One rule for them, One rule for us!

by petesomething Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:10 pm

You have probably read my posts before on the £18,600 rule that Theresa May bought in or £22,400 with one child. This is what you need to earn before you can bring your wife or husband into the country. Including any children that they may have.

Even though this is a lie, Theresa May says the reason for this is because these people can not become a tax burden on the tax payer, plus 3 english exams and the life in the uk test, plus you have to prove you are in a genuine relationship. This is the rule for us peasants, plus a lot of more rules we have to comply with.

Normally the spouse visa is over a 5 year period, at any time your wife or husband, even children can be deported from the country. For instance if you lost your job.

We have heard the great news today that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are engaged to be married and will spend Christmas at Buckingham palace. Will Harry need to prove they are in a genuine relationship, will she need to do the life in the uk test, will she be a tax burden on the tax payer who will pay for their wedding. Will it be the tax payer or the royal family?

We are supposed to live in a country where we are all equal, the problem is people go and buy the flags and be waving and cheering, and they will be looking out of their windows thinking the peasants love us.

In the supreme court the five judges said it is not against human rights for a white van to pull up outside of your home, grab your wife and kids by the neck, throw them in the white van and deport them. If this happened to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, I bet people would be screaming it is against their human rights.

by Guest Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:42 pm

Hi petesomething

i do remember that thread, but i don't recall how close to you the situation was....

The problem is that people deal with the issue under statute - and the statute is set-up to sucker you.

If statute isn't working then maybe the problem should be addressed in another jurisdiction.

Perhaps equity or commercial?

Cheers!

by Guest Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:45 pm

Hi

What you also have to ask yourself is - quid bono....?

.....and how.....?

Cheers!

by landlubber Wed Nov 29, 2017 3:05 pm

They talk about Human Rights, is that our governments version of human rights of 1998, or the one that nearly all countries signed up to in 1948? Yes, there is a huge difference between the two. In the Government's version, we are all corporate bodies with no rights at all. In other words, we are slaves.

Let's get it right about taxes. We are the most highly taxed nation in the word, but not a single penny is spent on any of us, because it all goes to the central banks. What taxes do the Royals pay and their hangers on? Diddly bloody Squat! The mere fact that all of our taxes go to those greedy central banks should have everyone in this country in an uproar, but no, we all sit back moan and take it, well those of us that know about it do.

by **LionsShare** Wed Nov 29, 2017 3:53 pm

I think we ALL need to remind the gov't slavery was abolished in the 1800's & now there is anti slavery legislation in place to stop it. WE are MEN & WOMEN not "persons", & certainly NOT slaves.

by Sponsored content

One rule for them, One rule for us!

One rule for them, One rule for us!

Re: One rule for them, One rule for us!

Re: One rule for them, One rule for us!

Re: One rule for them, One rule for us!

Re: One rule for them, One rule for us!

Re: One rule for them, One rule for us!