Ideas on utilities

From telegram - nothing to do with me! some of the ideas..... well..... I let you research for yourself:

GAS, ELECTRICITY, and a little bit more.....
No one ever pays for Gas and Electricity.
All these providers do not provide Gas or Electricity.
They are a Government Billing Company. That is all.
This is why they NEVER sign a Letter.

They have a Government Licence and they CANNOT turn off the Service. The British National Grid is a Piping Service and No Judge has the Authority to tell the National Grid to cut off the Supply.
Find out the facts first. Paul Webster made the Judge throw out the case. This is why they want to get into your House to fit a PAYG meter.

They CANNOT cut off the supply and they NEVER make a claim for Breach of Contract.
That would be simple.
But not so simple when you don't have a valid contract. If they could cut off the supply this would be happening all the time.
It doesn't.

Forced entry into your home. Rented or Private, it doesn't matter.
No one under any conditions can force entry into your home.
So let's keep this simple. Are you at war? No.
Has there been a declaration of War? No.
So this is a civil matter.
No force can be used in a Civil matter. That would be an Act of terrorism.
Can a utility company force entry into your home? NO.

This is a civil matter so NO force can be used in a civil matter.
Anyone using force in a Civil Matter is a TERRORIST by default. The Police soon back away when you say this. They cannot use force in a Civil matter.
You cannot be held in contempt of Court in a Civil matter. The Judge or Justice of the peace can go swivel. This is a civil matter and NO force can be used as it is an act of terrorism to do so.
It's that simple.

The Police cannot adjudicate either. The police cannot argue that the paper is real, therefore cannot adjudicate. So if the Locksmith opens the door, you stand your ground and if the guy from the utility company pushes past you, then THAT is the use of force which is a wilful and belligerent act of terrorism.
At that Point the police officer has to arrest and charge the utility company guy.
The utility company never makes a claim for breach of contract do they?
Think about that.
Circa 67.5 million people do not have a valid contract with any of the utility companies.
Keep thinking.

This is a shitload of fraud country wide by every utility company. Gas, Electric, Water. A Man's Home is his castle and any use of force is an act of War.
So the piece of paper they are waving around with a claim under an Act.... IS the valid material evidence that there is NO VALID CONTRACT.

The application In Court is a vexatious and fraudulent claim.
There is no Contract where the claim under the Act can be implemented.
Nobody has a Contract with a utility company.

Back to the Guy in Bolton Paul Webster. He defended in court and the Judge threw the case out because the applicant cannot present a valid Claim or Contract.
Is this getting big now?

All the Utility Companies Guilty of fraud by default as there is no Valid Contract. We would think that 350,000 Police officers and Gold Commanders would be interested in this FACT because they are getting screwed as well.

What about the Banks? Is that a civil matter? Yes.
Do the Banks ever make a claim in court for Breach of Contract? No.
You CANNOT be held in Contempt of Court in a Civil Matter. If they did then they would have to arrest you for Contempt of Court and that would be the use of force in a civil matter which would be an act of terrorism by default.

You CANNOT be held in contempt of Court in a Civil matter. The Court Judge would be guilty of an Act of terrorism by default.

Here is the cool part
Listen very carefully.
The office of the police Cannot adjudicate. The role of the police is to use force... "Police FORCE" The Police have Jurisdictional Boundaries to comply with as well.
This is where it gets really exciting.
The office of the police FORCE is not only crime prevention but it is also to use FORCE to suppress a wilful and belligerent act of terrorism UNDER their Jurisdictional boundaries. That would include the office of the Judiciary. Any Government officer.

Isn't there a bit of a contradiction, in that this was posted on the Telegram group specifically for people who have been disconnected?

FF may be it is?

remember I didn't write it so the viewers are advised to do thier own research

LionsShare wrote:remember I didn't write it so the viewers are advised to do thier own research

That's fair enough and I know you put this sort of content up for debate rather than as advice.

But I do wonder if the guy who posted that even bothered to read back in the group. The reason I care is because there's a risk that people could be misled and end up in deeper trouble relying on those arguments.