PMSL

Now, this isn't political and shouldn't be construed as such, but it does show how much the politicians hold the electorate in distain, and I have used the current Labour Party, allegedly playing the "party of the people" cards.

First there is Corbyn and this guy doesn't know if he is on his ars* or his elbow and will do anything to get into No 10 to keep his snout in the trough and if we go back to when he entered politics, he was an ardent Brexiteer and has been nearly all his career, yet suddenly he turns tail and is suddenly a remainer, hypocrite or not? and he tells the electorate he will uphold the result of the referendum and suddenly ignores this and claims he will still represent the majority if we remain in Europe, this by its very nature is contrary and shows he is now an ardent remainer and is selling the majority of the electorate down the river. This was recently reinforced when three leading Labour party members publicly stated that the party are a remain party in everything but name only.
Where does his huge pay off and pension, index linked for life come from? oh yes the EU.

His maths (or sums in his case) don't stand up to any scrutiny and I will highlight a few as simple examples from the party of the people PMSL at this.

Labour have traditionally claimed they will improve peoples living standards and make them richer, but how, currently they are proclaiming a living wage and this is fine, but he also claims he will raise corporation tax and raise more by making companies pay more and this doesn't stand up to scrutiny as he is increasing company overheads by taxing them more and then telling them they will have to pay employees more; how many large names have gone bust in recent years, and how many have emerged abroad, usually within other EU countries.

Next he wants to tax the highest earners and particularly those at the top, the same people who create jobs and own the largest corporations and employ the largest groups of individuals and these are the same people who have the ability, resources, and financial ability to move abroad and are willing to do so. Claims by numerous organisations are that if 50 of these people move abroad it will severely dent the treasuries income, and currently 370 of these people have committed to going abroad and many more will not disclose their intentions, but many more will follow.
Where will the income to the trausury be raised to meet this shortfall? of course it is the British taxpayers who will pay for it through the traditional stealth taxes which will be imposed.

He wants all schools to be state schools, so what about all the private schools, the same private schools which bring in over 50% of their intake from abroad and spend a lot of money to have a British private education, the same man who was privately educated as were his children along with the children of most of the Labour front bench, and where is this increased expenditure coming from? of course he will borrow more money and increase the debt of every UK resident and commit to paying huge interest rates for centuries to come.

He is going to have a massive property upgrade and undoubtedly borrow more money to achieve this, and while slating the Prime Minister for privatisation, yet 14 companies have been approached to undertake this work, 11 are private European companies while just 2 are British companies, and of course they will all have to have smart meters fitted to qualify, interesting.

He wants more people to have more money in their pockets (yes, really) and is proposing lowering the inheritance tax from the current £350,000 to just £125,000, so is taking even more from the British people after they die as anything above the threshold is taxed at 40%; and all this while the average property price is £173,000 (at the time of writing) so he is taking more from more people. Lets have some figures, Mr and Mrs average have an average property worth £173,000 and this is their only asset and it is left after their death, under current rules it would be free of inheritence tax, but under Corbyn's proposals anything over £125,000 would be taxed and it means £48,000 would be taxed at 40% so on this alone there would be a tax of £19,200 to be paid. Begin adding in investments such as pensions and the value rises, as does the tax.

I could go on but perhaps others could do the same for the other political parties and show just how easily people are duped.

Part 2

I deliberately waited until today before posting the last part of Corbyn's disasters as I awaited certain events to unfold and they have, in spectacular style.Corbyn proposes that any company with 250 or more employees give 10% of the shares to employees and this is something open to debate and considerable debt abuse, so how?

For every benefit there is a liability, for every liability there is a benefit, and if every employee gets a share of the company shares allocated to them then there is the benefit, free shares merely for being an employee and this brings us to the liability; only today Mothercare went into administration and they had well over 250 employees so they would all now have a liability.
How is this to be collected and more importantly, how are they going to collect this debt? if this is confined to 10% of the company debts and this is divided equally betwen the employee shareholders you can virtually guarantee several things:

All shareholdres will be liable for their percentage of the alleged debt.
All debts will be issued together as one unit and make a lot of money for the courts.
All warrants will be issued as it will be a financial bonus time for the courts.
That, those with assets such as homes or cars will have them seized and potentially lose their homes.
Government will recoup some of their expenses and not make such such a loss.
That, large debt recovery companies will take these alleged debts on for huge profits.

Am I being cynical here or is it simply another way of Corbyn putting the same people into debt, the same people he proclaims he is protecting.