Contact

Why are members not getting the basics? they are well documented and any contact should always be through the written word using Royal Mail and NOTHING ELSE.

Yet so many posters are coming onto the site and openly stating they have contacted ZYZ by E-mail.

Let me make this simple and clear, from the initial contact both parties are making claims and gathering evidence and if this is in writing they cannot unsay what is said in a letter and you can photocopy the letter as your evidence if a case goes to court, debt companies are crafty and if they send you a letter and it is unsigned it isn't a valid document and is worthless and you have the evidence, if they make a false or fraudulent claim in a letter and you fail to rebut then it stands as truth and truth becomes judgement, so automatic judgement for them.
Anyone making a claim has to accept responsiblity for their claim, and a corporate entity is a dead entity and cannot accept liability for their claims which means only a person can, now you know why they never sign their letters as no employee will accept liability for their (often fraudulent) claims

You can get proof of posting and track your letters to them by simply sending them as registered, you get the receipt as proof of posting and take a screen shot of the tracking as someone in their organisation as signing for it. If they start their usual antics of saying they didn't receive it you have the receipt as proof of posting a registered letter and the tracking saying what time it was delivered and who signed for it, you then stand up and show the court your proof of posting and show your tracking along with the signature of the person signing for it.
You simply state that you posted it and they received it; and then say their incompetence or ineptitude is their responsibility and not yours, you win that round.

When you post the letter in the post box it as classed as delivered, its that simple; and the law backs you.

Debt companies know this and their only agenda is getting money from you; they know that he who signs a letter is accepting liability for that claim, they also know that they can cheat and lie and in most cases, get away with it and they do and not signing a letter is one of their first tricks they employ. Their next trick is to say they know you are in financial trouble to appear sympathetic and state you can contact them by E-mail, but why? two reasons, this shows them you can afford an internet connection and afford to pay for it otherwise you would be cut off, and that if you E-mail them it proves their claim and you can enter into a payment plan with them.
Next is the big one, when you send an E-mail it is NOT classed as served, therefore any E-mail correspondence is inadmissible in court as it is unsigned and not complete and while a Judge may look at the E-mails you print off he has already dismissed it as evidence.

Any true, correct and complete documentation must be signed with a wet ink signature and they also know that, if you make a claim via E-mail it is not acctually a claim as it is invalid.

They have subtely removed your power and taken it themselves and you didn't even know it was happening.

Courts only deal with paperwork and if you have theirs and you have rebutted it in substance the paper trail will follow through in a logical order, they make a claim and you have rebutted it, the paperwork clearly shows this and this is why paperwork is so important and as courts are precise in their procedures. This is also the reason bailiffs claim to have warrants on an I-pad as the magistrate never signs them, and if they do it is an electronic signature which is not a wet ink signature and the document itself is invalid, if it is unsigned which magistrate is acepting liability for this claim? think about this for a minute, a magistrate sending a fraudulent document cannot be held liable without a true wet ink signature so who do you claim against. Self protectionism for magistrates issuing fraudulent documents.

ONLY EVER DEAL IN LETTERS AND SEND THEM BY RECORDED DELIVERY, AND NEVER BY E-MAIL.