debt brokers

some may find this useful? as usual research for yourself. same also applies to utilities.
https://t.me/unburdenyourselfchat/25714

This is a new regulation in plain sight that again is a treason
GDPR is smoke and mirrors - ICO are gate keepers

Debt Buying The Way it works
"A" sells "B" a debt (or so B claims), the debtor then pays B who pops up with a "notice of assignment" freshly printed by B. A in fact has no contract with B so enforces the debt against the debtor who ends up having to pay it TWICE. That is why you need to see the DEED of Assignment. To ensure that the debt buyer has good LEGAL title to the debt.
That is why in the Van Lynn Developments v Pelias Construction Co Ltd 1968 case, Lord Denning said "the debtor is entitled to view the sale agreement to ensure that the assignee can give him good discharge under the contract"
Of course the Zombie debt buying companies want you to believe that a "notice of assignment" is all they need to send to comply with Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925, because the don't have a valid Deed of Assignment. What they are relying on is in fact an "Equitable Assignment" and that is not enforceable in County Court. They must attach the Original Creditor to the court case if they wish to proceed under an Equitable Assignment.
If they ever produced what they purchased it would just show a big list of names with numbers next to them. Forensic examination of the document would show that it does not comply with:
Section 1(3) Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989,
Section 44 of the Companies Act 2006,
The Regulatory Reform (Execution of Deeds and Documents) Order 2005 (S.I. 2005/1906), arts. 1(1),3 ,
Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925.
Because it would be missing the company seal and the signatures of two directors of the Assignor's company or the signature of One Director and a Secretary.
The Debt buyer buys the Zombie debt for about 12% of the value of the alleged debt. Then try's to resurrect the whole alleged debt. They are attempting to profit out of the Litigation. The Zombie debt buying SCAM is big news in America and likely to be big news here soon.

this has also been pointed out to me & its very recent at time of writing, not had time to research proper, you can if you wish?

Proof that Warrants need to be signed.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1618987877400190976.html

In reference to a hearing in chambers on 16th December 2022 Kings Bench, London, a Judge ruled unsigned warrants illegal. As this was in chambers there isn't a listing, but there is a reference number. Case number KB2022004907
2. In R v. Clarke and McDaid [2008] UKHL8 the House of Lords confirmed that there is no valid trial if the bill/Indictment has not been signed by an appropriate officer of the Court because Parliament intended that the Indictment be signed by a proper officer of the Court.
3. A void order results from a ‘fundamental defect’ in proceedings (Upjohn LJ in Re Pritchard [1963] 1 Ch 502 and Lord Denning in Firman v Ellis [1978] 3 WLR 1) or from a ‘without jurisdiction’/ultra vires act of a public body or judicial office holder (Lord Denning in
4. Pearlman v Governors of Harrow School [1978] 3 WLR 736).

Everything is void based on the treason from 1st January 1973 when the coronation oath was broke and we were signed into the EEC/EU

Everything’s illegitimate and they’re all acting without legal right.
5. To destroy the constitution is treason. R v Thistlewood 1820

Every government agent from 1973 is aiding and abetting treason

A ‘without jurisdiction’/ultra vires act is any act which a Court did not have power to do (Lord Denning in Firman v Ellis [1978]).

This tells all...
6. Don't forget the Courts are now Corporate and they all require to contract with you.

Enforcement Agents are required to have a Certificate to allow them to act as an Enforcement Agent from the County Court Judge - Not a Magistrate !!! There is the Fraud right there.
7. This is why they cannot show the War-Rant as it cannot be signed by a Magistrate. It also stipulates who can be an Enforcement Agent:
8. Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
Enforcement agents
This section and section 64 apply for the purposes of Schedule 12.
An individual may act as an enforcement agent only if one of these applies—
he acts under a certificate under section 64;
he is exempt;
he acts
9. in the presence and under the direction of a person to whom paragraph (a) or (b) applies.
An individual is exempt if he acts in the course of his duty as one of these—
a constable;
an officer of Revenue and Customs;

[F1(ba) a person authorised to use the procedure in
10. Schedule 12 by the Welsh Revenue Authority (or by a person to whom the Welsh Revenue Authority has delegated the function of authorising the use of the procedure);]

a person appointed under section 2(1) of the Courts Act 2003 (c. 39) (court officers and staff).
11. 64 Certificates to act as an enforcement agent

A certificate may be issued under this [F1section by a judge of the county court.]

As per the bill of rights 1889 nothing can be done without a jury of your peers in court, so any warrant, especially digital, is fraud, demand
12. details of the jury, the judge, the justice of the peace, and anyone else involved.

As per Lord Halsbury laws the courts don’t exist anyway, so what are these people doing, are they crazy and need to be sectioned under the mental health act?
13. Incidentally - side note about control of goods

You must not take or attempt to take control of any of my goods unless you provide 7 days clear notice in accordance with Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, Schedule 12, Part 1, paragraph 7, and
14. The Taking Control of Goods Regulations 2013, section 6