Are they gearing up to go to war?

With the mainstream media brainwashing the population into thinking that North Korea is gearing up weapons of mass destruction, long range missiles with new technology that are being tested in the direction of the USA, it has occurred to me that over recent years we have had Iraq, Iran, Syria, Afghanistan not to mention the secret wars in Africa, not just the one in Libya thats not so secret al for what exactly? Banking Cartels, Black Gold, Opiates or all and more of the above.....

Cuba have been on their agenda but opted to treatise with Obama after witnessing the destruction the States and its allies had caused around the world during his administration. Another still on the list is North Korea, a closed country portrayed in the media as the next Hussain, treating his people without dignity, rights restricting their privileges and they don't even have an international banking cartel to supply "money" to the people.

Tonight local news south east 'army reserves' I quote "the military wants to double its amount of reserves from 15,000 to 30,000 by 2020, due to cuts'................................. WOW, due to cuts we want to double the army reserves within 3 years.............. or is it, we are planning a war and need more recruits to fight for freedom in other countries!

This post isn't intended to offend anyone...... Im sorry, its just how it is.

Here is an example, with 'terror attacks' they know for a fact that the psychological impact the media has with its webs of indoctrination that there is an increase not just in the amount of recruits joining the army, but also the police force and other emergency services. Im sorry, but thats how it is and if they are gearing up to take on recruits, double them in fact by 2020 within less than 3 years, what are they gearing up for? That is to double the army reserves within 2 and 1/2 years, we should be asking ourselves some serious questions here!

Does not offend me. I get the same feeling about this. The build up to WW1 and 2 took nearly a decade in my opinion. They are doing the same thing with this build up to what would be number 3. Would it go nuclear? I do not know but I think it would not be wise for all out nuclear even for the elites who supply the money to plan this. When will it all happen? Beyond 2020 I reckon but no idea when exactly. Unfortunatelly people will not wake up quick enough for this to happen. Look at all the scurrying around they do stop people from waking up. Monitered to the hilt and any uptake in an awakening will be quashed.

Hi All,

Agree surely there can be NO nuclear option as those at the top would suffer as well? More over how could we the none elites stop this? I think this really is beyond our control, too many of them have guns & we are too few. So I suppose this is lets wait & see!

As much as I hate the idea!

Doubling the Reserves locks people into the MINDSET;here at home.
I think it's more likely a series of false flags could lead to a situation similar to France,
where 8'000 ( I think ) troops are on the Streets gaurding against
Charlie Hebdo and bataclan type
scenarios.

Army 2020 is the transformation of the British Army for the 2020s and beyond, in response to the strategic challenges it is likely to face in the future.

http://www.army.mod.uk/structure/33449.aspx

This video features Brigadier Roly Walker, Army Head of Strategy, talking about the changes to the Army’s structure as a result of the Army 2020 Refine announcement. It sets out what the changes are, what they mean for the Army and explains the rationale behind them. Army 2020 Refine is an evolutionary process and more videos will be produced as it progresses.

Background

Army 2020 Refine is the implementation of the Government’s Strategic Defence and Security Review SDSR commitments. Before SDSR 15, Defence policy required an army designed for an enduring operation at the brigade level; new policy demands that we are able to field a modernised division, capable of fighting as the principal output of the Army. From this structure the Army must routinely be able to reorganise for a range of other tasks and operations, at increased readiness.

As a result of this, the Army’s structure will change. 3rd (UK) Division will be reorganised to form two Armoured Infantry and two STRIKE brigades, one of each held at high readiness. We have re-designed four infantry battalions, with a fifth to follow, to become Specialised Infantry. These battalions will become experts in Train, Advise, Assist, Mentor and Accompany operations with indigenous forces.

The introduction of Specialised Infantry capability will mean some re-organisation of the infantry divisional structure from seven to six divisions. The Royal Regiment of Scotland, the Royal Welsh Regiment and the Royal Irish Regiment will be grouped together into a single administrative division called The Scottish, Welsh and Irish Division, however there will be no changes to the Regimental construct of any of those regiments.

Army Reserve

Army 2020 Refine continues the investment in the Army Reserve and sustains the successful pairing strategy between Regular and Reserve units. It will see the creation of two new Reserve infantry battalions from 2017 and will mean continuity for many.

Changes to the Army structure will be implemented over the next 10 years and have been aligned with the Better Defence Estates Strategy (BDES) announced in early November 2016. All cap badges are retained in the new structure and there will be no reduction in the Army’s manpower.

Implementation of Army 2020

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmdfence/576/57606.htm#n117

55. The Army 2020 plan envisaged that the changes to the Regular Army structure would be in place by 2015.[104] At the time of publication of the Army 2020 plan, Rt Hon Philip Hammond MP, Secretary of State for Defence, pledged an additional £1.8 billion in spending on the Reserves over the next ten years and announced an ambitious plan to grow the trained strength of the Reserves to 30,000 by 2018.[105] However there was still work to be undertaken to implement the Army 2020 plan and further announcements to be made, particularly on the role, use and recruitment of Reservists and both the Regular and Reserve basing plans (see paragraph 2 (timeline of announcements) and paragraphs 7-10).

56. The MoD published its proposals for the Reserve Forces, Reserves in the Future Force 2020: Valuable and Valued, in July 2013.[106] Its central theme was the new relationship Defence would seek to build with Reservists and their families, employers and society. Specifically, the MoD is seeking to make serving as, and employing, a Reservist more appealing, challenging and financially rewarding. At the same time as publication of the White Paper, the MoD announced its Reserve basing plan,[107] the Regular Army basing plan having been announced in March 2013.[108]

Reforms have left the Army in chaos

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/10384403/Reforms-have-left-the-Army-in-chaos.html

Sir Nick admitted that the Army’s new recruitment operation, run by Capita, a private company, had “got off to a bit of a wobbly start”.

Future Reserves 2020

http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06733

The Ministry of Defence has proposed significant changes to the UK’s Reserve Forces. A White Paper was published in July 2013. This note examines the proposals, why they have been made and reaction to them.

Reserves in the Future Force 2020

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/210470/Cm8655-web_FINAL.pdf

.....Above all we seek a new relationship with society. Our Armed Forces, regular and
reserve, enjoy considerable public support and admiration, but if they are to continue to
flourish they require individuals to volunteer to join and to serve. The Reserves enable
the security on which we all depend to be delivered more cost-effectively. Under our
new model, the use of the Reserves is no longer exceptional or limited to times of
imminent national danger or disaster, but is integral to delivering military effect in almost
all situations. This is something we ask society to recognise and understand and, in so
doing, provide the support and encouragement to individuals to make that exceptional
contribution to the nation’s defence.....

Defence Committee Written evidence from the Min istry of Defence

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmdfence/576/576vw03.htm

1. Origins. The strategic rationale for Army 2020 came from the October 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) and the associated National Security Strategy, which laid out what the Army would be required to deliver in terms of types, frequency and concurrency of tasking. The funding envelope was set by the Ministry of Defence as a result of the so-called Three Month Exercise. The outcome was that the future Army would consist of around 82,000 Regular personnel and around 30,000 trained Reservists—ie an integrated Army of around 112,000.

2. Context. Against this background, the Chief of the General Staff, General Sir Peter Wall, asked Lieutenant General Nick Carter to conduct a study into the future structure and role of the Army in the context of the strategic imperatives for the Army to change. These included an end to the assumption that the Army would be permanently engaged on an enduring stabilisation operation (ie Afghanistan); a move from the Army’s current structure and capabilities optimised for Afghanistan to a more adaptable posture to meet likely future threats; an Army equally able to react to an enduring stabilisation operation and engaging with partner nations overseas to develop military capability to address causes of instability; changing the nature of the Reserves to ensure routine use as part of an integrated Army; an almost completely UK-based Army to engage civil society in a new manner; and ensuring cost and efficiency remain a driver in the force design and optimisation of capability.

Well of course they are, and I don't think the number of soldiers is that relevent now in the grand scheme of things.

This is my truth... What's yours?

https://youtu.be/47WtItcUKAI

I hope nobody minds but I think this 3 minute link belongs in this thread.

It encapsulates the recent journey mankind has been on.
If you watch it to end I think it shows quite clearly what lies ahead.

https://youtu.be/8sgycukafqQ

Never forget reserves are a cheaper option, never forget that reserves also have full time jobs and its twice as many people to spread their version of their gospel.

2 "dead" Illuminati collaboration for predictive programming song lyrics.


"I don't want to be around when the sh#t goes down"

Yeah I know, I'm now the resident loony... Just ignore me

https://youtu.be/tfbgtW4YYtE

I see it Awoken,
Just cant add anything yet.

I think the North Korea situation is to make people thankful that after all , It wont happen,
and we should just be thankful and not complain when there is an intervention in Venezuala or Syria for example.

Society of the Spectacle wrote:I see it Awoken,
Just cant add anything yet.

I think the North Korea situation is to make people thankful that after all , It wont happen,
and we should just be thankful and not complain when there is an intervention in Venezuala or Syria for example.

I tend to agree. This is a reverse psychology manoeuvre only. It"s a deflection. But the words he is using are saying that his war machine is soon to be put into use.

LionsShare wrote:Hi All,

Agree surely there can be NO nuclear option as those at the top would suffer as well? More over how could we the none elites stop this? I think this really is beyond our control, too many of them have guns & we are too few. So I suppose this is lets wait & see!

As much as I hate the idea!

Are you not familiar with the Georgia guidestones?

LionsShare wrote:Hi All,

Agree surely there can be NO nuclear option as those at the top would suffer as well? More over how could we the none elites stop this? I think this really is beyond our control, too many of them have guns & we are too few. So I suppose this is lets wait & see!

As much as I hate the idea!

Don't think the elite would suffer much at all. I Recently listened to an interview with a bloke who builds underground bunkers for billionaires. its seems it not uncommon for them to have an operating theather, a doctor etc and about 5 years worth of food and water on hand.

Then there is the work of Phil Schneider who created spaces for underground cities, using secret techno to get rid of the rock, in every state in the US. According to him, some of the spaces were cubic miles in size.

Awoken2 wrote:

LionsShare wrote:Hi All,

Agree surely there can be NO nuclear option as those at the top would suffer as well? More over how could we the none elites stop this? I think this really is beyond our control, too many of them have guns & we are too few. So I suppose this is lets wait & see!

As much as I hate the idea!

Are you not familiar with the Georgia guidestones?

Thanks for this, no was definatly not aware of these stones, but after reading

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

conspiracy theory. - eh!

Ausk wrote:

LionsShare wrote:Hi All,

Agree surely there can be NO nuclear option as those at the top would suffer as well? More over how could we the none elites stop this? I think this really is beyond our control, too many of them have guns & we are too few. So I suppose this is lets wait & see!

As much as I hate the idea!

Don't think the elite would suffer much at all. I Recently listened to an interview with a bloke who builds underground bunkers for billionaires. its seems it not uncommon for them to have an operating theather, a doctor etc and about 5 years worth of food and water on hand.

Then there is the work of Phil Schneider who created spaces for underground cities, using secret techno to get rid of the rock, in every state in the US. According to him, some of the spaces were cubic miles in size.

Hi ausk,

Have heard of these underground buildings including safe "houses/rooms", that is nothing too new as back in early 80's after leaving school, would see decumentaries about this sort of thing.

As for "Phil Schneider" will have to research as & when I get time.

Thanks for the reply!

LionsShare wrote:

Awoken2 wrote:

LionsShare wrote:Hi All,

Agree surely there can be NO nuclear option as those at the top would suffer as well? More over how could we the none elites stop this? I think this really is beyond our control, too many of them have guns & we are too few. So I suppose this is lets wait & see!

As much as I hate the idea!

Are you not familiar with the Georgia guidestones?

Thanks for this, no was definatly not aware of these stones, but after reading

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

conspiracy theory. - eh!

If you look at the date they were unveiled it was in March 22nd 1980, the number 22 crops up a lot in their work, hence s lot of these "events" take place on the 22nd of the month.

LionsShare wrote:

Awoken2 wrote:

LionsShare wrote:Hi All,

Agree surely there can be NO nuclear option as those at the top would suffer as well? More over how could we the none elites stop this? I think this really is beyond our control, too many of them have guns & we are too few. So I suppose this is lets wait & see!

As much as I hate the idea!

Are you not familiar with the Georgia guidestones?

Thanks for this, no was definatly not aware of these stones, but after reading

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

conspiracy theory. - eh!

Hey,

If you are interested there is a handbook that was produced by the author's of the stones which is rarely, if ever referenced but, provides a little more insight,

https://goodf.forumotion.com/t603-georgia-guidestones-authors-guidebook

Not saying they are not as many think. I did a post on the old site about them, I will see if I can find it and put it in the thread with the handbook.

Awoken2 wrote:This is my truth... What's yours?

https://youtu.be/47WtItcUKAI

I showed you mine first .

actinglikeabanker wrote:

Awoken2 wrote:This is my truth... What's yours?

https://youtu.be/47WtItcUKAI

I showed you mine first  .

ALAB so you did!, must have missed that one. Well that's answered my question about what I was going to read tonight. Thanks

It's interesting yet equally disturbing to learn that China is named on the stone with their population problem.

It's also interesting that the words fossil fuels and mineral resources were mentioned what with North Korea sitting on a vast amount of valuable mineral resources.

I think we can all see the long game now....

Just came across an interesting matter. Only really done the reading on wiki so far..... This is some major freaking cover up. A secret report, i mean its no secret that this is happening but to actually have had an inquiry into it pre iraq, then go into iraq and not tell the public about this.......

The Scott Report (the Report of the Inquiry into the Export of Defence Equipment and Dual-Use Goods to Iraq and Related Prosecutions) was a judicial inquiry commissioned in 1992 after reports of arms sales to Iraq in the 1980s by British companies surfaced

n 1992, Scott, while a Lord Justice of Appeal, was appointed to chair an inquiry into the Arms-to-Iraq scandal, in which it was claimed the British government had supported British companies in selling defence equipment to Iraq. The report was published in 1996, although much of it was secret. In 2001, Scott said it was "regrettable and disappointing" the Government had not made changes to the law regulating the arms trade.

In the late 1980s, Matrix Churchill, a British (Coventry) aerospace quality machine tools manufacturer that had been bought by the Iraqi government, was exporting machines used in weapons manufacture to Iraq. According to the International Atomic Energy Authority, the products later found in Iraq were among the highest quality of their kind in the world. They were 'dual use' machines that could be used to manufacture weapons parts. Such exports are subject to government control, and Matrix Churchill had the appropriate government permissions, following a 1988 relaxation of export controls. Crucially, however, this relaxation had not been announced to Parliament – indeed, when asked in Parliament whether controls had been relaxed, the then-Secretary of State for Trade and Industry replied incorrectly that they had not.

The report had to be debated in Parliament. Ministers criticised in the report were given advanced access to the report and briefed extensively on how to defend themselves against the report's criticisms. In contrast, according to senior Labour MP Robin Cook, the opposition were given just two hours to read the million-plus words, during which scrutiny they were supervised and prevented from making copies of the report. Finally, the Prime Minister, John Major, stated that a vote against the Government would be in effect a vote of no confidence, ensuring that Conservative MPs would not vote against, while a vote for was a vote exonerating the Government of any wrongdoing. Robin Cook worked with a team of researchers to scrutinise the report, and delivered "what was regarded as a bravura performance"


What it looks like me is that the then labor government were trading arms to iraq, got caught out and blamed some company to cover their own arses, as per kept it from the public! Then went to war in iraq after selling them arms!! Wow!!!

I don't know how I got onto that I started out reading about estoppels

I remember that all happening with Matrix Churchill and some super gun barrels which were said to be oil pipelines, I think the lorry driver was locked up in Greece for transporting the barrels on his lorry. I thought it was the Thatcher Government in charge at the time though not Blair.