Warning To Site Members On Benefits

Simple question, how many people on this site are on benefits and have been unlawfully sanctioned and the DWP have followed the same pattern of NOT disclosing any information in writing, as to why their claims have been stopped or suspended, and from this year I mean after the new tax year of April 5th 2018 to date.

It works simply, they have been targetting benefits recipients on older contracts as these give the DWP no power over them for one distinct reason, under English Contract Law only the terms and conditions in force at the time of signing a contract apply and those conditions in older contracts means the DWP have no power over benefits claimants unlike new contracts which have a clause within them which does allow the DWP to change or amend the contractual conditions, anytime they like.
In most of the 61 cases I have dealt with this year it follows almost exactly the same pattern, they claim they (DWP) have introduced a new policy and in many cases it has been the policy of bringing additional identity information and if you bring this information you comply by "action" and have entered a new contract with them, but in many cases people have taken my advice and refused to bring additional information and stuck to the contract in force as:

ONLY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN FORCE AT THE TIME OF SIGNING THE CONTRACT APPLY

This put these benefit recipients directly in the firing line and the well trained DWP staff tried threats and intimidation to force them against their own free will to enter a new contract, so why are these new policies an issue? because they were not in force at the time of signing a contract and are retrospectively applied contractual conditions, and what does ECL say about this:

RETROSPECTIVELY APPLIED CONTRATUAL CONDITIONS WERE NOT IN FORCE AT THE TIME OF SIGNING A CONTRACT AND CANNOT COME INTO FORCE AS THEY ARE VOID AB INITIO

This is directly from the High Court which has set numerous lawful precedents about this very subject and as most people know, Lawful trumps legal every time, but the DWP can only work in the legal.

How are they doing this? in the majority of cases they are claiming they cannot sign people on without additional identification, and they openly admit that this is a new policy, what they really mean is that it is a retrospectively applied policy which is void and cannot come into force, they conveniently ignore inconvenient facts such as the law and by doing this they are now in "breach of contract" and you have them. They refuse to do anything other than make their claims verbally as by doing this they try to create ambiguity and deniability, this basically means they use the old trick of denying this by the time honoured phrase of "I have no recollection of this" which is followed usually by "I deal with lots of clients and cannot remember every single case" which is a crafty way of denying something without incriminationg themselves. In most cases it is something along the lines of "you could have picked up this booklet on the street" and hope people comply, and when they dont they get flustered and this is where they make fraudulent claims and incriminate themselves. Look closely at what they claim, YOU COULD HAVE which means they are operating on an assumption and an unsubstantiated assumption, and they try to turn this assumption into fact and nothing more. Unrebutted claims stand in law so always rebut them.

Your claim will be stopped immediately and if you try to sign on again they will claim you are not on the list for signing on and when you try to establish the reasons for this they will claim anything to prevent themselves from giving you the reasons they stopped your benefits unlawfully and try to cover up other staff's unlawful actions.

They will try to fob you off for over 1 month as this is the time you are allowed for Mandatory Recosideration and then inform you that you are out of time, BULLS*IT as you have up to 13 months with justifiable reasons.