Understand The Paperwork

Understanding the system is crucial and the first thing we have to understand is the pecking order of law as a higher form of law is superior law while anything below it is inferior law, so what does this mean? it actually means that inferior law does not trump superior law and this is the reason that legal precedents set in a higher court such as the High Court are binging on lower courts such as Crown or magistrates courts.

To understand the pecking order of law we will look at the highest three forms of law in order of superiority and the highest for of law is:

Natural Law

Natural law is easily understood and as simple as "if it rains you get wet" and refers to natural occurances in life, therefore we could conclude that "if its icy in winter the ground will be slippery" is natural law as ice is a natural occurance and when its icy its slippery, so nothing difficult to understand.

Hext in the pecking order is:

Commercial Law

Commercial law is simply 10 maxims and understanding Commercial law maxims and their meanings is crucial as this dates back to pre Roman times and has never, and never can be changed or altered and understanding commercial law is the way to success, I will explain later.

Maxim 1 - A workman is worthy of his hire.
In simple terms this means "thou shalt not steal" which relates to the bible, Exodus I believe. This simply means that if you employ comeone you pay the agreed price.

Maxim 2 - All are equal before the law.
In simple terms this means that nobody is above the law.

Maxim 3 - In commerce truth is sovereign.
This means if someone doesn't tell the truth or lies then they have no claim and that any claim they make is invalid.

Maxim 4 - Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit.
What this actually means is that no valid transaction can occur in commerce unless someone states this is TRUE, CORRECT, AND COMPLETE, so what does this actually mean?
Affidavits can come in many forms such as an invoice, bill, or simply a claim which can be written or verbally, and anyone making such a claim must accept liability for its voracity, as a company is a dead entity it cannot make a claim leaving only another human being to make the claim. To make a claim someone somewhere has to have made a true ledger or true accounting to support their claim and must sign the claim and accept liability for their claims, irrespective of any claim made against you for any debt.

Maxim 5 - An unrebutted claim stands as truth.
Simply put, you always rebut their claims otherwise it stands at truth.

Common Law
In simple terms common law is merely judges trying to use common perceptions (misconceptions) and put them into law, does this really matter? NO because Commercil Law is superior to common law and cannot override it.

Both Natural Law and Commercial Law CANNOT be abrogated and this is proven by the fact they have remained unchanged for thousands of years and no judge can overrule them as they are absolutes.

Lets connect the dots here, why play in Government Acts and Statutes when they are inferior law, go straight to superior law and play in commercial law as this always trumps them and NO judge will even try as the liability would be horrific in more than just monetary terms.

Lets begin with claims:

Joe Bloggs gets a demand from a debt company claiming he owes them £2000 which will be reduced to £1000 if he pays within 28 days.
Maxim 1, have you hired him? no, then you dont have to pay him
Maxin 2, you are both equal before the law and always remember this.
Maxim 3, are they telling the truth?
Maxim 4Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit, now we look at their claims, who is making this claim, oh a company which are a dead entity and cannot make claims, they send a letter on company headed notepaper proving this letter is rom a company who cannot make a claim, who has signed this claim, Dopey Debt Collections LTD, no signature so who has done the ledgers for their claim and where is the accounting, oh no accounting, finally nobody has signed the letter so nobody is accepting liability so straight away it is an invalid claim due to procedural impropriety.
Maxim 5, you contact them and rebut their claims on the grounds of proceedural impropriety so they cannot stand as truth.

They cannot provide accounting so never will, meaning their claim is not true, correct and complete and note the complete and we can translate this to incomplete which means invalid claim.

They try for a CCJ, remember Commercial Law is superior Law and an inferior court cannot overrule Superior Law so respond to the court and remain in superior law and as no Judge from an inferior court can overrule a superior law, you win.
You need your copies of your paperwork, namely the letter of rebuttal and the letter stating commercial law and the Judge finds for you on the grounds of procedural impropriety.

A BRILLIANT post as always Assassin.