The GOODF Approach
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Promissory Notes
by daveiron Yesterday at 10:57 am

» CCIV Concerns Addressed
by assassin Fri May 17, 2024 4:38 am

» end tenancy fight with landlord
by Lopsum Thu May 16, 2024 10:25 pm

» MBNA
by Sam97 Thu May 16, 2024 5:31 pm

» Purchased Used car, thew con rod after 4 weeks, 40,000mi on clock, can we get out of the finance?
by scrwm Thu May 16, 2024 4:53 pm

» Lucy Letby
by daveiron Wed May 15, 2024 11:48 pm

» large Solar storms heading to earth as we speak
by daveiron Tue May 14, 2024 3:58 am

» Interesting Headline
by assassin Tue May 14, 2024 2:49 am

» Virgin money locked my account fraud query
by daveiron Sun May 12, 2024 12:32 am

» Astra Zeneca
by assassin Fri May 10, 2024 4:55 am

» At last.
by daveiron Thu May 09, 2024 6:53 am

» Know who you are
by LionsShare Wed May 08, 2024 1:24 pm

» hmrc bond
by LionsShare Tue May 07, 2024 9:56 am

» Chainsaws 1
by assassin Sat May 04, 2024 5:07 am

» Supply What Does It Mean?
by LionsShare Thu May 02, 2024 11:45 am

» Speed ticket Is This The Way To Go?
by flyingfish Wed May 01, 2024 10:11 pm

» DSAR
by brownowl Mon Apr 29, 2024 1:15 pm

» Council Tax questions we should all be asking
by LionsShare Mon Apr 29, 2024 10:20 am

» Whats In A Name?
by LionsShare Sun Apr 28, 2024 8:49 pm

» The infamous DP continus
by Biggiebest Sun Apr 28, 2024 2:20 pm

» C'Tax & The Bradbury Pound System
by flyingfish Sat Apr 27, 2024 8:21 pm

» Warranty issues
by brownowl Sat Apr 27, 2024 12:05 pm

» Smart Meter and Pre Pay Meter remedy
by daveiron Sat Apr 27, 2024 8:29 am

» are they feeling the pinch...?
by pitano1 Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:19 pm

» Fruit
by assassin Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:36 am

» Are Lowell getting desperate ?
by waylander62 Wed Apr 24, 2024 2:08 pm

» Electric Vehicles
by assassin Wed Apr 24, 2024 4:57 am

» Water charges
by daveiron Wed Apr 24, 2024 4:36 am

» 20 mph speed limit enforcable????
by flyingfish Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:26 pm

» Allotments
by flyingfish Tue Apr 23, 2024 7:54 am

» Energy debt
by flyingfish Tue Apr 23, 2024 7:49 am

» HO HO HO not that shinning or with clean hands !!!!!!
by Lopsum Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:04 pm

» Psychological Operation - Evidence on more fraud
by Lopsum Sun Apr 21, 2024 7:00 pm

» Allodial Title
by urchinatheart Wed Apr 17, 2024 10:13 am

» Grow Potatoes
by Mrblue2015 Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:18 am

» Feed Yourself For Less
by assassin Tue Apr 16, 2024 7:23 pm

» New GOODF - small account closed upon Notice 3
by RaspberryBlu Tue Apr 16, 2024 1:02 pm

» DWP
by daveiron Tue Apr 16, 2024 12:23 am

» LGA1888 sect79 sub2
by urchinatheart Mon Apr 15, 2024 9:15 am

» Know Who You Are Even More Volumes To Come
by LionsShare Sun Apr 14, 2024 11:24 am

» Woke, Nimbys, Snowflakes and idiots
by urchinatheart Fri Apr 12, 2024 12:09 am

» Never Buy Seeds Again
by assassin Wed Apr 10, 2024 6:14 pm

» Ovo bank giro?
by LionsShare Wed Apr 10, 2024 6:07 pm

» Is your car a government remote controled car???
by Lopsum Wed Apr 10, 2024 12:48 pm

» peacekeepers apprantly get a c'tax win?
by LionsShare Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:14 am

» Can I Complete The Food Circle
by urchinatheart Tue Apr 09, 2024 11:46 am

» Council tax and summons for arrest
by LionsShare Mon Apr 08, 2024 2:44 pm

» THIS IS THE ONE ?
by schist Fri Apr 05, 2024 1:04 pm

» Garden Share
by assassin Thu Apr 04, 2024 4:37 pm

» Serial Posty been awarded £10'000 for a fake bite
by assassin Wed Apr 03, 2024 7:23 pm

» The new ruling, lie-ability order
by assassin Wed Apr 03, 2024 7:04 pm

» New Member
by schist Sat Mar 30, 2024 3:00 pm

» DVLA [Hick] Does It Work [Hick] ?
by Miss Kermit Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:15 pm

» know who you are volume ??
by daveiron Tue Mar 26, 2024 9:38 pm

» Hopefully A Success
by daveiron Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:28 pm

Moon phases


3 letter process

5 posters

Go down

3 letter process Empty 3 letter process

Post by Silverfox283 Sun Dec 17, 2017 12:55 am

Hi all
Am scott new member
I've received a bus lane charge and I intend to challenge it using the 3 letter process

My query is can I use it directly with the council or the dca if it goes that far..
Also the templates used..can they be downloaded with spaces that you fill in

Meaning proper templates

Thanks in advance

Scott

Silverfox283
Newb
Newb

Posts : 3
Join date : 2017-12-17

Back to top Go down

3 letter process Empty Re: 3 letter process

Post by daveiron Sun Dec 17, 2017 9:06 am

Hi scott,

The new 3 letters are for credit cards , by all means read through them for ideas that you can use / adapt,but should not be used in their entirety.
There are no pre printed templates.& as far as i am concerned there never should be. The whole idea is that folks understand what they are writing . Pre printed templates are likely to do more harm than good.

daveiron
daveiron
Admin
Admin

Posts : 4925
Join date : 2017-01-17

Back to top Go down

3 letter process Empty Re: 3 letter process

Post by Kestrel Sun Dec 17, 2017 11:10 am

You could try the Bill of Rights 1688

Grants of Forfeitures.
That all Grants and Promises of Fines and Forfeitures of particular persons before Conviction are illegal and void.

But the criminal councils/courts etc are forever dismissing this so instead try a conditional acceptance offer with the BoeVat remedy.

Procedure & templates:
http://boevat.org.uk/

This link has a talk on it around 39mins into it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mu3WVMdrjPg

As above read all the information on the BoeVat site & understand what you are writing.


Kestrel
dedicated
dedicated

Posts : 739
Join date : 2017-08-27

Back to top Go down

3 letter process Empty Re: 3 letter process

Post by LionsShare Sun Dec 17, 2017 11:35 am

Could also try:

"how to beat speeding tickets 2014"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNxvlr_OKyg

as kestral says "make a conditional offer of acceptance".

although yours is for bus lane the same principals should apply. Watch the vid & learn to ask serious awkward questions.

Good luck
LionsShare
LionsShare
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 3288
Join date : 2017-04-26
Location : Literally Where Ever I Am

Back to top Go down

3 letter process Empty Re: 3 letter process

Post by Silverfox283 Sun Dec 24, 2017 11:52 pm

Ok guys thanks for all info especially the boevat remedy to which I will use

Cheers

Scott

Silverfox283
Newb
Newb

Posts : 3
Join date : 2017-12-17

Back to top Go down

3 letter process Empty Re: 3 letter process

Post by Ausk Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:27 am

Read this, you might like to adapt it your circumstances.

AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE AVERMENT
The undersigned Affiant, (XXXX), hereinafter “Affiant”, in care of (XXXX) Main Street, etc, does solemnly swear, declare and state as follows:
1. Affiant is competent to state the matters set forth herein; and
2. Affiant has knowledge of the facts stated herein; and
3. All the facts herein are true, correct and complete, admissible as evidence and if called upon as a witness, Affiant will testify to their veracity; and
Plain Statement of Facts
4. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence of any infringement/fine, affidavit, or citation signed and sworn by ..xxxxx an officer of hereinafter xxxx.Police Department or any other Law Enforcement Officer whose duty it is to enforce traffic laws in xxxxxx and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists; and
5. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that the accused driver, (XXXX), was operating the motor vehicle at the time, date and location of the alleged offence and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists; and
6. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that the speed camera measurement device(s) and/or speed estimation method(s) and associated equipment, hereinafter “MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT”, has been calibrated for accuracy and Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that a Certificate issued by a constitutionally authorised body exists; and
7. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that the MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT does not contravene the xxxxxxxx National Measurement Act 1960 and Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that the MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT is exempt from the xxxxxx National Measurement Act 1960 and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists; and
8. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that a chain of title of the custody of access to the programming, controlling, and possession of the MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT, has not been intercepted by any party committing foul-play, a fraudulent or illegal scheme to issue false-positive tickets to law-abiding drivers, or to otherwise defraud the people of THE STATE and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists; and
9. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that the MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT was not operated in a manner that breaches the manufacturer’s operating and maintenance manuals of said equipment and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists; and
10. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that respondent’s MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT is not fraudulently issuing tickets to the people of xxxxxx and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists; and
11. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that the MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT was not being misused and was not registering false readings at the time, date and location of the measurement reading and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists; and
12. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that Orange City Council, hereinafter “THE COMPANY” is a department of xxxxxx and has the authority by the Constitutions of xxxxx and Commonwealth to issue said fine(s)/infringement(s); and
13. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that THE COMPANY‘s claim is not contravening the xxxxx, IMPERIAL ACTS APPLICATION ACT 1969, SCHEDULE 2, Part 1 – Constitutional enactments, 1 William and Mary sess 2 c 2 (The Bill of Rights), which states:
– “That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void”; and
14. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that THE COMPANY‘s claim is not illegal and void and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists; and
15. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that THE COMPANY is not violating due process by issuing fines/infringements before conviction and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists; and
16. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that THE COMPANY is not attempting/committing extortion and/or fraud and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists; and
17. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that THE COMPANY has not breached Constitutional law(s) and laws of THE STATE and The Commonwealth and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists; and
18. Affiant sees no verifiable evidence that THE COMPANY is not liable for three (3) times costs in commercial damages and reasonable administrative costs and Affiant believes that no such evidence exists.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I hereunto set my hand on this _____<st/nd/rd/th> day of ____________ <year> and hereby certify all the statements made above are true, correct and complete.
Signed: _______________________________

Ausk
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 491
Join date : 2017-06-03

Back to top Go down

3 letter process Empty Re: 3 letter process

Post by Silverfox283 Thu Dec 28, 2017 11:02 pm

Thanks very much for this...a bit long but very good!

Silverfox283
Newb
Newb

Posts : 3
Join date : 2017-12-17

Back to top Go down

3 letter process Empty Re: 3 letter process

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum