookiemonster
by Society of the Spectacle Yesterday at 7:41 pm

» EU and Common Law
by assassin Yesterday at 6:49 pm

» CCJ circa 2013 vs Santander, now Cabot/Mortimer Clarke chasing
by hughythomas Yesterday at 12:42 pm

» Sister owes creation finance £20000
by squig007 Yesterday at 11:50 am

» Old member of GOODF
by assassin Yesterday at 2:17 am

» More Smart Meter - The New Scam
by assassin Sun Jan 20, 2019 6:27 pm

» DWP taking alleged JSA overpayment from 2013 from my State Pension and ignored letter asking for details and to stop
by davidg4039 Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:32 pm

» Police search warrents
by daveiron Sun Jan 20, 2019 1:46 pm

» remedy for P.C.N/COUNCIL TAX
by daveiron Sat Jan 19, 2019 3:02 pm

» Robinson way success
by nautilous Sat Jan 19, 2019 10:20 am

» Ceylon
by Mrblue2017 Sat Jan 19, 2019 8:37 am

» Introducing
by freeland Sat Jan 19, 2019 2:14 am

» posting a reply
by freeland Sat Jan 19, 2019 2:12 am

» BBC name sex abuse victim.
by midnight Fri Jan 18, 2019 9:50 am

» An Afternoons Thoughts
by assassin Thu Jan 17, 2019 4:05 pm

» Nottinghamshire Police In Action
by daveiron Thu Jan 17, 2019 12:11 pm

» My way of dealing with DCA
by barnwebb Wed Jan 16, 2019 8:57 pm

» DWP Information Appeal
by Kestrel Wed Jan 16, 2019 8:07 pm

» Reality chat , every wednesday at 8pm (ish)
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Jan 16, 2019 7:21 pm

» Man gets a visit from the Chilli Sauce Police!
by Society of the Spectacle Wed Jan 16, 2019 7:19 pm

» Brexit Survival
by assassin Wed Jan 16, 2019 3:15 am

» RBS Credit Cards
by daveystoat Tue Jan 15, 2019 11:23 am

» Your credit debts written off.
by Society of the Spectacle Mon Jan 14, 2019 6:43 pm

» Credit card agreement misfiled and they can't find it!
by Prometheus Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:19 am

» Postal Speeding Notice
by Ausk Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:07 am

» Will a debt purchaser register a new, more recent default?
by Mrblue2017 Sun Jan 13, 2019 10:06 pm

» Brown all CAPS window letter with "Defendant" visible!
by waylander62 Sun Jan 13, 2019 8:38 pm

» More Food Truths
by assassin Sun Jan 13, 2019 2:44 am

» Project Fear
by assassin Sun Jan 13, 2019 1:48 am

» Hello - Great to Find You!
by assassin Fri Jan 11, 2019 12:35 pm

» speeding tickets
by LionsShare Fri Jan 11, 2019 10:28 am

» War In Iran?
by Ausk Fri Jan 11, 2019 7:34 am

» Lowell Solicitors
by waylander62 Thu Jan 10, 2019 9:40 pm

» Fined because her dogs lead was too long.
by Ausk Thu Jan 10, 2019 10:02 am

» Serving Paperwork
by assassin Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:30 pm

» Agressive UUI's - utter scum, Civil Enforcement Officers
by assassin Wed Jan 09, 2019 7:02 pm

» Lowell threatening me Again !!
by barnwebb Wed Jan 09, 2019 2:12 pm

» 2 New letters received from DCA acting as agents on behalf of client- Please Advise
by Emilybm Tue Jan 08, 2019 12:59 pm

» Cabot- is there a realistic chance to fight them?
by assassin Tue Jan 08, 2019 2:09 am

» The Bacteria & Parasite Deception Raw Food fearmongering
by toolapcblack Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:55 pm

» The Human Apex Predator vs. Mentally Disabled Vegans
by toolapcblack Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:34 pm

by LionsShare Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:02 pm

by Society of the Spectacle Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:10 pm

» More Police Lies
by assassin Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:52 am

» Planned energy peak hiking rates USA
by Virum Spiritus Sun Jan 06, 2019 11:28 pm

Moon phases

Warning To Site Members On Benefits

Go down

Warning To Site Members On Benefits

Post by assassin on Thu Dec 06, 2018 2:13 am

Simple question, how many people on this site are on benefits and have been unlawfully sanctioned and the DWP have followed the same pattern of NOT disclosing any information in writing, as to why their claims have been stopped or suspended, and from this year I mean after the new tax year of April 5th 2018 to date.

It works simply, they have been targetting benefits recipients on older contracts as these give the DWP no power over them for one distinct reason, under English Contract Law only the terms and conditions in force at the time of signing a contract apply and those conditions in older contracts means the DWP have no power over benefits claimants unlike new contracts which have a clause within them which does allow the DWP to change or amend the contractual conditions, anytime they like.
In most of the 61 cases I have dealt with this year it follows almost exactly the same pattern, they claim they (DWP) have introduced a new policy and in many cases it has been the policy of bringing additional identity information and if you bring this information you comply by "action" and have entered a new contract with them, but in many cases people have taken my advice and refused to bring additional information and stuck to the contract in force as:


This put these benefit recipients directly in the firing line and the well trained DWP staff tried threats and intimidation to force them against their own free will to enter a new contract, so why are these new policies an issue? because they were not in force at the time of signing a contract and are retrospectively applied contractual conditions, and what does ECL say about this:


This is directly from the High Court which has set numerous lawful precedents about this very subject and as most people know, Lawful trumps legal every time, but the DWP can only work in the legal.

How are they doing this? in the majority of cases they are claiming they cannot sign people on without additional identification, and they openly admit that this is a new policy, what they really mean is that it is a retrospectively applied policy which is void and cannot come into force, they conveniently ignore inconvenient facts such as the law and by doing this they are now in "breach of contract" and you have them. They refuse to do anything other than make their claims verbally as by doing this they try to create ambiguity and deniability, this basically means they use the old trick of denying this by the time honoured phrase of "I have no recollection of this" which is followed usually by "I deal with lots of clients and cannot remember every single case" which is a crafty way of denying something without incriminationg themselves. In most cases it is something along the lines of "you could have picked up this booklet on the street" and hope people comply, and when they dont they get flustered and this is where they make fraudulent claims and incriminate themselves. Look closely at what they claim, YOU COULD HAVE which means they are operating on an assumption and an unsubstantiated assumption, and they try to turn this assumption into fact and nothing more. Unrebutted claims stand in law so always rebut them.

Your claim will be stopped immediately and if you try to sign on again they will claim you are not on the list for signing on and when you try to establish the reasons for this they will claim anything to prevent themselves from giving you the reasons they stopped your benefits unlawfully and try to cover up other staff's unlawful actions.

They will try to fob you off for over 1 month as this is the time you are allowed for Mandatory Recosideration and then inform you that you are out of time, BULLS*IT as you have up to 13 months with justifiable reasons.


Posts : 1721
Join date : 2017-01-28
Location : Wherever I Lay My Head

Back to top Go down

Back to top

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum